Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3543434.3543637acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesdg-oConference Proceedingsconference-collections
panel

Trust and Distrust in e-Democracy

Published: 14 September 2022 Publication History

Abstract

In the digital government research literature, the concept of trust is typically used as a precondition for the adoption of digital technology in the public sector or an outcome of a roadmap leading up to such adoption. The concept plays a central role in many decisions linked to the planning, adoption and management of the public sector technology. In contrast, the concept of distrust is almost neglected in such literature but, when approached, it appears as the opposite logical side of the trust-distrust dichotomy. However, we conjecture that the path to building trust is different than the path to building distrust and both concepts should be regarded as different theoretical constructs. The workshop aims to prove this conjecture drawing on the insights from the field of e-democracy including internet voting. Given its technical breadth, political and societal implications, and layers of complexity, e-democracy is a good benchmark for exploring this topic. The workshop will confront the main conjecture using examples, research and experiences contributed by participants, conceptual and methodological tools introduced by the organizers, and a discussion shared by everybody. The outcome – elements that help build trust or distrust in various forms of e-democracy – will have practical and theoretical implications, aiming at further research by the participants and collective publication of the results in a special issue in a top ranked journal, preferably Government Information Quarterly.

References

[1]
Alvarez, R.M., Hall, T.E.: Point, click, and vote: The future of internet voting. Brookings Institution Press, Washington DC (2004).
[2]
Carter, L., Campbell, R.L.: Internet voting usefulness: An empirical analysis of trust, convenience and accessibility. Journal of Organizational and End User Computing. 24, 3, 1–17 (2012). https://doi.org/10.4018/joeuc.2012070101.
[3]
Gjøsteen, K.: Analysis of an internet voting protocol. IACR Cryptology ePrint Archive. 1–16 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32747-6_1.
[4]
Hopland, L., Hole, K.: Building and Maintaining Trust in Internet Voting. Computer. 74–80 (2012). https://doi.org/10.4018/9781930708198.ch005.
[5]
IDEA - International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance: Introducing Electronic Voting: Essential Considerations. International IDEA (2011).
[6]
Janowski, T.: Digital government evolution: From transformation to contextualization. Government Information Quarterly. 32, 3, 221–236 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.07.001.
[7]
Krimmer, R. : New methodology for calculating cost-efficiency of different ways of voting: is internet voting cheaper? Public Money and Management. 41, 1, 17–26 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2020.1732027.
[8]
Kulyk, O., Volkamer, M.: Usability is not Enough: Lessons Learned from ’Human Factors in Security’ Research for Verifiability. In: Krimmer, R. and Volkamer, M. (eds.) Third International Joint Conference on Electronic Voting (E-Vote-ID 2018). pp. 66–81 TUT Press, Bregenz (2018).
[9]
Licht, N. : To i-vote or Not to i-vote: Drivers and Barriers to the Implementation of Internet Voting. In: Krimmer, R. (eds.) Electronic Voting. E-Vote-ID 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86942-7_7.
[10]
Luhmann, N.: Trust and Power. Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester (1979).
[11]
McKnight, H., Chervany, N.: Trust and Distrust Definitions: One Bite at a Time. In: Falcone, R. (eds.) Trust in Cyber-societies Integrating the Human and Artificial Perspectives. pp. 27–55 Springer-Verlag, Berlin (2001).
[12]
Oostveen, A.-M.: Outsourcing Democracy: Losing Control of e-Voting in the Netherlands. Policy & Internet. 2, 4, 201–220 (2010). https://doi.org/10.2202/1944-2866.1065.
[13]
Oostveen, A.-M., van den Besselaar, P.: Security as belief User's perceptions on the security of electronic voting systems. Electronic Voting in Europe: Technology, Law, Politics and Society. 47, May 2014, 73–82 (2004).
[14]
Simmel, G.: The sociology of secrecy and of secret societies. The American Journal of Sociology. XI, 11, 441–498 (1906).
[15]
Toots, M. : Success in evoting - Success in e-Democracy? The Estonian paradox. In: Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics). pp. 55–66 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45074-2_5.
[16]
Vayenas, C.: Democracy in the Digital Age. How we'll vote and what we'll vote about. Arena Books, Bury Saint Edmunds (2017).

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)The social contract theory meets cybersecurity: systematic literature reviewDigital Policy, Regulation and Governance10.1108/DPRG-06-2024-0118Online publication date: 25-Sep-2024
  • (2023)The success of the E-voting to Enhance the Political Engagement: A Comparative StudyJournal of Law and Sustainable Development10.55908/sdgs.v11i11.173211:11(e1732)Online publication date: 14-Nov-2023
  • (2023)Blockchain and digital governance: Decentralization of decision making policyReview of Policy Research10.1111/ropr.12585Online publication date: 27-Nov-2023

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
dg.o '22: Proceedings of the 23rd Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research
June 2022
499 pages
ISBN:9781450397490
DOI:10.1145/3543434
Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 14 September 2022

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Distrust
  2. Internet Voting
  3. Perception
  4. Privacy
  5. Security
  6. Trust
  7. e-Democracy

Qualifiers

  • Panel
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Conference

dg.o 2022

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 150 of 271 submissions, 55%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)24
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
Reflects downloads up to 24 Sep 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)The social contract theory meets cybersecurity: systematic literature reviewDigital Policy, Regulation and Governance10.1108/DPRG-06-2024-0118Online publication date: 25-Sep-2024
  • (2023)The success of the E-voting to Enhance the Political Engagement: A Comparative StudyJournal of Law and Sustainable Development10.55908/sdgs.v11i11.173211:11(e1732)Online publication date: 14-Nov-2023
  • (2023)Blockchain and digital governance: Decentralization of decision making policyReview of Policy Research10.1111/ropr.12585Online publication date: 27-Nov-2023

View Options

Get Access

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media