Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3568834.3568880acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicibeConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

How to Successfully Develop Functional Conflict to Enhance Marketing Channels and Co-Creation Value: Channel Conflict Management Mechanism as the Pre-variable

Published: 25 January 2023 Publication History

Abstract

In the market competition of marketing channel, channel conflict can sometimes positively impact and stimulate the operation of the entire channel. If channel conflict mechanism can be properly displayed among channel members, a valuable channel relationship can be established. Thus, the purpose of this study is to explore the relationship of conflict mechanism, functional conflict, and co-creation value among channel members, and to construct a theoretical framework to study the relationship between marketing channels. This study focuses on smartphone retailers in the Greater Taipei area in Taiwan as research objects. The method of questionnaire survey is used to collect data, and a total of 223 valid questionnaires are obtained. This study also uses structural equations to conduct data analysis to verify of the relationship between marketing channels. The results of the study found that partner-type channel conflict mechanism does not generate co-creation value of the channel. On the contrary, self- interested channel conflict mechanism will have a negative impact on the co-creation value of the channel, but will not generate co-creation value of the channel through functional conflict. In addition, partner-type channel conflict mechanism has a significant and direct impact on improving functional conflict of retailers, and further generates channel co-creation value through functional conflict. Co-creation value of channels cannot be increased when partner-type channel conflict mechanism is adopted.

