Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3573834.3574504acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesaissConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Short-term air traffic flow forecasting based on model fusion

Published: 17 January 2023 Publication History

Abstract

Short-term air traffic flow prediction provides decision information for optimal air traffic flow control and management. To accurately predict the short-term air traffic flow, this study uses time series decomposition to determine that the air traffic flow has obvious segmentation characteristics, that is, different time periods are superimposed with different degrees of periodicity, trend and randomness, where periodicity is mixed with two kinds of short-term and long-term circulation patterns. Existing prediction methods cannot capture the complex features of the traffic flow data dynamics well. Herein, we develop a new multi component network (MCNet) composed of a deep learning component and an autoregressive component. For capturing the periodicity of traffic flow and extract the short- and long-term recurrent patterns of traffic flow data, we use the deep learning component, consisting of a convolutional neural network and a recurrent neural network with a self-attention mechanism. The autoregressive component is responsible for catching the trend of traffic flow, solving the problem that the deep learning component is insensitive to the scale of input and output. Experiments are conducted on air traffic data based on OpenSky statistics, and the results show that MCNet achieves optimal results compared to other models.

References

[1]
Shaojie Bai, J Zico Kolter, and Vladlen Koltun. 2018. Trellis networks for sequence modeling. arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.06682(2018).
[2]
George EP Box and David A Pierce. 1970. Distribution of residual autocorrelations in autoregressive-integrated moving average time series models. Journal of the American statistical Association 65, 332(1970), 1509–1526.
[3]
Junyoung Chung, Caglar Gulcehre, KyungHyun Cho, and Yoshua Bengio. 2014. Empirical evaluation of gated recurrent neural networks on sequence modeling. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.3555(2014).
[4]
Gary A Davis and Nancy L Nihan. 1991. Nonparametric regression and short-term freeway traffic forecasting. Journal of Transportation Engineering 117, 2 (1991), 178–188.
[5]
Siteng Huang, Donglin Wang, Xuehan Wu, and Ao Tang. 2019. Dsanet: Dual self-attention network for multivariate time series forecasting. In Proceedings of the 28th ACM international conference on information and knowledge management. 2129–2132.
[6]
Kyoung-jae Kim. 2003. Financial time series forecasting using support vector machines. Neurocomputing 55, 1-2 (2003), 307–319.
[7]
S Vasantha Kumar and Lelitha Vanajakshi. 2015. Short-term traffic flow prediction using seasonal ARIMA model with limited input data. European Transport Research Review 7, 3 (2015), 1–9.
[8]
Guokun Lai, Wei-Cheng Chang, Yiming Yang, and Hanxiao Liu. 2018. Modeling long-and short-term temporal patterns with deep neural networks. In The 41st international ACM SIGIR conference on research & development in information retrieval. 95–104.
[9]
Zachary C Lipton, David C Kale, Charles Elkan, and Randall Wetzel. 2015. Learning to diagnose with LSTM recurrent neural networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1511.03677(2015).
[10]
Shun-Yao Shih, Fan-Keng Sun, and Hung-yi Lee. 2019. Temporal pattern attention for multivariate time series forecasting. Machine Learning 108, 8 (2019), 1421–1441.
[11]
Sima Siami-Namini, Neda Tavakoli, and Akbar Siami Namin. 2018. A comparison of ARIMA and LSTM in forecasting time series. In 2018 17th IEEE international conference on machine learning and applications (ICMLA). IEEE, 1394–1401.
[12]
Martin Strohmeier, Xavier Olive, Jannis Lübbe, Matthias Schäfer, and Vincent Lenders. 2021. Crowdsourced air traffic data from the OpenSky Network 2019–2020. Earth System Science Data 13, 2 (2021), 357–366.
[13]
Johan AK Suykens and Joos Vandewalle. 1999. Least squares support vector machine classifiers. Neural processing letters 9, 3 (1999), 293–300.
[14]
Alper Tokgöz and Gözde Ünal. 2018. A RNN based time series approach for forecasting turkish electricity load. In 2018 26th Signal Processing and Communications Applications Conference (SIU). IEEE, 1–4.
[15]
CP Van Hinsbergen, JW Van Lint, and FM Sanders. 2007. Short term traffic prediction models. In PROCEEDINGS OF THE 14TH WORLD CONGRESS ON INTELLIGENT TRANSPORT SYSTEMS (ITS), HELD BEIJING, OCTOBER 2007.
[16]
Ashish Vaswani, Noam Shazeer, Niki Parmar, Jakob Uszkoreit, Llion Jones, Aidan N Gomez, Łukasz Kaiser, and Illia Polosukhin. 2017. Attention is all you need. Advances in neural information processing systems 30 (2017).
[17]
Dong Wang, Jie Xiong, Zhu Xiao, and Xiaohong Li. 2016. Short-term traffic flow prediction based on ensemble real-time sequential extreme learning machine under non-stationary condition. In 2016 IEEE 83rd Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Spring). IEEE, 1–5.
[18]
Yifei WANG, Lei YU, Fei TENG, Jiayu SONG, and Yue YUAN. 2022. Resource load prediction model based on long-short time series feature fusion. Journal of Computer Applications 42, 5 (2022), 1508.
[19]
Hailun Xie, Li Zhang, and Chee Peng Lim. 2020. Evolving CNN-LSTM models for time series prediction using enhanced grey wolf optimizer. IEEE Access 8(2020), 161519–161541.
[20]
Yife Zhao, Linghang Meng, and Kenan Li. 2019. Intelligent civil aviation transportation system based on Artificial Intelligence. Command information system and technology 10, 6 (2019), 1–7.

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
AISS '22: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Advanced Information Science and System
November 2022
396 pages
ISBN:9781450397933
DOI:10.1145/3573834
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 17 January 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. autoregressive
  2. multi component fusion
  3. neural network
  4. self-attentive mechanism
  5. time series

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Conference

AISS 2022

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 41 of 95 submissions, 43%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 27
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)8
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 18 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media