Evaluating Mobile Apps Targeting Personal Goals
Authors: 
Sruzan Lolla, 
Corina SasAuthors Info & Claims
Article No.: 106, Pages 1 - 7
Abstract
Goals are fundamental to everyday life and are reflected in the growing HCI research in personal informatics and behaviour change. Besides academic work, a wealth of commercial mobile apps have also been developed to support users in setting their goals and achieving them. Despite their popularity, such apps, however, have been limitedly evaluated. We report a functionality review grounded in auto-ethnography and expert evaluation of the 21 most popular such apps selected from 1336 apps on the Google Play Store. We used a hybrid approach based on goal-setting theory for the evaluation. Findings indicate the more nuanced functionality of goal capturing, extending those explored in previous work for goal setting, monitoring and maintaining motivation. They also highlight the importance of distinguishing between high and low-level goals and their domains since most apps support multiple rather than individual goals. We conclude with design implications to support the setting of multiple personal goals at both high and low levels and across different domains, the use of consistent terms for distinguishing goals at different levels, and for visualizing the relationships among multiple goals.
Supplementary Material
References
[1]
Irum Saeed Abbasi, Nawal G Alghamdi, 2015. The prevalence, predictors, causes, treatment, and implications of procrastination behaviors in general, academic, and work setting. International journal of psychological studies 7, 1 (2015), 59–66.
[2]
Kaveh Abhari and Isaac Vaghefi. 2022. Screen time and productivity: an extension of goal-setting theory to explain optimum smartphone use. AIS Transactions on Human-Computer Interaction 14, 3 (2022), 254–288.
[3]
Ashkan Afshin, Patrick John Sur, Kairsten A Fay, Leslie Cornaby, Giannina Ferrara, Joseph S Salama, Erin C Mullany, Kalkidan Hassen Abate, Cristiana Abbafati, Zegeye Abebe, 2019. Health effects of dietary risks in 195 countries, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. The Lancet 393, 10184 (2019), 1958–1972.
[4]
Zaifulasraf Ahmad, Nor Zairah Ab Rahim, and Suraya Ya’acob. 2019. Persuasive system design: social support elements to influence the Malaysian wellness in social media. Procedia Computer Science 161 (2019), 773–780.
[5]
James T Austin and Jeffrey B Vancouver. 1996. Goal constructs in psychology: Structure, process, and content.Psychological bulletin 120, 3 (1996), 338.
[6]
Albert Bandura. 1991. Social cognitive theory of self-regulation. Organizational behavior and human decision processes 50, 2 (1991), 248–287.
[7]
Albert Bandura and Karen M Simon. 1977. The role of proximal intentions in self-regulation of refractory behavior. Cognitive therapy and research 1, 3 (1977), 177–193.
[8]
Dario Baretta, Paulina Bondaronek, Artur Direito, and Patrizia Steca. 2019. Implementation of the goal-setting components in popular physical activity apps: Review and content analysis. Digital health 5 (2019), 2055207619862706.
[9]
Thomas S Bateman, Hugh O’Neill, and Amy Kenworthy-U’Ren. 2002. A hierarchical taxonomy of top managers’ goals.Journal of Applied Psychology 87, 6 (2002), 1134.
[10]
Aksel Biørn-Hansen, Cecilia Katzeff, and Elina Eriksson. 2022. Exploring the Use of a Carbon Footprint Calculator Challenging Everyday Habits. In Nordic Human-Computer Interaction Conference. 1–10.
[11]
Aleksandra J Borek and Charles Abraham. 2018. How do small groups promote behaviour change? An integrative conceptual review of explanatory mechanisms. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being 10, 1 (2018), 30–61.
[12]
Meta Brown, John Grigsby, Wilbert Van Der Klaauw, Jaya Wen, and Basit Zafar. 2016. Financial education and the debt behavior of the young. The Review of Financial Studies 29, 9 (2016), 2490–2522.
[13]
Charles S Carver and Michael F Scheier. 2000. On the structure of behavioral self-regulation. In Handbook of self-regulation. Elsevier, 41–84.
[14]
Beenish Moalla Chaudhry, Dipanwita Dasgupta, and Nitesh Chawla. 2022. Formative Evaluation of a Tablet Application to Support Goal-Oriented Care in Community-Dwelling Older Adults. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 6, MHCI (2022), 1–21.
[15]
Yu Chen and Pearl Pu. 2014. HealthyTogether: exploring social incentives for mobile fitness applications. In Proceedings of the second international symposium of chinese chi. 25–34.
[16]
Sunny Consolvo, Predrag Klasnja, David W McDonald, and James A Landay. 2009. Goal-setting considerations for persuasive technologies that encourage physical activity. In Proceedings of the 4th international Conference on Persuasive Technology. 1–8.
