research-article

‘Treat me as your friend, not a number in your database’: Co-designing with Children to Cope with Datafication Online

Authors:

Nigel ShadboltAuthors Info & Claims

CHI '23: Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Article No.: 95, Pages 1 - 21

https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3580933

Published: 19 April 2023 Publication History

Abstract

Datafication refers to the practices through which children’s online actions are pervasively recorded, tracked, aggregated, analysed, and exploited by online services in ways including behavioural engineering and monetisation. Previous research has shown that not only do children care significantly about various aspects of datafication, but they demand a chance to take action. Through 10 co-design sessions with 53 children, we examined how children in the UK want to be supported to cope with the datafication practices. Our findings provide insights for creating age-appropriate support for children’s algorithmic literacy development, highlighting and unpacking the importance of no one-size-fitting-all designs to support children’s coping with datafication. We contribute a first understanding of how children aged 7–14 would like to be supported with datafication and what future data-driven digital experiences should be like for them, who demand a shift of the current data ecosystem towards a more humane-by-design and autonomy-supportive future.

Supplementary Material

MP4 File (3544548.3580933-talk-video.mp4)

Pre-recorded Video Presentation

Download
166.94 MB

References

[1]

1998. Children’s Online Privacy Protection Rule ("COPPA"). https://www.ftc.gov/enforcement/rules/rulemaking-regulatory-reform-proceedings/childrens-online-privacy-protection-rule

[2]

2020. 7 Heuristics For Humane Design. https://designlab.com/blog/heuristics-humane-design-designing-for-dignity/

[3]

2020. Age appropriate design: a code of practice for online services. https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/guide-to-data-protection/ico-codes-of-practice/age-appropriate-design-a-code-of-practice-for-online-services

[4]

2020. Annex B: Age and developmental stages. https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/guide-to-data-protection/ico-codes-of-practice/age-appropriate-design-a-code-of-practice-for-online-services/annex-b-age-and-developmental-stages/

[5]

2020. What is automated individual decision-making and profiling?https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/guide-to-data-protection/guide-tothe-general-data-protection-regulation-gdpr/automated-decision-makingand-profiling/what-is-automated-individual-decision-making-and-profiling/

[6]

2020. What is automated individual decision-making and profiling?https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/guide-to-data-protection/guide-to-the-general-data-protection-regulation-gdpr/automated-decision-making-and-profiling/what-is-automated-individual-decision-making-and-profiling/

[7]

2021. Ethical Web And Data Architectures. https://www.oxfordmartin.ox.ac.uk/ethical-web-and-data-architectures/

[8]

2021. ICO Age-appropriate mindsets tool. https://ico.org.uk/media/for-organisations/documents/4017954/age-appropriate-mindsets-pdf.pdf

[9]

2021. Playful by Design: Free play in a digital world.https://digitalfuturescommission.org.uk/wpcontent/uploads/2021/11/A-Vision-of-Free-Play-in-a-Digital-World.pdf

[10]

2022. The Algorithmic and Data Literacy Project. https://algorithmliteracy.org/

[11]

2022. Humane by Design. https://humanebydesign.com/

[12]

2022. InterLand. https://beinternetawesome.withgoogle.com/en_us/interland

[13]

2022. Track This. https://trackthis.link/

[14]

Amelia Acker and Leanne Bowler. 2017. What is your Data Silhouette? Raising teen awareness of their data traces in social media. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Social Media & Society. 1–5.

Digital Library

[15]

Divyakant Agrawal, Philip Bernstein, Elisa Bertino, Susan Davidson, Umeshwas Dayal, Michael Franklin, Johannes Gehrke, Laura Haas, Alon Halevy, Jiawei Han, 2011. Challenges and opportunities with Big Data 2011-1. (2011).

[16]

Lindsey Arnold, Kung Jin Lee, and Jason C Yip. 2016. Co-designing with children: An approach to social robot design. ACM Human-Robot Interaction (HRI)(2016).

[17]

Alejandra Arrúa, Leticia Vidal, Lucía Antúnez, Leandro Machín, Joseline Martínez, María Rosa Curutchet, Ana Giménez, and Gastón Ares. 2017. Influence of label design on children’s perception of 2 snack foods. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior 49, 3 (2017), 211–217.

