Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
survey
Open access

Exploring the Potential of Cyber Manufacturing System in the Digital Age

Published: 17 November 2023 Publication History

Abstract

Cyber-manufacturing Systems (CMS) have been growing in popularity, transitioning from conventional manufacturing to an innovative paradigm that emphasizes innovation, automation, better customer service, and intelligent systems. A new manufacturing model can improve efficiency and productivity, and provide better customer service and response times. In addition, it may revolutionize the way products are produced, from design to completion. Therefore, it is likely that this new manufacturing model will become increasingly popular. By building new technologies on top of existing CMS, these systems will ensure that data exchange and integration between decentralized systems are reliable and secure. Recently published case studies from industry and the literature support this claim; some challenges remain to be overcome. In general, the use of CMS can revolutionize the manufacturing industry. This study comprehensively analyzes these systems and their potential applications and implications. An overview of the field is then given and various aspects of CMS are also explored with more details. A taxonomy of the most common and current approaches to CMS is presented, including networked cyber-manufacturing systems, distributed cyber-manufacturing systems, cloud-based cyber-manufacturing systems, and cyber-physical systems (CPS). Furthermore, our survey identifies several popular open-source software and datasets and discusses how these resources can reduce barriers to CMS research. In addition, we identify several important issues and research opportunities associated with CMS, including better integration between hardware and software, improved security and privacy protocols, communication protocols, and improved data management systems. In summary, this paper presents a comprehensive overview of current technology and valuable insights are provided for the potential impact of CMS on society and industry.

1 Introduction

Cyber-manufacturing Systems (CMS) are a rapidly growing area of research and development that can revolutionize the way of the manufacturing processes [59]. These systems are based on Cyber-Physical Systems (CPS), which integrate physical components, such as machines, robots, and sensors, with software and networked information systems [82]. CMS can provide a high degree of automation, flexibility, and scalability to the manufacturing process while also reduce costs and improve product quality [24]. They can also provide real-time feedback and data analytics to optimize manufacturing process [88].
Cyber manufacturing, also known as digital manufacturing, is a relatively new branch of industrial production that integrates digital technology with conventional manufacturing processes [19, 99, 134]. In this manufacturing area, the entire design and production process is digitized and automated, from initial design to post-production. Advances in digital technology, such as 3D printing, robotics, Artificial Intelligence (AI), and the Internet of Things (IoT), have made this type of manufacturing possible. Cyber manufacturing originated in the automotive industry in the mid-1990s with the use of automated and computer-aided manufacturing techniques. This allowed for more efficient and cost-effective automotive manufacturing and greater design flexibility. By the early 21st century, companies such as Airbus and Boeing had adopted cyber manufacturing to reduce costs and increase productivity. Subsequently, the cyber manufacturing industry experienced tremendous growth, and other industries such as electronics, medical devices and consumer products have begun to adopt digital technologies. As technology continues to evolve, cyber manufacturing is likely to remain an important part of modern manufacturing.
CMS are increasingly used in industry to enable the automation and optimization of production processes [114]. As these systems become more complex and sophisticated, the need for innovative network architectures that facilitates communication and data transfer between various components has become increasingly important [135].

1.1 Theoretical Foundation of CMS

The Internet of Things (IoT) and CMS are two technologies that have become increasingly important in the industrial world. The term “Industrial Internet of Things” (IIoT) refers to the integration of physical devices and systems with Internet, allowing for real-time data exchange and communication [39]. This technology can revolutionize the way companies operate and manage their production processes [175].
The concept of CMS is closely related to IIoT, because it involves the use of information technology to improve manufacturing processes, as shown in Figure 1. The beginnings of IIoT and CMS systems can be traced back to the early 2000s when the first wireless sensors were developed and integrated into industrial systems [59]. This technology has since been significantly improved and is now used in a wide range of industries. As technology continues to advance, IIoT and CMS are likely to become even more integrated into industrial processes, leading to further efficiency gains and cost savings. CMS enable improved data collection and analysis and has the ability to quickly identify and fix potential problems [123]. This technology can be used to streamline production processes and reduce potential costs.
Fig. 1.
Fig. 1. Theoretical foundations of Cyber Manufacturing and Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) systems [59].
As shown in Figure 1, CMS and IIoT are not individual technologies with a closed theory framework and are interdisciplinary (computer science, mechatronics, communication technology, and ergonomics). Instead, these are a combination of technologies and frameworks that work together to create a more efficient, secure, and automated manufacturing environment. CMS are a combination of hardware, software, and networking components that provides connectivity, communications, and control infrastructure for manufacturing processes. They include industrial automation systems, distributed control systems, communication networks and other related technologies.
As mentioned in Figure 1, designing efficient and reliable cyber-manufacturing systems requires a thorough understanding of design theory [46]. Engineers can design systems that are optimal for their intended functions by understanding their components and their relationships with each other. In addition, the design theory helps engineers anticipate and mitigate potential operational challenges. This theory facilitates engineers’ understanding of the physical environment in which the system operates. Furthermore, the design theory enables engineers to design energy-efficient systems that use less energy to achieve the same results. For cyber-manufacturing systems to function optimally, all the system components must be able to interact and communicate effectively. This concept must be carefully considered during the development process to ensure efficient and effective interaction between all components.
The combination of CMS and IIoT provides a comprehensive solution for the automation of manufacturing processes. This solution can be used to improve efficiency, reduce costs, and ensure the quality of products. CMS provide communications, control, and monitoring infrastructure, while IIoT provides data collection, analysis, and control capabilities. The combination of these technologies allows for the automation of complex processes, reduces the need for manual intervention. The combination of CMS and Machine Learning (ML) can be used to improve production processes and increase efficiency. Companies can reduce costs and increase productivity by automating production processes using CMS. In addition, ML algorithms can analyze production processes’ data and identify patterns and trends. This can be used to optimize production processes and make better decisions. The combination of CMS and ML can also be used to improve the accuracy of predictive models, which can be used to anticipate future events and make better decisions.
The combination of IIoT and CMS has enabled a new era of manufacturing [112]. Companies now can monitor and control their production processes remotely, and the ability to quickly identify and address any potential problems. This technology has significantly increased production processes’ efficiency and allowed companies to reduce costs and improve their products.
As CMS and IIoT continue to evolve, they will become more integrated and powerful. For instance, the integration of IIoT devices and sensors in the CMS can provide real-time data that can be used to analyze and optimize processes. This data can also detect and respond to potential issues before they cause problems. Additionally, the integration of CMS and IIoT can be used to create predictive models that can be used to anticipate future issues and take proactive steps to address them. The interconnection between CMS and IIoT makes them interdependent technologies. Instead, they are a combination of technologies and frameworks that interact to create a efficient, secure, and automated manufacturing environment. The process of designing a system requires creative thinking to combine the various areas of design theory. A cohesive framework can be established by combining the various elements of design theory to maximize the synergy between the different domains. Essentially, this framework acts as a glue to bind the individual domains together, allowing for innovative solutions to be realized.

1.2 Contribution

CMS are a new form of automation for manufacturing and industrial processes. It involves the use of advanced digital technologies such as artificial intelligence, robotics, and the Internet of Things to streamline and optimize production processes. CMS can be used to improve efficiency, reduce costs, and increase product quality. This survey attempts to provide a clear and comprehensive overview of the advances of CMS. First, various CMS technologies and their applications in the manufacturing industry are described. Next, various challenges faced in the development of CMS. These include the need for better security, scalability, and cost efficiency. Our work also addresses the potential benefits of using CMS, such as increased efficiency, better quality control, and faster production. Finally, we review the current state of the art in CMS and provides suggestions for future research. We end with the notion that although CMS still have some challenges to be overcome, it is already proving to be a powerful too for improving the efficiency and quality of manufacturing processes. The main contributions are as follows:
(1)
Provide an in-depth understanding of CMS, including concepts, examples, comparisons with related studies, applications, and evaluation measures. It starts with a bird’s eye view of the field and then explores various aspects of CMS in more details.
(2)
A taxonomy of the most common and state-of-the-art CMS approaches is presented. The approaches discussed include networked CMS, distributed CMS, cloud-based CMS, and CPS.
(3)
This study helps identify the most promising areas for future research and development and provides a thorough understanding of the potential benefits and risks of each approach. Furthermore, the paper provides valuable insights into the potential implications of the technology in the industry and society.
(4)
Several popular open-source software and datasets were identified, such as the Robot Operating System (ROS), the Manufacturing Execution System (MES), and Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT). The potential of these resources in reducing barriers to CMS research is then discussed. Those resources also help to identify several important issues and research opportunities associated with CMS. These issues and opportunities include the need for better integration between hardware and software, improve security and privacy protocols, improve communication protocols, and the need for data management systems.

2 Taxonomy of CMS

The CMS taxonomy is a classification system for categorizing the various technologies and systems used in cyber manufacturing as shown in Figure 3 and the acronyms as given in Table 1. Figure 3 includes Industrial Automation, Smart Factories, Cyber-Physical Production Systems, Data-driven Manufacturing, and Cyber Security.
Table 1.
AbbreviationDescription
CPSCyber-Physical Systems
CMSCyber manufacturing Systems
IoTInternet of Things
IIoTIndustrial Internet of Things
AGVsRobots/automated Guided Vehicles
AIArtificial Intelligence
MESManufacturing Execution System
ROSRobot Operating System
CPPSCyber-Physical Production Systems
PLCsProgrammable Logic Controllers
NLPNatural Language Processing
CNCComputer Numerical Control
CADComputer-Aided Design
CAMComputer-Aided Manufacturing
SDNSoftware-Defined Networking
Table 1. Abbreviation Table
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2. Analysis of the papers by year.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3. A detailed taxonomy of CMS.
As shown in Figure 2, this graph shows an annual breakdown of papers published from 2009 to 2023. There has been a steady increase in the number of articles published over the years, with the greatest growth occurring in recent years. The number of publications indicates that the field of study is becoming more popular and active. Especially, it Figure 2 shows that the number of published papers has increased at an accelerated rate in recent years. For example, between 2016 and 2017, the number of publications increased by four or 57% from seven to eleven. Between 2017 and 2018, there was a 53% increase, and between 2018 and 2019, a 52% increase. The need for new knowledge and new findings in this research area is increasing, as proven by the rapid acceleration.
As shown in Table 2, we ranked the keywords in the articles. IoT (Internet of Things) is a rapidly growing technology sector that connects physical objects to the Internet. The use of this technology is helping to create a smarter and automated world. The second most popular keyword is cyber-manufacturing, which uses technology and digital data to improve production efficiency and effectiveness in the manufacturing industry. Regarding digital transformation, industrial and blockchain are ranked third and fourth, respectively. The term “automation” refers to the use of automated processes and technologies to complete tasks more efficiently and accurately.
Table 2.
RankKeywordsRankKeywordsRankKeywords
1iot11sensor21machine
2cyber-manufacturing12robots22workforce
3industrial13cyberattack23countermeasures
4blockchain14decentralized24future
5automation15securing25predictive
6cybersecurity16open SCADA26forecasting
7factory17security27learning
8middleware18manufacturing28networking
9workflows19fintech29decryption
10virtualization20technologies30classification
Table 2. Keywords Analysis of the Selected Papers in a Survey
Security is ranked as sixth because it is a critical component of digital transformation and protects companies from threats. In the production process, factory and middleware, are the essential components which are ranked seventh and eigth, respectively. Due to the use of virtual computers and networks increases, workflow and virtualization are ranked ninth and tenth, respectively. The eleventh, twelfth and thirteenth of automation are respectively the sensors, robots, and cyberattacks.
Decentralized, securing, and open SCADA are ranked as fourteenth, fifteenth, and sixteenth, respectively, highlighting their importance to digital network security. The importances of security, manufacturing, and FinTech as integral components of digital transformation are ranked seventeenth, eighteenth, and nineteenth, respectively. It refers to the use of technology and machines to increase productivity and workforce employment in the twentieth, twenty-first, and twenty-second centuries, respectively.
The following categories occupy the 23rd, 24th, 25th, 26th, 27th, 28th, 29th, and 30th positions about countermeasures, future, prediction, forecasting, learning, networking, decryption, and classification. In this context, the keywords point to the application of technology and data to anticipate and respond to cyberattacks and other risks and develop smarter, automated operations.
This ranking of terms reflects the current trend toward digital transformation and the move toward a more automated, secure and efficient world. The Internet of Things, cyber manufacturing, industrial, and blockchain technologies are among the most important components of digital transformation. To increase productivity and efficiency in the production process, automation, cybersecurity, and the factory are essential. In addition, robotics, sensors, and cyberattacks are essential elements of automation, while decentralized, secure, and open SCADA are essential to securing digital networks. In addition, technologies, machines, and manpower are essential for maximizing the efficiency of technologies and machines, while countermeasures, futures, predictions, forecasting, learning, networking, decryption, and categorization are critical for predicting and responding to threats. These keywords are organized according to the current trend of digital transformation and the shift to a smarter and more automated world.

2.1 Industrial Automation

Industrial automation involves the use of computers, robots, and other automated technologies to reduce the need for human labour in the manufacturing process [92]. This technology can be used in a wide range of applications, from simple programmable logic controllers (PLCs) to sophisticated systems such as IIoT and Artificial Intelligence (AI) [100]. Industrial automation is used to reduce costs, improve efficiency, and increase product quality. In the manufacturing process, machines, robots, and other automated technologies are used to do the necessary tasks in a factory.
Various products can be manufactured using with CMS, ranging from consumer items to complex industrial components. Robots/automated guided vehicles (AGVs) can move materials from one location to another by following predefined paths that can be programmed [103]. These robots can autonomously navigate obstacles and can be used for various tasks, such as loading and unloading materials in a factory setting. Due to their cost effectiveness, reliability, and safety, AGVs are becoming increasingly popular in manufacturing. Articulated robots utilize a combination of joints, motors, and other components to move with a more excellent range of motion than standard robots [173]. Articulated robots are commonly used in the automotive industry to do complex tasks. They are often used for welding, spot welding, and painting tasks. Robots with cylindrical joints can do various tasks in a limited area using cylindrical joints to move in a circular motion. Since cylindrical robots can do precise and complex tasks within a limited space, they are used in many industries, from automotive to electronics [23]. SCARA robot uses a combination of four rotary joints to move in various directions. The SCARA robot is commonly used for high-speed assembly processes such as pick-and-place [90]. SCARA robot is also used for precise assembly processes. Delta robot uses three linear actuators to move, enabling them to move quickly and accurately in a small space, pick-and-place operations, painting, and welding. For the pneumatic robot, air pressure is used to move the robots, allowing them robots to move rapidly and accurately within a small area. They are frequently used for packaging, sorting, and assembly tasks [147]. The collaborative robot, or cobot, works with humans to accomplish tasks more efficiently and quickly. These robots are commonly used in the manufacturing industry such as assembly, welding, and painting. By reducing costs, improving safety, and increasing productivity, collaborative robots can help to reduce costs.
In a manufacturing environment, CMS are used to manage the production process, whereas CPS is used to monitor and control physical processes. Manufacturing items using CMS often requires the integration of a variety of technologies, including robotics, artificial intelligence, computer vision, and automation. The real-time monitoring and modification of production processes is part of this process. In contrast, CPS is about monitoring and controlling physical processes by integrating sensors and actuators with computer equipments. In an industrial setting, this can include monitoring temperature, humidity, other environmental characteristics, and controlling robots in an automated production line. CPS are also capable of interacting with their environment, such as opening and closing valves or turning lights on and off. Therefore, the main difference between CMS and CPS is that CMS manage production processes, whereas CPS monitor and control physical processes.
CPS and the Internet of Things (IoT) differ primarily in their complexity and level of interaction with the physical world. CPS is a sophisticated system consisting of physical components and software components capable of monitoring, controlling, and interacting with their environment. The IoT, on the other hand, is a network of connected devices that interact with each other over the Internet. While IoT devices can interact with their environment, they are generally not as complex as the systems found at CPS. In addition, a CPS system is generally isolated from the Internet and connected to a local network, while an IoT device is generally connected to the Internet.
CMS use computer technology to control the entire production process [29]. Many industries use CMS, including automotive, aerospace, and medical device manufacturing. Manufacturers can reduce costs, improve efficiency, and reduce time-to-market by automating various processes, such as material handling, assembly, and quality control [167]. CMS are used in a variety of industries. It is a specialized computer used in industrial automation that is programmed to control machines and systems, primarily in manufacturing. Programmable logic controllers, or PLCs, are used to control the operation of machines and systems. And, monitoring and controlling a wide range of parameters, PLCs can also be utilized to integrate multiple machines and systems into an efficient production line. Manufacturing companies can benefit from CMS by reducing costs, improving quality, and increasing efficiency [48]. Furthermore, these systems are relatively easy to implement and maintain, making them a cost-effective solution for many organizations. By utilizing CMS, manufacturers can produce higher quality products faster and with less waste [59].
In summary, industrial automation involves replacing human labour with computers, robots, and other automated technologies. To this end, there are a variety of technologies ranging from simple PLCs to more complex systems such as AI and IIoT. In the industrial sector, automation is used to reduce costs, increase productivity, and improve product quality. Numerous tasks in manufacturing are done by machines, robots, and other automated devices. In addition to CMS, CPS are also used to manage and control production processes. Cost savings, increased productivity and improved product quality are the advantages of industrial automation. Disadvantages of this method include the need for complex systems, possibility of job loss, and the need for specialized training.