[17]
Nediyana Daskalova, Eindra Kyi, Kevin Ouyang, Arthur Borem, Sally Chen, Sung Hyun Park, Nicole Nugent, and Jeff Huang. 2021. Self-e: Smartphone-supported guidance for customizable self-experimentation. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–13.
[18]
Nediyana Daskalova, Danaë Metaxa-Kakavouli, Adrienne Tran, Nicole Nugent, Julie Boergers, John McGeary, and Jeff Huang. 2016. SleepCoacher: A personalized automated self-experimentation system for sleep recommendations. In Proceedings of the 29th annual symposium on user interface software and technology. 347–358.
[19]
Nediyana Daskalova, Jina Yoon, Yibing Wang, Cintia Araujo, Guillermo Beltran Jr, Nicole Nugent, John McGeary, Joseph Jay Williams, and Jeff Huang. 2020. SleepBandits: Guided flexible self-experiments for sleep. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–13.
[20]
Samuel C Dumith, Pedro C Hallal, Rodrigo S Reis, and Harold W Kohl III. 2011. Worldwide prevalence of physical inactivity and its association with human development index in 76 countries. Preventive medicine 53, 1-2 (2011), 24–28.
[21]
Martin E Ford and CW Nichols. 2019. A taxonomy of human goals and some possible applications. In Humans as self-constructing living systems. Routledge, 289–312.
[22]
Rúben Gouveia, Evangelos Karapanos, and Marc Hassenzahl. 2018. Activity tracking in vivo. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–13.
[23]
Xinning Gui, Yu Chen, Clara Caldeira, Dan Xiao, and Yunan Chen. 2017. When fitness meets social networks: Investigating fitness tracking and social practices on werun. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 1647–1659.
[24]
Katja Herrmanny, Nils Beckmann, Katrin Nachbar, Hanno Sauer, Jürgen Ziegler, and Aysegül Dogangün. 2016. Using psychophysiological parameters to support users in setting effective activity goals. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1637–1646.
[25]
Robert G Isaac, Wilfred J Zerbe, and Douglas C Pitt. 2001. Leadership and motivation: The effective application of expectancy theory. Journal of managerial issues (2001), 212–226.
[26]
Ravi Karkar, Jessica Schroeder, Daniel A Epstein, Laura R Pina, Jeffrey Scofield, James Fogarty, Julie A Kientz, Sean A Munson, Roger Vilardaga, and Jasmine Zia. 2017. Tummytrials: a feasibility study of using self-experimentation to detect individualized food triggers. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 6850–6863.
[27]
Artie Konrad, Victoria Bellotti, Nicole Crenshaw, Simon Tucker, Les Nelson, Honglu Du, Peter Pirolli, and Steve Whittaker. 2015. Finding the adaptive sweet spot: Balancing compliance and achievement in automated stress reduction. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 3829–3838.
[28]
Chrysanthi Konstanti and Evangelos Karapanos. 2018. An inquiry into goal-setting practices with physical activity trackers. In Extended Abstracts of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–6.
[29]
Geza Kovacs, Zhengxuan Wu, and Michael S Bernstein. 2018. Rotating online behavior change interventions increases effectiveness but also increases attrition. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 2, CSCW (2018), 1–25.
[30]
Amanda Lazar, Christian Koehler, Theresa Jean Tanenbaum, and David H Nguyen. 2015. Why we use and abandon smart devices. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM international joint conference on pervasive and ubiquitous computing. 635–646.
[31]
Cynthia Lee, Philip Bobko, P Christopher Earley, and Edwin A Locke. 1991. An empirical analysis of a goal setting questionnaire. Journal of Organizational Behavior 12, 6 (1991), 467–482.
[32]
Hyunsoo Lee, Auk Kim, Hwajung Hong, and Uichin Lee. 2021. Sticky goals: understanding goal commitments for behavioral changes in the wild. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–16.
[33]
Helena Lindgren and Saskia Weck. 2022. Contextualising Goal Setting for Behaviour Change–from Baby Steps to Value Directions. In Proceedings of the 33rd European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics. 1–7.
[34]
Edwin A Locke and Gary P Latham. 1990. A theory of goal setting & task performance.Prentice-Hall, Inc.
[35]
Edwin A Locke and Gary P Latham. 2002. Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey.American psychologist 57, 9 (2002), 705.
[36]
Edwin A Locke and Gary P Latham. 2013. New developments in goal setting and task performance. (2013).
[37]
Edwin A Locke and Gary P Latham. 2015. Breaking the rules: a historical overview of goal-setting theory. In Advances in motivation science. Vol. 2. Elsevier, 99–126.
[38]
Edwin A Locke and Gary P Latham. 2019. The development of goal setting theory: A half century retrospective.Motivation Science 5, 2 (2019), 93.
