Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3573942.3574108acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesaiprConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Hyperspectral Anomaly Detection based on Autoencoder using Superpixel Manifold Constraint

Published: 16 May 2023 Publication History

Abstract

In the field of hyperspectral anomaly detection, autoencoder (AE) have become a hot research topic due to their unsupervised characteristics and powerful feature extraction capability. However, autoencoders do not keep the spatial structure information of the original data well during the training process, and is affected by anomalies, resulting in poor detection performance. To address these problems, a hyperspectral anomaly detection method based on autoencoders with superpixel manifold constraints is proposed. Firstly, superpixel segmentation technique is used to obtain the superpixels of the hyperspectral image, and then the manifold learning method is used to learn the embedded manifold that based on the superpixels. Secondly, the learned manifold constraints are embedded in the autoencoder to learn the potential representation, which can maintain the consistency of the local spatial and geometric structure of the hyperspectral images (HSI). Finally, anomalies are detected by computing reconstruction errors of the autoencoder. Extensive experiments are conducted on three datasets, and the experimental results show that the proposed method has better detection performance than other hyperspectral anomaly detectors.

References

[1]
Kang Sun, Xiurui Geng, Luyan Ji and Yun Lu. 2014. A new band selection method for hyperspectral image based on data quality. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing 7.6 (2014): 2697-2703.
[2]
Yuan, Yuan, Dandan Ma and Qi Wang. 2015. Hyperspectral anomaly detection by graph pixel selection. IEEE transactions on cybernetics 46.12 (2015): 3123-3134.
[3]
Xiaoqiang Lu, Wuxia Zhang and Xuelong Li. 2017. A hybrid sparsity and distance-based discrimination detector for hyperspectral images. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 56.3 (2017): 1704-1717.
[4]
Telmo Adão, Jonáš Hruška, Luís Pádua, José Bessa, Emanuel Peres, Raul Morais and Joaquim J. Sousa. 2017. Hyperspectral imaging: A review on UAV-based sensors, data processing and applications for agriculture and forestry. Remote sensing 9.11 (2017): 1110.
[5]
Shangzhen Song, Huixin Zhou, Yixin Yang and Jiangluqi Song. 2019 Hyperspectral anomaly detection via convolutional neural network and low rank with density-based clustering. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing 12.9 (2019): 3637-3649.
[6]
Wei Li, Guodong Wu and Qian Du. 2017. Transferred deep learning for anomaly detection in hyperspectral imagery. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters 14.5 (2017): 597-601.
[7]
Shangzhen Song, Huixin Zhou, Yixin Yang and Jiangluqi Song. 2019. Hyperspectral anomaly detection via convolutional neural network and low rank with density-based clustering. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing 12.9 (2019): 3637-3649.
[8]
Chunhui Zhao, Xueyuan Li and Haifeng Zhu. 2017. Hyperspectral anomaly detection based on stacked denoising autoencoders. Journal of Applied Remote Sensing 11.4 (2017): 042605.
[9]
Ning Ma, Yu Peng, Shaojun Wang and Philip H.W. Leong. 2018. An unsupervised deep hyperspectral anomaly detector. Sensors 18.3 (2018): 693.
[10]
Fei Li, Xiuwei Zhang, Lei Zhang, Dongmei Jiang and Yanning Zhang. 2018. Exploiting structured sparsity for hyperspectral anomaly detection. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 56.7 (2018): 4050-4064.
[11]
Chunhui Zhao and Lili Zhang. 2018. Spectral-spatial stacked autoencoders based on low-rank and sparse matrix decomposition for hyperspectral anomaly detection. Infrared Physics & Technology 92 (2018): 166-176.
[12]
Xiaoqiang Lu, Wuxia Zhang and Ju Huang. 2019. Exploiting embedding manifold of autoencoders for hyperspectral anomaly detection. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 58.3 (2019): 1527-1537.
[13]
Jie Lei, Weiying Xie, Jian Yang, Yunsong Li and Chein-I Chang. 2019. Spectral–spatial feature extraction for hyperspectral anomaly detection. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 57.10 (2019): 8131-8143.
[14]
Chris Ding, Ding Zhou, Xiaofeng He and Hongyuan Zha.2006. R1-pca: rotational invariant l 1-norm principal component analysis for robust subspace factorization. Proceedings of the 23rd international conference on Machine learning. 2006.
[15]
Charles M Bachmann, Thomas L. Ainsworth and Robert A. Fusina. 2005. Exploiting manifold geometry in hyperspectral imagery. IEEE transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 43.3 (2005): 441-454.
[16]
Jun He, Lei Zhang, Qing Wang and Zigang Li. 2009. Using diffusion geometric coordinates for hyperspectral imagery representation. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters 6.4 (2009): 767-771.
[17]
Li Ma, Melba M. Crawford and Jinwen Tian. 2010. Local manifold learning-based k-nearest-neighbor for hyperspectral image classification. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 48.11 (2010): 4099-4109.
[18]
Li Ma, Melba M. Crawford, Xiaoquan Yang and Yan Guo. 2014. Local-manifold-learning-based graph construction for semisupervised hyperspectral image classification. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 53.5 (2014): 2832-2844.
[19]
Hong-Bing Huang, Hong Huo and Tao Fang. 2013. Hierarchical manifold learning with applications to supervised classification for high-resolution remotely sensed images. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 52.3 (2013): 1677-1692.
[20]
Yuan Yan Tang, Haoliang Yuan and Luoqing Li. 2014. Manifold-based sparse representation for hyperspectral image classification. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 52.12 (2014): 7606-7618.
[21]
Li Ma, Melba M. Crawford and Jinwen Tian. 2010. Anomaly detection for hyperspectral images based on robust locally linear embedding. Journal of Infrared, Millimeter, and Terahertz Waves 31.6 (2010): 753-762.
[22]
Lefei Zhang, Liangpei Zhang, Dacheng Tao and Xin Huang. 2013. Sparse transfer manifold embedding for hyperspectral target detection. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 52.2 (2013): 1030-1043.
[23]
Xiaofeng Ren and Jitendra Malik. 2003. Learning a classification model for segmentation. Computer Vision, IEEE International Conference on. Vol. 2. IEEE Computer Society, 2003.
[24]
Marcus S. Stefanou and John P. Kerekes. 2009. A method for assessing spectral image utility. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 47.6 (2009): 1698-1706.
[25]
Zhe Wang and Ryan Martin. 2020. Model-free posterior inference on the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 209 (2020): 174-186.
[26]
Peter A. Flach, José Hernández-Orallo and Cèsar Ferri Ramirez. 2011. A coherent interpretation of AUC as a measure of aggregated classification performance. ICML. 2011.

Index Terms

  1. Hyperspectral Anomaly Detection based on Autoencoder using Superpixel Manifold Constraint
      Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      AIPR '22: Proceedings of the 2022 5th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Pattern Recognition
      September 2022
      1221 pages
      ISBN:9781450396899
      DOI:10.1145/3573942
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 16 May 2023

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Funding Sources

      Conference

      AIPR 2022

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • 0
        Total Citations
      • 37
        Total Downloads
      • Downloads (Last 12 months)24
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)4
      Reflects downloads up to 25 Nov 2024

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      View Options

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      HTML Format

      View this article in HTML Format.

      HTML Format

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media