2.2 Cyber Physical Production Systems

Cyber-physical production systems (CPPS), referred to Industry 4.0, automate production processes by combining physical and cyber components, such as sensors and software. These systems enable machines to communicate with each other, share data, and respond to their surroundings in real-time. The result is increased productivity, cost savings, better product quality, and a high customer satisification. CMS are integrated into a system that uses digital technologies such as computers, robots, and sensors to control and monitor production processes. CMS allow manufacturers to optimize production processes, increases production efficiency, reduces costs, and improves product quality. CMS mostly focus on the use of digital technologies to automate production processes and improve production efficiency. CPPS, on the other hand, is an advanced form of a cyber manufacturing system that combines physical production systems [17, 131]. The goal of CPPS is to provide a fully automated manufacturing process that is more efficient, reliable, and cost-effective than traditional production systems [144]. CPPS can be used to automate processes and reduce manual labour, and improve the tracking and analysis of production data.

2.2.1 Data-driven Manufacturing.

Manufacturing processes are driven by data and analytics in data-driven manufacturing. Optimizing the manufacturing process and increasing efficiency involves gathering, analyzing, and leveraging data and insights gathered from various sources, including production, supply chain, and customer feedback [145]. Due to data-driven manufacturing, manufacturers can make smarter, faster decisions because it improves quality, and customer service increases efficiency and reduces costs.
In computer science, AI refers to the ability of computers to learn from experience, comprehend, and interact with their environments, and make decisions based on the information they receive, as mentioned in Figure 3. AI in data-driven manufacturing automates and streamlines predictive maintenance, process optimization, and supply chain management processes [165]. Production monitoring, identifying potential problems and inefficiencies, and making decisions that optimize production processes can be accomplished using AI technologies, including data mining, machine learning, computer vision, natural language processing, predictive analytics, process optimization, and data visualization [41].
Data mining is an effective tool for identifying trends, inefficiencies and opportunities for improvement, and developing predictive models that can be used to predict outcomes and optimize processes in data-driven manufacturing [45]. In machine learning, machines can learn from data without explicit programming [145]. It is a subset of AI that involves identifying patterns in data and making predictions based on algorithms. As part of data-driven manufacturing, machine learning can be used to analyze production data, identify potential problems and inefficiencies, and make recommendations for improving operations based on production data analysis [106]. In computer vision, machines can interpret and comprehend visual information, such as images or videos, as a branch of artificial intelligence. Computer vision can be used in data-driven manufacturing to monitor production, detect errors and defects, and identify inefficiency.
Natural Language Processing (NLP) is one of the AI branches that enables machines to comprehend and interact with human language. In data-driven manufacturing, NLP can determine customer preferences and needs [10, 61]. The goal of predictive analytics is to make predictions based on the analysis of data and analytics [99, 119, 164]. Predictive analytics can be applied to data-driven manufacturing to predict future demand, identify potential problems, and optimize production processes. Data-driven manufacturing employs autonomous agents to automate repetitive tasks and optimize. In data-driven manufacturing, predictive maintenance can identify potential problems in a production process and take proactive measures to prevent them from occurring. Optimization of production processes involves using data and analytics to enhance productivity and efficiency [33]. In data-driven manufacturing, process optimization can identify inefficiencies in the production process. In data-driven manufacturing, data visualization [13] can be applied to identify trends and patterns in production data and better understand the performance of the production process. In general, data-driven manufacturing employs autonomous agents to automate repetitive tasks and optimize production processes by interacting with their environment, learning from experience, and making decisions without human intervention [49, 56, 152].
Table 3 shows the collection of data from a variety of manufacturing processes. In addition to predictive analytics, supply chain optimization, and production process optimization, manufacturing dataset can be used in various applications. In addition to helping businesses reduce costs and increase profits, the manufacturing dataset mentioned in Table 3, this data can be used to improve product quality, customer satisfaction, and customer loyalty. It can also identify areas for improvement in the manufacturing process. Data analysis enables businesses to better understand the strengths and weakness of the production process and to make changes accordingly.
Table 3.
No.DataURLDescriptions
1Manufacturing Data Exchange (MDX)https://www.mdx.org.uk/data-sets/Contains operational data from global manufacturing operations, including production, maintenance, and process data. It is hosted by the Manufacturing Data Exchange (MDX), a platform developed by the Manufacturing Technology Centre, a UK-based research and development organization.
2Global Manufacturing Competitiveness Index (GMCI)https://www.weforum.org/reports/the-global-competitiveness-report-2020/Consists of the Global Manufacturing Competitiveness Index (GMCI), which tracks the competitiveness of global manufacturing by country across multiple metrics, including the manufacturing environment, cost, and market environment.
3Manufacturing Industry Database (MIDB)https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/asm/data.htmlContains detailed manufacturing industry data including production and capacity use, employment, construction, and trade. It is maintained by the US Census Bureau and can be accessed through their Manufacturing Industry Database (MIDB)
4International Trade Database (ITD)https://data.world/cow/bilateral-tradeIncludes detailed import and export data from the International Trade Database (ITD), which is maintained by the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD).
5Manufacturing Plant Sensor Datahttps://data.world/noeleisac822/vibration-detectors-london-englandContains information from sensors at a manufacturing plant, including operational and environmental metrics. The dataset can be used to analyze production processes and identify inefficiencies.
6Global Manufacturing Data Sethttps://data.world/city-of-ny/kxg8-856sContains information about the global manufacturing industry, including historical production levels, inputs and outputs, and energy consumption. The dataset can be used to gain insights into the global manufacturing industry and identify trends.
7Automotive Manufacturing Datasethttps://data.world/freemotion/car-battery-sungai-bulohContains information on the automotive manufacturing industry, including production trends, metrics, and market data. The dataset can be used to gain insights into the automotive manufacturing industry and identify trends.
Table 3. Manufacturing Dataset
In summary, CPS and CMS are the integrated systems that monitor and control manufacturing processes using digital technologies such as computers, robotics, and sensors. CPPS and CMS are designed to automate manufacturing processes, increase production efficiency, and minimize production costs. Data-driven manufacturing optimizes processes and increase productivity by collecting, analyzing, and visualizing data, data-driven manufacturing optimizes processes and increases productivity. Industrial processes can thus be improved by using autonomous agents to automate repetitive tasks.

2.3 Industrial Networking

Industrial networking uses network technology to connect industrial machines and devices such as computers, robots, and other devices [132, 149]. Industrial networks enable the sharing of data between machines and allow for the remote control of machines and processes. Industrial networking is important because it helps to improve communication between machines, reduce costs, and increase efficiency. By connecting machines, it is possible to share data, automate processes, and reduce downtime due to manual error [6]. Additionally, industrial networking allows for remote diagnostics, which can help identify and resolve problems quickly. Industrial networking is also important because it provides a secure and reliable connection between machines, which can help protect against malicious attacks and cyber threats [75]. It is important to ensure that industrial networks are secure, reliable, and scalable to ensure that they can support the operations of the business [124]. By establishing and maintaining best practices, businesses can ensure that their industrial networks are up-to-date and secure from cyber threats. Additionally, businesses must ensure that their networks are interoperable and able to communicate with multiple devices from different vendors [140]. Finally, businesses must ensure that their networks can scale to meet the demands of the environment. They inherit the following issues:
(1)
Security: Industrial networks are vulnerable to cyber-attacks, and malicious actors may be able to gain access to sensitive data or disrupt operations [126]. Security protocols such as firewalls, antivirus, and encryption are essential for protecting industrial networks from these threats.
(2)
Interoperability: Industrial networks require the ability to communicate with multiple devices from different vendors [125]. This requires compatible protocols and standards to ensure that data can be exchanged between systems.
(3)
Scalability: Industrial networks must be able to scale to meet the increasing demands of the environment [9, 155]. This requires the ability to add additional devices, expand existing connections, and upgrade existing systems.
(4)
Reliability: Industrial networks must be able to operate in harsh environments and provide reliable connections [100]. This requires robust hardware, reliable communications protocols, and redundant power sources.

2.3.1 Cyber Security.

It is the objective of cyber security to protect networks, systems, and programs from digital attacks. A cyber attack is usually intended to access, alter, or destroy sensitive data, extort money from users, or interrupt normal business operations [19, 161, 163, 169]. Because of cyber security, businesses, organizations, and individuals are protected from cyber attacks that could result in significant harm, financial loss, or damage to their reputations. For cyber security to remain effective, it must be continuously implemented and monitored [12, 19, 35, 89, 134]. Cyber security is an important aspect of any organization or individual using computers and the internet because cyber attacks can occur anywhere. Cyber security can be achieved with tools and processes such as firewalls, antivirus software, encryption, and user authentication. Because of cyber security, individuals, organizations, and businesses are protected from cyber attacks that could cause serious harm to their reputation, financial loss, and even other serious harm to their finances [134].
A firewall is a network security system that monitors and controls network traffic based on predefined security rules. An effective firewall protects networks from malicious attacks such as malware, ransomware, and Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) attacks [35, 134]. Firewalls can be deployed either on-premises or in the cloud.
Intrusion Prevention Systems (IPS): An intrusion prevention system monitors network traffic and blocks malicious traffic following predetermined security policies. Additionally, it detects suspicious traffic and alerts administrators so they can take action. It can detect and block malicious traffic before it reaches the network, detect suspicious traffic, and alert administrators [134]. Data is scrambled during encryption so only the intended recipient can access it. It can be used in hardware and software to protect sensitive data from unauthorized access. A network’s access control system is a process for restricting access to specific resources or areas of a network. It can control user access to data, applications, and networks and is often implemented using authentication mechanisms such as passwords or biometrics. Identifying, classifying, remediating, and mitigating vulnerabilities within a system is the goal of vulnerability management [19, 34]. Using it, organizations can identify and address security risks before they become an issue. Access Management: Access management refers to controlling how users access resources and applications. It ensures that only authorized users can access sensitive data and applications. Data Loss Prevention (DLP): The purpose of DLP is to prevent unauthorized access to sensitive data, and its leakage [12, 19, 89]. This technology can be applied to transit, rest, and operation data. This type of firewall controls and monitors application-level traffic and is known as an application firewall. Typically, it is used with a network firewall to protect applications from malicious attacks, such as malware and DDoS attacks. Antivirus software detects, prevents, and removes malicious software, including viruses, malware, and spyware [12, 19, 34, 89]. It is used to protect computers and networks from malicious attacks.
As technology and the internet have become more prevalent in all aspects of our lives, industrial networking and cyber security have become increasingly important. Security and reliability of networks are particularly essential in industrial environments, where equipment and systems must function efficiently and safely. With the continued expansion and evolution of the industrial sector, it has become increasingly important to implement safe networks and cyber security measures. Industrial cyber security can be achieved by utilizing blockchain-based models.

2.3.2 Blockchain and Federated Learning.

Blockchain technology provides an immutable, distributed ledger that can be used to protect various types of data, including data related to industrial networks [74]. Blockchain-based solutions can be used by companies to ensure that their data is protected from unauthorized access and manipulation and that all recorded data is accurate and up-to-date. In addition, it is possible to improve cybersecurity by combining blockchain technology with other technologies [84, 137].
Federated learning is a form of machine learning capable of detecting and preventing cyberattacks. Due to the distributed nature of blockchain networks, federated learning can detect malicious behaviour and alert appropriate personnel [57]. When blockchain and federated learning are used in the cyber manufacturing system, the potential exists for data leaks [150]. Whenever data is stored or shared over remote networks, individuals or organizations can gain access to the information without authorization. There are numerous opportunities for misuse of data by bad actors [110].
In addition, using blockchain and federated learning can be complex and require significant computing capacity, which can be difficult for smaller companies to acquire. As a result, it can be challenging for these firms to take advantage of the potential benefits of these technologies. Finally, blockchain and federated learning are still in their early stages. As a result, there is a lack of understanding and awareness of their potential benefits and threats.
For industrial networks to be secured, organizations must be adequately trained and educated in the use of these technologies. Industrial networks and cybersecurity are essential to the effective and secure operation of industrial facilities and systems. Enterprises can ensure the security of their data and the accuracy of all transactions by integrating blockchain models and federated learning. Enterprises must keep pace with ever-evolving cybersecurity threats to ensure their networks remain secure and their operations continue to run smoothly.
In summary, networking in the industrial sector refers to the use of network technology to connect industrial machines and devices such as computers, robots, and other equipment so that they can be controlled remotely and data can be exchanged between connected units. By improving machine-to-machine communication, reducing costs, and increasing productivity, it also provides a secure and reliable connection between machines and protects against malicious attacks. To ensure the security of data and the accuracy of all transactions, cybersecurity is necessary to protect networks, systems, and programs from digital attacks. The use of blockchain models and federated learning can enhance security, but their potential benefits and risks are not yet fully understood or appreciated. In addition, these technologies are difficult to implement and require a large amount of processing capacity that is difficult for small businesses to acquire. Companies need to ensure that their industrial networks are secure, reliable and scalable, regardless of the obstacles they face.