[18]

Thomas Beelen, Ella Velner, Roeland Ordelman, Khiet P Truong, Vanessa Evers, and Theo Huibers. 2022. Designing Conversational Robots with Children during the Pandemic. arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.11300(2022).

[19]

Mathilde M Bekker, Panos Markopoulos, and M Kersten-Tsikalkina. 2002. Interaction design and children: proceedings of the International Workshop" Interaction design and children", August 28-29, 2002, Eindhoven, The Netherlands. Shaker-Verlag.

[20]

Cindy L Bethel, Matthew R Stevenson, and Brian Scassellati. 2011. Secret-sharing: Interactions between a child, robot, and adult. In 2011 IEEE International Conference on systems, man, and cybernetics. IEEE, 2489–2494.

[21]

Leanne Bowler, Amelia Acker, Wei Jeng, and Yu Chi. 2017. “It lives all around us”: Aspects of data literacy in teen’s lives. Proceedings of the association for information science and technology 54, 1 (2017), 27–35.

[22]

Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology 3, 2 (2006), 77–101.

[23]

Kimberly A Brink and Henry M Wellman. 2020. Robot teachers for children? Young children trust robots depending on their perceived accuracy and agency.Developmental Psychology 56, 7 (2020), 1268.

[24]

AJ Brush, Paul Johns, Kori Inkpen, and Brian Meyers. 2011. Speech@ home: an exploratory study. In CHI’11 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 617–632.

[25]

Moritz Büchi, Eduard Fosch-Villaronga, Christoph Lutz, Aurelia Tamò-Larrieux, and Shruthi Velidi. 2021. Making sense of algorithmic profiling: user perceptions on Facebook. Information, Communication & Society(2021), 1–17.

[26]

Moritz Büchi, Eduard Fosch-Villaronga, Christoph Lutz, Aurelia Tamò-Larrieux, Shruthi Velidi, and Salome Viljoen. 2020. The chilling effects of algorithmic profiling: Mapping the issues. Computer law & security review 36 (2020), 105367.

[27]

Ingrid Burkett. 2012. An introduction to co-design. Sydney: Knode (2012), 12.

[28]

European Commision. 2021. General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). https://gdpr-info.eu/

[29]

European Commission. 2016. The European Digital Competence Framework for Citizens.

[30]

Sayamindu Dasgupta and Benjamin Mako Hill. 2020. Designing for Critical Algorithmic Literacies. arXiv preprint arXiv:2008.01719(2020).

[31]

Lindsay Daugherty, Rafiq Dossani, Erin-Elizabeth Johnson, and Cameron Wright. 2014. Moving beyond Screen Time: Redefining Developmentally Appropriate Technology Use in Early Childhood Education. Policy Brief.RAND Corporation (2014).

[32]

Maria del Mar Pàmies, Gerard Ryan, and Mireia Valverde. 2016. How intervention can empower children as consumers in dealing with advertising. International Journal of Consumer Studies 40, 5 (2016), 601–609.

[33]

Christian Dindler, Eva Eriksson, Ole Sejer Iversen, Andreas Lykke-Olesen, and Martin Ludvigsen. 2005. Mission from Mars: a method for exploring user requirements for children in a narrative space. In Proceedings of the 2005 conference on Interaction design and children. 40–47.

Digital Library

[34]

Christian Dindler and Ole Sejer Iversen. 2007. Fictional inquiry—design collaboration in a shared narrative space. CoDesign 3, 4 (2007), 213–234.

[35]

Stefania Druga, Sarah T Vu, Eesh Likhith, and Tammy Qiu. 2019. Inclusive AI literacy for kids around the world. In Proceedings of FabLearn 2019. 104–111.

Digital Library

[36]

Stefania Druga, Sarah T. Vu, Eesh Likhith, and Tammy Qiu. 2019. Inclusive AI Literacy for Kids around the World. In Proceedings of FabLearn 2019 (New York, NY, USA) (FL2019). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 104–111. https://doi.org/10.1145/3311890.3311904

Digital Library

[37]

Stefania Druga, Randi Williams, Hae Won Park, and Cynthia Breazeal. 2018. How smart are the smart toys? Children and parents’ agent interaction and intelligence attribution. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Interaction Design and Children. 231–240.

