Adaptable Take-Over Concepts: Considering Partial and Gradual Take-Overs
Pages 103 - 107
Abstract
In this paper, we explore a novel three-stage take-over (TO) concept for conditionally autonomous vehicles (SAE L3). In a user study in a driving simulator, we evaluated the usability of four different TO concepts: a) a basic concept including only a single TO request, b) a partial take-over (PTO) concept, where the longitudinal coordination of the vehicle remains automatic, when a TO is performed by steering only, c) a concept with an improved minimum safety manoeuvre (MSM) with additional warnings and automatic braking manoeuvres, and d) a TO concept including both PTO and MSM. The results showed that when PTO and MSM were both used, the minimal time-to-collision (TTC) was longer on average, and the maximal lateral acceleration was lower on average compared to the basic or PTO concepts. In addition, significantly fewer collisions were observed when using PTO+MSM compared to the basic TO concept.
References
[1]
‘SAE International Releases Updated Visual Chart for Its “Levels of Driving Automation” Standard for Self-Driving Vehicles’. https://www.sae.org/ (accessed Jul. 19, 2019).
[2]
W. Morales-Alvarez, O. Sipele, R. Léberon, H. H. Tadjine, and C. Olaverri-Monreal, ‘Automated Driving: A Literature Review of the Take over Request in Conditional Automation’, Electronics, vol. 9, no. 12, Art. no. 12, Dec. 2020.
[3]
C. Gold, R. Happee, and K. Bengler, ‘Modeling take-over performance in level 3 conditionally automated vehicles’, Accident Analysis & Prevention, vol. 116, pp. 3–13, Jul. 2018.
[4]
F. Zhou, X. J. Yang, and J. C. F. de Winter, ‘Using Eye-Tracking Data to Predict Situation Awareness in Real Time During Takeover Transitions in Conditionally Automated Driving’, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, pp. 1–12, 2021.
[5]
S. Ma, ‘Take over Gradually in Conditional Automated Driving: The Effect of Two-stage Warning Systems on Situation Awareness, Driving Stress, Takeover Performance, and Acceptance’, International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 352–362, Feb. 2021.
[6]
D. Vanderwerp, ‘It's Not Just Tesla: All Other Driver-Assist Systems Work without Drivers, Too’, Car and Driver, Aug. 11, 2021. https://www.caranddriver.com/news/a37260363/driver-assist-systems-tested/ (accessed Jun. 23, 2022).
[7]
A. Reschka, ‘Safety Concept for Autonomous Vehicles’, in Autonomous Driving: Technical, Legal and Social Aspects, M. Maurer, J. C. Gerdes, B. Lenz, and H. Winner, Eds. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 2016, pp. 473–496.
[8]
R. De Iaco, S. L. Smith, and K. Czarnecki, ‘Universally Safe Swerve Maneuvers for Autonomous Driving’, IEEE Open Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems, vol. 2, pp. 482–494, 2021.
[9]
F. Naujoks, K. Wiedemann, N. Schömig, S. Hergeth, and A. Keinath, ‘Towards guidelines and verification methods for automated vehicle HMIs’, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, vol. 60, pp. 121–136, Jan. 2019.
[10]
T. Gruden, M. Hribernik, E. Keš, J. Sodnik, and G. Jakus, ‘Taktilno-vizualni uporabniški vmesnik za voznikov prevzem upravljanja vozila pri prekinitvi avtonomne vožnje’, in Zbornik osemindvajsete mednarodne Elektrotehniške in računalniške konference, Portorož, Slovenija, 2019, pp. 53–56.
[11]
E. J. Williams, ‘Experimental Designs Balanced for the Estimation of Residual Effects of Treatments’, Aust. J. Chem., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 149–168, 1949.
[12]
‘Nervtech Simuation Technologies’, Nervtech. https://www.nervtech.com (accessed Apr. 29, 2019).
[13]
‘AVSimulation SCANeR studio’, AVSimulation. https://www.avsimulation.com/scanerstudio/ (accessed Aug. 12, 2020).
[14]
J. Radlmayr, C. Gold, L. Lorenz, M. Farid, and K. Bengler, ‘How Traffic Situations and Non-Driving Related Tasks Affect the Take-Over Quality in Highly Automated Driving’, Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 2063–2067, Sep. 2014.