2.4 Potentials and Challenges of CMS

The successful transition to IIoT and CMS is likely to determine the future economic success of the entire economy [36, 59]. Countries with a large industry sector, such as Germany, account for 30% of its Gross Domestic Product and employ 25% of its labour force [51]. IIoT and CMS together enable the integration of physical and digital assets which can be used to optimize production processes and increase efficiency [108]. This can lead to increased productivity, cost savings, improved quality, and increased customer satisfaction.
CMS are a type of digital manufacturing system that is designed to automate, optimize, and modernize the production process [162]. This system combines a range of technologies such as sensors, computer vision, robotics, and the IoT [161]. It enables manufacturers to quickly create and customize products while reducing costs and increasing efficiency. CMS can be used to improve the design, production, and delivery of products and services. It can also be used to automate and optimize processes, reducing the need for manual labour. Additionally, it can provide data-driven insights into production processes, allowing manufacturers to identify areas of improvement and increase profitability [32]. In comparison with related studies [27], CMS can be compared to traditional manufacturing systems, such as Computer Numerical Control (CNC) machines, which are limited in their ability to automate production processes. CMS can provide a more efficient system with greater flexibility and scalability.
CMS can be used in a variety of applications, such as 3D printing [58], additive manufacturing [40, 86], product customization, and quality control. It can also be used to monitor and control production processes, such as temperature and pressure, and track and log production data [5, 52]. Regarding evaluation measures, CMS systems must be evaluated based on their ability to meet the goals of the manufacturing process and their ability to integrate with existing systems and processes [79]. Additionally, they should be evaluated on the cost-effectiveness of their implementation, and the ease of use and scalability of the system.
The integration of IIoT and CMS can lead to new business models, such as predictive maintenance, which can improve the competitiveness of industries [83]. However, the successful transition to IIoT and CMS is not without its challenges. Industries must invest in the necessary infrastructure and technology and train their employees on the new systems. Companies must ensure that their data is secure and that their systems are compliant with the appropriate regulations [120]. To ensure a successful transition to IIoT and CMS, industries must collaborate to develop a comprehensive strategy. This strategy should include an assessment of the existing infrastructure and technology, a plan to invest in the necessary technology and training, and a plan to ensure data security and regulatory compliance. The strategy should include measures to ensure the effective use of the technology, such as the development of new business models [151]. Overall, digitalization presents both opportunities and challenges for countries with large industry sectors. By investing in the necessary infrastructure and technology and developing a comprehensive strategy, industries can ensure that they are well-prepared for digital transformation and can benefit from the opportunities that it presents [159].
The transformation to Industry 4.0 is indeed a major step forward in the way manufacturing and production. It can lead to greater resource efficiency, shorter time-to-market, higher-value products, and new services [128]. More specifically, applications and potential benefits of Industry 4.0 include improved production processes and efficiency, better product quality, and reduced costs. By connecting machines, systems, and people, it is possible to gain real-time insights into the production process, allowing for faster and more accurate decision-making [91, 115]. This can result in improving production planning, reducing inventory costs, and improving customer service. Industry 4.0 also offers the potential for greater customization of products and services, allowing manufacturers to better meet the needs of their customers. This can be achieved with advanced analytics, artificial intelligence, and machine learning. Additionally, it can help improve product quality and safety, reduce waste, and increase efficiency [127]. Finally, Industry 4.0 can also help to reduce energy consumption and emissions and increase the use of renewable energy sources. This can be achieved with smart sensors and data analytics, which can monitor and adjust energy consumption in real-time [62, 101]. This is particularly beneficial for companies looking to reduce their carbon footprint. Overall, the transformation to Industry 4.0 offers a wide range of potential benefits, from improved production processes and efficiency to better product quality, cost savings, and reduced energy consumption. By leveraging advanced technology, companies can gain a competitive edge and better meet the needs of their customers [37, 121].
Intelligent automation is a type of automation that uses AI and machine learning to automate processes and tasks. It is becoming increasingly popular in the manufacturing industry because it can help reduce costs, increase efficiency, and improve product quality [31, 76]. One of the key benefits of intelligent automation is that it makes small batch sizes down to batch size one feasible. This is because programming and commissioning efforts become negligible [42]. With intelligent automation, machines can be programmed to recognize patterns and make decisions based on those patterns. CMS are quickly becoming the industry standard for a variety of manufacturing processes. One of the most promising technologies within this field is high-resolution production, which offers significant advantages for manufacturers.
High-resolution production is a form of a cyber manufacturing system that utilizes sophisticated analytics, computer-aided design, and advanced manufacturing techniques to create more precise and detailed products [55]. This type of production can significantly improve predictability and cost transparency for manufacturers. High-resolution production allows manufacturers to accurately predict each manufacturing process’s cost and identify any potential issues before they arise. This is accomplished by utilizing sophisticated analytics that analyzes the production process and identifies potential problems before they occur. This increases the predictability of the production process and reduces the potential for surprises that could increase costs. Additionally, high-resolution production further improves cost transparency by providing detailed cost breakdowns for each manufacturing process step. This allows manufacturers to easily identify areas where they can reduce costs or increase efficiency.
In addition to improving predictability and cost transparency, high-resolution production also offers the potential to greatly increase the quality of products [71]. By utilizing advanced manufacturing techniques, manufacturers can create products with greater detail and accuracy than ever before [154]. This can be especially beneficial for manufacturers in the medical field, as high-resolution production can be used to create medical implants and devices with greater precision and accuracy.
High-resolution production is a revolutionary technology that offers a variety of benefits for manufacturers. By utilizing sophisticated analytics and advanced manufacturing techniques, manufacturers can create products with greater precision and accuracy. Additionally, high-resolution production can improve predictability and cost transparency, allowing manufacturers to better manage their production costs and identify potential issues before they occur [11]. High-resolution production is quickly becoming the standard for a variety of manufacturing processes, and its potential for improving the quality of products is only beginning to be realized.
Intelligent production planning is an important part of managing a business. It helps to ensure that products are delivered on time and at a lower cost [174]. It also helps to reduce throughput times, which is the amount of time it takes for a product to be manufactured from start to finish. Predictive maintenance and automatic fault detection are essential for ensuring high overall equipment effectiveness, which leads to fewer maintenance costs. These techniques help to identify potential problems before they occur, allowing businesses to take preventative action to avoid costly repairs. In addition, intelligent production planning can help to reduce waste and optimize production processes. By analyzing data collected during the production process, businesses can identify areas of inefficiency and make improvements to increase production efficiency.
Reconfiguration of CMS and processes help to quickly scale up or change management. This reconfigurability is enabled with sensors, software, and controllers to monitor and adjust the machines and processes to optimize the production process [78, 97]. This enables companies to quickly scale up or change the production process to meet customer demands [80]. Human-machine interaction is also important for CMS to improve labour productivity, and ergonomics [7, 38, 72]. With advanced technologies such as augmented reality, natural language processing, and voice recognition, humans and machines can interact to improve the efficiency of the production process [142]. By using these technologies, workers can interact with the machines to monitor production, adjust settings, and troubleshoot any errors. This interaction leads to improve labour productivity and ergonomics as workers can work more efficiently and comfortably.
Overall, CMS offers great flexibility and scalability, enables companies to quickly adjust to customer demands and improve production efficiency [162]. Companies can further improve labour productivity by using advanced technologies to enable human-machine interaction, leading to improved customer satisfaction. The usage of CMS and IIoT may be beneficial in certain areas, but there are also some drawbacks to be considered. For example, these systems can be expensive to implement and maintain and may require specialized personnel to operate them. Additionally, there is a risk of security breaches, as these systems are connected to the internet and can be vulnerable to hacking. The approaches from other fields may not be directly transferable, as the specific points of CMS and IIoT may not apply to those fields. Finally, there may be privacy concerns, as these systems collect and store data about users. That includes:
(1)
Compatibility: Ensuring that the components and machines are compatible with each other and the factory’s existing systems is a major challenge [108].
(2)
Maintenance: Once the integration is complete, the machines and components need ongoing maintenance and upkeep to ensure that they are functioning properly [109].
(3)
Cost: Integrating machines and components into the factory’s existing systems can be costly, as new hardware and software may need to be purchased [25].
(4)
Data Management: Managing data generated by the machines and components can be a challenge, as it must be stored, tracked, and analyzed [47, 138, 151].
CMS and heterogeneous production infrastructure from different suppliers can be a costly and risky [105]. Companies may be forced to invest in expensive hardware and software and hire additional personnel to manage the system [122]. Additionally, the different suppliers may not be able to provide the same level of support and service, which could lead to compatibility issues and increased downtime. Furthermore, the complexity of the System could lead to increased security risks, as hackers may be able to exploit the vulnerabilities. Companies should carefully consider the potential benefits and drawbacks of investing in such a system.
CMS use computer-based technologies to control and manage the manufacturing process. These systems are used to automate the production process, reduce costs, and improve product quality. CMS are used in a variety of industries, including automotive, aerospace, medical, and consumer electronics. Spatio-temporal relationships are the relationships between objects in the system through both spatial and temporal characteristics [60, 146]. In a cyber manufacturing system, these relationships can be used to optimize the production process and improve the efficiency of the system [66]. For example, the spatial relationships between objects can be used to determine the optimal placement of components in the production line, whereas temporal relationships can be used to determine the optimal timing of production steps [170]. The broad field of manufacturing technologies refers to the wide range of technologies used in manufacturing. These technologies include robotics, computer-aided design (CAD), computer-aided manufacturing (CAM), and additive manufacturing. Each of these technologies has its own unique set of advantages and disadvantages and can be used to optimize the production process.
Humans in versatile operating conditions refer to the use of human operators in the production process [81]. Human operators can be used to do complex tasks that require a high degree of skill and precision [18]. However, they can also be used to do simpler tasks that require less skill and precision. In either case, human operators must be trained to operate in a variety of conditions, including extreme temperatures, hazardous environments, and difficult working conditions [116].
In summary, both CMS and IIoT can be considered complex systems, and therefore the development of such systems presents several challenges. The first challenge is to select the right technological basis and architecture. The second challenge is to create an extensible infrastructure or architectural pattern that can support a variety of sensors, actuators, and other hardware and software systems while still maintaining the complexity of the system manageable. This networked system can include a small sensor device and management or planning systems that provide access to enterprise information such as key performance indicators or mass information such as inventory of components, parts, and products. By implementing IIoT and CMS, the transition to Industry 4.0 can improve production processes, efficiency, product quality, cost savings, and energy consumption. By combining intelligent automation with high-resolution production, CMS offers improved predictability, cost transparency, product quality, and the ability to produce small quantities of products more efficiently. In addition, intelligent production planning and CMS and process reconfiguration help optimize production processes and improve labour productivity and ergonomics.

2.4.1 Challenges in the Cyber Manufacturing to Enable Smart Manufacturing.

The transition to CMS is important as a key step toward enabling smart manufacturing. CMS integrate physical components with digital technology to automate production processes. Several challenges must be addressed to successfully transition to CMS, as listed in Table 4. Integration of various systems and technologies is one of the major challenges. An integral part of CMS is the integration of physical components, such as machines and robots, with digital technologies, such as sensors, controllers, and software. For this integration to be reliable, secure, and efficient, it must be implemented in a secure, reliable, and efficient manner [87, 139].
Table 4.
No.DomainChallengesYear
1Data exchange and analysis [87, 139]Next generation of CPPS needs to transfer these capabilities to the edge network, and data heterogeneity must be addressed. This includes the standard syntax and semantics requirements needed for data exchange.2019
2System complexity [15, 93]System needs to be scalable, flexible, and capable of self-adapting and self-organizing so that it can integrate new applications under any circumstances. In summary, communication problems can be arisen when interconnected devices are using mutually incompatible networks, and the system needs to be able to adapt and self-organize to integrate new applications.2021
3Production planning [21]Companies need to consider the impact of product variants on their planning data and take steps to ensure that they have access to accurate and up-to-date data.2018
4Authentication [139]Verifying and validating decentralized systems is a difficult task that requires the construction of a virtual simulation to ensure accuracy and reliability.2019
5Data security and privacy [22]In conclusion, cloud solutions can provide several benefits, but they also come with risks that must be addressed to ensure secure access to resources.2020
6Interoperability [65, 130]Cyber manufacturing involves the integration of various digital technologies and systems that may use different communication protocols and data formats, create interoperability issues that can hinder the seamless integration of these technologies and systems.2022
7Regulatory compliance [50]Cyber manufacturing involves the collection, storage, and analysis of sensitive data subject to various regulations, such as data privacy laws and industry-specific regulations. Complying with these regulations can be challenging due to the rapidly evolving nature of cyber threats and the need for continuous monitoring and updates to security measures.2023
Table 4. Challenges for Cyber Manufacturing
Edge computing is a paradigm that involves processing data at the edge of a network rather than at a centralized unit [15, 93]. This can result in data degradation, as some information is lost when exchanging operational data over the edge computing paradigm. Balancing this trade-off is difficult, and most data analysis is still done in the cloud. Communication problems can arise when interconnected devices are using mutually incompatible networks. Different vendors typically provide these networks, and each system is exposed to different market needs, operational conditions, and environmental conditions [21]. As the number of product variants increases, the accuracy of planning data decreases due to the lack of historical data. This is because when more product variants exist, there are less data available to accurately predict future demand.
The integration of diverse digital technologies and systems is a fundamental aspect of cyber manufacturing [65, 130]. However, the integration of these systems often poses challenges due to the different communication protocols and data formats used. The resulting interoperability issues hinder the seamless integration of technologies and systems, causing significant setbacks in the production process.
Cyber manufacturing involves the collection, storage, and analysis of sensitive data, making regulatory compliance an important aspect of the process [50]. This entails compliance with sundry regulations, such as data privacy laws and industry-specific regulations. However, abiding by such regulations is no mean feat, given the swiftly evolving nature of cyber threats. Therefore, it is imperative to engage in continuous surveillance and modifications to security measures to guarantee compliance with the regulations.
As a result, it becomes more difficult to forecast demand and plan production accordingly and accurately. This can lead to overproduction or underproduction, resulting in lost profits and wasted resources. To ensure that the proposed models are accurate and reliable, it is necessary to construct a virtual simulation that can be used to test and verify the models. This is especially difficult in decentralized systems, as the efficient and optimum use of resources is more difficult to achieve in a multi-resource and dynamic environment. Potential risks are associated with cloud solutions and the need for secure access to resources in CPPS (Cyber-Physical Production Systems).
Cloud solutions provide many standards and procedures for their business processes, but this can lead to a loss of governance over valuable data. With increased interconnectivity and resource sharing, there is a greater risk of malicious attacks and trust and credibility issues. To address these issues, peer nodes must be able to handle secure access to resources to ensure trust and consensus among stakeholders.
Additionally, integration must be performed to allow for scalability and flexibility, as production processes may need to be changed or updated over time. A significant challenge lies in developing new skills and capabilities. The operation and maintenance of CMS require new skills and capabilities, as they are more complex than traditional production systems. The ability to understand and work with the system’s various components and troubleshoot and debug any problems that may arise constitutes this ability. Also, there is the issue of cost [22, 139]. The cost of transitioning to CMS must be weighed against the potential benefits, as CMS are more expensive than traditional production systems. Additionally, the cost of training personnel to operate and maintain CMS must also be taken into consideration. In conclusion, the transition to CMS is an important step in enabling smart manufacturing, but several challenges must be addressed to successfully transition to CMS. These challenges include the integration of different systems and technologies, the development of new skills and capabilities, and the cost of transitioning to CMS.
In summary, several obstacles must be overcome to enable a smooth transition from CMS to smart manufacturing. These obstacles entail integrating physical components with digital technology, developing new skills and competencies, and making the transition to CMS costly. As the number of product variants increases, the accuracy of planning data decreases and edge computing can degrade data, communication problems can arise when devices are networked over incompatible networks, and edge computing can degrade data. To overcome these difficulties, we need to build a virtual simulation and secure access to resources. While there are some drawbacks moving to a CMS, it can also offer numerous benefits, such as greater efficiency, flexibility, and scalability.

