Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3585088.3593929acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesidcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
extended-abstract

Developing Machine Learning Agency Among Youth: Investigating Youth Critical Use, Examination, and Production of Machine Learning Applications

Published: 19 June 2023 Publication History

Abstract

Abstract. Young people are surrounded by machine learning (ML) devices and their lived experiences are increasingly shaped by the ML technologies that are ever-present in their lives. As innovations in machine learning technologies continue to shape society, it raises important implications for what young people learn, their career trajectories, and the required literacies they need to thrive in this changing occupational environment. Youth are particularly vulnerable to the impact of ML and very little has been done to empower them to critically engage in the discourse surrounding the next generation of technologies that have a marked potential to shape their lives for better or worse. My dissertation work seeks to develop youth autonomy and agency around ML by designing an intervention that supports youth critical use, examination, and production of ML applications in the context of promoting self-expression and social good. I will conduct a qualitative single case study research and collect multiple forms of data using interviews, story completions, digital artifacts, observations, and focus group discussions. These data sources will allow me to conduct an intensive analysis and investigation of how youth populations can be supported to develop the skills, practices and critical consciousness needed to effectively engage with machine learning technologies. Through my research, I also hope to advance the literature on how young people creatively collaborate with ML and use ML for self-expression.

References

[1]
Alexa Hasse, Sandra Clio Cortesi, Andres Lombana, and Urs Gasser. 2019. Youth and Artificial Intelligence: Where We Stand. SSRN Journal (2019).
[2]
Mary E. Webb, Andrew Fluck, Johannes Magenheim, Joyce Malyn-Smith, Juliet Waters, Michelle Deschênes, and Jason Zagami. 2021. Machine learning for human learners: opportunities, issues, tensions and threats. Education Tech Research Dev 69, 4 (August 2021), 2109–2130.
[3]
Safiya Umoja Noble. 2018. Algorithms of Oppression: How Search Engines Reinforce Racism (1 edition). NYU Press.
[4]
Lorenzo Belenguer. 2022. AI bias: exploring discriminatory algorithmic decision-making models and the application of possible machine-centric solutions adapted from the pharmaceutical industry. AI Ethics 2, 4 (November 2022), 771–787.
[5]
Leanne Bowler, Amelia Acker, Wei Jeng, and Yu Chi. 2017. “It lives all around us”: Aspects of data literacy in teen's lives. Proc. Assoc. Info. Sci. Tech. 54, 1 (January 2017), 27–35.
[6]
Radu Mariescu-Istodor and Ilkka Jormanainen. 2019. Machine Learning for High School Students. In Proceedings of the 19th Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research, ACM, Koli Finland, 1–9.
[7]
David Touretzky, Christina Gardner-McCune, Fred Martin, and Deborah Seehorn. 2019. Envisioning AI for K-12: What Should Every Child Know about AI? AAAI 33, 01 (July 2019), 9795–9799.
[8]
Duri Long and Brian Magerko. 2020. What is AI Literacy? Competencies and Design Considerations. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, Honolulu HI USA, 1–16.
[9]
Michelle Carney, Barron Webster, Irene Alvarado, Kyle Phillips, Noura Howell, Jordan Griffith, Jonas Jongejan, Amit Pitaru, and Alexander Chen. 2020. Teachable Machine: Approachable Web-Based Tool for Exploring Machine Learning Classification. In Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, Honolulu HI USA, 1–8.
[10]
Dale Lane. 2021. Machine learning for kids: A project-based introduction to artificial intelligence. No Starch Press.
[11]
Golnaz Arastoopour Irgens, Hazel Vega, Ibrahim Adisa, and Cinamon Bailey. 2022. Characterizing children's conceptual knowledge and computational practices in a critical machine learning educational program. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction 34, (December 2022), 100541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2022.100541
[12]
Randi Williams and Cynthia Breazeal. How to Train Your Robot: A Middle School AI and Ethics Curriculum. In the International Workshop on Education in Artificial Intelligence K-12 (EDUAI ’20). Retrieved March 2, 2022 from https://www.media.mit.edu/publications/how-to-train-your-robot-a-middle-school-ai-and-ethics-curriculum/
[13]
Abigail Zimmermann-Niefield, Makenna Turner, Bridget Murphy, Shaun K. Kane, and R. Benjamin Shapiro. 2019. Youth Learning Machine Learning through Building Models of Athletic Moves. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM International Conference on Interaction Design and Children, ACM, Boise ID USA, 121–132.
[14]
Randi Williams. 2021. How to train your robot: project-based ai and ethics education for middle school classrooms. Proceedings of the 52nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. 2021. 1382–1382.
[15]
Sayamindu Dasgupta and Benjamin Mako Hill. 2020. Designing for Critical Algorithmic Literacies. arXiv preprint arXiv:2008.01719 (2020).
[16]
Henriikka Vartiainen, Tapani Toivonen, Ilkka Jormanainen, Juho Kahila, Matti Tedre, and Teemu Valtonen. 2020. Machine learning for middle-schoolers: Children as designers of machine-learning apps. In 2020 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), IEEE, Uppsala, Sweden, 1–9.
[17]
Clifford H. Lee, Nimah Gobir, Alex Gurn, and Elisabeth Soep. 2022. In the Black Mirror: Youth Investigations into Artificial Intelligence. ACM Trans. Comput. Educ. 22, 3 (September 2022), 1–25.
[18]
Joan G DeJaeghere, Jasmina Josić, and Kate S McCleary. 2016. Education and youth agency: Qualitative case studies in global contexts. Springer.
[19]
Clifford H. Lee and Antero D. Garcia. 2014. “I Want Them to Feel the Fear…”: Critical Computational Literacy as the New Multimodal Composition. Exploring Multimodal Composition and Digital Writing, 364–378.
[20]
Robert K Yin. 2018. Case study research and applications. Sage.
[21]
Karen Gravett. 2019. Story Completion: Storying as a Method of Meaning-Making and Discursive Discovery. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 18, (January 2019), 1609406919893155.
[22]
Sharan B. Merriam and Elizabeth J. Tisdell. 2015. Qualitative research: a guide to design and implementation (Fourth edition ed.). John Wiley & Sons, San Francisco, CA.
[23]
David Williamson Shaffer. 2017. Quantitative Ethnography. Lulu.com.
[24]
Rogers Kaliisa, Kamila Misiejuk, Golnaz Arastoopour Irgens, and Morten Misfeldt. 2021. Scoping the Emerging Field of Quantitative Ethnography: Opportunities, Challenges and Future Directions. In Advances in Quantitative Ethnography (Communications in Computer and Information Science), Springer International Publishing, Cham, 3–17.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Is a Sunny Day Bright and Cheerful or Hot and Uncomfortable? Young Children's Exploration of ChatGPTProceedings of the 13th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/3679318.3685397(1-15)Online publication date: 13-Oct-2024

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
IDC '23: Proceedings of the 22nd Annual ACM Interaction Design and Children Conference
June 2023
824 pages
ISBN:9798400701313
DOI:10.1145/3585088
Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 19 June 2023

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. agency
  2. computational thinking
  3. machine learning
  4. youth

Qualifiers

  • Extended-abstract
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Conference

IDC '23
Sponsor:
IDC '23: Interaction Design and Children
June 19 - 23, 2023
IL, Chicago, USA

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 172 of 578 submissions, 30%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)60
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)9
Reflects downloads up to 21 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Is a Sunny Day Bright and Cheerful or Hot and Uncomfortable? Young Children's Exploration of ChatGPTProceedings of the 13th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/3679318.3685397(1-15)Online publication date: 13-Oct-2024

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media