Digital Library

[38]

Stefania Druga, Jason Yip, Michael Preston, and Devin Dillon. 2021. The 4As: Ask, Adapt, Author, Analyze-AI Literacy Framework for Families. In Algorithmic Rights and Protections for Children. PubPub.

[39]

Allison Druin. 1999. Cooperative inquiry: developing new technologies for children with children. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 592–599.

Digital Library

[40]

Allison Druin. 2002. The role of children in the design of new technology. Behaviour and information technology 21, 1 (2002), 1–25.

[41]

Kenneth D Eason. 1995. User-centred design: for users or by users?Ergonomics 38, 8 (1995), 1667–1673.

[42]

Colleen Finegan and Nancy Jo Austin. 2002. Developmentally appropriate technology for young children. Information Technology in Childhood Education Annual 2002, 1 (2002), 87–102.

[43]

Dan Fitton and Janet C Read. 2019. Creating a framework to support the critical consideration of dark design aspects in free-to-play apps. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM International Conference on Interaction Design and Children. 407–418.

Digital Library

[44]

UK Council for Internet Safety. 2020. Education for a Connected World - 2020 Edition. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/896323/UKCIS_Education_for_a_Connected_World_.pdf

[45]

Sarah Forberger, Lucia Reisch, Teresa Kampfmann, and Hajo Zeeb. 2019. Nudging to move: a scoping review of the use of choice architecture interventions to promote physical activity in the general population. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity 16, 1(2019), 1–14.

[46]

5 Rights Foundation. 2021. Playful by Design: Free play in a digital world. https://digitalfuturescommission.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/A-Vision-of-Free-Play-in-a-Digital-World.pdf

[47]

Radhika Garg and Subhasree Sengupta. 2020. He Is Just Like Me: A Study of the Long-Term Use of Smart Speakers by Parents and Children. Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol. 4, 1, Article 11 (mar 2020), 24 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3381002

Digital Library

[48]

Mona Leigh Guha, Allison Druin, Gene Chipman, Jerry Alan Fails, Sante Simms, and Allison Farber. 2004. Mixing ideas: a new technique for working with young children as design partners. In Proceedings of the 2004 conference on Interaction design and children: building a community. 35–42.

Digital Library

[49]

Mona Leigh Guha, Allison Druin, and Jerry Alan Fails. 2013. Cooperative Inquiry revisited: Reflections of the past and guidelines for the future of intergenerational co-design. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction 1, 1(2013), 14–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2012.08.003

[50]

Valerie Hémar-Nicolas, Hanum Putri Hapsari, Stephanie Angka, and Annemarie Olsen. 2021. How cartoon characters and claims influence children’s attitude towards a snack vegetable–An explorative cross-cultural comparison between Indonesia and Denmark. Food Quality and Preference 87 (2021), 104031.

[51]

Alexis Hiniker, Kiley Sobel, and Bongshin Lee. 2017. Co-designing with preschoolers using fictional inquiry and comicboarding. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 5767–5772.

Digital Library

[52]

DQ Institute. 2021. Digital Intellegence Framework. https://www.dqinstitute.org/global-standards/

[53]

Yasmin Kafai, Chris Proctor, and Debora Lui. 2020. From theory bias to theory dialogue: embracing cognitive, situated, and critical framings of computational thinking in K-12 CS education. ACM Inroads 11, 1 (2020), 44–53.

Digital Library

[54]

Gabriella Kazai, Iskander Yusof, and Daoud Clarke. 2016. Personalised news and blog recommendations based on user location, Facebook and Twitter user profiling. In Proceedings of the 39th International ACM SIGIR conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. 1129–1132.

Digital Library

[55]

James Kennedy, Séverin Lemaignan, Caroline Montassier, Pauline Lavalade, Bahar Irfan, Fotios Papadopoulos, Emmanuel Senft, and Tony Belpaeme. 2017. Child speech recognition in human-robot interaction: evaluations and recommendations. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. 82–90.