2.5 Security and Privacy-preserving Architectures for the Future of Cyber Manufacturing

As mentioned in Figure 4, CMS organization security is an important aspect of any organization, as it is essential to ensure the safety and security of all data and personnel [30]. Cyber manufacturing organizations must consider a range of security measures to protect their systems and data. These include physical security, personal security, information confidentiality, availability, integrity, communication, and software security. Physical security is essential in any cyber manufacturing organization, as it is the first line of defence against any potential threat. This includes the use of locks, alarms, and CCTV to protect the premises and the personnel. It is also important to ensure that the premises are regularly monitored and maintained to ensure that any potential threats can be identified and addressed quickly. Personal security is also important in any cyber manufacturing organization. This includes the use of secure passwords, two-factor authentication, and other security measures to ensure that only authorized personnel can access the system. It is also important to ensure that personnel are trained in security protocols and practices and that they are aware of the importance of security. Information confidentiality is also important in any cyber manufacturing organization. This includes the use of encryption, access control, and other security measures to ensure that only authorized personnel can access the System. It is also important to ensure that information is stored securely and that any third-party providers are verified and trusted. Availability, integrity, and communication are also important aspects of any cyber manufacturing organization. This includes the use of secure networks, backup systems, and other measures to ensure that the system is always available and operating effectively. It is also important to ensure that all communication is secure and that any information shared is done so in a secure manner. Software security is also an important aspect of any cyber manufacturing organization. This includes the use of secure coding practices, secure software development, and other measures to ensure that the system is secure. It is also important to ensure that all software is regularly updated and that any potential security threats are addressed quickly.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4. A comprehensive view of the information security landscape in Cyber Manufacturing systems, showing the various layers and components that make up a secure system [30].
The future of cyber manufacturing will depend on the development of secure and privacy-preserving architectures [153]. To ensure the safety of data and processes associated with cyber manufacturing, it is necessary to implement security, and privacy-preserving architectures that protect data and processes from malicious attacks [26]. These architectures should include measures such as authentication, encryption, access control, and other security and privacy-oriented technologies [171]. Additionally, the architectures should be designed to enable the secure and private sharing of data between different entities involved in the cyber manufacturing process [14]. The architectures should be designed to ensure the integrity of data and processes related to cyber manufacturing. This will enable cyber manufacturing to remain secure and private while allowing for the efficient and effective development of cyber manufacturing processes. One of the most promising network architectures for CMS is software-defined networking (SDN) [94]. SDN is a network architecture that allows for centralized control of network traffic, enabling administrators to make changes to the network without having to reconfigure individual devices. This is accomplished by using a logically centralized controller that provides a unified view of the network, allowing for more efficient management and control of the network.
Another innovative network architecture for CMS is edge computing. Edge computing is a distributed computing model that moves data and computing resources from the cloud to the edge of the network [102]. This can help reduce latency, improve scalability, and enable more efficient communication between the various components of the System. Edge computing can also help reduce the overall cost of CMS, as it eliminates the need for costly cloud computing resources. Wireless networks are becoming increasingly important in CMS [28]. Wireless networks enable devices to communicate without the need for physical connections, allowing for more flexible and adaptive communication between components. Wireless networks can be used to help communication between robots, sensors, and other devices, enabling more efficient and accurate production processes.
One of the main challenges in developing CMS networks is the integration of different systems and processes. This requires a comprehensive understanding of the various components and their interactions, and the ability to effectively manage communication between them [16]. In addition, integrating different technologies and systems is often a major challenge due to their different architectures, protocols, and standards. Therefore, a robust integration strategy must be developed to ensure the successful integration of different systems.
Industry 4.0 is a next-generation manufacturing model that incorporates modern information and communication technologies to improve the efficiency, productivity, and profitability of CMS [63, 73]. Although CMS are gaining competitive advantages in the global market, cyberattacks within the manufacturing sector are becoming increasingly sophisticated and frequent, posing a significant threat to companies and organizations worldwide, making smart manufacturing security a global concern. The security of CMS networks is also a major challenge [160]. As these systems are increasingly connected to the internet, they become more vulnerable to cyber-attacks. It is essential to ensure the security of these systems by implementing robust security measures such as encryption, authentication, and access control. Additionally, these systems must be designed with the ability to detect and respond to any potential security threats.
To develop CMS networks, new technologies and processes need to be adopted that are reliable, secure, easy to use, easy to maintain, and scalable [2]. Furthermore, these technologies must be flexible and interoperable since these characteristics are necessary to maintain relevance and adaptability to market changes. A robust authentication protocol, authorization controls, and encryption technique should be included in the design of systems to ensure security and reliability [133]. It is also important to implement access control measures to ensure that only authorized personnel can access the system. Moreover, the system should be designed to be scalable, flexible, and interoperable so that it can be adapted to changing market conditions in the future [54]. In addition, the system should be designed so that it can be used, maintained, and understood easily by the users. In particular, CMS has the following challenges:
(1)
Data security is a major challenge in cyber manufacturing [161]. As cyber manufacturing involves the use of large amounts of data, it is important to ensure that data is secure from unauthorized access and manipulation. This can be achieved by using strong encryption algorithms and secure authentication methods.
(2)
Network security is another challenge in cyber manufacturing [8]. As cyber manufacturing involves the use of interconnected networks, it is important to ensure that the networks are secure from external threats such as malicious attacks. This can be achieved using firewalls, intrusion detection systems, and other security measures.
(3)
Privacy is a major challenge in cyber manufacturing [107]. As cyber manufacturing involves the use of large amounts of personal data, it is important to ensure that data is not misused or shared without the user’s consent. This can be achieved by using privacy-preserving technologies such as encryption and anonymization.
(4)
Access control is another challenge in cyber manufacturing. As cyber manufacturing involves the use of interconnected networks, it is important to ensure that only authorized users have access to the networks [111]. This can be achieved by using access control mechanisms such as authentication, authorization, and role-based access control.
(5)
System integrity is a major challenge in cyber manufacturing [166]. As cyber manufacturing involves the use of interconnected networks, it is important to ensure that the systems are secure from malicious attacks and unauthorised modifications. This can be achieved by using secure coding practices and system integrity checks.
In summary, CMS organizations need to take a variety of security measures to protect their systems and data, including physical security, human security, confidentiality, availability, integrity, communications, and software security. Industry 4.0 is a manufacturing paradigm of the fourth industrial revolution that focuses on the use of advanced information and communication technologies to improve the effectiveness, productivity, and profitability of manufacturing processes. However, integration of diverse systems and processes, data security, network security, data privacy, access control, and system integrity remain significant barriers to CMS network development. As a result, organizations need to implement robust security measures, including encryption, authentication and access control, and develop systems that are reliable, secure, easy to use and maintain, are adaptable, interoperable, and scalable.

2.6 Efficient Resource Allocation and Energy Efficiency in Cyber Manufacturing

Cyber manufacturing is an emerging technology that utilizes digital automation, information technology, and communication networks to integrate design, production, and distribution processes into a single system [171]. As technology continues to evolve, it is becoming increasingly important for organizations to allocate resources effectively and improve energy efficiency to maximize productivity and reduce costs [1]. One potential strategy for efficient resource allocation and energy efficiency in cyber manufacturing is to utilize smart sensors to monitor production processes. These sensors can be used to capture real-time data on the performance of machines, enabling organizations to quickly identify underdoing processes and adjust resources accordingly. Additionally, data collected by these sensors can be used to identify areas where energy consumption can be reduced, such as optimizing the temperature of production environments or reducing the speed of machines when not in use. Another strategy to improve resource allocation and energy efficiency in cyber-manufacturing is to leverage cloud computing technologies [113]. By utilizing cloud computing, organizations can access a virtually unlimited pool of resources and scale up or down as needed, allowing them to quickly and efficiently adjust to changing production demands. Additionally, cloud computing can reduce energy consumption by reducing the need for physical infrastructure and providing access to advanced analytics tools that can be used to identify areas for improvement [3]. Overall, effective resource allocation and energy efficiency are critical for organizations utilizing cyber-manufacturing technologies. By utilizing smart sensors, and leveraging cloud computing technologies, organizations can optimize their production processes and reduce energy consumption, leading to increased efficiency and cost savings.
In summary, the use of digital automation and communication networks and cyber-manufacturing integrates design, production, and distribution processes. Smart sensors can be used to collect data on machine performance in real-time, while cloud computing provides access to virtually unlimited resources and sophisticated analytics tools. These tactics allow companies to optimize resource allocation and energy consumption, which can lead to increased productivity and cost savings. To implement these initiatives, companies must make significant investments in technology and knowledge.

2.7 Cyber Manufacturing Service Orchestration and Scheduling

Figure 5 illustrates that a framework consists of five levels of connection, namely, Smart Connection, Data to Information, Cyber Level, Cognition Level, and Configuration Level. Each level is characterized by its unique features, such as Plug & Play, Intelligent Analysis of Machines, Twin Model for Machine, Simulation and Synthesis, and Auto Configuration. These features enable the creation of a smart connection between the machines and their environment, allowing for communication without ties, multi-dimensional data correlation, performance and degradation prediction, remote viewing, collaborative diagnosis and decision-making, and auto-optimized configurations.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 5. Cyber manufacturing smart connection framework [176].
Smart Connection is a new technology that enables sensor networks to be connected quickly and easily, eliminating the need for complex wiring and connections [95]. With this technology, sensor networks can be set up in a matter of minutes, allowing manufacturers to monitor their production processes in real-time [95]. This technology also allows communication without wires, for a more efficient and cost-effective way to monitor the production process. Data to information is another technology that is part of the cyber manufacturing smart connection [96]. This technology allows for intelligent analysis of machines, providing manufacturers with multi-dimensional data correlation. This enables the prediction of performance and degradation, facilitating the improvement of production processes. The cyber level technology is a twin model for machines that allow for machine time for identification and grouping similarity in data mining [176]. This technology allows for improved process efficiency and better decision-making. The cognition level technology is a simulation and synthesis technology that allows for remote viewing and collaborative diagnosis and decision-making. This technology allows manufacturers to better understand their production processes and make more informed decisions. Finally, the configuration level technology allows for auto-configuration, auto adjustable, and auto optimized. This technology allows manufacturers to quickly and easily configure their production processes, allowing for improved efficiency and cost savings.
In summary, smart connectivity for digital manufacturing is a novel technology that allows sensor networks to be connected without complicated wiring and connectors. It offers manufacturers numerous benefits, including real-time monitoring of production processes, increased process efficiency, improved decision-making, remote monitoring, collaborative diagnostics, and auto-configuration. Installing and maintaining this technology can be costly and requires extensive technical knowledge.

2.8 Open Source Software in CMS

Open-source software has many advantages for CMS, as it allows users to develop their custom solutions without having to pay for expensive cost. Additionally, open-source software allows users to collaborate to share ideas and develop better solutions for their applications. Finally, the open-source development model encourages the sharing of best practices and encourages the development of high-quality software. Following are the lists of the most used software.
(1)
OpenPLC is an open-source programmable logic controller (PLC) designed to be used in industrial control systems [4]. It is based on the IEC 61131-3 standard and supports multiple programming languages, including ladder logic, structured text, and C.
(2)
Node-RED is an open-source programming tool for wiring together hardware devices, APIs and online services in new and interesting ways [67]. It is designed to be used in industrial control systems and can be used to create flows that can be used to control and monitor machines.
(3)
OpenSCADA is an open-source software platform for Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) systems [118]. It is designed to be used in industrial control systems and provides data logging, alarm management, and remote monitoring features.
(4)
OpenCNC is an open-source software platform for controlling Computer Numerical Control (CNC) machines [168]. It is designed to be used in industrial control systems and provides tool path generation, machine monitoring, and machine control features.
(5)
OpenMTC is an open-source platform for machine-to-machine (M2M) communication [157]. It provides a framework for connecting devices and services and enables the development of distributed applications and services.
(6)
OpenIoT is an open-source platform for the Internet of Things (IoT) [136]. It provides a framework for connecting devices and services and enables the development of distributed applications and services.
(7)
OpenPnP is an open-source software project designed to control pick and place machines used in the manufacture of electronics [69]. It is designed to be modular, extensible and configurable, allowing users to tailor the software to their systems. It supports multiple camera configurations, automated fiducial recognition, and the ability to create custom machine profiles.
(8)
OpenSCAD is an open-source software used for creating 3D models for 3D printing and CNC manufacturing [68]. It is designed to be user-friendly and intuitive, making it easy for users to create designs. It supports multiple file formats, automated rendering, and a library of 3D shapes.
(9)
GRBL is an open-source software platform for controlling CNC machinery used in the manufacture of electronics [129]. It is designed to be user-friendly and intuitive, making it easy for users to control their machines. It supports multiple communication protocols, automated tool calibration and touch-off, and a library of G-code commands.
(10)
FreeEMS is an open-source embedded engine control system for cars and trucks [156]. It provides a platform for creating, debugging, and running custom applications for automotive control. It also has support for data logging, real-time tuning, and remote diagnostics.

