Listen Veronica! Can You Give Me a Hand With This Bug?
Pages 24 - 30
Abstract
Developing software implies looking for documentation, following tutorials, making implementation decisions, encountering errors, and overcoming them. Behind each aspect is the developer’s reasoning that, if not collected, is lost after the implementation. Conversely, if captured and linked to the code, the developers’ reasoning and motivations for each step they accomplish can become a valuable asset, meaningful for them and other developers. Looking for a mechanism to capture such knowledge seamlessly, we present Veronica. It is a conversational agent integrated directly into Visual Studio Code that, based on the developers’ self-explanatory reasoning, records memos and links them with the code they are writing. Furthermore, Veronica can interact with the web browser to automatically gather the sources consulted by the developer and attach them to the code. We validated our approach by conducting a usability study with eight participants that positively assessed the tool’s usefulness and suggested improvements in the graphical interface.
References
[1]
Ahmad Abdellatif, Khaled Badran, and Emad Shihab. 2020. MSRBot: Using bots to answer questions from software repositories. Empirical Software Engineering 25, 3 (01 May 2020), 1834–1863. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-019-09788-5
[2]
Merav Allouch, Amos Azaria, and Rina Azoulay. 2021. Conversational Agents: Goals, Technologies, Vision and Challenges. Sensors 21, 24 (Dec 2021), 8448. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21248448
[3]
Kiran Bisra, Qing Liu, John C. Nesbit, Farimah Salimi, and Philip H. Winne. 2018. Inducing Self-Explanation: a Meta-Analysis. Educational Psychology Review 30, 3 (01 Sep 2018), 703–725. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-018-9434-x
[4]
Bruno da Silva, Chloe Hebert, Abhishu Rawka, and Siriwan Sereesathien. 2020. Robin: A Voice Controlled Virtual Teammate for Software Developers and Teams. In 2020 IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance and Evolution (ICSME). 789–791. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSME46990.2020.00092
[5]
H. Happel and W. Maalej. 2009. From work to word: How do software developers describe their work?. In 2009 6th IEEE International Working Conference on Mining Software Repositories. MSR 2009. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, CA, USA, 121–130. https://doi.org/10.1109/MSR.2009.5069490
[6]
Björn Hartmann, Daniel MacDougall, Joel Brandt, and Scott R. Klemmer. 2010. What Would Other Programmers Do: Suggesting Solutions to Error Messages. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Atlanta, Georgia, USA) (CHI ’10). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1019–1028. https://doi.org/10.1145/1753326.1753478
[7]
Andrew Head, Elena L. Glassman, Björn Hartmann, and Marti A. Hearst. 2018. Interactive Extraction of Examples from Existing Code. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Montreal QC, Canada) (CHI ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173659
[8]
Michelle Ichinco and Caitlin Kelleher. 2015. Exploring novice programmer example use. In 2015 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing (VL/HCC). 63–71. https://doi.org/10.1109/VLHCC.2015.7357199
[9]
Kyungbin Kwon and David H. Jonassen. 2011. The Influence of Reflective Self-Explanations on Problem-Solving Performance. Journal of Educational Computing Research 44, 3 (2011), 247–263. https://doi.org/10.2190/EC.44.3.a
[10]
Carlene Lebeuf, Margaret-Anne Storey, and Alexey Zagalsky. 2018. Software Bots. IEEE Software 35, 1 (2018), 18–23. https://doi.org/10.1109/MS.2017.4541027
[11]
Hongwei Li, Zhenchang Xing, Xin Peng, and Wenyun Zhao. 2013. What help do developers seek, when and how?. In 2013 20th Working Conference on Reverse Engineering (WCRE). 142–151. https://doi.org/10.1109/WCRE.2013.6671289
[12]
Michael Xieyang Liu, Jane Hsieh, Nathan Hahn, Angelina Zhou, Emily Deng, Shaun Burley, Cynthia Taylor, Aniket Kittur, and Brad A. Myers. 2019. Unakite: Scaffolding Developers’ Decision-Making Using the Web. In Proceedings of the 32nd Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (New Orleans, LA, USA) (UIST ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 67–80. https://doi.org/10.1145/3332165.3347908
[13]
Walid Maalej, Rebecca Tiarks, Tobias Roehm, and Rainer Koschke. 2014. On the Comprehension of Program Comprehension. ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. 23, 4, Article 31 (sep 2014), 37 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2622669
[14]
Michael F. McTear. 2017. The Rise of the Conversational Interface: A New Kid on the Block?. In Future and Emerging Trends in Language Technology. Machine Learning and Big Data, José F Quesada, Francisco-Jesús Martín Mateos, and Teresa López Soto (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 38–49.