Digital Library

[56]

Nawsher Khan, Ibrar Yaqoob, Ibrahim Abaker Targio Hashem, Zakira Inayat, Waleed Kamaleldin Mahmoud Ali, Muhammad Alam, Muhammad Shiraz, and Abdullah Gani. 2014. Big data: survey, technologies, opportunities, and challenges. The scientific world journal 2014 (2014).

[57]

Maaike Kleinsmann and Rianne Valkenburg. 2008. Barriers and enablers for creating shared understanding in co-design projects. Design studies 29, 4 (2008), 369–386.

[58]

Priya Kumar, Shalmali Milind Naik, Utkarsha Ramesh Devkar, Marshini Chetty, Tamara L Clegg, and Jessica Vitak. 2017. ’No Telling Passcodes Out Because They’re Private’ Understanding Children’s Mental Models of Privacy and Security Online. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 1, CSCW(2017), 1–21.

Digital Library

[59]

Priya Kumar, Jessica Vitak, Marshini Chetty, Tamara L Clegg, Jonathan Yang, Brenna McNally, and Elizabeth Bonsignore. 2018. Co-designing online privacy-related games and stories with children. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on interaction design and children. 67–79.

Digital Library

[60]

Bruno Latour 2004. Politics of nature: How to bring the sciences into democracy. Harvard University Press.

[61]

Kung Jin Lee, Wendy Roldan, Tian Qi Zhu, Harkiran Kaur Saluja, Sungmin Na, Britnie Chin, Yilin Zeng, Jin Ha Lee, and Jason Yip. 2021. The show must go on: A conceptual model of conducting synchronous participatory design with children online. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 1–16.

Digital Library

[62]

James R Lewis. 2006. Usability testing. Handbook of human factors and ergonomics 12 (2006), e30.

[63]

Sonia Livingstone. 2018. Children: a special case for privacy?Intermedia 46, 2 (2018), 18–23.

[64]

Sonia Livingstone, Mariya Stoilova, and Rishita Nandagiri. 2019. Children’s data and privacy online. Technology 58, 2 (2019), 157–65.

[65]

Duri Long and Brian Magerko. 2020. What is AI literacy? Competencies and design considerations. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–16.

Digital Library

[66]

Noortje Suzanne Marres 2005. No issue, no public: Democratic deficits after the displacement of politics. Amsterdam.

[67]

Dorothea U Martin, Madeline I MacIntyre, Conrad Perry, Georgia Clift, Sonja Pedell, and Jordy Kaufman. 2020. Young children’s indiscriminate helping behavior toward a humanoid robot. Frontiers in psychology 11 (2020), 239.

[68]

Giovanna Mascheroni. 2020. Datafied childhoods: Contextualising datafication in everyday life. Current Sociology 68, 6 (2020), 798–813.

[69]

Ariadna Matamoros-Fernández. 2017. Platformed racism: The mediation and circulation of an Australian race-based controversy on Twitter, Facebook and YouTube. Information, Communication & Society 20, 6 (2017), 930–946.

[70]

Brenna McNally, Priya Kumar, Chelsea Hordatt, Matthew Louis Mauriello, Shalmali Naik, Leyla Norooz, Alazandra Shorter, Evan Golub, and Allison Druin. 2018. Co-designing mobile online safety applications with children. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–9.

Digital Library

[71]

Brenna McNally, Matthew Louis Mauriello, Mona Leigh Guha, and Allison Druin. 2017. Gains from participatory design team membership as perceived by child alumni and their parents. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 5730–5741.

Digital Library

[72]

Ulises A Mejias and Nick Couldry. 2019. Datafication. Internet Policy Review 8, 4 (2019).

[73]

Amanda Meincke Melo and M Cecília C Baranauskas. 2003. Design with children: a Semiotic approach. In Proceedings of the Latin American conference on Human-computer interaction. 69–78.