3 Open Research Questions

Cyber manufacturing aims to develop and deploy advanced technologies that enable the development of intelligent, connected, and automated manufacturing systems [53, 64, 85, 98, 104, 141, 143, 153, 158]. As the field of cyber manufacturing continues to evolve, there are still some open research questions to be addressed [20, 43, 70, 77, 112, 148, 172]. This paper provides an overview of these open research questions.
The first open research question in the field of cyber manufacturing is the development of reliable and secure communication protocols for connected manufacturing systems. The need for secure and reliable communication protocols in manufacturing systems increases with the number of connected devices. As part of this research question, protocols must be developed to ensure data integrity and security while also providing a reliable and efficient means of communication between devices.
The development of intelligent control systems for automated manufacturing processes is another open research question within the field of cyber manufacturing. A critical component of automated manufacturing processes is the development of intelligent control systems able to accurately monitor and control the various components of the manufacturing process. Developing algorithms and systems for monitoring and controlling the various components of the manufacturing process is required for this research question.
The third open research question in the field of cyber manufacturing is the development of advanced sensing and monitoring technologies for manufacturing systems. The efficient and accurate operation of manufacturing systems requires advanced sensing and monitoring technologies. The development of technologies that can accurately measure and monitor the various components of the manufacturing process is necessary for the advancement of this research question.
Finally, the fourth open research question in the field of cyber manufacturing is the development of advanced analytics and decision-making systems for manufacturing systems. Manufacturing systems require advanced analytics and decision-making systems to operate efficiently and accurately. For this research question, algorithms and systems will have to be developed that can accurately analyze and interpret data generated by various manufacturing components. A survey of open research questions in the field of cyber manufacturing has been presented in this paper. The open research questions discussed in this paper include the development of reliable and secure communication protocols, developing intelligent control systems, developing advanced sensing and monitoring technologies, and developing advanced analytics and decision-making systems. These research questions are essential for the continued development of cyber manufacturing and the advancement of the field. Following are the lists of more specific questions with potential directions for future work.
Question 1: How can CMS be used to improve the efficiency of production processes? Manufacturing processes can be improved with CMS. By implementing these systems, manufacturing companies can reduce costs, increase productivity, and improve product quality. In addition to reducing waste, improving safety, and increasing the accuracy of production processes, CMS may be used to optimize production schedules and reduce downtime [172]. With the use of CMS, manufacturers can improve the efficiency of their production processes and gain a competitive advantage in the marketplace.
Question 2: What are the ethical implications of using CMS? It is a complex and far-reaching problem to utilize CMS. CMS are a computer-controlled system that automates production processes, such as 3D printing, robotics, and other automated processes. There are several benefits to using these systems, including increased efficiency, cost savings, and improved safety. However, there are also ethical implications to be considered. There is a potential for job loss associated with CMS as they become more advanced [43]. As these systems become more advanced, they may replace human labour, resulting in job losses. This can have a significant impact on workers and their families, and the local economy. In addition, CMS can be used for unethical purposes, such as manufacturing weapons or dangerous goods. Because of the use of CMS, data privacy and security concerns may also arise. These systems can be vulnerable to hacking and other malicious activities as they become more sophisticated because they can collect and store large amounts of data. Additionally, CMS may produce counterfeit goods, adversely affecting the economy and consumer confidence. Overall, the ethical implications of using CMS are complex and far-reaching. It is essential for companies to consider these implications when implementing these systems and to ensure that they are used responsibly and ethically.
Question 3: What are the legal implications of using CMS? The legal implications of using CMS are complex and far-reaching. Because of these systems, several advantages can be gained, including increased efficiency, cost savings, and enhanced product quality. However, several potential legal implications must also be considered. One of the primary legal implications of using CMS is the potential for intellectual property infringement. Using CMS, you may be able to produce products that are identical to or similar to existing products, which may violate copyright or patent rights [148]. Additionally, CMS can be used to produce counterfeit products, which could result in trademark infringement. Another legal implication of using CMS is liability. Product liability claims may result from using CMS to produce defective or dangerous products. Furthermore, CMS can be used to produce products that violate applicable laws and regulations, resulting in regulatory violations. Furthermore, CMS can produce products that do not comply with applicable labour laws, resulting in violations of labour laws. There may also be cases in which CMS are used to produce products that do not comply with applicable environmental laws, resulting in environmental law violations. In summary, the legal implications of using CMS are complex and far-reaching. Companies need to be aware of the potential for intellectual property infringement, liability, labour law violations, and environmental law violations when using these systems. Compliance with applicable laws and regulations should also be ensured by companies.
Question 4: How can machine learning technologies be leveraged to improve resource allocation and energy efficiency in cyber manufacturing? Machine learning technologies can be leveraged to improve resource allocation and energy efficiency in cyber manufacturing by utilizing predictive analytics to identify patterns in data and make decisions based on those patterns [20]. This can be used to optimize the use of resources and energy and identify potential problems and inefficiencies. For example, machine learning can identify the most efficient production processes, areas of waste, and areas where energy can be saved. Additionally, machine learning can be used to monitor and analyze energy usage in real-time, allowing for more efficient energy management. Finally, machine learning can identify potential improvement areas in the production process, allowing for more efficient resource allocation and energy efficiency.
Question 5: What methods and strategies can be used to optimize resource allocation and energy efficiency in cyber manufacturing? In cyber manufacturing, resource allocation and energy efficiency are important factors. By optimizing resource allocation and energy efficiency, costs can be reduced, productivity can be increased, and product quality can be improved [77]. Several methods and strategies can be employed to optimize resource allocation and energy efficiency. Predictive analytics can be used as a method of anticipating and planning for resource requirements. Using predictive analytics, we can identify trends in resource use and anticipate future needs. Utilizing automation and robotics to reduce manual labour and improve efficiency can help to ensure that resources are allocated efficiently and energy is used in the most efficient manner possible. It is important to use data-driven decision-making to optimize resource allocation and energy efficiency to reduce costs and improve efficiency. Making data-driven decisions can help identify areas where resources can be better utilized, and energy can be more efficiently utilized. As a result, resources can be allocated most efficiently, and energy can be utilized effectively. In summary, several methods and strategies can be used to optimize resource allocation and energy efficiency in cyber manufacturing. These methods include the use of predictive analytics, automation and robotics, and data-driven decision-making. Companies can reduce costs, increase productivity, and enhance product quality by using these methods.
Question 6: What are the economic implications of implementing energy efficiency measures in cyber manufacturing processes? Using energy efficiency measures in cyber manufacturing processes has significant economic implications. Companies can reduce their energy bills and save money by reducing energy consumption [112]. Energy efficiency measures can reduce energy costs, improve operational efficiency, and increase profits. Additionally, energy efficiency measures can reduce the amount of energy used in production processes, thus resultingin lower emissions and a more sustainable production process. By reducing downtime and increasing production speed, energy efficiency measures can help companies meet environmental regulations and reduce their impact on the environment. Finally, energy efficiency measures can improve operational efficiency. As a result, profits can be increased, and businesses can gain a competitive edge. In summary, the economic implications of implementing energy efficiency measures in cyber manufacturing processes are significant and can lead to cost savings, improved operational efficiency, and increased profits.
Question 7: What trends can be observed in the energy consumption of cyber manufacturing processes over time? The trend in energy consumption of cyber manufacturing processes over time is one of increasing efficiency [70]. As technology advances, the energy required to manufacture a given product is decreasing. This is a result of using more efficient processes, such as automation, robotics, and computer-aided design, which are more efficient. Moreover, renewable energy sources are becoming increasingly prevalent, further reducing the amount of energy required to manufacture products. Consequently, cyber manufacturing processes consume less energy over time, making them more cost-effective and sustainable.
Question 8: What are the security challenges associated with resource allocation and energy efficiency in cyber manufacturing? Cyber manufacturing poses numerous and varied security challenges related to resource allocation and energy efficiency. The process of cyber manufacturing involves automating and streamlining the manufacturing process with digital technologies. Cyber manufacturing can be used to reduce costs, increase efficiency, and improve product quality [143]. However, it also poses several security challenges. Among the most significant security challenges is resource allocation. Various resources are required for the implementation of cyber manufacturing, including computing power, storage, and network bandwidth. If these resources are not properly allocated, they can create inefficiencies and security vulnerabilities. For instance, misallocating resources to a specific task can lead to reducing performance or even a security breach. Another security challenge relates to cyber manufacturing is energy efficiency. It is important to note that cyber manufacturing requires a significant amount of energy to operate, and if it is not properly managed, it can result in higher energy costs and increasing security risks. Additionally, energy efficiency can be improved by utilizing renewable energy sources, such as solar and wind power, reducing the risk of security breaches as well. In addition, cyber manufacturing poses data security challenges. There is a potential for malicious actors to gain access to large amounts of data used in cyber manufacturing. To ensure the security of this data, manufacturers must implement robust security measures, such as encryption and authentication, to protect it from unauthorised access. As a result, two of the most important security challenges associated with cyber manufacturing are resource allocation and energy efficiency. To ensure the security of CMS, manufacturers must properly allocate resources and use renewable energy sources to reduce energy costs. Additionally, they must also implement robust security measures to protect data from malicious actors.
Question 9: What are the most suitable data-driven approaches to optimize energy efficiency in cyber manufacturing? The use of data to identify areas of inefficiency in cyber manufacturing and then implement changes to reduce energy consumption is an essential part of data-driven approaches to optimizing energy efficiency [53]. Various methods can be used to accomplish this, including predictive analytics, machine learning, and artificial intelligence. Predictive analytics is used to identify energy usage patterns and areas for energy conservation. An algorithm can be developed based on machine learning to detect and respond to changes in energy consumption. Additionally, data-driven approaches can monitor energy usage in real-time and identify inefficiencies by automating processes and optimizing energy efficiency. Artificial intelligence can also be utilized to automate processes and optimize energy efficiency. Overall, data-driven approaches can optimize energy efficiency in cyber-manufacturing by identifying areas of inefficiency and implementing changes to reduce energy consumption. These approaches can be used to monitor energy usage in real-time and develop algorithms to respond to changes in energy consumption. Additionally, artificial intelligence can automate processes and optimize energy efficiency.
Question 10: What are the potential benefits and drawbacks of using predictive analytics to achieve resource allocation optimization in cyber-manufacturing? Cyber manufacturing utilizes predictive analytics as a powerful tool for resource allocation optimization [85]. By identifying potential problems and anticipating them, predictive analytics allows for proactive decision-making and resource allocation, thereby reducing costs. However, some potential drawbacks exist to utilizing predictive analytics for resource allocation optimization. Data used for predictive analytics may need to be completed or is inaccurate, making it difficult to predict future demand accurately. Furthermore, predictive analytics can be costly to implement and maintain, and may only be suitable for some types of cyber manufacturing. Finally, predictive analytics can be vulnerable to cyber-attacks, which may result in data breaches and other security problems. As a whole, predictive analytics is an effective tool for optimizing resource allocation in cyber-manufacturing. However, it is essential to consider its potential benefits and drawbacks before implementing it.
Question 11: How can virtual simulations be used to optimize resource allocation and energy efficiency in cyber manufacturing? Virtual simulations can optimize resource allocation and energy efficiency in cyber manufacturing by providing a virtual environment to analyze and test different scenarios [98]. This allows manufacturers to identify and address potential issues before they become costly problems in the physical world. Manufacturers can identify the most efficient and cost-effective resource allocation and energy efficiency strategies by simulating different scenarios. Additionally, virtual simulations can identify and address potential safety and environmental risks associated with cyber manufacturing processes. This can help manufacturers ensure that their processes are safe and compliant with regulations. Finally, virtual simulations can identify and address potential bottlenecks in manufacturing, allowing manufacturers to optimize their production processes and reduce energy consumption. In summary, virtual simulations can optimize resource allocation and energy efficiency in cyber manufacturing by providing a virtual environment to analyze and test different scenarios. This can help manufacturers identify the most efficient and cost-effective strategies, identify and address potential safety and environmental risks, and identify and address potential bottlenecks in the manufacturing process.
Question 12: What are the most effective strategies to protect Cyber Manufacturing’s data and systems from cyberattacks? Cyber manufacturing should implement strong security measures such as firewalls, antivirus software, and encryption to protect its data and systems from cyberattacks [153].
(1)
Implementing strong security measures: Cyber manufacturing should take strong security measures to protect its data and systems from cyber-attacks.
(2)
Training employees: Cyber manufacturing should regularly train its employees on cybersecurity best practices and how to recognize and respond to potential cyber threats.
(3)
Update all software regularly: Cyber manufacturing should ensure that all software is regularly updated to the latest version to ensure that all security vulnerabilities are patched.
(4)
Monitor networks: Cyber manufacturing should monitor its networks for suspicious activity and take immediate action when a threat is detected. Regular backup of cyber manufacturing data ensures that data are lost because a cyberattack can be quickly recovered. Cyber manufacturing can protect its data and systems from cyberattacks by implementing these strategies.
Question 13: What are the potential benefits of utilizing cyber manufacturing service and scheduling in improving production process efficiency? To improve the efficiency of production processes, cyber manufacturing service and scheduling can be used. Throughout the production process, digital technologies are utilized to coordinate and automate the process, from the initial design of the product to its delivery [141]. In addition to reducing costs, improving quality, and increasing efficiency, this process begins with the design of the product using computer-aided design (CAD). By using this software, a 3D model of the product can be created, which can then be used to create a virtual prototype. Cyber-manufacturing service and scheduling can be used to automate the production process once the design has been completed. In this situation, the software is used to coordinate the various stages of the production process, including ordering materials, scheduling production, and managing inventory. This process can help to reduce costs by eliminating the requirement for manual labour and streamlining the production process. Besides reducing costs, cyber-manufacturing service and scheduling can also improve product quality. Automating the production process can help to ensure that the product meets the requirements and is produced promptly. It can also help to reduce the risk of errors and defects, as the production process is monitored and controlled by the software. Overall, cyber manufacturing service and scheduling can be used to improve the efficiency of production processes. It can help to reduce costs, improve quality, and streamline the production process.
Question 14: How can machine learning be used to improve the accuracy of cyber manufacturing service and scheduling? By utilizing predictive analytics to anticipate and respond to changes in the manufacturing environment, machine learning can be utilized to increase the accuracy of cyber manufacturing service and scheduling [158]. It is possible to do this by identifying patterns in data and then interpreting those patterns to make predictions about future events based on these patterns. As an example, machine learning can be used to predict the need for maintenance of a machine or the high demand for a particular product. This information can then optimize a schedule for services and resources, ensuring that the appropriate resources are available at the right time. Additionally, machine learning can be utilized to detect anomalies in data, such as unexpected changes in demand or unexpected production delays. To ensure that production remains on schedule, manufacturers can take corrective action when these anomalies are detected.
Question 15: What are the best practices for designing and implementing cyber manufacturing service and scheduling systems to be used to improve customer experience? It is recommended that cyber-manufacturing service and scheduling systems be designed and implemented to improve customer service: (1) It is essential to understand the customer’s needs and preferences to design a system that meets their needs and preferences [104]. Data on customer preferences, such as preferred delivery times, payment methods, and product features, are gathered as part of this process. (2) By utilizing automation and artificial intelligence, we can streamline the process of scheduling services and managing customer orders, thereby reducing errors and increasing customer satisfaction. To provide a positive customer experience, it is essential to establish a clear communication channel between the service provider and the customer. In addition, customers should be provided with timely updates and notifications regarding their orders. It is imperative to implement a secure service and scheduling system for cyber-manufacturing services to protect customer data. To identify areas for improvement, it is necessary to monitor and evaluate the performance of the system. This includes using secure authentication methods and encryption technologies. This includes tracking customer satisfaction and response times. By following these best practices, companies can design and implement cyber manufacturing service and scheduling systems that improve customer experience. These systems can help streamline the process of scheduling services and managing customer orders while also providing customers with a secure and reliable experience.
Question 16: How can cyber manufacturing service orchestration and scheduling be used to improve the scalability and accuracy of production processes? To increase the scalability and accuracy of production processes, cyber manufacturing service and scheduling can be employed. Several services, such as production planning, material handling, and quality assurance, are coordinated to ensure that production processes are efficient and accurate [64]. Production processes can be optimized to reduce costs and increase productivity by utilizing cyber-manufacturing service orchestration and scheduling. Additionally, it can help to reduce the risk of errors and delays in production. The main benefit of cyber manufacturing service orchestration and scheduling is that it allows for the automation of production processes. Automating the production process can reduce the manual labour and time necessary to complete the process. Additionally, it can ensure that the production process is accurate and efficient. A company can improve its scalability and reduce costs by automating its production processes. Overall, cyber manufacturing service and scheduling can be utilized to increase production efficiency and accuracy. By automating production processes, companies can reduce costs, increase their scalability, and reduce the likelihood of errors and delays.

3.1 Future Directions

As cyber manufacturing evolves, it becomes increasingly important to explore the most efficient ways to allocate resources, maximize energy efficiency, and improve the customer experience. Many of these tactics leverage cutting-edge technologies such as blockchain, natural language processing, augmented reality, artificial neural networks, and predictive analytics. Cyber-manufacturing technologies are capable of improving the security of data and systems, automating production processes, and optimizing resource allocation and energy efficiency. In addition, these technologies can improve the user experience by providing timely updates and notifications and leveraging secure authentication and encryption methods. With further exploration of these strategies, cyber manufacturing could become more efficient, secure, and cost-effective. Below are some open research problems in the CMS domain for future consideration:
(1)
Investigating the use of blockchain technology to improve the security of data and systems in cyber manufacturing.
(2)
Developing new algorithms to improve the accuracy and efficiency of resource allocation and energy efficiency in cyber manufacturing.
(3)
Exploring the use of natural language processing in cyber manufacturing service and scheduling to improve customer experience.
(4)
Examining the use of augmented reality for optimizing product design in cyber manufacturing.
(5)
Investigating the use of artificial neural networks for predictive analytics and optimization of cyber manufacturing processes.
(6)
Developing algorithms to improve the scalability and accuracy of cyber manufacturing processes.

