Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3565066.3609735acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmobilehciConference Proceedingsconference-collections
extended-abstract

User-Centered Design of a Mobile Augmented Reality HMI for Virtual Stops

Published: 26 September 2023 Publication History

Abstract

Shared automated mobility on-demand (SAMOD) might be an efficient and convenient mode of transportation in the future. The new concept of a virtual stop (vStop) will coordinate the road users during its dynamic pick-up scenarios. Users need to walk to the pick-up locations in order to board the automated shuttle bus (ASB). Here, users want to find the location, which has no references in the real world, effortlessly. Then, users desire trouble-free identification of the ASB. This doctoral research project aims at designing a human-machine interface (HMI) for vStops with methods of user-centered design. The HMI displays important information in relation to the road environment using augmented reality (AR). This provides users with high rates of user experience, high rates of acceptance and low rates of cognitive workload when solving the tasks. First results show the positive perception of a vStop HMI and the advantages of AR for the selected use case. The doctoral research contributes to widespread deployment of SAMOD in the future and to the change towards more sustainable mobility solutions.

References

[1]
Ryley, T.J., A. Stanley, P., P. Enoch, M., M. Zanni, A., A. Quddus, M.: Investigating the contribution of Demand Responsive Transport to a sustainable local public transport system. Research in Transportation Economics 48, 364–372 (2014).
[2]
Alonso-González, M.J., Cats, O., van Oort, N., Hoogendoorn-Lanser, S., Hoogendoorn, S.: What are the determinants of the willingness to share rides in pooled on-demand services? Transportation (2020).
[3]
Shaheen, S., Cohen, A.: Shared ride services in North America: definitions, impacts, and the future of pooling. Transport Reviews 39(4), 427–442 (2018).
[4]
Fagnant, D.J., Kockelman, K.: Preparing a nation for autonomous vehicles: opportunities, barriers and policy recommendations. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 77, 167–181 (2015).
[5]
Martinez, L.M., Viegas, J.M.: Assessing the impacts of deploying a shared self-driving urban mobility system: An agent-based model applied to the city of Lisbon, Portugal. International Journal of Transportation Science and Technology 6(1), 13–27 (2017).
[6]
Hub, F., Oehl, M., Hesse, T., Seifert, K.: Supporting User Experience of Shared Automated Mobility On-Demand through Novel Virtual Infrastructure: Making the Case for Virtual Stops. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 103043 (2023).
[7]
Feys, M., Rombaut, E., Vanhaverbeke, L.: Experience and Acceptance of Autonomous Shuttles in the Brussels Capital Region. Sustainability 12(20), 8403 (2020).
[8]
Dix, A.: Human-Computer Interaction. In: LIU, L., ÖZSU, M.T. (eds.) Encyclopedia of Database Systems, pp. 1327–1331. Springer US, Boston, MA (2009).
[9]
Carsten, O., Martens, M.H.: How can humans understand their automated cars? HMI principles, problems and solutions. Cogn Tech Work 21(1), 3–20 (2019).
[10]
DIN EN ISO 9241-210:2011-01, Ergonomie der Mensch-System-Interaktion - Teil 210: Prozess zur Gestaltung gebrauchstauglicher interaktiver Systeme (ISO 9241-210:2010); Deutsche Fassung EN ISO 9241-210:2010.
[11]
Schrepp, M., Hinderks, A., Thomaschewski, J.: Construction of a Benchmark for the User Experience Questionnaire (UEQ). IJIMAI 4(4), 40 (2017).
[12]
Harborth, D., Pape, S.: German Translation of the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology 2 (UTAUT2) Questionnaire. SSRN Journal (2018).
[13]
Hart, S.G., Staveland, L.E.: Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research. In: Human Mental Workload, vol. 52. Advances in Psychology, pp. 139–183. Elsevier (1988).
[14]
Hub, F., Oehl, M.: How to Find My Ride? Results of an HCI Expert Workshop for AR-Aided Navigation. In: Stephanidis, C., Antona, M., Ntoa, S. (eds.) HCI International 2021 - Late Breaking Posters, vol. 1498. Communications in Computer and Information Science, pp. 535–542. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2021).
[15]
Hub, F., Oehl, M.: Design and Field Test of a Mobile Augmented Reality Human–Machine Interface for Virtual Stops in Shared Automated Mobility On-Demand. Electronics 11(17), 2687 (2022).
[16]
Azuma, R.T.: A Survey of Augmented Reality. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 6(4), 355–385 (1997).
[17]
Milgram, P., Kishino, F.: A Taxonomy of Mixed Reality Visual Displays. IEICE Trans. Information Systems vol. E77-D, no. 12, 1321–1329 (1994).
[18]
Billinghurst, M., Clark, A., Lee, G.: A Survey of Augmented Reality. FNT in Human–Computer Interaction 8(2-3), 73–272 (2015).
[19]
Choi, H., Kim, Y.R., Kim, G.J.: Presence, Immersion and Usability of Mobile Augmented Reality. In: Chen, J.Y., Fragomeni, G. (eds.) Virtual, Augmented and Mixed Reality. Multimodal Interaction, vol. 11574. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 3–15. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2019).,

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
MobileHCI '23 Companion: Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Mobile Human-Computer Interaction
September 2023
256 pages
Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 26 September 2023

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Augmented Reality
  2. Human-Machine Interface
  3. User-centered Design
  4. Virtual Stop

Qualifiers

  • Extended-abstract
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Funding Sources

Conference

MobileHCI '23
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 202 of 906 submissions, 22%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 72
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)53
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)9
Reflects downloads up to 13 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

Get Access

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media