Digital Library

[74]

Rebecca Michelson, Akeiylah DeWitt, Ria Nagar, Alexis Hiniker, Jason Yip, Sean A Munson, and Julie A Kientz. 2021. Parenting in a Pandemic: Juggling Multiple Roles and Managing Technology Use in Family Life During COVID-19 in the United States. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 5, CSCW2(2021), 1–39.

Digital Library

[75]

Stefania Milan and Lonneke Van der Velden. 2016. The alternative epistemologies of data activism. Digital Culture & Society 2, 2 (2016), 57–74.

[76]

Lilian Mitrou, Miltiadis Kandias, Vasilis Stavrou, and Dimitris Gritzalis. 2014. Social media profiling: A Panopticon or Omniopticon tool?. In Proc. of the 6th Conference of the Surveillance Studies Network. Barcelona, Spain, 1–15.

[77]

Neema Moraveji, Jason Li, Jiarong Ding, Patrick O’Kelley, and Suze Woolf. 2007. Comicboarding: using comics as proxies for participatory design with children. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. 1371–1374.

Digital Library

[78]

Myfanwy Morgan, Sara Gibbs, Krista Maxwell, and Nicky Britten. 2002. Hearing children’s voices: methodological issues in conducting focus groups with children aged 7-11 years. Qualitative research 2, 1 (2002), 5–20.

[79]

Michael J Muller and Sarah Kuhn. 1993. Participatory design. Commun. ACM 36, 6 (1993), 24–28.

Digital Library

[80]

Ofcom. 2021. Children and parents: media use and attitudes report 2020/21. https://www.ofcom.org.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0025/217825/children-and-parents-media-use-and-attitudes-report-2020-21.pdf

[81]

Ofcom. 2022. Children and parents: media use and attitudes report 2022. https://www.ofcom.org.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0025/217825/children-and-parents-media-use-and-attitudes-report-2022.pdf

[82]

Ofcom.org. [n.d.]. children and parents: media use and attitudes report 2019. https://www.ofcom.org.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0023/190616/children-media-use-attitudes-2019-report.pdf

[83]

Gwenn Schurgin O’Keeffe, Kathleen Clarke-Pearson, Council on Communications, and Media. 2011. The impact of social media on children, adolescents, and families. Pediatrics 127, 4 (2011), 800–804.

[84]

Joint Committee on the Draft Online Safety Bill. 2021. Draft Online Safety Bill. https://committees.parliament.uk/publications/8206/documents/84092/default/

[85]

Luci Pangrazio and Lourdes Cardozo-Gaibisso. 2021. “Your Data Can Go to Anyone”: The Challenges of Developing Critical Data Literacies in Children. In Critical digital literacies: Boundary-crossing practices. Brill, 35–51.

[86]

Luci Pangrazio and Neil Selwyn. 2017. ’My Data, My Bad...’ Young People’s Personal Data Understandings and (Counter) Practices. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Social Media & Society. 1–5.

Digital Library

[87]

M Platt. 1999. Children as our technology design partners. A. Druin (1999).

[88]

Amanda Purington, Jessie G Taft, Shruti Sannon, Natalya N Bazarova, and Samuel Hardman Taylor. 2017. " Alexa is my new BFF" Social Roles, User Satisfaction, and Personification of the Amazon Echo. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI conference extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems. 2853–2859.

Digital Library

[89]

Ashwini Rao, Florian Schaub, and Norman Sadeh. 2015. What do they know about me? Contents and concerns of online behavioral profiles. arXiv preprint arXiv:1506.01675(2015).

[90]

Deborah Richards, Patrina HY Caldwell, and Henry Go. 2015. Impact of social media on the health of children and young people. Journal of paediatrics and child health 51, 12 (2015), 1152–1157.

[91]

Bernhard Rieder. 2017. Scrutinizing an algorithmic technique: The Bayes classifier as interested reading of reality. Information, Communication & Society 20, 1 (2017), 100–117.

[92]

Elizabeth B-N Sanders and Pieter Jan Stappers. 2008. Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. Co-design 4, 1 (2008), 5–18.

[93]

Marijn Sax. 2016. Big data: Finders keepers, losers weepers?Ethics and Information Technology 18, 1 (2016), 25–31.