4 Conclusion

The digital age has provided an opportunity to explore CMS in greater depth. In addition to improving processes, reducing costs, and increasing efficiency, CMS are a powerful tool that can assist organizations in reducing costs and improving their efficiency. Moreover, organizations can benefit from CMS by better managing their own resources, streamlining all production processes, and reducing their overall environmental impact. Thus organizations can benefit from implementing CMS and enhancing their operational efficiency with these systems. The importance of cybersecurity in CMS has been highlighted in this paper, which is crucial to its successful implementation. Furthermore, this study has demonstrated that CMS can enhance organizations’ competitiveness in digitalization. This paper also summarizes the current state of CMS and their potential applications and implications. It includes a taxonomy of the most common and current approaches to CMS and the various open-source software and datasets available. In addition, this paper identifies several important issues and research opportunities associated with CMS that can be further explored to improve the technology and its applications in the industry. This survey paper serves as an informative and valuable resource for anyone interested in understanding the potential impact of CMS on society and industry.

References

[1]
Usman Ahmed, Jerry Chun-Wei Lin, Gautam Srivastava, M. S. Mekala, and Ho-Youl Jung. 2022. Fuzzy active learning to detect OpenCL kernel heterogeneous machines in cyber physical systems. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems (2022).
[2]
Tejasvi Alladi, Vinay Chamola, and Sherali Zeadally. 2020. Industrial control systems: Cyberattack trends and countermeasures. Computer Communications 155 (2020), 1–8.
[3]
Naif Almakayeel, Salil Desai, Saleh Alghamdi, and Mohamed Rafik Noor Mohamed Qureshi. 2022. Smart agent system for cyber nano-manufacturing in industry 4.0. Applied Sciences 12, 12 (2022), 6143.
[4]
Thiago Rodrigues Alves, Mario Buratto, Flavio Mauricio De Souza, and Thelma Virginia Rodrigues. 2014. OpenPLC: An open source alternative to automation. In IEEE Global Humanitarian Technology Conference (GHTC 2014). IEEE, 585–589.
[5]
Ann-Louise Andersen, Jesper Kranker Larsen, Kjeld Nielsen, Thomas D. Brunoe, and Christopher Ketelsen. 2018. Exploring barriers toward the development of changeable and reconfigurable manufacturing systems for mass-customized products: An industrial survey. In Customization 4.0. Springer, 125–140.
[6]
Mihai Andronie, George Lăzăroiu, Roxana Ștefănescu, Cristian Uță, and Irina Dijmărescu. 2021. Sustainable, smart, and sensing technologies for cyber-physical manufacturing systems: A systematic literature review. Sustainability 13, 10 (2021), 5495.
[7]
Fazel Ansari, Philipp Hold, and Marjan Khobreh. 2020. A knowledge-based approach for representing jobholder profile toward optimal human–machine collaboration in cyber physical production systems. CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology 28 (2020), 87–106.
[8]
Muhammad Rizwan Asghar, Qinwen Hu, and Sherali Zeadally. 2019. Cybersecurity in industrial control systems: Issues, technologies, and challenges. Computer Networks 165 (2019), 106946.
[9]
Mohsen Attaran. 2021. The impact of 5G on the evolution of intelligent automation and industry digitization. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing (2021), 1–17.
[10]
Serkan Ayvaz and Koray Alpay. 2021. Predictive maintenance system for production lines in manufacturing: A machine learning approach using IoT data in real-time. Expert Systems with Applications 173 (2021), 114598.
[11]
Radu F. Babiceanu and Remzi Seker. 2016. Big data and virtualization for manufacturing cyber-physical systems: A survey of the current status and future outlook. Computers in Industry 81 (2016), 128–137.
[12]
Radu F. Babiceanu and Remzi Seker. 2019. Cyber resilience protection for industrial internet of things: A software-defined networking approach. Computers in Industry 104 (2019), 47–58.
[13]
Mujahid Mohiuddin Babu, Mahfuzur Rahman, Ashraful Alam, and Bidit Lal Dey. 2021. Exploring big data-driven innovation in the manufacturing sector: Evidence from UK firms. Annals of Operations Research (2021), 1–28.
[14]
Behrad Bagheri, Maryam Rezapoor, and Jay Lee. 2020. A unified data security framework for federated prognostics and health management in smart manufacturing. Manufacturing Letters 24 (2020), 136–139.
[15]
Ali Balador, Nielas Ericsson, and Zeinab Bakhshi. 2017. Communication middleware technologies for industrial distributed control systems: A literature review. In 2017 22nd IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (ETFA). IEEE, 1–6.
[16]
Mahmoud Barhamgi, Michael N. Huhns, Charith Perera, and Pinar Yolum (Eds). 2021. Introduction to the special section on human-centered security, privacy, and trust in the internet of things. ACM Transactions on Internet Technology (TOIT). 21, 1 (2021), 1–3.
[17]
Till Becker and Hendrik Stern. 2016. Future trends in human work area design for cyber-physical production systems. Procedia CIRP 57 (2016), 404–409.
[18]
Ronal Bejarano, Borja Ramis Ferrer, Wael M. Mohammed, and Jose L. Martinez Lastra. 2019. Implementing a human-robot collaborative assembly workstation. In 2019 IEEE 17th International Conference on Industrial Informatics (INDIN), Vol. 1. IEEE, 557–564.
[19]
Deval Bhamare, Maede Zolanvari, Aiman Erbad, Raj Jain, Khaled Khan, and Nader Meskin. 2020. Cybersecurity for industrial control systems: A survey. Computers & Security 89 (2020), 101677.
[20]
Ron Bitton, Nadav Maman, Inderjeet Singh, Satoru Momiyama, Yuval Elovici, and Asaf Shabtai. 2023. Evaluating the cybersecurity risk of real-world, machine learning production systems. Comput. Surveys 55, 9 (2023), 1–36.
[21]
Christian Block, Dominik Lins, and Bernd Kuhlenkötter. 2018. Approach for a simulation-based and event-driven production planning and control in decentralized manufacturing execution systems. Procedia CIRP 72 (2018), 1351–1356.
[22]
Umesh Bodkhe, Dhyey Mehta, Sudeep Tanwar, Pronaya Bhattacharya, Pradeep Kumar Singh, and Wei-Chiang Hong. 2020. A survey on decentralized consensus mechanisms for cyber physical systems. IEEE Access 8 (2020), 54371–54401.
[23]
Julien Boisclair, Pierre-Luc Richard, Thierry Laliberte, and Clement Gosselin. 2016. Gravity compensation of robotic manipulators using cylindrical Halbach arrays. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics 22, 1 (2016), 457–464.
[24]
Didem Gürdür Broo, Ulf Boman, and Martin Törngren. 2021. Cyber-physical systems research and education in 2030: Scenarios and strategies. Journal of Industrial Information Integration 21 (2021), 100192.
[25]
Alberto Charro and Dirk Schaefer. 2018. Cloud manufacturing as a new type of product-service system. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing 31, 10 (2018), 1018–1033.
[26]
Ayan Chatterjee and Bestoun S. Ahmed. 2022. IoT anomaly detection methods and applications: A survey. Internet of Things 19 (2022), 100568.
[27]
Toly Chen, Yi-Chi Wang, and Zhirong Lin. 2017. Predictive distant operation and virtual control of computer numerical control machines. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 28, 5 (2017), 1061–1077.
[28]
Xiaoyu Chen, Lening Wang, Canran Wang, and Ran Jin. 2018. Predictive offloading in mobile-fog-cloud enabled cyber-manufacturing systems. In 2018 IEEE Industrial Cyber-Physical Systems (ICPS). IEEE, 167–172.
[29]
Yu-Qiang Chen, Biao Zhou, Mingming Zhang, and Chien-Ming Chen. 2020. Using IoT technology for computer-integrated manufacturing systems in the semiconductor industry. Applied Soft Computing 89 (2020), 106065.
[30]
Yulia Cherdantseva and Jeremy Hilton. 2015. Information security and information assurance: Discussion about the meaning, scope, and goals. In Standards and Standardization: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications. IGI Global, 1204–1235.
[31]
Parames Chutima. 2022. A comprehensive review of robotic assembly line balancing problem. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 33, 1 (2022), 1–34.
[32]
Yuval Cohen, Maurizio Faccio, Francesco Pilati, and Xifan Yao. 2019. Design and management of digital manufacturing and assembly systems in the industry 4.0 era. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 105, 9 (2019), 3565–3577.
[33]
Jacqueline M. Cole. 2020. A design-to-device pipeline for data-driven materials discovery. Accounts of Chemical Research 53, 3 (2020), 599–610.
[34]
Angelo Corallo, Mariangela Lazoi, and Marianna Lezzi. 2020. Cybersecurity in the context of industry 4.0: A structured classification of critical assets and business impacts. Computers in Industry 114 (2020), 103165.
[35]
Angelo Corallo, Mariangela Lazoi, Marianna Lezzi, and Angela Luperto. 2022. Cybersecurity awareness in the context of the industrial internet of things: A systematic literature review. Computers in Industry 137 (2022), 103614.
[36]
Yesheng Cui, Sami Kara, and Ka C. Chan. 2020. Manufacturing big data ecosystem: A systematic literature review. Robotics and Computer-integrated Manufacturing 62 (2020), 101861.
[37]
Giovanna Culot, Guido Nassimbeni, Guido Orzes, and Marco Sartor. 2020. Behind the definition of industry 4.0: Analysis and open questions. International Journal of Production Economics 226 (2020), 107617.
[38]
L. B. P. da Silva, R. Soltovski, J. Pontes, F. T. Treinta, Paulo Leitão, E. Mosconi, L. M. M. de Resende, and R. T. Yoshino. 2022. Human resources management 4.0: Literature review and trends. Computers & Industrial Engineering (2022), 108111.
[39]
Jovani Dalzochio, Rafael Kunst, Edison Pignaton, Alecio Binotto, Srijnan Sanyal, Jose Favilla, and Jorge Barbosa. 2020. Machine learning and reasoning for predictive maintenance in industry 4.0: Current status and challenges. Computers in Industry 123 (2020), 103298.
[40]
Kathrin Dörfler, Gido Dielemans, Lukas Lachmayer, Tobias Recker, Annika Raatz, Dirk Lowke, and Markus Gerke. 2022. Additive manufacturing using mobile robots: Opportunities and challenges for building construction. Cement and Concrete Research 158 (2022), 106772.
[41]
Pavol Durana, Neil Perkins, and Katarina Valaskova. 2021. Artificial intelligence data-driven internet of things systems, real-time advanced analytics, and cyber-physical production networks in sustainable smart manufacturing. Economics, Management, and Financial Markets 16, 1 (2021), 20–31.
[42]
Martin Eling, Davide Nuessle, and Julian Staubli. 2022. The impact of artificial intelligence along the insurance value chain and on the insurability of risks. The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance-Issues and Practice 47, 2 (2022), 205–241.
[43]
Jose A. Espinoza, Thomas A. O’Neill, and Magda B. L. Donia. 2023. Big five factor and facet personality determinants of conflict management styles. Personality and Individual Differences 203 (2023), 112029.
[44]
Yixiong Feng, Yuliang Zhao, Hao Zheng, Zhiwu Li, and Jianrong Tan. 2020. Data-driven product design toward intelligent manufacturing: A review. International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems 17, 2 (2020), 1729881420911257.
[45]
Oliver J. Fisher, Nicholas J. Watson, Josep E. Escrig, Rob Witt, Laura Porcu, Darren Bacon, Martin Rigley, and Rachel L. Gomes. 2020. Considerations, challenges and opportunities when developing data-driven models for process manufacturing systems. Computers & Chemical Engineering 140 (2020), 106881.
[46]
Xiuwen Fu, Pasquale Pace, Gianluca Aloi, Antonio Guerrieri, Wenfeng Li, and Giancarlo Fortino. 2023. Tolerance analysis of cyber-manufacturing systems to cascading failures. ACM Transactions on Internet Technology (2023).
[47]
Juan F. Galvez, Juan C. Mejuto, and Jesus Simal-Gandara. 2018. Future challenges on the use of blockchain for food traceability analysis. TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry 107 (2018), 222–232.
[48]
Béla Genge, Flavius Graur, and Piroska Haller. 2015. Experimental assessment of network design approaches for protecting industrial control systems. International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection 11 (2015), 24–38.
[49]
Abhishek Gupta, Alagan Anpalagan, Ling Guan, and Ahmed Shaharyar Khwaja. 2021. Deep learning for object detection and scene perception in self-driving cars: Survey, challenges, and open issues. Array 10 (2021), 100057.
[50]
Suada Hadzovic, Sasa Mrdovic, and Milutin Radonjic. 2023. A path towards an internet of things and artificial intelligence regulatory framework. IEEE Communications Magazine (2023).
[51]
Markus Haeffner and Kriengsak Panuwatwanich. 2017. Perceived impacts of industry 4.0 on manufacturing industry and its Workforce: Case of Germany. In International Conference on Engineering, Project, and Product Management. Springer, 199–208.
[52]
Jesko Hermann, Pascal Rübel, Max Birtel, Florian Mohr, Achim Wagner, and Martin Ruskowski. 2019. Self-description of cyber-physical production modules for a product-driven manufacturing system. Procedia Manufacturing 38 (2019), 291–298.
[53]
Ziqi Huang, Marcel Fey, Chao Liu, Ege Beysel, Xun Xu, and Christian Brecher. 2023. Hybrid learning-based digital twin for manufacturing process: Modeling framework and implementation. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing 82 (2023), 102545.
[54]
Abdulmalik Humayed, Jingqiang Lin, Fengjun Li, and Bo Luo. 2017. Cyber-physical systems security—A survey. IEEE Internet of Things Journal 4, 6 (2017), 1802–1831.
[55]
Jordi Inglada, Arthur Vincent, Marcela Arias, Benjamin Tardy, David Morin, and Isabel Rodes. 2017. Operational high resolution land cover map production at the country scale using satellite image time series. Remote Sensing 9, 1 (2017), 95.
[56]
Naeem Iqbal, Anam-Nawaz Khan, Atif Rizwan, Faiza Qayyum, Sehrish Malik, Rashid Ahmad, Do-Hyeun Kim, et al. 2022. Enhanced time-constraint aware tasks scheduling mechanism based on predictive optimization for efficient load balancing in smart manufacturing. Journal of Manufacturing Systems 64 (2022), 19–39.
[57]
Amir Namavar Jahromi, Hadis Karimipour, and Ali Dehghantanha. 2023. An ensemble deep federated learning cyber-threat hunting model for industrial internet of things. Computer Communications 198 (2023), 108–116.
[58]
Anketa Jandyal, Ikshita Chaturvedi, Ishika Wazir, Ankush Raina, and Mir Irfan Ul Haq. 2022. 3D printing–A review of processes, materials and applications in industry 4.0. Sustainable Operations and Computers 3 (2022), 33–42.
[59]
Sabina Jeschke, Christian Brecher, Tobias Meisen, Denis Özdemir, and Tim Eschert. 2017. Industrial internet of things and cyber manufacturing systems. In Industrial Internet of Things. Springer, 3–19.
[60]
Haifan Jiang, Shengfeng Qin, Jianlin Fu, Jian Zhang, and Guofu Ding. 2021. How to model and implement connections between physical and virtual models for digital twin application. Journal of Manufacturing Systems 58 (2021), 36–51.
[61]
ElMouatez Billah Karbab and Mourad Debbabi. 2019. MalDy: Portable, data-driven malware detection using natural language processing and machine learning techniques on behavioral analysis reports. Digital Investigation 28 (2019), S77–S87.
[62]
Niharika Karnik, Urvi Bora, Karan Bhadri, Prasanna Kadambi, and Pankaj Dhatrak. 2022. A comprehensive study on current and future trends towards the characteristics and enablers of industry 4.0. Journal of Industrial Information Integration 27 (2022), 100294.
[63]
Hakan Kayan, Matthew Nunes, Omer Rana, Pete Burnap, and Charith Perera. 2022. Cybersecurity of industrial cyber-physical systems: A review. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR) 54, 11s (2022), 1–35.
[64]
Wazir Zada Khan, M. H. Rehman, Hussein Mohammed Zangoti, Muhammad Khalil Afzal, Nasrullah Armi, and Khaled Salah. 2020. Industrial internet of things: Recent advances, enabling technologies and open challenges. Computers & Electrical Engineering 81 (2020), 106522.
[65]
Mahyar Khorasani, Jennifer Loy, Amir Hossein Ghasemi, Elmira Sharabian, Martin Leary, Hamed Mirafzal, Peter Cochrane, Bernard Rolfe, and Ian Gibson. 2022. A review of industry 4.0 and additive manufacturing synergy. Rapid Prototyping Journalahead-of-print (2022).
[66]
Halim Khujamatov, Ernazar Reypnazarov, Doston Khasanov, and Nurshod Akhmedov. 2021. IoT, IIoT, and cyber-physical systems integration. In Emergence of Cyber Physical System and IoT in Smart Automation and Robotics. Springer, 31–50.
[67]
Myungsoo Kim, Jaehyeong Lee, and Jongpil Jeong. 2019. Open source based industrial IoT platforms for smart factory: Concept, comparison and challenges. In International Conference on Computational Science and Its Applications. Springer, 105–120.
[68]
Marius Kintel and Clifford Wolf. 2014. OpenSCAD. GNU General Public License, p GNU General Public License (2014).
[69]
Heiko Koziolek, Andreas Burger, Marie Platenius-Mohr, Julius Rückert, and Gösta Stomberg. 2019. OpenPnP: A plug-and-produce architecture for the industrial internet of things. In 2019 IEEE/ACM 41st International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering in Practice (ICSE-SEIP). IEEE, 131–140.
[70]
Kacper Kubiak, Grzegorz Dec, and Dorota Stadnicka. 2022. Possible applications of edge computing in the manufacturing industry—systematic literature review. Sensors 22, 7 (2022), 2445.
[71]
Indrajeet Kumar, Jyoti Rawat, Noor Mohd, and Shahnawaz Husain. 2021. Opportunities of artificial intelligence and machine learning in the food industry. Journal of Food Quality 2021 (2021).
[72]
Naveen Kumar and Seul Chan Lee. 2022. Human-machine interface in smart factory: A systematic literature review. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 174 (2022), 121284.
[73]
María Pilar Lambán, Paula Morella, Jesús Royo, and Juan Carlos Sánchez. 2022. Using industry 4.0 to face the challenges of predictive maintenance: A key performance indicators development in a cyber physical system. Computers & Industrial Engineering 171 (2022), 108400.
[74]
Jay Lee, Moslem Azamfar, and Jaskaran Singh. 2019. A blockchain enabled Cyber-Physical System architecture for industry 4.0 manufacturing systems. Manufacturing Letters 20 (2019), 34–39.
[75]
Jay Lee, Behrad Bagheri, and Chao Jin. 2016. Introduction to cyber manufacturing. Manufacturing Letters 8 (2016), 11–15.
[76]
Jay Lee, Hossein Davari, Jaskaran Singh, and Vibhor Pandhare. 2018. Industrial artificial intelligence for industry 4.0-based manufacturing systems. Manufacturing Letters 18 (2018), 20–23.
[77]
Jay Lee, Shahin Siahpour, Xiaodong Jia, and Patrick Brown. 2022. Introduction to resilient manufacturing systems. Manufacturing Letters 32 (2022), 24–27.
[78]
Jiewu Leng, Ziying Chen, Weinan Sha, Zisheng Lin, Jun Lin, and Qiang Liu. 2022. Digital twins-based flexible operating of open architecture production line for individualized manufacturing. Advanced Engineering Informatics 53 (2022), 101676.
[79]
Jiewu Leng, Dewen Wang, Weiming Shen, Xinyu Li, Qiang Liu, and Xin Chen. 2021. Digital twins-based smart manufacturing system design in industry 4.0: A review. Journal of Manufacturing Systems 60 (2021), 119–137.
[80]
Vuk Lesi, Zivana Jakovljevic, and Miroslav Pajic. 2022. IoT-enabled motion control: Architectural design challenges and solutions. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics (2022).
[81]
Shufei Li, Ruobing Wang, Pai Zheng, and Lihui Wang. 2021. Towards proactive human–robot collaboration: A foreseeable cognitive manufacturing paradigm. Journal of Manufacturing Systems 60 (2021), 547–552.
[82]
Xiaoming Li, Hao Liu, Weixi Wang, Ye Zheng, Haibin Lv, and Zhihan Lv. 2022. Big data analysis of the internet of things in the digital twins of smart city based on deep learning. Future Generation Computer Systems 128 (2022), 167–177.
[83]
Yongxin Liao, Eduardo de Freitas Rocha Loures, and Fernando Deschamps. 2018. Industrial Internet of Things: A systematic literature review and insights. IEEE Internet of Things Journal 5, 6 (2018), 4515–4525.
[84]
Shimin Liu, Yuqian Lu, Jie Li, Xingwang Shen, Xuemin Sun, and Jinsong Bao. 2023. A blockchain-based interactive approach between digital twin-based manufacturing systems. Computers & Industrial Engineering 175 (2023), 108827.
[85]
Yuehua Liu, Wenjin Yu, Wenny Rahayu, and Tharam Dillon. 2023. An evaluative study on IoT ecosystem for smart predictive maintenance (IoT-SPM) in manufacturing: Multi-view requirements and data quality. IEEE Internet of Things Journal (2023).
[86]
Zhiyuan Liu, Dandan Zhao, Pei Wang, Ming Yan, Can Yang, Zhangwei Chen, Jian Lu, and Zhaoping Lu. 2022. Additive manufacturing of metals: Microstructure evolution and multistage control. Journal of Materials Science & Technology 100 (2022), 224–236.
[87]
Yuqian Lu and Muhammad Rizwan Asghar. 2020. Semantic communications between distributed cyber-physical systems towards collaborative automation for smart manufacturing. Journal of Manufacturing Systems 55 (2020), 348–359.
[88]
Hugo Daniel Macedo, Claudio Sassanelli, Peter Gorm Larsen, and Sergio Terzi. 2021. Facilitating model-based design of cyber-manufacturing systems. Procedia CIRP 104 (2021), 1936–1941.
[89]
Hermann Meissner and Jan C. Aurich. 2019. Implications of cyber-physical production systems on integrated process planning and scheduling. Procedia Manufacturing 28 (2019), 167–173.