References

[1]
Amason, A. C., 1996. Distinguishing the Effects of Functional and Dysfunctional Conflict on Strategic Decision Making: Resolving a Paradox for Top Management Teams, Academy of Management Journal, 39(1), 123-148.
[2]
Barney, J. B. (2001). Resource-based theories of competitive advantage: A ten-year retrospective on the resource-based view. Journal of management, 27(6), 643-650.
[3]
Baron, R. A. (1991). Positive effects of conflict: A cognitive perspective. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 4(1), 25-36.
[4]
Bennet, G. A. and J. W. Cadogan (2001),” Partner symmetries, partner conflict and the quality of joint venture marketing strategy: An empirical investigation, ” Journal of Marketing Management, 17(1/2), 223−256.
[5]
Blau, P. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. Wiley, NY.
[6]
Boehm, D. N., & Hogan, T. 2014. 'A jack of all trades': The role of PIs in the establishment and management of collaborative networks in scientific knowledge commercialisation. Journal of Technology Transfer, 39(1): 134-149.
[7]
Bridoux, F., & Stoelhorst, J. W. 2014. Microfoundations for stakeholder theory: Managing stakeholders with heterogeneous motives. Strategic Management Journal, 35(1): 107-125.
[8]
Bridoux, F., & Stoelhorst, J. W. 2016. Stakeholder relationships and social welfare: A behavioral theory of contributions to joint value creation. Academy of Management Review, 41(2): 229-251.
[9]
Bridoux, F., Coeurderoy, R., & Durand, R. 2011. Heterogeneous motives and the collective creation of value. Academy of Management Review, 36(4): 711-730.
[10]
Cetin, Munevver Olcum and Ozge Hacifazlioglu (2004), “Conflict Management Styles: A Comparative Study of University Academics and High School Teachers,” Journal of American Academy of Business, 5 (1/2), 325–332.
[11]
Chang, K. H. and D. F. Gotcher (2010), “Conflict-coordination learning in marketing channel relationships: The distributor view, ” Industrial Marketing Management, 39 Chen, H. and T.J. Chen (2003), “Governance structures in strategic alliances: Transaction cost versus resource-based perspective, ” Journal of World Business, 38(1), 1-14.
[12]
Claycomb, C., & Frankwick, G. L. (2004). A contingency perspective of communication, conflict resolution and buyer search effort in buyer‐supplier relationships. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 40(4), 18-34.
[13]
Coleman, J. S. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
[14]
Cosier, R. A. (1978). The effects of three potential aids for making strategic decisions on prediction accuracy. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 22(2), 295-306.
[15]
Dahlstrom, R. and A. Nygaard (1999), “An Empirical Investigation of Ex Post Transaction Costs in Franchised Distribution Channels, ” Journal of Marketing Research, 36(2), 160-170.
[16]
Emerson, R. M. (1976). Social exchange theory. Annual Review of Sociology, 2, 335-362.
[17]
Filley, A. C. (1970). Committee management: guidelines from social science research. California Management Review, 13(1), 13-21.
[18]
Gouillart, F., & Billings, D. 2013. Community-powered problem solving. Harvard Business Review, 91(4): 70-77.
[19]
Heide, J. B., & John, G. (1990). Alliances in industrial purchasing: The determinants of joint action in buyer-supplier relationships. Journal of marketing Research, 27(1), 24-36.
[20]
Homans, G. (1958). Social behavior as exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 63, 597-606.
[21]
Jap, S. D. (1999), “ Pie-expansion effects: Collaboration processes in buyer–seller relationships, ” Journal of Marketing Research, 36(4), 461-475.
[22]
Madhok, A. and S. Tallman (1998), “ Resources, transaction and rents: Managing value through interfirm collaborative relative relationships, ” Organizational Science, 9(3), 326-339.
[23]
March, J. G., & Simon, H. A. (1958). Organizations. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
[24]
Menon, A., S. G. Bharadwaj and R. Howell (1996), “ The quality and effectiveness of marketing strategy: Effects of functional and dysfunctional conflict in intraorganizational relationships, ” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 14(4), 299−313.
[25]
Morris, M., & Carter, C. R. (2005). Relationship marketing and supplier logistics performance: an extension of the key mediating variables model. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 41(4), 32-43.
[26]
Nonaka, I., & Konno, N. 1998. The concept of "Ba": Building a foundation for knowledge creation. California Management Review, 40(3): 40-54.
[27]
Pinho, N., Beirão, G., Patrício, L., & Fisk, R. P. 2014. Understanding value co-creation in complex services with many actors. Journal of Service Management, 25(4): 470-493.
[28]
Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. 2011. Creating shared value. Harvard Business Review, 89(1/2): 62-77.
[29]
Priem, R. L., & Butler, J. E. 2001. Is the resource-based "view" a useful perspective for strategic management research? Academy of Management Review, 26(1): 22-40.
[30]
Rahim, A., & Bonoma, T. V. (1979). Managing organizational conflict: A model for diagnosis and intervention. Psychological reports, 44(3), 1323-1344.
[31]
Rahim, M. A., Antonioni, D., & Psenicka, C. (2001). A STRUCTURAL EQUATIONS MODEL OF LEADER POWER, SUBORDINATES'STYLES OF HANDLING CONFLICT, AND JOB PERFORMANCE. International journal of conflict management.
[32]
Raisch, S. and Birkinshaw, J., 2008. Organizationl Mbidexterity: Antecedents, Outcomes, and Moderators, Journal of Management, 34(3), 375-409.
[33]
Rawwas, M. Y., Vitell, S. J., & Barnes, J. H. (1997). Management of conflict using individual power sources: A retailers' perspective. Journal of Business Research, 40(1), 49–64.
[34]
Robbins, S. P., 1978. Conflict Management and ConflictResolution are not Synonymous Terms, California Management Review, 21(2), 67-75.
[35]
Rose, Gregory M. and Aviv Shoham (2004), “Inter–organizational Task and Emotional Conflict with International Channels of Distribution,” Journal of Business Research, 57 (9), 942–950.
[36]
Simons, T. L., & Peterson, R. S. (2000). Task conflict and relationship conflict in top management teams: the pivotal role of intragroup trust. Journal of applied psychology, 85(1), 102.
[37]
Stiles, P. (2001). The impact of the board on strategy: An empirical examination. Journal of management studies, 38(5), 627-650.
[38]
Tantalo, C., & Priem, R. L. 2016. Value creation through stakeholder synergy. Strategic Management Journal, 37(2): 314-329.
[39]
Thibaut, J., & Kelley, H. (1959). The social psychology of groups. Wiley, NY.
[40]
Thomas, K. W. (1992). Conflict and conflict management: Reflections and update. Journal of organizational behavior, 265-274.
[41]
Ting-Toomey, S., & Kurogi, A. (1998). Facework competence in intercultural conflict: An updated face-negotiation theory. International journal of intercultural relations, 22(2), 187-225.
[42]
Tjosvold, D. (1985). Implications of controversy research for management. Journal of management, 11(3), 21-37.
[43]
Tjosvold, D., Hui, C., & Yu, Z. (2003). Conflict management and task reflexivity for team in‐role and extra‐role performance in China. International Journal of Conflict Management.
[44]
Van Alstyne, M. W., Parker, G. G., & Choudary, S. P. 2016. Pipelines, platforms, and the new rules of strategy. Harvard Business Review, 94(4): 54-62.
[45]
Vargo, S. L. and R. Lusch (2004), “ Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing, ” Journal of Marketing, 68, 1-17.
[46]
Zaheer, A., & Venkatraman, N. (1995). Relational governance as an inter organizational strategy: An empirical test of the role of trust in economic exchange. Strategic Management Journal, 16, 373-392.

Index Terms

  1. How to Successfully Develop Functional Conflict to Enhance Marketing Channels and Co-Creation Value: Channel Conflict Management Mechanism as the Pre-variable

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    ICIBE '22: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Industrial and Business Engineering
    September 2022
    552 pages
    ISBN:9781450397582
    DOI:10.1145/3568834
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 25 January 2023

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Co-Creation Value of the Channel
    2. Functional Conflict
    3. Partner-Type Channel Conflict Mechanism
    4. Self-Interested Channel Conflict Mechanism

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Conference

    ICIBE 2022

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • 0
      Total Citations
    • 24
      Total Downloads
    • Downloads (Last 12 months)8
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2
    Reflects downloads up to 18 Nov 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format.

    HTML Format

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media