[15]
S. Petermeijer, P. Bazilinskyy, K. Bengler, and J. de Winter, ‘Take-over again: Investigating multimodal and directional TORs to get the driver back into the loop’, Applied Ergonomics, vol. 62, pp. 204–215, Jul. 2017.
[16]
S. M. Petermeijer, S. Cieler, and J. C. F. de Winter, ‘Comparing spatially static and dynamic vibrotactile take-over requests in the driver seat’, Accident Analysis & Prevention, vol. 99, pp. 218–227, Feb. 2017.
[17]
M. Körber, L. Prasch, and K. Bengler, ‘Why Do I Have to Drive Now? Post Hoc Explanations of Takeover Requests’, Hum Factors, vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 305–323, May 2018.
[18]
M. M. Minderhoud and P. H. L. Bovy, ‘Extended time-to-collision measures for road traffic safety assessment’, Accident Analysis & Prevention, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 89–97, Jan. 2001.
[19]
T. Köhn, M. Gottlieb, M. Schermann, and H. Krcmar, ‘Improving take-over quality in automated driving by interrupting non-driving tasks’, in Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, Marina del Ray, California, Mar. 2019, pp. 510–517.
[20]
K. Zeeb, A. Buchner, and M. Schrauf, ‘Is take-over time all that matters? The impact of visual-cognitive load on driver take-over quality after conditionally automated driving’, Accident Analysis & Prevention, vol. 92, pp. 230–239, Jul. 2016.
[21]
J. Radlmayr, V. Weinbeer, C. Löber, M. Farid, and K. Bengler, ‘How Automation Level and System Reliability Influence Driver Performance in a Cut-In Situation’, in Advances in Human Aspects of Transportation, 2018, pp. 684–694.
[22]
C. Hydén, ‘Traffic conflicts technique: state-of-the-art’, Traffic Safety Work with Video-processing. University Kaiserlauten, Transportation Department, no. Green Series No. 37, pp. 3–14, 1996.
[23]
H. Winner, S. Hakuli, and G. Wolf, Handbuch Fahrerassistenzsysteme: Grundlagen, Komponenten und Systeme für aktive Sicherheit und Komfort: mit 550 Abbildungen und 45 Tabellen. Springer-Verlag, 2009.
[24]
‘Tetris® – Aplikacije v Googlu Play’. https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=game.puzzle.blockpuzzle&hl=sl (accessed Aug. 27, 2020).
Index Terms
- Adaptable Take-Over Concepts: Considering Partial and Gradual Take-Overs
Recommendations
Numerical Analysis of Tractor Accidents using Driving Simulator for Autonomous Driving Tractor
ICMRE'19: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Mechatronics and Robotics EngineeringAutonomous driving of automobiles is a hot research topic in recent years. The autonomous driving tractor also has been studied in the agricultural field as well as an autonomous driving automobile. On the other hand, tractor accidents frequently occur ...
From reading to driving: priming mobile users for take-over situations in highly automated driving
MobileHCI '18: Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and ServicesHighly automated vehicles, occasionally require users to resume vehicle control from non-driving related tasks by issuing cues called take-over request (TOR). Due to being engaged in non-driving related tasks (NDRT), users have a decreased level of ...
Comparing Shape-Changing and Vibro-Tactile Steering Wheels for Take-Over Requests in Highly Automated Driving
AutomotiveUI '17: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular ApplicationsAutomation shortcomings in highly automated driving (level 3) might require the driver to take over vehicle control. When the vehicle issues a take-over request (TOR), the driver has to immediately comprehend the situation, which highly demands visual ...
Comments
Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
September 2022
225 pages
Copyright © 2022 Owner/Author.
Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.
Sponsors
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 17 September 2022
Check for updates
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Work in progress
- Research
- Refereed limited
Funding Sources
- Horizon 2020 Framework Programme
- Slovenian Research Agency
Conference
AutomotiveUI '22
Sponsor:
AutomotiveUI '22: 14th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications
September 17 - 20, 2022
Seoul, Republic of Korea
Acceptance Rates
Overall Acceptance Rate 248 of 566 submissions, 44%
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 74Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)23
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 12 Nov 2024
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
Get Access
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign inFull Access
View options
View or Download as a PDF file.
PDFeReader
View online with eReader.
eReaderHTML Format
View this article in HTML Format.
HTML Format