[94]

Sofia Serholt, Wolmet Barendregt, Asimina Vasalou, Patrícia Alves-Oliveira, Aidan Jones, Sofia Petisca, and Ana Paiva. 2017. The case of classroom robots: teachers’ deliberations on the ethical tensions. Ai & Society 32, 4 (2017), 613–631.

Digital Library

[95]

Rachel L Severson and Shailee R Woodard. 2018. Imagining others’ minds: The positive relation between children’s role play and anthropomorphism. Frontiers in psychology 9 (2018), 2140.

[96]

Amanda JC Sharkey. 2016. Should we welcome robot teachers?Ethics and Information Technology 18, 4 (2016), 283–297.

[97]

Matthijs Smakman, Paul Vogt, and Elly A Konijn. 2021. Moral considerations on social robots in education: A multi-stakeholder perspective. Computers & Education 174 (2021), 104317.

Digital Library

[98]

Clay Spinuzzi. 2005. The methodology of participatory design. Technical communication 52, 2 (2005), 163–174.

[99]

Pieter Jan Stappers, Paul Hekkert, David Keyson, 2007. Design for interaction: consolidating the user-centred focus in industrial design engineering. In DS 43: Proceedings of E&PDE 2007, the 9th International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education, University of Northumbria, Newcastle, UK, 13.-14.09. 2007. 69–74.

[100]

Marc Steen. 2013. Co-design as a process of joint inquiry and imagination. Design Issues 29, 2 (2013), 16–28.

[101]

Mariya Stoilova, Sonia Livingstone, and Rishita Nandagiri. 2020. Digital by default: Children’s capacity to understand and manage online data and privacy. Media and Communication(2020).

[102]

Rebecca Stower, Natalia Calvo-Barajas, Ginevra Castellano, and Arvid Kappas. 2021. A meta-analysis on children’s trust in social robots. International Journal of Social Robotics 13, 8 (2021), 1979–2001.

[103]

THORN. 2021. Responding to Online Threats: Minors’ Perspectives on Disclosing, Reporting, and Blocking.https: //info.thorn.org/hubfs/Research/Responding%20to%20Online%20Threats_2021-Full-Report.pdf

[104]

Kjerstin Thorson, Kelley Cotter, Mel Medeiros, and Chankyung Pak. 2021. Algorithmic inference, political interest, and exposure to news and politics on Facebook. Information, Communication & Society 24, 2 (2021), 183–200.

[105]

Simone Van Der Hof, Eva Lievens, Ingrida Milkaite, Valerie Verdoodt, Thijs Hannema, and Ton Liefaard. 2020. The child’s right to protection against economic exploitation in the digital world. The International Journal of Children’s Rights 28, 4 (2020), 833–859.

[106]

Maarten Van Mechelen. 2016. Designing technologies for and with children: Theoretical reflections and a practical inquiry towards a co-design toolkit. (2016).

[107]

Sandra Wachter. 2020. Affinity Profiling and Discrimination by Association in Online Behavioral Advertising. Berkeley Tech. LJ 35(2020), 367.

[108]

Greg Walsh, Elizabeth Foss, Jason Yip, and Allison Druin. 2013. FACIT PD: a framework for analysis and creation of intergenerational techniques for participatory design. In proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2893–2902.

Digital Library

[109]

Ge Wang, Jun Zhao, Max Van Kleek, and Nigel Shadbolt. 2022. ‘Don’t make assumptions about me!’: Understanding Children’s Perception of Datafication Online. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 6, CSCW2, Article 419 (nov 2022), 24 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3555144

Digital Library

[110]

Ge Wang, Jun Zhao, Max Van Kleek, and Nigel Shadbolt. 2022. Informing Age-Appropriate AI: Examining Principles and Practices of AI for Children. In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (New Orleans, LA, USA) (CHI ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3502057

Digital Library

[111]

J Kory Westlund, Cynthia Breazeal, and A Story. 2015. Deception, secrets, children, and robots: What’s acceptable. In Workshop on The Emerging Policy and Ethics of Human-Robot Interaction, held in conjunction with the 10th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction.

