Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3584931.3606984acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescscwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open access

Post-Spotlight Posts: The Impact of Sudden Social Media Attention on Account Behavior

Published: 14 October 2023 Publication History

Abstract

Within social media communities, sudden attention is a frequent phenomenon where a particular user receives a rapid onset of heightened engagement. Using a statistical analysis, we examine the impacts that this outsized attention has on the subsequent behavior of accounts who received sudden social media attention for Twitter posts in the early stages of the Covid-19 pandemic. We find that accounts that received sudden social media attention were more likely to post after receiving sudden social media attention, though this effect was not persistent and did not boost original content production. We also find that these accounts were significantly more likely to alter their self-presentation through updating their “bio” after receiving suddenly increased attention.

References

[1]
David Ifeoluwa Adelani, Ryota Kobayashi, Ingmar Weber, and Przemyslaw A. Grabowicz. 2020. Estimating community feedback effect on topic choice in social media with predictive modeling. EPJ Data Science 9, 1 (Dec. 2020), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjds/s13688-020-00243-w Number: 1 Publisher: SpringerOpen.
[2]
Audrey Armstrong. 2022. Mamma Mia: On Accidentally Going Viral. https://audreyarmstrongwriter.wordpress.com/2022/04/27/mamma-mia-on-accidentally-going-viral/
[3]
Justin T. Brady, Molly E. Kelly, and Sharon L. Stein. 2017. The Trump Effect: With No Peer Review, How Do We Know What to Really Believe on Social Media?Clinics in Colon and Rectal Surgery 30, 4 (Sept. 2017), 270–276. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1604256
[4]
Tomás Capretto, Camen Piho, Ravin Kumar, Jacob Westfall, Tal Yarkoni, and Osvaldo A. Martin. 2022. Bambi: A simple interface for fitting Bayesian linear models in Python. arxiv:2012.10754 [stat.CO]
[5]
Natalia Cecire. 2015. Everybody’s Authority. PMLA 130, 2 (March 2015), 453–460. https://doi.org/10.1632/pmla.2015.130.2.453 Publisher: Cambridge University Press.
[6]
Omkar Gurjar, Tanmay Bansal, Hitkul Jangra, Hemank Lamba, and Ponnurangam Kumaraguru. 2022. Effect of Popularity Shocks on User Behaviour. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media 16 (May 2022), 253–263. https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v16i1.19289
[7]
Rakibul Hasan, Cristobal Cheyre, Yong-Yeol Ahn, Roberto Hoyle, and Apu Kapadia. 2022. The Impact of Viral Posts on Visibility and Behavior of Professionals: A Longitudinal Study of Scientists on Twitter. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media 16 (May 2022), 323–334. https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v16i1.19295
[8]
Amanda Lee Hughes and Leysia Palen. 2009. Twitter Adoption and Use in Crisis Twitter Adoption and Use in Mass Convergence and Emergency Events. In Proceedings of the 6th International ISCRAM Conference. Gothenburg, Sweden, 10 pages. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.156.8385&rep=rep1&type=pdf
[9]
John D. Hunter. 2007. Matplotlib: A 2D Graphics Environment. Computing in Science & Engineering 9, 3 (May 2007), 90–95. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCSE.2007.55 Conference Name: Computing in Science & Engineering.
[10]
Ebuka Elias Igwebuike and Lily Chimuanya. 2021. Legitimating falsehood in social media: A discourse analysis of political fake news. Discourse & Communication 15, 1 (Feb. 2021), 42–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481320961659 Publisher: SAGE Publications.
[11]
Ravin Kumar, Colin Carroll, Ari Hartikainen, and Osvaldo Martin. 2019. ArviZ a unified library for exploratory analysis of Bayesian models in Python. Journal of Open Source Software 4, 33 (Jan. 2019), 1143. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.01143
[12]
Zoe Lofft. 2020. When social media met nutrition: How influencers spread misinformation, and why we believe them. Health Science Inquiry 11, 1 (Aug. 2020), 56–61. https://doi.org/10.29173/hsi319 Number: 1.
[13]
John Salvatier, Thomas V. Wiecki, and Christopher Fonnesbeck. 2016. Probabilistic programming in Python using PyMC3. PeerJ Computer Science 2 (April 2016), e55. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.55 Publisher: PeerJ Inc.
[14]
Zeynep Tufekci. 2014. Big Questions for Social Media Big Data: Representativeness, Validity and Other Methodological Pitfalls. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media 8, 1 (May 2014), 505–514. https://ojs.aaai.org/index.php/ICWSM/article/view/14517 Number: 1.
[15]
Rens van de Schoot, Sarah Depaoli, Ruth King, Bianca Kramer, Kaspar Märtens, Mahlet G. Tadesse, Marina Vannucci, Andrew Gelman, Duco Veen, Joukje Willemsen, and Christopher Yau. 2021. Bayesian statistics and modelling. Nature Reviews Methods Primers 1, 1 (Jan. 2021), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43586-020-00001-2 Number: 1 Publisher: Nature Publishing Group.
[16]
Michael L. Waskom. 2021. seaborn: statistical data visualization. Journal of Open Source Software 6, 60 (April 2021), 3021. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.03021
[17]
Kaitlyn Zhou, Tom Wilson, Kate Starbird, and Emma S. Spiro. 2023. Spotlight Tweets: A Lens for Exploring Attention Dynamics within Online Sensemaking During Crisis Events. Trans. Soc. Comput. 6, 1–2, Article 2 (jun 2023), 33 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3577213

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
CSCW '23 Companion: Companion Publication of the 2023 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing
October 2023
596 pages
ISBN:9798400701290
DOI:10.1145/3584931
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike International 4.0 License.

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 14 October 2023

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Bayesian modeling
  2. Twitter
  3. influencers
  4. social media analysis

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Funding Sources

Conference

CSCW '23
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 2,235 of 8,521 submissions, 26%

Upcoming Conference

CSCW '25

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 357
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)252
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)35
Reflects downloads up to 12 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

Get Access

Login options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media