Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3564721.3565957acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pageskoli-callingConference Proceedingsconference-collections
extended-abstract

Examining the Use of Computational Thinking Skills When Solving Bebras Tasks

Published: 17 November 2022 Publication History

Abstract

Computational thinking (CT) is considered an essential problem-solving skill in the 21st century, and is receiving attention on different educational levels. To promote and assess students’ CT skills, so-called ’Bebras tasks’ (i.e. small tasks for problem solving in informatics) are created by experts in the field of CT. There has not been empirical research to determine to what extent and how CT skills are used while solving these tasks, however. This qualitative study bridges this gap by using the think-aloud method to examine the use of CT skills when solving Bebras. The results of this study can serve as a validation for the use of CT skills in solving Bebras tasks. This poster abstract introduces the background and setup of the study.

References

[1]
Soumela Atmatzidou and Stavros Demetriadis. 2016. Advancing students’ computational thinking skills through educational robotics: A study on age and gender relevant differences. Robotics and Autonomous Systems 75 (2016), 661–670. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.robot.2015.10.008
[2]
Sarah Bonner, Peggy Chen, Kristi Jones, and Brandon Milonovich. 2021. Formative Assessment of Computational Thinking: Cognitive and Metacognitive Processes. Applied Measurement in Education 34, 1 (2021), 27–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/08957347.2020.1835912
[3]
Luca Chiodini and Matthias Hauswirth. 2021. Wrong Answers for Wrong Reasons: The Risks of Ad Hoc Instruments. In 21st Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research (Joensuu, Finland) (Koli Calling ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 16, 11 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3488042.3488045
[4]
Valentina Dagiene and Vladimiras Dolgopolovas. 2022. Short Tasks for Scaffolding Computational Thinking by the Global Bebras Challenge. Mathematics 10, 17 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/math10173194
[5]
Valentina Dagienė and Sue Sentance. 2016. It’s Computational Thinking! Bebras Tasks in the Curriculum. In Informatics in Schools: Improvement of Informatics Knowledge and Perception, Andrej Brodnik and Françoise Tort (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 28–39.
[6]
Valentina Dagienė, Sue Sentance, and Gabrielė Stupurienė. 2017. Developing a two-dimensional categorization system for educational tasks in informatics. Informatica 28, 1 (2017), 23–44. https://doi.org/10.15388/Informatica.2017.119
[7]
Takam Djambong and Viktor Freiman. 2016. Task-Based Assessment of Students’ Computational Thinking Skills Developed through Visual Programming or Tangible Coding Environments.International Association for Development of the Information Society (2016).
[8]
Andreas Febrian, Oenardi Lawanto, Kamyn Peterson-Rucker, Alia Melvin, and Shane E. Guymon. 2018. Does Everyone Use Computational Thinking?: A Case Study of Art and Computer Science Majors. In 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. ASEE Conferences, Salt Lake City, Utah. https://peer.asee.org/30344
[9]
EG Flaherty. 1975. The thinking aloud technique and problem solving ability. The Journal of Educational Research 68, 6 (1975), 223–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.1975.10884753
[10]
Cruz Izu, Claudio Mirolo, Amber Settle, Linda Mannila, and Gabriele Stupuriene. 2017. Exploring Bebras Tasks Content and Performance: A Multinational Study.Informatics in Education 16, 1 (2017), 39–59.
[11]
Ruohan Liu, Feiya Luo, and Maya Israel. 2021. What Do We Know about Assessing Computational Thinking? A New Methodological Perspective from the Literature. In Proceedings of the 26th ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education V. 1 (Virtual Event, Germany) (ITiCSE ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 269–275. https://doi.org/10.1145/3430665.3456380
[12]
Feiya Luo, Maya Israel, Ruohan Liu, Wei Yan, Brian Gane, and John Hampton. 2020. Understanding Students’ Computational Thinking through Cognitive Interviews: A Learning Trajectory-Based Analysis. In Proceedings of the 51st ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (Portland, OR, USA) (SIGCSE ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 919–925. https://doi.org/10.1145/3328778.3366845
[13]
Sze Yee Lye and Joyce Hwee Ling Koh. 2014. Review on teaching and learning of computational thinking through programming: What is next for K-12?Computers in Human Behavior 41 (2014), 51–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.09.012
[14]
Julie Mueller, Danielle Beckett, Eden Hennessey, and Hasan Shodiev. 2017. Assessing Computational Thinking Across the Curriculum. In Emerging Research, Practice, and Policy on Computational Thinking, Peter J. Rich and Charles B. Hodges (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 251–267. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52691-1_16
[15]
Cliodhna O’Connor and Helene Joffe. 2020. Intercoder Reliability in Qualitative Research: Debates and Practical Guidelines. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 19 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919899220
[16]
Cynthia C. Selby. 2015. Relationships: Computational Thinking, Pedagogy of Programming, and Bloom’s Taxonomy. In Proceedings of the Workshop in Primary and Secondary Computing Education (London, United Kingdom) (WiPSCE ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 80–87. https://doi.org/10.1145/2818314.2818315
[17]
Elizabeth J. Short, Steven W. Evans, Sarah E. Friebert, and Chris W. Schatschneider. 1991. Thinking aloud during problem solving: Facilitation effects. Learning and Individual Differences 3, 2 (1991), 109–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/1041-6080(91)90011-O
[18]
Jeannette Wing. 2010. Computational thinking: What and Why. https://www.cs.cmu.edu/ CompThink/resources/TheLinkWing.pdf

Index Terms

  1. Examining the Use of Computational Thinking Skills When Solving Bebras Tasks

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    Koli Calling '22: Proceedings of the 22nd Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research
    November 2022
    282 pages
    ISBN:9781450396165
    DOI:10.1145/3564721
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 17 November 2022

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Bebras
    2. computational thinking
    3. think-aloud

    Qualifiers

    • Extended-abstract
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Conference

    Koli 2022

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 80 of 182 submissions, 44%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • 0
      Total Citations
    • 106
      Total Downloads
    • Downloads (Last 12 months)35
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3
    Reflects downloads up to 30 Nov 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format.

    HTML Format

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media