Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3436286.3436397acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesisbdaiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Study on the Tourism Eco-efficiency in Central China

Published: 04 January 2021 Publication History

Abstract

By using the panel data of eight provinces in Central China, the tourism eco-efficiency from 2008 to 2017 was measured by the method of Super-SBM model. Based on the results, this research analyzed the differences of tourism eco-efficiency from the temporal and spatial dimension. The Malmquist index model is introduced to further measure and decompose the tourism eco-efficiency TFP. The final results indicated: (1) the 8 central provinces' tourism eco-efficiency was 0.93, falling short of the effective level. The overall tourism eco-efficiency came to a notable decline from 2008 to 2009 and then has maintained a moderate growth trend. (2) Significant differences in tourism eco-efficiencies existed between the 8 central provinces, The tourism eco-efficiency level shows three types: high, medium, low; and three types of the development trend: rising, declining and stable fluctuation. (3) The average annual growth rate of the tourism eco-efficiency TFP in central China is 19%, which is mainly led by technological progress. The tourism eco-efficiency TFP in all provinces was greater than 1, the highest in Anhui was 1.306, and the lowest in Heilongjiang was 1.072. (4) The technological progress is the highest in the mean value of decomposition efficiency, while the scale efficiency is the lowest. The difference of scale efficiency is the main reason for the difference of technical efficiency among provinces.

References

[1]
Adrian Henriques, Tefan Schaltegger, Roger Bxorritt, Holger Petersen. 2004. An introduction to corporate environmental management 2003 green leaf publishing. Ecological economics, 52(4)
[2]
Liu Jun, Ma Yong, Wen Ding, Tong Yun, Ren Jie. 2018. Measuring of Regional Eco-efficiency in China and Its Spatial-temporal Differences from 2000 to 2014. Journal of ecological environment, 27(03), 498--508.
[3]
Stefan G, Paul P, Jean- Paul C, et al. 2005. The Eco-efficiency of Tourism. Ecological Economics, 54(4), 417--434.
[4]
Sabine P, Ana S, Matthias S. 2010. The greenhouse gas intensity of the tourism sector: The case of Switzerland. Environmental Science & Policy, 13(2), 131--140.
[5]
Bruijn D K, Dirven R, Eijgelaar E, et al. 2013. Travelling large in 2011: The carbon footprint of Dutch holidaymakers in 2011 and the development since 2002. Breda, Netherlands: NHTV Breda University of Applied Sciences.
[6]
Joe K, Wolfgang H, Peter W, et al. 2007. Stated preferences of tourists for eco-efficient destination planning options. Tourism Management, 28(2), 337--390.
[7]
Jennifer R, Peter W, Wolfgang H. 2010. Moving towards more eco-efficient tourist transportation to a resort destination: The case of Whistler, British Columbia. Research in Transportation Economics, 26(1), 66--73.
[8]
Susanne K, Ariane W, Mattia W. 2011. How can tourism use land more efficiently? A model-based approach to land-use efficiency for tourist destinations. Tourism Management, 32(3), 629--640.
[9]
Li Peng, Yang Guihua, Zheng Biao, Zhang Yiqun. 2008. GHG emission-based eco-efficiency study on tourism itinerary products in Shangri-La, Yunnan Province, China. Acta Ecologica Sinica, (05), 2207--2219.
[10]
Zhen Yi. 2014. Tourism Ecological Efficiency Evaluation---Based on the comparative study of the ecological footprint and carbon footprint. Issues of Forestry Economics, 34(05), 474--480.
[11]
Wang Shuxin, He Hong, Wang Zhongfeng. 2016. Measuring Tourism Ecological Efficiency and It's Influencing Factors-Taking 4 Typical Scenic Spots in Qinba Region for Examples. Journal of Southwest University (Natural Science Edition), 38(10), 97--103.
[12]
Zhang Lei, Gao Xu, Cai Weimin, Chen Xiaoqin, Wang Lijun, HUANG Qiu. 2017 Eco-efficiency Evaluation of Tourism Lands in Qilihai Wetlands, Tianjin. Wetland Science, 15(04), 489--496.
[13]
Wang Zhaofeng, Huo Feifei. 2017. Analysis of influencing factors on eco-efficiency of tourism industry in Hunan Wuling mountain based on VAR model. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 38(11), 136--144.
[14]
Huang Heping, Wang Zhipeng, Song Yiyao. 2019. Carbon footprint and eco-efficiency of rural tourism destination under the background of rural revitalization: A case study of Huangling scenic spot in Wuyuan of Jiangxi Province. Research of Agricultural Modernization, 40(04), 683--691.
[15]
Yao Zhiguo, Chen Tian. 2016. A Literature Review of Tourism Eco-efficiency. Tourism Science, 30(06), 74--91.
[16]
Lin Wenkai, Lin Bishu. 2018. Ecological Efficiency Evaluation and Its Spatial Differences of Regional Tourism Industry------A Case of Jiangxi Province. East China Economic Management, 32(06), 19--25.
[17]
Wang Zhaofeng, Liu Qingfang. 2019. The spatio-temporal evolution of tourism eco-efficiency in the Yangtze River Economic Belt and its interactive response with tourism economy. Journal of Natural Resources, 34(09), 1945--1961.
[18]
Di Qianbin, Zhao Xiaoman, Wang Min. 2020. Ecological efficiency evaluation of China coastal tourism based on undesired output: China coastal tourism based on undesired output: China coastal city case. Marine Science Bulletin, 39(02), 160--168.
[19]
Liu Jia, Lu Ju. 2016. Research of the Time-space Differentiation Pattern and Formation Mechanism of China's Tourism Industry Eco-efficiency. Journal of Ocean University of China (Social Sciences), (01), 50--59.
[20]
Wang Shengpeng, Qiao Huafang, Feng Juan, Xie Shuangyu. 2020. The Spatio-Temporal Evolution of Tourism Eco-Efficiency in the Yellow River Basin and Its Interactive Response with Tourism Economy Development Level. Economic Geography, 40(05), 81--89.
[21]
Ma Yong, Liu Jun. 2015. Efficiency Evaluation of Regional Industrial Ecology of the Yangtze River Middle Reaches Urban Agglomerations. Economic Geography, 35(06), 124--129.
[22]
Zheng Bingyun, Yang Hongfeng. 2020. Spatial and Temporal Evolution of Eco-efficiency of Inter-provincial Tourism in China Based on Ecological Footprint. East China Economic Management, 34(04), 79--91.
[23]
Li Zhilong, Wang Diyun. 2020. Temporal and Spatial Differentiation of Tourism Economy-Ecological Efficiency and Its Influencing Factors in Wuling Mountain Area. Economic Geography, 40(06):233--240.
[24]
TONE K. 2002. A slacks-based measure of super efficiency in data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 143(1), 32--41.
[25]
Liu Jun, Ma Yong, Wen Ding, Tong Yun, Ren Jie. 2018. Measuring of Regional Eco-efficiency in China and Its Spatial-temporal Differences from 2000 to 2014. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 27(03), 498--508.
[26]
Liang Hongjun. 2020. Accelerating the construction of ecological civilization in Henan Province. China National Conditions and Strength, (01), 44--47.

Index Terms

  1. Study on the Tourism Eco-efficiency in Central China

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    ISBDAI '20: Proceedings of the 2020 2nd International Conference on Big Data and Artificial Intelligence
    April 2020
    640 pages
    ISBN:9781450376457
    DOI:10.1145/3436286
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 04 January 2021

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Malmquist index
    2. Super-SBM model
    3. The central china
    4. Tourism eco-efficiency

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Conference

    ISBDAI '20

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 70 of 340 submissions, 21%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • 0
      Total Citations
    • 45
      Total Downloads
    • Downloads (Last 12 months)9
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
    Reflects downloads up to 22 Nov 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media