[39]
Edwin A Locke, Karyll N Shaw, Lise M Saari, and Gary P Latham. 1981. Goal setting and task performance: 1969–1980.Psychological bulletin 90, 1 (1981), 125.
[40]
Ulrik Lyngs, Kai Lukoff, Petr Slovak, William Seymour, Helena Webb, Marina Jirotka, Jun Zhao, Max Van Kleek, and Nigel Shadbolt. 2020. ’I Just Want to Hack Myself to Not Get Distracted’ Evaluating Design Interventions for Self-Control on Facebook. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–15.
[41]
Gabriela Marcu, Anjali Misra, Karina Caro, Meghan Plank, Amy Leader, and Andrea Barsevick. 2018. Bounce: designing a physical activity intervention for breast cancer survivors. In Proceedings of the 12th EAI International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare. 25–34.
[42]
AH Maslow, R Frager, J Fadiman, C McReynolds, and R Cox. 1970. Motivation and personality Harper & Row New York. McClelland, DC, & Burnham, DH (1976). Power is the great motivator. Harvard Business Review 25 (1970), 159–166.
[43]
Abraham Harold Maslow. 1981. Motivation and personality. Prabhat Prakashan.
[44]
Ronald L Pardee. 1990. Motivation Theories of Maslow, Herzberg, McGregor & McClelland. A Literature Review of Selected Theories Dealing with Job Satisfaction and Motivation. (1990).
[45]
Olga Perski, Ann Blandford, Robert West, and Susan Michie. 2017. Conceptualising engagement with digital behaviour change interventions: a systematic review using principles from critical interpretive synthesis. Translational behavioral medicine 7, 2 (2017), 254–267.
[46]
Charlie Pinder, Jo Vermeulen, Benjamin R Cowan, and Russell Beale. 2018. Digital behaviour change interventions to break and form habits. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) 25, 3 (2018), 1–66.
[47]
James O Prochaska, Carlo C DiClemente, and John C Norcross. 1993. In search of how people change: Applications to addictive behaviors. Addictions Nursing Network 5, 1 (1993), 2–16.
[48]
Richard M Ryan and Edward L Deci. 2000. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being.American psychologist 55, 1 (2000), 68.
[49]
Carol Sansone and Dustin B Thoman. 2006. Maintaining activity engagement: Individual differences in the process of self-regulating motivation. Journal of Personality 74, 6 (2006), 1697–1720.
[50]
Jessica Schroeder, Ravi Karkar, Natalia Murinova, James Fogarty, and Sean A Munson. 2019. Examining opportunities for goal-directed self-tracking to support chronic condition management. Proceedings of the ACM on interactive, mobile, wearable and ubiquitous technologies 3, 4 (2019), 1–26.
[51]
Agnis Stibe and Brian Cugelman. 2019. Social influence scale for technology design and transformation. In Human-Computer Interaction–INTERACT 2019: 17th IFIP TC 13 International Conference, Paphos, Cyprus, September 2–6, 2019, Proceedings, Part III 17. Springer, 561–577.
[52]
Barry J Zimmerman. 2000. Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In Handbook of self-regulation. Elsevier, 13–39.
Index Terms
- Evaluating Mobile Apps Targeting Personal Goals
Recommendations
Goals in agent systems: a unifying framework
AAMAS '08: Proceedings of the 7th international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems - Volume 2In the literature on agent systems, the proactive behavior of agents is often modeled in terms of goals that the agents pursue. We review a number of commonly-used existing goal types and propose a simple and general definition of goal, which unifies ...
Personal Trait Predicting Work Engagement in Crowdsourcing through Achievement Goals: Mediation Analyses
ICEME '17: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on E-business, Management and EconomicsThe purpose of this research is to investigate how personal traits influence work engagement on crowdsourcing platform through achievement goals. This study uses Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory (RST) in order to explain initial energization of behavior ...
Self-setting of physical activity goals and effects on perceived difficulty, importance and competence
Persuasive '09: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Persuasive TechnologyGoal setting can be a powerful method for persuading individuals to adopt an active lifestyle. In order for this to be the case, it is important to set concrete and challenging goals, and to strongly commit to them. In this study, we explored how people ...
Comments
Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
April 2023
3914 pages
ISBN:9781450394222
DOI:10.1145/3544549
Copyright © 2023 Owner/Author.
Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.
Sponsors
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 19 April 2023
Check for updates
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Work in progress
- Research
- Refereed limited
Conference
CHI '23
Sponsor:
Acceptance Rates
Overall Acceptance Rate 6,164 of 23,696 submissions, 26%
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 437Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)321
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)57
Reflects downloads up to 22 Sep 2024
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
Get Access
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign inFull Access
View options
View or Download as a PDF file.
PDFeReader
View online with eReader.
eReaderFull Text
View this article in Full Text.
Full TextHTML Format
View this article in HTML Format.
HTML Format