Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3588967.3588975acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesempathichConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open access

Fast Drink: Mediating Empathy for Gig Workers

Published: 18 May 2023 Publication History

Abstract

The digitization of services and global lock-downs have led an explosion of delivery services, which use gig-workers as delivery personnel. They can face apathy from both their employers and users of the service. Previous studies focused on mediating interactions between workers or workers and tasks. However, delivery presents the opportunity for HCI interventions to mediate the interaction between worker and users to increase their empathy. We conducted an empirical study where 63 participants ordered a drink with an app which presented a different level of information about the delivery person (nothing; name and photo; heart rate). Initial results show no significant impact on empathy measures between conditions, however post-hoc analysis showed that heart rate lead to increased Compassionate and decreased Affective empathy. This raises the question of what “type” of empathy is beneficial for delivery personnel and the need to refine the concept and measures of empathy used in HCI.

References

[1]
2022. Rapid Delivery App Revenue and Usage Statistics (2022). https://www.businessofapps.com/data/rapid-delivery-app-market/
[2]
C. Daniel Batson. 2009. These Things Called Empathy: Eight Related but Distinct Phenomena. In The Social Neuroscience of Empathy. The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262012973.003.0002
[3]
Brianna B Caza, Erin M Reid, Susan J Ashford, and Steve Granger. 2022. Working on my own: Measuring the challenges of gig work. Human Relations 75, 11 (Nov. 2022), 2122–2159. https://doi.org/10.1177/00187267211030098 Publisher: SAGE Publications Ltd.
[4]
Max T. Curran, Jeremy Raboff Gordon, Lily Lin, Priyashri Kamlesh Sridhar, and John Chuang. 2019. Understanding Digitally-Mediated Empathy: An Exploration of Visual, Narrative, and Biosensory Informational Cues. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300844
[5]
Michael R Harwell. 1988. Choosing between parametric and nonparametric tests. Journal of Counseling & Development 67, 1 (1988), 35–38. Publisher: Wiley Online Library.
[6]
Eliscia Kinder, Mohammad Hossein Jarrahi, and Will Sutherland. 2019. Gig Platforms, Tensions, Alliances and Ecosystems: An Actor-Network Perspective. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 3, CSCW (Nov. 2019), 212:1–212:26. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359314
[7]
Dominique Kost, Christian Fieseler, and Sut I Wong. 2020. Boundaryless careers in the gig economy: An oxymoron?Human Resource Management Journal 30, 1 (2020), 100–113. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12265 _eprint: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/1748-8583.12265.
[8]
Camille Krier, Laetitia Dablanc, Anne Aguiléra, and Nicolas Louvet. 2022. Sharing within the gig economy: The use of shared e-bikes by on-demand platform-based instant meal delivery workers in Paris. Case Studies on Transport Policy 10, 4 (Dec. 2022), 2280–2289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2022.10.012
[9]
Toby Jia-Jun Li, Yuwen Lu, Jaylexia Clark, Meng Chen, Victor Cox, Meng Jiang, Yang Yang, Tamara Kay, Danielle Wood, and Jay Brockman. 2022. A Bottom-Up End-User Intelligent Assistant Approach to Empower Gig Workers against AI Inequality. In 2022 Symposium on Human-Computer Interaction for Work(CHIWORK 2022). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1145/3533406.3533418
[10]
Fannie Liu. 2019. Expressive Biosignals: Authentic Social Cues for Social Connection. In Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI EA ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290607.3299081
[11]
Fannie Liu, Laura Dabbish, and Geoff Kaufman. 2017. Can Biosignals be Expressive?: How Visualizations Affect Impression Formation from Shared Brain Activity. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 1, CSCW (Dec. 2017), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1145/3134706
[12]
Fannie Liu, Geoff Kaufman, and Laura Dabbish. 2019. The Effect of Expressive Biosignals on Empathy and Closeness for a Stigmatized Group Member. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 3, CSCW (Nov. 2019), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359303
[13]
Fannie Liu, Chunjong Park, Yu Jiang Tham, Tsung-Yu Tsai, Laura Dabbish, Geoff Kaufman, and Andrés Monroy-Hernández. 2021. Significant Otter: Understanding the Role of Biosignals in Communication. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445200