[112]

Julia Woodward, Zari McFadden, Nicole Shiver, Amir Ben-Hayon, Jason C Yip, and Lisa Anthony. 2018. Using co-design to examine how children conceptualize intelligent interfaces. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–14.

Digital Library

[113]

Julia Woodward, Zari McFadden, Nicole Shiver, Amir Ben-hayon, Jason C. Yip, and Lisa Anthony. 2018. Using Co-Design to Examine How Children Conceptualize Intelligent Interfaces. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Montreal QC, Canada) (CHI ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174149

Digital Library

[114]

Jason Yip, Tamara Clegg, Elizabeth Bonsignore, Helene Gelderblom, Emily Rhodes, and Allison Druin. 2013. Brownies or bags-of-stuff? Domain expertise in cooperative inquiry with children. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children. 201–210.

Digital Library

[115]

Jason C Yip, Elizabeth Foss, Elizabeth Bonsignore, Mona Leigh Guha, Leyla Norooz, Emily Rhodes, Brenna McNally, Panagis Papadatos, Evan Golub, and Allison Druin. 2013. Children initiating and leading cooperative inquiry sessions. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children. 293–296.

Digital Library

[116]

Jun Zhao, Ge Wang, Carys Dally, Petr Slovak, Julian Edbrooke-Childs, Max Van Kleek, and Nigel Shadbolt. 2019. ‘I Make up a Silly Name’: Understanding Children’s Perception of Privacy Risks Online. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Glasgow, Scotland Uk) (CHI ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300336

Digital Library

[117]

Shoshana Zuboff. 2015. Big other: surveillance capitalism and the prospects of an information civilization. Journal of information technology 30, 1 (2015), 75–89.

[118]

Shoshana Zuboff. 2019. The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power: Barack Obama’s books of 2019. Profile books.

Cited By

Farthing RKoren Ošljak KAkuetteh TCamacho KSmith-Nunes GZhao J(2024)Online Privacy, Young People, and Datafication: Different Perceptions About Online Privacy Across Antigua & Barbuda, Australia, Ghana, and SloveniaSocial Media + Society10.1177/2056305124129804210:4Online publication date: 11-Nov-2024
https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051241298042
Sun YChen JYao BLiu JWang DMa XLu YXu YHe L(2024)Exploring Parent's Needs for Children-Centered AI to Support Preschoolers' Interactive Storytelling and Reading ActivitiesProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36870358:CSCW2(1-25)Online publication date: 8-Nov-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3687035
Zhou XZhou YGong YCai ZQiu AXiao QAntle ABai Z(2024)"Bee and I need diversity!" Break Filter Bubbles in Recommendation Systems through Embodied AI LearningProceedings of the 23rd Annual ACM Interaction Design and Children Conference10.1145/3628516.3655802(44-61)Online publication date: 17-Jun-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3628516.3655802
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

‘Treat me as your friend, not a number in your database’: Co-designing with Children to Cope with Datafication Online
1. Human-centered computing
  1. Human computer interaction (HCI)
    1. Empirical studies in HCI
2. Security and privacy
  1. Human and societal aspects of security and privacy
    1. Social aspects of security and privacy

Recommendations

'Don't make assumptions about me!': Understanding Children's Perception of Datafication Online
CSCW

Datafication, which is the process in which children's actions online are pervasively recorded, tracked, aggregated, analysed, and exploited by online services in multiple ways that include behavioural engineering, and monetisation, is becoming ...
Children with ADHD and their Care Ecosystem: Designing Beyond Symptoms
CHI '23: Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Designing for children with ADHD has been of increasing interest to the HCI community. However, current approaches do not adequately involve all relevant stakeholders, and primarily focus on addressing symptoms, following a medical model of disability ...
P(L)AY ATTENTION! Co-designing for and with Children with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)
Human-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 2019
Abstract
In recent years, children’s mental health problems, including Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), have been a growing phenomenon. However, there are limited examples of designing for and with children with ADHD. This work views ...

