Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3569219.3569353acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmindtrekConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open access

A Socioecological Approach to ICT Use by Adults over 65 and its Implication on Design

Published: 16 November 2022 Publication History

Abstract

The use of information and communication technology (ICT) by adults over 65 has been studied in the past years extensively to understand any obstacles and facilitators as well as to propose design suggestions that are specific to the group. However, these studies have mainly focused on the adult over 65 as an individual and sometimes also on their immediate social circle. The broader socio-ecological environment of adults over 65 is rarely addressed. In this paper, we present the results of a survey focusing on how highly educated seniors in a highly digitalized society use ICT. We discuss the data from a socio-ecological perspective and draw the attention to the environmental facilitators for the use of ICT in this age group. We conclude with a discussion how design research might address the needs of older adults.

References

[1]
Raghad A. Alharbi, Faisal T. Altayyari, Farah S. Alamri, and Sultan A. Alharthi. 2021. Pandemic-Driven Technology during COVID-19: Experiences of Older Adults. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, CSCW: 5–9. https://doi.org/10.1145/3462204.3481769
[2]
Murtaja Ali, Azham Hussain, and Seng Yue Wong. 2019. Conceptualizing Mobile Health Application Use Intention and Adoption Among Iraqian Older Adults: From the Perspective of Expanded Technology Acceptance Model Computer-Mediated Communication and Cultural Emoticon View project Adaptive Emergency Evacuation Centre Management (AEECM) View project. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v13i10.11285
[3]
Steven Baker, Jeni Warburton, Jenny Waycott, Frances Batchelor, Thuong Hoang, Briony Dow, Elizabeth Ozanne, and Frank Vetere. 2018. Combatting social isolation and increasing social participation of older adults through the use of technology: A systematic review of existing evidence. Australasian Journal on Ageing 37, 3: 184–193. https://doi.org/10.1111/AJAG.12572
[4]
Michael T. Braun. 2013. Obstacles to social networking website use among older adults. Computers in Human Behavior 29, 3: 673–680. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CHB.2012.12.004
[5]
Sreelakshmi C.C and Sangeetha K. Prathap. 2020. Continuance adoption of mobile-based payments in Covid-19 context: an integrated framework of health belief model and expectation confirmation model. International Journal of Pervasive Computing and Communications 16, 4: 351–369. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPCC-06-2020-0069/FULL/PDF
[6]
Katerina Cerna, Richard Paluch, Fabian Bäumer, Tanja Ertl, and Claudia Müller. 2021. Transformation of HCI co-research with older adults: researchers’ positionality in the COVID-19 pandemic. Interaction Design and Architecture (s), 50: 27–47.
[7]
Eddie W.L. Cheng. 2019. Choosing between the theory of planned behavior (TPB) and the technology acceptance model (TAM). Educational Technology Research and Development 67, 1: 21–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11423-018-9598-6/FIGURES/2
[8]
Shelia R. Cotten, Amy M. Schuster, and Alexander Seifert. 2022. Social media use and well-being among older adults. Current Opinion in Psychology 45: 101293. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COPSYC.2021.12.005
[9]
Sara J. Czaja, Neil Charness, Arthur D. Fisk, Christopher Hertzog, Sankaran N. Nair, Wendy A. Rogers, and Joseph Sharit. 2006. Factors predicting the use of technology: Findings from the Center for Research and Education on Aging and Technology Enhancement (CREATE). Psychology and Aging 21, 2: 333–352. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.21.2.333
[10]
Patrizia D'Olivo, Marco C. Rozendaal, Elisa Giaccardi, Martha A. Grootenhuis, and Jaap Huisman. 2018. Reconfiguring a New Normal: A Socio-Ecological Perspective for Design Innovation in Sensitive Settings. She Ji 4, 4: 392–406. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SHEJI.2018.10.003
[11]
European Commission. 2016. eGovernment in Sweden. Retrieved April 26, 2022 from https://joinup.ec.europa.eu/sites/default/files/inline-files/eGovernment in Sweden - February 2016 - 18_0_v1_00.pdf
[12]
European Commission. 2021. DESI - Sweden | Shaping Europe's digital future. Retrieved April 26, 2022 from https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/desi-sweden
[13]
Eurostat. 2021. How popular is internet use among older people? - Products Eurostat News - Eurostat. Retrieved April 26, 2022 from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-eurostat-news/-/edn-20210517-1
[14]
Karen Glanz, Barbara K Rimer, and K Viswanath. 2008. Health Behavior and Health Education: Theory, Research, and Practice. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0033-3506(49)81524-1