[15]
Stephen Oney and Joel Brandt. 2012. Codelets: Linking Interactive Documentation and Example Code in the Editor. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Austin, Texas, USA) (CHI ’12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2697–2706. https://doi.org/10.1145/2207676.2208664
[16]
Chris Parnin and Robert DeLine. 2010. Evaluating Cues for Resuming Interrupted Programming Tasks. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Atlanta, Georgia, USA) (CHI ’10). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 93–102. https://doi.org/10.1145/1753326.1753342
[17]
James Prather, Raymond Pettit, Brett A. Becker, Paul Denny, Dastyni Loksa, Alani Peters, Zachary Albrecht, and Krista Masci. 2019. First Things First: Providing Metacognitive Scaffolding for Interpreting Problem Prompts. In Proceedings of the 50th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (Minneapolis, MN, USA) (SIGCSE ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 531–537. https://doi.org/10.1145/3287324.3287374
[18]
Peter Robe and Sandeep Kaur Kuttal. 2022. Designing PairBuddy—A Conversational Agent for Pair Programming. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 29, 4, Article 34 (may 2022), 44 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3498326
[19]
Sivasurya Santhanam, Tobias Hecking, Andreas Schreiber, and Stefan Wagner. 2022. Bots in software engineering: a systematic mapping study. PeerJ Computer Science 8 (2022), e866.
[20]
Emad Shihab, Stefan Wagner, Marco A. Gerosa, Mairieli Wessel, and Jordi Cabot. 2022. The Present and Future of Bots in Software Engineering. IEEE Software 39, 5 (2022), 28–31. https://doi.org/10.1109/MS.2022.3176864
[21]
Yusuke Shinyama, Yoshitaka Arahori, and Katsuhiko Gondow. 2018. Analyzing Code Comments to Boost Program Comprehension. In 2018 25th Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference (APSEC). 325–334. https://doi.org/10.1109/APSEC.2018.00047
[22]
Margaret-Anne Storey and Alexey Zagalsky. 2016. Disrupting Developer Productivity One Bot at a Time. In Proceedings of the 2016 24th ACM SIGSOFT International Symposium on Foundations of Software Engineering (Seattle, WA, USA) (FSE 2016). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 928–931. https://doi.org/10.1145/2950290.2983989
[23]
Camilo Vieira, Alejandra J. Magana, Michael L. Falk, and R. Edwin Garcia. 2017. Writing In-Code Comments to Self-Explain in Computational Science and Engineering Education. ACM Trans. Comput. Educ. 17, 4, Article 17 (aug 2017), 21 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3058751
[24]
Camilo Vieira, Alejandra J. Magana, Anindya Roy, and Michael L. Falk. 2019. Student Explanations in the Context of Computational Science and Engineering Education. Cognition and Instruction 37, 2 (2019), 201–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2018.1539738
[25]
Zhendong Wang, Yi Wang, and David Redmiles. 2022. From Specialized Mechanics to Project Butlers: The Usage of Bots in Open Source Software Development. IEEE Software 39, 5 (2022), 38–43. https://doi.org/10.1109/MS.2022.3180297
[26]
Joseph J. Williams and Tania Lombrozo. 2010. The Role of Explanation in Discovery and Generalization: Evidence From Category Learning. Cognitive Science 34, 5 (2010), 776–806. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2010.01113.x
Index Terms
- Listen Veronica! Can You Give Me a Hand With This Bug?
Recommendations
Elderly Users' Interaction with Conversational Agent
HAI '19: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Human-Agent InteractionExploring how users behave when they interact with a conversational agent has been a popular research topic recently. However, very few studies have focused on the unique features of old people's interaction with an agent. In this paper, we report the ...
"My Hand Doesn't Listen to Me!": Adoption and Evaluation of a Communication Technology for the 'Oldest Old'
CHI '15: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsAdoption and use of novel technology by the institutionalized 'oldest old' (80+) is understudied. This population is the fastest growing demographic group in developed countries, providing design opportunities and challenges for HCI. Since the ...
Hibachi: the eclipse ada development toolset
SIGAda '07: Proceedings of the 2007 ACM international conference on SIGAda annual international conferenceHibachi is an open source (EPL), standard, extensible, vendor-neutral Eclipse Ada development environment. Hibachi is currently in the project proposal phase (see http://www.eclipse.org/projects/dev_process/development_process.php, which involves ...
Comments
Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
Copyright © 2023 ACM.
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].
Sponsors
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 27 June 2023
Check for updates
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Research-article
- Research
- Refereed limited
Funding Sources
- MUR National Recovery and Resilience Plan funded by the European Union - NextGenerationEU
Conference
EICS '23
Sponsor:
EICS '23: The 15th ACM SIGCHI Symposium on Engineering Interactive Computing Systems
June 27 - 30, 2023
Swansea, United Kingdom
Acceptance Rates
Overall Acceptance Rate 73 of 299 submissions, 24%
Upcoming Conference
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 230Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)160
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)21
Reflects downloads up to 17 Nov 2024
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
View options
View or Download as a PDF file.
PDFeReader
View online with eReader.
eReaderHTML Format
View this article in HTML Format.
HTML FormatLogin options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign in