Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3437963.3441812acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswsdmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Mining the Stars: Learning Quality Ratings with User-facing Explanations for Vacation Rentals

Published: 08 March 2021 Publication History

Abstract

Online Travel Platforms are virtual two-sided marketplaces where guests search for accommodations and accommodation providers list their properties such as hotels and vacation rentals. The large majority of hotels are rated by official institutions with a number of stars indicating the quality of service they provide. It is a simple and effective mechanism that contributes to match supply with demand by helping guests to find options meeting their criteria and accommodation suppliers to market their product to the right segment directly impacting the number of transactions on the platform. Unfortunately, no similar rating system exists for the large majority of vacation rentals, making it difficult for guests to search and compare options and hard for vacation rentals suppliers to market their product effectively. In this work we describe a machine learned quality rating system for vacation rentals. The problem is challenging, mainly due to explainability requirements and the lack of ground truth. We present techniques to address these challenges and empirical evidence of their efficacy. Our system was successfully deployed and validated through Online Controlled Experiments performed in Booking.com, a large Online Travel Platform, and running for more than one year, impacting more than a million accommodations and millions of guests.

References

[1]
Alejandro Barredo Arrieta, Natalia D'iaz-Rodr'iguez, Javier Del Ser, Adrien Bennetot, Siham Tabik, Alberto Barbado, Salvador Garc'ia, Sergio Gil-López, Daniel Molina, Richard Benjamins, et al. 2020. Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI. Information Fusion, Vol. 58 (2020), 82--115.
[2]
Stefano Baccianella, Andrea Esuli, and Fabrizio Sebastiani. 2009. Evaluation measures for ordinal regression. In 2009 Ninth international conference on intelligent systems design and applications. IEEE, 283--287.
[3]
Ralf Bender and Ulrich Grouven. 1997. Ordinal logistic regression in medical research. Journal of the Royal College of physicians of London, Vol. 31, 5 (1997), 546.
[4]
Lucas Bernardi, Themistoklis Mavridis, and Pablo Estevez. 2019. 150 Successful Machine Learning Models: 6 Lessons Learned at Booking. com. In Proceedings of the 25th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining. 1743--1751.
[5]
Eibe Frank and Mark Hall. 2001. A simple approach to ordinal classification. In European Conference on Machine Learning. Springer, 145--156.
[6]
Sorelle A. Friedler, Chitradeep Dutta Roy, Carlos Scheidegger, and Dylan Slack. 2019. Assessing the Local Interpretability of Machine Learning Models. CoRR, Vol. abs/1902.03501 (2019). arxiv: 1902.03501 http://arxiv.org/abs/1902.03501
[7]
Jerome H Friedman. 2002. Stochastic gradient boosting. Computational statistics & data analysis, Vol. 38, 4 (2002), 367--378.
[8]
David Gunning. 2017. Explainable artificial intelligence (xai). Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), nd Web, Vol. 2 (2017), 2.
[9]
Frank E Harrell Jr. 2015. Regression modeling strategies: with applications to linear models, logistic and ordinal regression, and survival analysis .Springer. 282--290 pages.
[10]
Fátima Leal, Benedita Malheiro, and Juan Carlos Burguillo. 2017. Prediction and analysis of hotel ratings from crowd-sourced data. In World Conference on Information Systems and Technologies. Springer, 493--502.
[11]
Scott M. Lundberg, Gabriel Erion, Hugh Chen, Alex DeGrave, Jordan M. Prutkin, Bala Nair, Ronit Katz, Jonathan Himmelfarb, Nisha Bansal, and Su-In Lee. 2020. From local explanations to global understanding with explainable AI for trees. Nature Machine Intelligence, Vol. 2, 1 (2020), 2522--5839.
[12]
Scott M Lundberg and Su-In Lee. 2017. A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. In Advances in neural information processing systems. 4765--4774.
[13]
R. Potharst and A. J. Feelders. 2002. Classification Trees for Problems with Monotonicity Constraints. SIGKDD Explor. Newsl., Vol. 4, 1 (June 2002), 1--10. https://doi.org/10.1145/568574.568577
[14]
Lloyd S Shapley. 1953. A value for n-person games. Contributions to the Theory of Games, Vol. 2, 28 (1953), 307--317.
[15]
Robert Tibshirani. 1996. Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), Vol. 58, 1 (1996), 267--288.
[16]
PAL Vine. 1981. Hotel classification?art or science? International Journal of Tourism Management, Vol. 2, 1 (1981), 18--29.
[17]
Xiaojin Zhur and Zoubin Ghahramani. 2002. Learning from labeled and unlabeled data with label propagation. (2002).

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)A/B testingJournal of Systems and Software10.1016/j.jss.2024.112011211:COnline publication date: 2-Jul-2024
  • (2021)Putting the Role of Personalization into ContextProceedings of the 44th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval10.1145/3404835.3464929(2631-2632)Online publication date: 11-Jul-2021

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
WSDM '21: Proceedings of the 14th ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining
March 2021
1192 pages
ISBN:9781450382977
DOI:10.1145/3437963
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 08 March 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. explainability
  2. recommender systems
  3. semi-supervised learning

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

WSDM '21

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 498 of 2,863 submissions, 17%

Upcoming Conference

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)22
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
Reflects downloads up to 25 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)A/B testingJournal of Systems and Software10.1016/j.jss.2024.112011211:COnline publication date: 2-Jul-2024
  • (2021)Putting the Role of Personalization into ContextProceedings of the 44th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval10.1145/3404835.3464929(2631-2632)Online publication date: 11-Jul-2021

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media