[15]
Amanda Hunsaker and Eszter Hargittai. 2018. A review of Internet use among older adults: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818787348 20, 10: 3937–3954. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818787348
[16]
Eli Hustad, June Lithell Hansen, Andreas Skaiaa, and Polyxeni Vassilakopoulou. 2019. Digital Inequalities: A Review of Contributing Factors and Measures for Crossing the Divide. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 11701: 505–519. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29374-1_41/TABLES/3
[17]
Jenna Jacobson, Chang Z. Lin, and Rhonda McEwen. 2017. Aging with technology: Seniors and mobile connections. Canadian Journal of Communication 42, 2: 331–357. https://doi.org/10.22230/cjc.2017v42n2a3221
[18]
Michael Kretschmer, Jan Pennekamp, and Klaus Wehrle. 2021. Cookie Banners and Privacy Policies: Measuring the Impact of the GDPR on the Web. ACM Transactions on the Web 15, 4: 1–42. https://doi.org/10.1145/3466722
[19]
Sara Landgren and Åsa Cajander. 2021. Non-use of Digital Health Consultations Among Swedish Elderly Living in the Countryside. Frontiers in Public Health 9: 1323. https://doi.org/10.3389/FPUBH.2021.588583/BIBTEX
[20]
Xue Li, Kum Fai Yuen, Xueqin Wang, and Yiik Diew Wong. 2021. Contactless technologies adoption during the coronavirus pandemic: a combined technology acceptance and health belief perspective. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2021.1988919. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2021.1988919
[21]
James J Lin, Lena Mamykina, Silvia Lindtner, Gregory Delajoux, and Henry B Strub. 2006. Fish'n’Steps: Encouraging Physical Activity with an Interactive Computer Game. UbiComp 2006: Ubiquitous Computing: 261–278. https://doi.org/10.1007/11853565_16
[22]
Chia Hui Liu, Zhen Yu Wu, and Cho Pu Lin. 2018. A study of intention and behavior of using mobile communication software: The case of seniors. In Proceedings of 4th IEEE International Conference on Applied System Innovation 2018, ICASI 2018, 1006–1008. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICASI.2018.8394443
[23]
Jonas F. Ludvigsson. 2020. The first eight months of Sweden's COVID-19 strategy and the key actions and actors that were involved. Acta Paediatrica 109, 12: 2459–2471. https://doi.org/10.1111/APA.15582
[24]
Kenneth R. Mcleroy, Daniel Bibeau, Allan Steckler, and Karen Glanz. 1988. An Ecological Perspective on Health Promotion Programs. Health Education & Behavior 15, 4: 351–377. https://doi.org/10.1177/109019818801500401
[25]
Lyndsey Middleton, Hazel Hall, and Robert Raeside. 2018. Applications and applicability of Social Cognitive Theory in information science research: https://doi.org/10.1177/0961000618769985 51, 4: 927–937. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961000618769985
[26]
Hazwani Mohd Mohadis and Nazlena Mohamad Ali. 2015. Using socio-ecological model to inform the design of persuasive applications. In Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1905–1910. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702613.2732835
[27]
Marjan Momeni, Nadjla Hariri, Monir Nobahar, and Fatemeh Noshinfard. 2018. Barriers and Challenges Experienced by Seniors in Using Online Social Networks: A Phenomenological Study. Middle East Journal of Rehabilitation and Health 5, 1. https://doi.org/10.5812/mejrh.65310
[28]
Elizabeth L. Murnane, Tara G. Walker, Beck Tench, Stephen Voida, and Jaime Snyder. 2018. Personal Informatics in Interpersonal Contexts. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 2, CSCW. https://doi.org/10.1145/3274396
[29]
Vasiliki Mylonopoulou, Alexandra Weilenmann, Olof Torgersson, Beata Jungselius, and Fredrik Bergstrand. 2020. Searching for Empathy: A Swedish Study on Designing for Seniors. In 11th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction.
[30]
Atsushi Nakagomi, Koichiro Shiba, Katsunori Kondo, and Ichiro Kawachi. 2022. Can Online Communication Prevent Depression Among Older People? A Longitudinal Analysis. Journal of Applied Gerontology 41, 1: 167–175. https://doi.org/10.1177/0733464820982147
[31]
Jakob Nielsen. 1994. Enhancing the Explanatory Power of Usability Heuristics. In Enhancing the Explanatory Power of Usability Heuristics, 152–158.
[32]
Carolyn Pang Zhiqin Collin Wang Joanna McGrenere, Rock Leung Jiamin Dai Karyn Mofatt, Carolyn Pang, Zhiqin Collin Wang, Joanna McGrenere, Rock Leung, Jiamin Dai, and Karyn Mofatt. 2021. Technology Adoption and Learning Prefer-ences for Older Adults:: Evolving Perceptions, Ongoing Challenges, and Emerging Design Opportunities. In CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764
[33]
Anabel Quan-Haase and Isioma Elueze. 2018. Revisiting the Privacy Paradox: Concerns and Protection Strategies in the Social Media Experiences of Older Adults. In 9th International Conference on Social Media and Society. https://doi.org/10.1145/3217804
[34]
