Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3558884.3558892acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiwoarConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Discovering Behavioural Predispositions in Data to Improve Human Activity Recognition

Published: 05 January 2023 Publication History

Abstract

The automatic, sensor-based assessment of challenging behavior of persons with dementia is an important task to support the selection of interventions. However, predicting behaviors like apathy and agitation is challenging due to the large inter- and intra-patient variability. Goal of this paper is to improve the recognition performance by making use of the observation that patients tend to show specific behaviors at certain times of the day or week. We propose to identify such segments of similar behavior via clustering the distributions of annotations of the time segments. All time segments within a cluster then consist of similar behaviors and thus indicate a behavioral predisposition (BPD). We utilize BPDs by training a classifier for each BPD. Empirically, we demonstrate that when the BPD per time segment is known, activity recognition performance can be substantially improved.

References

[1]
Ridwan Alam, Azziza Bankole, Martha Anderson, and John Lach. 2019. Multiple-Instance Learning for Sparse Behavior Modeling from Wearables: Toward Dementia-Related Agitation Prediction. In 2019 41st Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC). IEEE, Berlin, Germany, 1330–1333. https://doi.org/10.1109/EMBC.2019.8856502
[2]
David M Blei, Andrew Y Ng, and Michael I Jordan. 2003. Latent dirichlet allocation. Journal of machine Learning research 3, Jan (2003), 993–1022.
[3]
Marco Canevelli, Martina Valletta, Alessandro Trebbastoni, Giuseppe Sarli, Fabrizia D’Antonio, Leonardo Tariciotti, Carlo de Lena, and Giuseppe Bruno. 2016. Sundowning in Dementia: Clinical Relevance, Pathophysiological Determinants, and Therapeutic Approaches. Frontiers in Medicine 3 (Dec. 2016), 73. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2016.00073
[4]
Jiska Cohen-Mansfield. 1996. Assessment of Agitation. International Psychogeriatrics 8, 2 (1996), 233–245. https://doi.org/10.1017/S104161029600261X
[5]
Jiska Cohen-Mansfield and Perla Werner. 1995. Environmental influences on agitation: An integrative summary of an observational study. American Journal of Alzheimer’s Care and Related Disorders & Research 10, 1 (Jan. 1995), 32–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/153331759501000108
[6]
Anthony G. Cohn, Brandon Bennett, John Gooday, and Nicholas Mark Gotts. 1997. Qualitative Spatial Representation and Reasoning with the Region Connection Calculus. GeoInformatica 1, 3 (Oct. 1997), 275–316. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009712514511
[7]
Jeffrey L Cummings. 1997. The Neuropsychiatric Inventory: assessing psychopathology in dementia patients. Neurology 48, 5 Suppl 6 (1997), 10S–16S.
[8]
M. Fox and D. Long. 2003. PDDL2.1: An Extension to PDDL for Expressing Temporal Planning Domains. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 20 (Dec. 2003), 61–124. https://doi.org/10.1613/jair.1129
[9]
Doreen Goerss, Albert Hein, Sebastian Bader, Margareta Halek, Sven Kernebeck, Andreas Kutschke, Christina Heine, Frank Krueger, Thomas Kirste, and Stefan Teipel. 2020. Automated sensor-based detection of challenging behaviors in advanced stages of dementia in nursing homes. Alzheimer’s & Dementia 16, 4 (2020), 672–680. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalz.2019.08.193 arXiv:https://alz-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1016/j.jalz.2019.08.193
[10]
Sozo Inoue, Naonori Ueda, Yasunobu Nohara, and Naoki Nakashima. 2016. Recognizing and Understanding Nursing Activities for a Whole Day with a Big Dataset. Journal of Information Processing 24, 6 (2016), 853–866. https://doi.org/10.2197/ipsjjip.24.853
[11]
Frank Krüger, Alexander Steiniger, Sebastian Bader, and Thomas Kirste. 2012. Evaluating the Robustness of Activity Recognition Using Computational Causal Behavior Models. In Proceedings of the 2012 ACM Conference on Ubiquitous Computing (Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania) (UbiComp ’12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1066–1074. https://doi.org/10.1145/2370216.2370443
[12]
Sang Uk Lee, Andreas Hofmann, and Brian Williams. 2019. A Model-Based Human Activity Recognition for Human–Robot Collaboration. In 2019 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). IEEE, Macau, China, 736–743. https://doi.org/10.1109/IROS40897.2019.8967650
[13]
Stefan Lüdtke, Fernando Moya Rueda, Waqas Ahmed, Gernot A. Fink, and Thomas Kirste. 2021. Human Activity Recognition using Attribute-Based Neural Networks and Context Information. In 3rd International Workshop on Deep Learning for Human Activity Recognition.
[14]
Amir Pnueli. 1977. The Temporal Logic of Programs. In Proceedings of the 18th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science(SFCS ’77). IEEE Computer Society, USA, 46–57. https://doi.org/10.1109/SFCS.1977.32
[15]
Fernando Moya Rueda, Stefan Lüdtke, Max Schroder, Kristina Yordanova, Thomas Kirste, and Gernot A. Fink. 2019. Combining Symbolic Reasoning and Deep Learning for Human Activity Recognition. In 2019 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops (PerCom Workshops). IEEE, Kyoto, Japan, 22–27. https://doi.org/10.1109/PERCOMW.2019.8730792
[16]
Stefan Teipel, Christina Heine, Albert Hein, Frank Krüger, Andreas Kutschke, Sven Kernebeck, Margareta Halek, Sebastian Bader, and Thomas Kirste. 2017. Multidimensional assessment of challenging behaviors in advanced stages of dementia in nursing homes—The insideDEM framework. Alzheimer’s & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring 8, 1 (Jan. 2017), 36–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dadm.2017.03.006
[17]
B.C. Williams, M.D. Ingham, S.H. Chung, and P.H. Elliott. 2003. Model-based programming of intelligent embedded systems and robotic space explorers. Proc. IEEE 91, 1 (2003), 212–237. https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2002.805828
[18]
Yaqi Xie, Fan Zhou, and Harold Soh. 2021. Embedding Symbolic Temporal Knowledge into Deep Sequential Models. In 2021 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). IEEE, Xi’an, China, 4267–4273. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRA48506.2021.9561952
[19]
Yunyang Xiong, Hyunwoo J. Kim, and Vikas Singh. 2019. Mixed Effects Neural Networks (MeNets) With Applications to Gaze Estimation. In 2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). IEEE, Long Beach, CA, USA, 7735–7744. https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2019.00793
[20]
Kristina Yordanova, Stefan Lüdtke, Samuel Whitehouse, Frank Krüger, Adeline Paiement, Majid Mirmehdi, Ian Craddock, and Thomas Kirste. 2019. Analysing Cooking Behaviour in Home Settings: Towards Health Monitoring. Sensors 19, 3 (Feb. 2019), 646. https://doi.org/10.3390/s19030646

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
iWOAR '22: Proceedings of the 7th International Workshop on Sensor-based Activity Recognition and Artificial Intelligence
September 2022
117 pages
ISBN:9781450396240
DOI:10.1145/3558884
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 05 January 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. clustering
  2. human activity recognition
  3. machine learning
  4. wearable sensors

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Conference

iWOAR '22

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 46 of 73 submissions, 63%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 65
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)26
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
Reflects downloads up to 12 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

Get Access

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media