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences

CHI '23: Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

April 2023

14911 pages

ISBN:9781450394215

DOI:10.1145/3544548

Editors:
Albrecht Schmidt
LMU Munich, Germany60028717
,
Kaisa Väänänen
Tampere University, Finland60011170
,
Tesh Goyal
Google Research, USA60006191
,
Per Ola Kristensson
University of Cambridge, UK60031101
,
Anicia Peters
University of Namibia, Namibia60072704
,
Stefanie Mueller
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USA60022195
,
Julie R. Williamson
University of Glasgow, UK60001490
,
Max L. Wilson
University of Nottingham, UK60015138

Copyright © 2023 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Sponsors

SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 19 April 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Badges

Best Paper

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article
Research
Refereed limited

Funding Sources

Ethical Web and Data Architectures

Conference

CHI '23

Sponsor:

SIGCHI

CHI '23: CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

April 23 - 28, 2023

Hamburg, Germany

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 6,199 of 26,314 submissions, 24%

Upcoming Conference

CHI '25

Sponsor:
sigchi

CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

April 26 - May 1, 2025

Yokohama , Japan

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

11
Total Citations
View Citations
1,625
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)1,019
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)62

Reflects downloads up to 18 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Farthing RKoren Ošljak KAkuetteh TCamacho KSmith-Nunes GZhao J(2024)Online Privacy, Young People, and Datafication: Different Perceptions About Online Privacy Across Antigua & Barbuda, Australia, Ghana, and SloveniaSocial Media + Society10.1177/2056305124129804210:4Online publication date: 11-Nov-2024
https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051241298042
Sun YChen JYao BLiu JWang DMa XLu YXu YHe L(2024)Exploring Parent's Needs for Children-Centered AI to Support Preschoolers' Interactive Storytelling and Reading ActivitiesProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36870358:CSCW2(1-25)Online publication date: 8-Nov-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3687035
Zhou XZhou YGong YCai ZQiu AXiao QAntle ABai Z(2024)"Bee and I need diversity!" Break Filter Bubbles in Recommendation Systems through Embodied AI LearningProceedings of the 23rd Annual ACM Interaction Design and Children Conference10.1145/3628516.3655802(44-61)Online publication date: 17-Jun-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3628516.3655802
Han AZhou XCai ZHan SKo RCorrigan SPeppler K(2024)Teachers, Parents, and Students' perspectives on Integrating Generative AI into Elementary Literacy EducationProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642438(1-17)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613904.3642438
Wang GZhao JJohnston SZhang ZVan Kleek MShadbolt N(2024)CHAITok: A Proof-of-Concept System Supporting Children's Sense of Data Autonomy on Social MediaProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642294(1-19)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613904.3642294
Wang GZhao JKollnig KZier ADuron BZhang ZVan Kleek MShadbolt N(2024)KOALA Hero Toolkit: A New Approach to Inform Families of Mobile Datafication RisksProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642283(1-18)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613904.3642283
Zhu YWang GLi YZhao J(2024)“It’s Like How Mom Cooks for You, Tell Her Nothing You Only Get Chicken Soup.”: Understanding Children’s Perception of Datafication Online in ChinaInternational Journal of Human–Computer Interaction10.1080/10447318.2024.2372146(1-19)Online publication date: 5-Jul-2024
https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2024.2372146
Wang GZhao JVan Kleek MShadbolt N(2024)Challenges and opportunities in translating ethical AI principles into practice for childrenNature Machine Intelligence10.1038/s42256-024-00805-x6:3(265-270)Online publication date: 20-Mar-2024
https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-024-00805-x
Itenge HKays RAuala SChivuno-Kuria SPeter KMakosa I(2023)Co-Designing Technologies with ChildrenProceedings of the 4th African Human Computer Interaction Conference10.1145/3628096.3629075(300-303)Online publication date: 27-Nov-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3628096.3629075
Wagman KBlinder ESong KVignon ADworkin SClegg TVitak JChetty M(2023)"We picked community over privacy": Privacy and Security Concerns Emerging from Remote Learning Sociotechnical Infrastructure During COVID-19Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36100367:CSCW2(1-29)Online publication date: 4-Oct-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3610036
Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Full Text

View this article in Full Text.

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View full text|Download PDF

View Table of Contents