Anabel Quan-Haase, Kim Martin, and Kathleen Schreurs. 2016. Interviews with digital seniors: ICT use in the context of everyday life. Information Communication and Society 19, 5: 691–707. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1140217
[35]
Emanuela Sala, Gabriele Cerati, and Alessandra Gaia. 2021. Are social media users more satisfied with their life than non-users? A study on older Italians. Ageing & Society: 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X21000416
[36]
SCB Statistics Sweden. ICT usage in households and by individuals. Retrieved from https://www.scb.se/en/finding-statistics/statistics-by-subject-area/living-conditions/living-conditions/ict-usage-in-households-and-by-individuals/#_Tablesandgraphs
[37]
Frances Sin, Sophie Berger, Ig Jae Kim, and Dongwook Yoon. 2021. Digital Social Interaction in Older Adults During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 5, CSCW2: 20. https://doi.org/10.1145/3479524
[38]
Jaisie Sin and Cosmin Munteanu. 2020. An empirically grounded sociotechnical perspective on designing virtual agents for older adults. Human-Computer Interaction 35, 5–6: 481–510. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370024.2020.1731690
[39]
Statista. 2019. Sweden: daily mobile internet usage, by age group 2019. Retrieved January 24, 2020 from https://www.statista.com/statistics/544075/sweden-daily-mobile-internet-usage-by-age-group/
[40]
Erik Stolterman and Anna Croon Fors. 2004. Information Technology and the Good Life. Advances in Information and Communication Technology 143: 687–692. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-8095-6_45
[41]
Sveriges Riksbank. 2020. Changed Swish habits during the pandemic . Retrieved April 26, 2022 from https://www.riksbank.se/en-gb/payments–cash/payments-in-sweden/payments-in-sweden-2020/1.-the-payment-market-is-being-digitalised/many-people-make-payments-by-mobile-for-example-with-swish/changed-swish-habits-during-the-pandemic/
[42]
Franziska Tachtler, Reem Refaat Talhouk, Toni Michel, Petr Slovák, and Geraldine Fitzpatrick. 2021. Unaccompanied Migrant Youth and Mental Health Technologies: A social-Ecological Approach to Understanding and Designing. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings: 541. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445470
[43]
Sa-Rang Um, Hye-Ri Shin, Young-Sun Kim, Gurvan Branellec, and Ji-Yong Lee. 2022. Fintech and South Korean seniors: A study of factors affecting acceptance of Fintech. Innovations: 195–229.
[44]
Christine Utz, Martin Degeling, Sascha Fahl, Florian Schaub, and Thorsten Holz. 2019. (Un)informed Consent: Studying GDPR Consent Notices in the Field ACM Reference Format. In Conference on Computer and Communications Security, 973–990. https://doi.org/10.1145/3319535
[45]
Kerryellen G. Vroman, Sajay Arthanat, and Catherine Lysack. 2015. “Who over 65 is online?” Older adults’ dispositions toward information communication technology. Computers in Human Behavior 43: 156–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.10.018
[46]
Nicole Wagner, Khaled Hassanein, and Milena Head. 2010. Computer use by older adults: A multi-disciplinary review. Computers in Human Behavior 26, 5: 870–882. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.03.029
[47]
Alexandra Weilenmann, Beata Jungselius, and Vasiliki Mylonopoulou. 2022. Understanding older experienced social media users. In International Conference on Social Media and Society, (to be published).
[48]
Masha Zager. 2019. Municipal Fiber in Sweden. broadband communities. Retrieved April 15, 2022 from https://www.bbcmag.com/community-broadband/municipal-fiber-in-sweden
[49]
Seniorsurfarna. Retrieved April 26, 2022 from https://urplay.se/serie/214200-seniorsurfarna
[50]
Digital video calls have soared during the pandemic, mainly among the oldest. The Swedes and the internet. Retrieved April 27, 2022 from https://svenskarnaochinternet.se/rapporter/svenskarna-och-internet-2020/digitala-kommunikationstjanster/de-som-ar-76-ar-eller-aldre-har-dubblerat-sin-anvandning-av-videosamtal-under-pandemin/

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
Academic Mindtrek '22: Proceedings of the 25th International Academic Mindtrek Conference
November 2022
407 pages
ISBN:9781450399555
DOI:10.1145/3569219
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution International 4.0 License.

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 16 November 2022

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. ICT usage
  2. design
  3. socio-ecological design
  4. socio-ecological model

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Conference

Academic Mindtrek 2022

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 110 of 207 submissions, 53%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 283
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)187
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)23
Reflects downloads up to 24 Sep 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

Get Access

Login options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media