Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
article
Free access

On Reporting Computational Experiments with Mathematical Software

Published: 01 June 1979 Publication History
First page of PDF

References

[1]
AIRD, T., BATTISTE, E.L, AND GREGORY, W.C. Portability of mathematical software coded m Fortran. ACM Trans. Math Software 3, 2 (June 1977), 113-127.
[2]
ANDERSON, V.L, AND MCLEAN, 1~ A. Design of Experiments" A Realistic Approach. Dekker, New York, 1974
[3]
ANSI FORTRAN X3.9-1978, American National Standards Institute, New York, 1978.
[4]
DEMBO, R.S, AND MULVEY, J M On the analyms and comparison of mathematical programming algorithms and software In National Bureau of Standards Special Publication 502, W.W. White, Ed., U S Department of Commerce, Washington, D.C, 1978, pp. 106-116.
[5]
HOFFMAN, A., MANNOS, M., SOKOLOWSKY, D, AND WIEGMANN, N. Computational experience m solving linear programs SIAM J 1 (1953), 1-33
[6]
IGNIZIO, J.P. Validating claims for algorithms proposed for publication. Oper. Res. 21, 3 (May 1973), 852-854
[7]
IGNIZIO, J P On the estabhshment of standards for comparing algorithm performance. Interfaces 2, 1 (Nov 1971), 8-11.
[8]
JACKSON, R.H., AND MULVEY, J.M. A critical review of methods for comparing mathematical programming algorithms and software' 1951-1977. Presented at The Institute of Management Science Syrup. XXIII, Athens, July 1977.
[9]
LIN, BOY., AND RARDIN, F~.L. Controlled experimental design for comparison of integer programmmg algorithms. J-76-25, Industrial and Systems Engineering, Georgia Inst. of Technology, Atlanta, Ga, 1976.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Computational Experiments in Computer Science Research: A Literature SurveyIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2024.345880812(132254-132270)Online publication date: 2024
  • (2024)A methodology for comparing optimization algorithms for auto-tuningFuture Generation Computer Systems10.1016/j.future.2024.05.021159(489-504)Online publication date: Oct-2024
  • (2024)Computational ExperimentationComputational Stochastic Programming10.1007/978-3-031-52464-6_10(465-504)Online publication date: 10-Jan-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. On Reporting Computational Experiments with Mathematical Software

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software
    ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software  Volume 5, Issue 2
    June 1979
    115 pages
    ISSN:0098-3500
    EISSN:1557-7295
    DOI:10.1145/355826
    Issue’s Table of Contents

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 01 June 1979
    Published in TOMS Volume 5, Issue 2

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • Article

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)113
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)14
    Reflects downloads up to 20 Dec 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Computational Experiments in Computer Science Research: A Literature SurveyIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2024.345880812(132254-132270)Online publication date: 2024
    • (2024)A methodology for comparing optimization algorithms for auto-tuningFuture Generation Computer Systems10.1016/j.future.2024.05.021159(489-504)Online publication date: Oct-2024
    • (2024)Computational ExperimentationComputational Stochastic Programming10.1007/978-3-031-52464-6_10(465-504)Online publication date: 10-Jan-2024
    • (2022)A Composite Index Method for Optimization BenchmarkingLearning and Intelligent Optimization10.1007/978-3-031-24866-5_4(43-57)Online publication date: 5-Jun-2022
    • (2021)Sustainable Research Software Hand-OverJournal of Open Research Software10.5334/jors.3079Online publication date: 30-Apr-2021
    • (2021)Tuning Algorithms for Stochastic Black-Box Optimization: State of the Art and Future PerspectivesBlack Box Optimization, Machine Learning, and No-Free Lunch Theorems10.1007/978-3-030-66515-9_3(67-108)Online publication date: 4-Jan-2021
    • (2017)A critical analysis of the “improved Clarke and Wright savings algorithm”International Transactions in Operational Research10.1111/itor.1244326:1(54-63)Online publication date: 14-Aug-2017
    • (2017)The multiple-choice multi-period knapsack problemJournal of the Operational Research Society10.1057/palgrave.jors.260166155:2(187-197)Online publication date: 21-Dec-2017
    • (2017)Good Laboratory Practice for optimization researchJournal of the Operational Research Society10.1057/jors.2015.7767:4(676-689)Online publication date: 21-Dec-2017
    • (2017)Best practices for comparing optimization algorithmsOptimization and Engineering10.1007/s11081-017-9366-118:4(815-848)Online publication date: 19-Sep-2017
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Login options

    Full Access

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media