[90]
Qizhi Meng, Fugui Xie, and Xin-Jun Liu. 2018. Conceptual design and kinematic analysis of a novel parallel robot for high-speed pick-and-place operations. Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering 13, 2 (2018), 211–224.
[91]
Paloma Merello, Antonio Barberá, and Elena De la Poza. 2022. Is the sustainability profile of FinTech companies a key driver of their value? Technological Forecasting and Social Change 174 (2022), 121290.
[92]
Ishan Mistry, Sudeep Tanwar, Sudhanshu Tyagi, and Neeraj Kumar. 2020. Blockchain for 5G-enabled IoT for industrial automation: A systematic review, solutions, and challenges. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 135 (2020), 106382.
[93]
Jozef Mocnej, Adrian Pekar, Winston K. G. Seah, Peter Papcun, Erik Kajati, Dominika Cupkova, Jiri Koziorek, and Iveta Zolotova. 2021. Quality-enabled decentralized IoT architecture with efficient resources utilization. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing 67 (2021), 102001.
[94]
Elias Molina and Eduardo Jacob. 2018. Software-defined networking in cyber-physical systems: A survey. Computers & Electrical Engineering 66 (2018), 407–419.
[95]
Paula Morella, María Pilar Lambán, Jesús Royo, Juan Carlos Sánchez, and Lisbeth del Carmen Ng Corrales. 2020. Development of a new green indicator and its implementation in a cyber–physical system for a green supply chain. Sustainability 12, 20 (2020), 8629.
[96]
Paula Morella, María Pilar Lambán, Jesús Antonio Royo, and Juan Carlos Sánchez. 2021. The importance of implementing cyber physical systems to acquire real-time data and indicators. J — Multidisciplinary Scientific Journal 4, 2 (2021), 147–153.
[97]
Jeff Morgan, Mark Halton, Yuansong Qiao, and John G. Breslin. 2021. Industry 4.0 smart reconfigurable manufacturing machines. Journal of Manufacturing Systems 59 (2021), 481–506.
[98]
Kubura Motalo, Lolade Nojeem, Vivian Lotisa, Mike Embouma, and Ibrina Browndi. 2023. Evaluating artificial intelligence effects on additive manufacturing by machine learning procedure. Journal of Basis Applied Science and Management System 13, 2023 (2023), 3196–3205.
[99]
Debasmita Mukherjee, Kashish Gupta, Li Hsin Chang, and Homayoun Najjaran. 2022. A survey of robot learning strategies for human-robot collaboration in industrial settings. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing 73 (2022), 102231.
[100]
Sathyan Munirathinam. 2020. Industry 4.0: Industrial internet of things (IIOT). In Advances in Computers. Vol. 117. Elsevier, 129–164.
[101]
Judit Nagy, Judit Oláh, Edina Erdei, Domicián Máté, and József Popp. 2018. The role and impact of Industry 4.0 and the internet of things on the business strategy of the value chain—the case of Hungary. Sustainability 10, 10 (2018), 3491.
[102]
Garima Nain, K. K. Pattanaik, and G. K. Sharma. 2022. Towards edge computing in intelligent manufacturing: Past, present and future. Journal of Manufacturing Systems 62 (2022), 588–611.
[103]
István Németh, János Püspöki, Andor Bálint Viharos, Levente Zsóka, and Benjámin Pirka. 2019. Layout configuration, maintenance planning and simulation of AGV based robotic assembly systems. IFAC-PapersOnLine 52, 13 (2019), 1626–1631.
[104]
Qingwei Nie, Dunbing Tang, Changchun Liu, Liping Wang, and Jiaye Song. 2023. A multi-agent and cloud-edge orchestration framework of digital twin for distributed production control. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing 82 (2023), 102543.
[105]
Nikolaos Nikolakis, Richard Senington, Konstantinos Sipsas, Anna Syberfeldt, and Sotiris Makris. 2020. On a containerized approach for the dynamic planning and control of a cyber-physical production system. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing 64 (2020), 101919.
[106]
Christine Ikram Noshi, Marco Risk Eissa, and Ramez Maher Abdalla. 2019. An intelligent data driven approach for production prediction. In Offshore Technology Conference. OnePetro.
[107]
Nnamdi Johnson Ogbuke, Yahaya Y. Yusuf, Kovvuri Dharma, and Burcu A. Mercangoz. 2022. Big data supply chain analytics: Ethical, privacy and security challenges posed to business, industries and society. Production Planning & Control 33, 2-3 (2022), 123–137.
[108]
Ercan Oztemel and Samet Gursev. 2020. Literature review of Industry 4.0 and related technologies. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 31, 1 (2020), 127–182.
[109]
Peter O’Donovan, Kevin Leahy, Ken Bruton, and Dominic T. J. O’Sullivan. 2015. An industrial big data pipeline for data-driven analytics maintenance applications in large-scale smart manufacturing facilities. Journal of Big Data 2, 1 (2015), 1–26.
[110]
Sharnil Pandya, Gautam Srivastava, Rutvij Jhaveri, M. Rajasekhara Babu, Sweta Bhattacharya, Praveen Kumar Reddy Maddikunta, Spyridon Mastorakis, Md. Jalil Piran, and Thippa Reddy Gadekallu. 2023. Federated learning for smart cities: A comprehensive survey. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments 55 (2023), 102987.
[111]
Hervé Panetto, Benoit Iung, Dmitry Ivanov, Georg Weichhart, and Xiaofan Wang. 2019. Challenges for the cyber-physical manufacturing enterprises of the future. Annual Reviews in Control 47 (2019), 200–213.
[112]
Shreyanshu Parhi, Manoj Govind Kharat, Mukesh Govind Kharat, Sharad Chandra Srivastava, and Anju Singh. 2022. Industrial Internet of Things (IoT) and cyber manufacturing systems: Industry 4.0 implementation and impact on business strategy and value chain. In ICT and Data Sciences. CRC Press, 73–100.
[113]
Mahmoud Parto, Pedro Daniel Urbina Coronado, Christopher Saldana, and Thomas Kurfess. 2022. Cyber-physical system implementation for manufacturing with analytics in the cloud layer. Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering 22, 1 (2022).
[114]
Cong Peng, Jianhua Chen, Pandi Vijayakumar, Neeraj Kumar, and Debiao He. 2021. Efficient distributed decryption scheme for IoT gateway-based applications. ACM Transactions on Internet Technology (TOIT) 21, 1 (2021), 1–23.
[115]
Ana C. Pereira and Fernando Romero. 2017. A review of the meanings and the implications of the Industry 4.0 concept. Procedia Manufacturing 13 (2017), 1206–1214.
[116]
Luis Pérez, Silvia Rodríguez-Jiménez, Nuria Rodríguez, Rubén Usamentiaga, Daniel F. García, and Lihui Wang. 2020. Symbiotic human–robot collaborative approach for increased productivity and enhanced safety in the aerospace manufacturing industry. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 106, 3 (2020), 851–863.
[117]
Catherine Prentice, Sergio Dominique Lopes, and Xuequn Wang. 2020. Emotional intelligence or artificial intelligence–an employee perspective. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management 29, 4 (2020), 377–403.
[118]
Andrey S. Prokhorov, Maksim A. Chudinov, and Sergei E. Bondarev. 2018. Control systems software implementation using open source SCADA-system OpenSCADA. In 2018 IEEE Conference of Russian Young Researchers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering (EIConRus). IEEE, 220–222.
[119]
Miriam Punzi, Nicolas Ladeveze, Huyen Nguyen, and Brian Ravenet. 2022. ImCasting: Nonverbal behaviour reinforcement learning of virtual humans through adaptive immersive game. In 27th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces. 62–65.
[120]
Y. J. Qu, X. G. Ming, Z. W. Liu, X. Y. Zhang, and Z. T. Hou. 2019. Smart manufacturing systems: State of the art and future trends. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 103, 9 (2019), 3751–3768.
[121]
Alok Raj, Gourav Dwivedi, Ankit Sharma, Ana Beatriz Lopes de Sousa Jabbour, and Sonu Rajak. 2020. Barriers to the adoption of industry 4.0 technologies in the manufacturing sector: An inter-country comparative perspective. International Journal of Production Economics 224 (2020), 107546.
[122]
Rômulo Marcos Lardosa Rebelo, Susana Carla Farias Pereira, and Maciel M. Queiroz. 2021. The interplay between the internet of things and supply chain management: Challenges and opportunities based on a systematic literature review. Benchmarking: An International Journal (2021).
[123]
Elisabeth B. Reynolds and Yilmaz Uygun. 2018. Strengthening advanced manufacturing innovation ecosystems: The case of Massachusetts. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 136 (2018), 178–191.
[124]
Peter Rost, Markus Breitbach, Hendrik Roreger, Bilgehan Erman, Christian Mannweiler, Ray Miller, and Ingo Viering. 2018. Customized industrial networks: Network slicing trial at Hamburg seaport. IEEE Wireless Communications 25, 5 (2018), 48–55.
[125]
Pavel Rousek. 2020. Evaluation of the EU policy concerning the basic economic functions of a modern government in a mixed economy. In SHS Web of Conferences, Vol. 73. EDP Sciences, 01024.
[126]
Zuzana Rowland, Jaromír Vrbka, and Marek Vochozka. 2020. Machine learning forecasting of USA and PRC balance of trade in context of mutual sanctions. In SHS Web of Conferences, Vol. 73. EDP Sciences, 01025.
[127]
Sami Sader, Istvan Husti, and Miklos Daroczi. 2022. A review of quality 4.0: Definitions, features, technologies, applications, and challenges. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence 33, 9-10 (2022), 1164–1182.
[128]
Miranda Salvatore, Riemma Stefano, et al. 2021. Smart operators: How industry 4.0 is affecting the worker’s performance in manufacturing contexts. Procedia Computer Science 180 (2021), 958–967.
[129]
Sakib Shaukat Sarguroh and Arun Bhiva Rane. 2018. Using GRBL-Arduino-based controller to run a two-axis computerized numerical control machine. In 2018 International Conference on Smart City and Emerging Technology (ICSCET). IEEE, 1–6.
[130]
Benjamin Schellinger, Fabiane Völter, Nils Urbach, and Johannes Sedlmeir. 2022. Yes, I do: Marrying blockchain applications with GDPR. e-government 19 (2022), 22.
[131]
Giuseppe Settanni, Florian Skopik, Anjeza Karaj, Markus Wurzenberger, and Roman Fiedler. 2018. Protecting cyber physical production systems using anomaly detection to enable self-adaptation. In 2018 IEEE Industrial Cyber-Physical Systems (ICPS). IEEE, 173–180.
[132]
Abdulrazak F. Shahatha Al-Mashhadani, Muhammad Imran Qureshi, Sanil S. Hishan, Mohd Shamsuri Md. Saad, Yamunah Vaicondam, and Nohman Khan. 2021. Towards the development of digital manufacturing ecosystems for sustainable performance: Learning from the past two decades of research. Energies 14, 10 (2021), 2945.
[133]
Parjanay Sharma, Siddhant Jain, Shashank Gupta, and Vinay Chamola. 2021. Role of machine learning and deep learning in securing 5G-driven industrial IoT applications. Ad Hoc Networks 123 (2021), 102685.
[134]
Lei Shi, Shanti Krishnan, and Sheng Wen. 2022. Study cybersecurity of cyber physical system in the virtual environment: A survey and new direction. In Australasian Computer Science Week 2022. 46–55.
[135]
Gaurav Singal, Vijay Laxmi, Manoj Singh Gaur, D. Vijay Rao, Riti Kushwaha, Deepak Garg, and Neeraj Kumar. 2021. QoS–aware mesh-based multicast routing protocols in edge ad hoc networks: Concepts and challenges. ACM Transactions on Internet Technology (TOIT) 22, 1 (2021), 1–27.
[136]
John Soldatos, Nikos Kefalakis, Manfred Hauswirth, Martin Serrano, Jean-Paul Calbimonte, Mehdi Riahi, Karl Aberer, Prem Prakash Jayaraman, Arkady Zaslavsky, Ivana Podnar Žarko, et al. 2015. OpenIoT: Open source internet-of-things in the cloud. In Interoperability and Open-source Solutions for the Internet of Things. Springer, 13–25.
[137]
Jinwoo Song and Young B. Moon. 2019. A secure Cyber-Manufacturing System augmented by the Blockchain. In ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, Vol. 59384. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, V02BT02A003.
[138]
Mehdi Sookhak, Helen Tang, Ying He, and F. Richard Yu. 2018. Security and privacy of smart cities: A survey, research issues and challenges. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials 21, 2 (2018), 1718–1743.
[139]
Timothy Sprock, Michael Sharp, William Z. Bernstein, Michael P. Brundage, Moneer Helu, and Thomas Hedberg. 2019. Integrated operations management for distributed manufacturing. IFAC-PapersOnLine 52, 13 (2019), 1820–1824.
[140]
Jangirala Srinivas, Ashok Kumar Das, and Neeraj Kumar. 2019. Government regulations in cyber security: Framework, standards and recommendations. Future Generation Computer Systems 92 (2019), 178–188.
[141]
Panagiotis Stavropoulos, Alexios Papacharalampopoulos, Kyriakos Sabatakakis, and Dimitris Mourtzis. 2023. Metamodelling of manufacturing processes and automation workflows towards designing and operating digital twins. Applied Sciences 13, 3 (2023), 1945.
[142]
Hendrik Stern and Till Becker. 2017. Development of a model for the integration of human factors in cyber-physical production systems. Procedia Manufacturing 9 (2017), 151–158.
[143]
S. M. Nahian Al Sunny, Xiaoqing “Frank” Liu, and Md. Rakib Shahriar. 2023. Development of machine tool communication method and its edge middleware for cyber-physical manufacturing systems. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing (2023), 1–22.
[144]
Manu Suvarna, Ken Shaun Yap, Wentao Yang, Jun Li, Yen Ting Ng, and Xiaonan Wang. 2021. Cyber–physical production systems for data-driven, decentralized, and secure manufacturing—a perspective. Engineering 7, 9 (2021), 1212–1223.
[145]
Fei Tao, Qinglin Qi, Ang Liu, and Andrew Kusiak. 2018. Data-driven smart manufacturing. Journal of Manufacturing Systems 48 (2018), 157–169.
[146]
Fei Tao, Qinglin Qi, Lihui Wang, and A. Y. C. Nee. 2019. Digital twins and cyber–physical systems toward smart manufacturing and industry 4.0: Correlation and comparison. Engineering 5, 4 (2019), 653–661.
[147]
Seppe Terryn, Joost Brancart, Dirk Lefeber, Guy Van Assche, and Bram Vanderborght. 2017. Self-healing soft pneumatic robots. Science Robotics 2, 9 (2017), eaan4268.
[148]
Damien Trentesaux, Emmanuel Caillaud, and Raphaël Rault. 2022. A framework fostering the consideration of ethics during the design of industrial cyber-physical systems. In Service Oriented, Holonic and Multi-agent Manufacturing Systems for Industry of the Future: Proceedings of SOHOMA 2021. Springer, 349–362.
[149]
Caryl Tuffnell, Pavol Kral, Anna Siekelova, and Jakub Horak. 2019. Cyber-physical smart manufacturing systems: Sustainable industrial networks, cognitive automation, and data-centric business models. Economics, Management and Financial Markets 14, 2 (2019), 58–63.
[150]
Ihsan Ullah, Umair Ul Hassan, and Muhammad Intizar Ali. 2023. Multi-level federated learning for industry 4.0-A crowdsourcing approach. Procedia Computer Science 217 (2023), 423–435.
[151]
Muhammad Habib ur Rehman, Ibrar Yaqoob, Khaled Salah, Muhammad Imran, Prem Prakash Jayaraman, and Charith Perera. 2019. The role of big data analytics in industrial Internet of Things. Future Generation Computer Systems 99 (2019), 247–259.
[152]
Juan Pablo Usuga Cadavid, Samir Lamouri, Bernard Grabot, Robert Pellerin, and Arnaud Fortin. 2020. Machine learning applied in production planning and control: A state-of-the-art in the era of industry 4.0. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 31, 6 (2020), 1531–1558.
[153]
Hari Vasudevan, Narendra M. Shekokar, Ramesh Rajguru, and Rajendra Khavekar. 2023. Cyber security challenges in digital manufacturing and possible ways of mitigation. In Cyber Security Threats and Challenges Facing Human Life. Chapman and Hall/CRC, 3–12.
[154]
Javier Villalba-Diez, Daniel Schmidt, Roman Gevers, Joaquín Ordieres-Meré, Martin Buchwitz, and Wanja Wellbrock. 2019. Deep learning for industrial computer vision quality control in the printing industry 4.0. Sensors 19, 18 (2019), 3987.
[155]
Harish Viswanathan and Preben E. Mogensen. 2020. Communications in the 6G era. IEEE Access 8 (2020), 57063–57074.
[156]
Valery G. Voinov, Max L. Deinzer, Joseph S. Beckman, and Douglas F. Barofsky. 2011. Electron capture, collision-induced, and electron capture-collision induced dissociation in Q-TOF. Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry 22, 4 (2011), 607–611.
[157]
Sebastian Wahle, Thomas Magedanz, and Frank Schulze. 2012. The OpenMTC framework—M2M solutions for smart cities and the internet of things. In 2012 IEEE International Symposium on a World of Wireless, Mobile and Multimedia Networks (WoWMoM). IEEE, 1–3.
[158]
Tian Wang, Yuzhu Liang, Xuewei Shen, Xi Zheng, Adnan Mahmood, and Quan Z. Sheng. 2023. Edge computing and sensor-cloud: Overview, solutions, and directions. Comput. Surveys (2023).
[159]
X. Wang, Soh-Khim Ong, and Andrew Y. C. Nee. 2018. A comprehensive survey of ubiquitous manufacturing research. International Journal of Production Research 56, 1-2 (2018), 604–628.
[160]
Bethanie Williams, Marena Soulet, and Ambareen Siraj. 2023. A taxonomy of cyber attacks in smart manufacturing systems. In 6th EAI International Conference on Management of Manufacturing Systems. Springer, 77–97.
[161]
Dazhong Wu, Anqi Ren, Wenhui Zhang, Feifei Fan, Peng Liu, Xinwen Fu, and Janis Terpenny. 2018. Cybersecurity for digital manufacturing. Journal of Manufacturing Systems 48 (2018), 3–12.
[162]
Dazhong Wu, David W. Rosen, Lihui Wang, and Dirk Schaefer. 2015. Cloud-based design and manufacturing: A new paradigm in digital manufacturing and design innovation. Computer-aided Design 59 (2015), 1–14.
[163]
Mingtao Wu, Zhengyi Song, and Young B. Moon. 2019. Detecting cyber-physical attacks in CyberManufacturing systems with machine learning methods. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 30, 3 (2019), 1111–1123.
[164]
Kaishu Xia, Christopher Sacco, Max Kirkpatrick, Clint Saidy, Lam Nguyen, Anil Kircaliali, and Ramy Harik. 2021. A digital twin to train deep reinforcement learning agent for smart manufacturing plants: Environment, interfaces and intelligence. Journal of Manufacturing Systems 58 (2021), 210–230.
[165]
Ke Xu, Yingguang Li, Changqing Liu, Xu Liu, Xiaozhong Hao, James Gao, and Paul G. Maropoulos. 2020. Advanced data collection and analysis in data-driven manufacturing process. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering 33, 1 (2020), 1–21.
[166]
Jean-Paul A. Yaacoub, Ola Salman, Hassan N. Noura, Nesrine Kaaniche, Ali Chehab, and Mohamad Malli. 2020. Cyber-physical systems security: Limitations, issues and future trends. Microprocessors and Microsystems 77 (2020), 103201.
[167]
Chunyang Yu, Xun Xu, and Yuqian Lu. 2015. Computer-integrated manufacturing, cyber-physical systems and cloud manufacturing–concepts and relationships. Manufacturing Letters 6 (2015), 5–9.
[168]
Dong Yu, Yi Hu, Xun W. Xu, Yan Huang, and Shaohua Du. 2009. An open CNC system based on component technology. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering 6, 2 (2009), 302–310.
[169]
Alireza Zarreh, HungDa Wan, Yooneun Lee, Can Saygin, and Rafid Al Janahi. 2019. Cybersecurity concerns for total productive maintenance in smart manufacturing systems. Procedia Manufacturing 38 (2019), 532–539.
[170]
Haijun Zhang, Guohui Zhang, and Qiong Yan. 2019. Digital twin-driven cyber-physical production system towards smart shop-floor. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing 10, 11 (2019), 4439–4453.
[171]
Kunwu Zhang, Yang Shi, Stamatis Karnouskos, Thilo Sauter, Huazhen Fang, and Armando Walter Colombo. 2022. Advancements in industrial cyber-physical systems: An overview and perspectives. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics (2022).
[172]
Jun Zheng, Junjie Shi, Feng Lin, Xinyu Hu, Qi Pan, Tiening Qi, Yicheng Ren, Aizhi Guan, Zhiyi Zhang, and Wei Ling. 2023. Reducing manufacturing carbon emissions: Optimal low carbon production strategies respect to product structures and batches. Science of the Total Environment 858 (2023), 159916.
[173]
Yuhai Zhong, Runxiao Wang, Huashan Feng, and Yasheng Chen. 2019. Analysis and research of quadruped robot’s legs: A comprehensive review. International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems 16, 3 (2019), 1729881419844148.
[174]
Liping Zhou, Zhibin Jiang, Na Geng, Yimeng Niu, Feng Cui, Kefei Liu, and Nanshan Qi. 2022. Production and operations management for intelligent manufacturing: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Production Research 60, 2 (2022), 808–846.
[175]
Tiago Zonta, Cristiano André Da Costa, Rodrigo da Rosa Righi, Miromar Jose de Lima, Eduardo Silveira da Trindade, and Guann Pyng Li. 2020. Predictive maintenance in the Industry 4.0: A systematic literature review. Computers & Industrial Engineering 150 (2020), 106889.
[176]
Diego Galar Pascual, Pasquale Daponte, and Uday Kumar. 2019. Handbook of Industry 4.0 and Smart Systems. CRC Press.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Trust Management and Resource Optimization in Edge and Fog Computing Using the CyberGuard FrameworkSensors10.3390/s2413430824:13(4308)Online publication date: 2-Jul-2024
  • (2023)Safe Performance of an Industrial Autonomous Ground Vehicle in the Supervisory Control FrameworkElectronics10.3390/electronics1224503512:24(5035)Online publication date: 17-Dec-2023
  • (2023)A Comprehensive Analysis of Trust, Privacy, and Security Measures in the Digital Age2023 5th IEEE International Conference on Trust, Privacy and Security in Intelligent Systems and Applications (TPS-ISA)10.1109/TPS-ISA58951.2023.00051(360-369)Online publication date: 1-Nov-2023