[14]
Nick Merrill and Coye Cheshire. 2017. Trust Your Heart: Assessing Cooperation and Trust with Biosignals in Computer-Mediated Interactions. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing(CSCW ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/2998181.2998286
[15]
Katie Myhill, James Richards, and Kate Sang. 2021. Job quality, fair work and gig work: the lived experience of gig workers. The International Journal of Human Resource Management 32, 19 (Oct. 2021), 4110–4135. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2020.1867612
[16]
Daniel Navarro. 2013. Learning statistics with R: A tutorial for psychology students and other beginners: Version 0.5. University of Adelaide Adelaide, Australia.
[17]
Lene Nielsen, Kira Storgaard Hansen, Jan Stage, and Jane Billestrup. 2015. A Template for Design Personas: Analysis of 47 Persona Descriptions from Danish Industries and Organizations. International Journal of Sociotechnology and Knowledge Development (IJSKD) 7, 1 (2015), 45–61. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijskd.2015010104 Publisher: IGI Global.
[18]
Delroy Paulhus. 1991. Measurement and Control of Response Bias. Measurement of Personality and Social Psychological Attitudes 1 (Dec. 1991). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-590241-0.50006-X
[19]
Philip A. Powell and Jennifer Roberts. 2017. Situational determinants of cognitive, affective, and compassionate empathy in naturalistic digital interactions. Computers in Human Behavior 68 (March 2017), 137–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.11.024
[20]
Camilo Rojas, Eugenio Zuccarelli, Alexandra Chin, Gaurav Patekar, David Esquivel, and Pattie Maes. 2022. Towards Enhancing Empathy Through Emotion Augmented Remote Communication. In CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Extended Abstracts. ACM, New Orleans LA USA, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491101.3519797
[21]
Ann C. Rumble, Paul A. M. Van Lange, and Craig D. Parks. 2010. The benefits of empathy: When empathy may sustain cooperation in social dilemmas. European Journal of Social Psychology 40, 5 (2010), 856–866. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.659 _eprint: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/ejsp.659.
[22]
Joni Salminen, Soon-Gyo Jung, João M. Santos, and Bernard J. Jansen. 2020. Does a Smile Matter if the Person Is Not Real?: The Effect of a Smile and Stock Photos on Persona Perceptions. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction 36, 6 (April 2020), 568–590. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2019.1664068
[23]
Froukje Sleeswijk Visser and Merlijn Kouprie. 2008. Stimulating empathy in ideation workshops. (2008), 4.
[24]
Jan Wieseke, Anja Geigenmüller, and Florian Kraus. 2012. On the Role of Empathy in Customer-Employee Interactions. Journal of Service Research 15, 3 (Aug. 2012), 316–331. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670512439743 Publisher: SAGE Publications Inc.
[25]
R. Michael Winters, Bruce N. Walker, and Grace Leslie. 2021. Can You Hear My Heartbeat?: Hearing an Expressive Biosignal Elicits Empathy. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Yokohama Japan, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445545
[26]
Zheng Yao, Silas Weden, Lea Emerlyn, Haiyi Zhu, and Robert E. Kraut. 2021. Together But Alone: Atomization and Peer Support among Gig Workers. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 5, CSCW2 (Oct. 2021), 391:1–391:29. https://doi.org/10.1145/3479535
[27]
Angie Zhang, Alexander Boltz, Chun Wei Wang, and Min Kyung Lee. 2022. Algorithmic Management Reimagined For Workers and By Workers: Centering Worker Well-Being in Gig Work. In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3501866

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
EmpathiCH '23: Proceedings of the 2nd Empathy-Centric Design Workshop
April 2023
67 pages
ISBN:9798400707490
DOI:10.1145/3588967
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution International 4.0 License.

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 18 May 2023

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. biosignals
  2. empathy
  3. gig-work

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Conference

EMPATHICH '23
EMPATHICH '23: EmpathiCH Workshop
April 23, 2023
Hamburg, Germany

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 178
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)111
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)9
Reflects downloads up to 16 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

Login options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media