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Transactions on Internet Technology
ACM Transactions on Internet Technology  Volume 23, Issue 4
November 2023
249 pages
ISSN:1533-5399
EISSN:1557-6051
DOI:10.1145/3633308
  • Editor:
  • Ling Liu
Issue’s Table of Contents

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 17 November 2023
Online AM: 08 May 2023
Accepted: 05 May 2023
Revised: 25 April 2023
Received: 31 December 2022
Published in TOIT Volume 23, Issue 4

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Industrial automation
  2. cybersecurity
  3. automated production processes
  4. cyber manufacturing systems

Qualifiers

  • Survey

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)929
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)133
Reflects downloads up to 26 Sep 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Trust Management and Resource Optimization in Edge and Fog Computing Using the CyberGuard FrameworkSensors10.3390/s2413430824:13(4308)Online publication date: 2-Jul-2024
  • (2023)Safe Performance of an Industrial Autonomous Ground Vehicle in the Supervisory Control FrameworkElectronics10.3390/electronics1224503512:24(5035)Online publication date: 17-Dec-2023
  • (2023)A Comprehensive Analysis of Trust, Privacy, and Security Measures in the Digital Age2023 5th IEEE International Conference on Trust, Privacy and Security in Intelligent Systems and Applications (TPS-ISA)10.1109/TPS-ISA58951.2023.00051(360-369)Online publication date: 1-Nov-2023

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Get Access

Login options

Full Access

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media