Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3429889.3429906acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesisaimsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

The Optimal Wavelet Basis for Electroencephalogram Denoising

Published: 04 December 2020 Publication History

Abstract

To solve the problem of optimal wavelet basis selection in motor imagery electroencephalogram (MI-EEG) denoising by wavelet transform, based on the analysis of wavelet basis parameters and characteristics, combined with the characteristics of MI-EEG, we summarized the characteristics of wavelet basis suitable for MI-EEG denoising. Signal to noise ratio (SNR) and root mean squared error (RMSE) are introduced as evaluation criteria of signal denoising effect, it is concluded that the bior and rbio wavelet basis functions are better at denoising MI-EEG among the 7 types of wavelet clusters. Among them, the rbio2.2 wavelet basis is the most suitable for MI-EEG denoising. The comparison of simulation results verifies the correctness of the conclusions.

References

[1]
Li, Y., Zhang, L., Li, B., Yan, G., Geng, X., Jin, Z., Xu, Y., Wang, H., Liu, X. and Lin, R. The comparison study of wavelet and wavelet packet analysis in the de-noising of EEG test signal. IEEE, Huangshan, 2015.
[2]
Al-Kadi, M. I., Reaz, M. and Ali, M. M. Compatibility of mother wavelet functions with the electroencephalographic signal. IEEE, Langkawi, 2012.
[3]
Al-Qazzaz, N. K., Ali, S., Ahmad, S. A., Islam, M. S. and Ariff, M. I. Selection of mother wavelets thresholding methods in denoising multi-channel EEG signals during working memory task. IEEE, Kuala Lumpur, 2014.
[4]
Hussain, M., Reaz, M. B. I., Mohd - Yasin, F. and Ibrahimy, M. I. Electromyography signal analysis using wavelet transform and higher order statistics to determine muscle contraction. Expert Systems, 26, 1 (2009), 35--48.
[5]
Servín-Aguilar, J. G., Rizo-Dominguez, L. and Pardiñas-Mir, J. A. A comparison between wavelet families to compress an EEG signal. IEEE, 2016.
[6]
Yan, G.-z., Yang, B.-h. and Chen, S. Automated and adaptive feature extraction for brain-computer interfaces by using wavelet packet. IEEE, 2006.
[7]
Lema-Condo, E. L., Bueno-Palomeque, F. L., Castro-Villalobos, S. E., Ordoñez-Morales, E. F. and Serpa-Andrade, L. J. Comparison of wavelet transform symlets (2-10) and daubechies (2-10) for an electroencephalographic signal analysis. IEEE, 2017.
[8]
Eraldemır, S. G. and Yıldırım, E. Comparison of wavelets for classification of cognitive EEG signals. IEEE, 2015.
[9]
Cheng, L., Li, D., Li, X. and Yu, S. The Optimal Wavelet Basis Function Selection in Feature Extraction of Motor Imagery Electroencephalogram Based on Wavelet Packet Transformation. IEEE Access, 7 (2019), 174465--174481.
[10]
Inuso, G., La Foresta, F., Mammone, N. and Morabito, F. C. Wavelet-ICA methodology for efficient artifact removal from Electroencephalographic recordings. IEEE, Orlando, FL, 2007.
[11]
Graps, A. An introduction to wavelets. IEEE computational science and engineering, 2, 2 (1995), 50--61.
[12]
Rafiee, J., Rafiee, M., Prause, N. and Schoen, M. Wavelet basis functions in biomedical signal processing. Expert systems with Applications, 38, 5 (2011), 6190--6201.
[13]
Janjarasjitt, S. Classification of the epileptic EEGs using the wavelet-based scale variance feature. Int J Appl Biomed Eng, 3, 1 (2010), 19--25.
[14]
Jahankhani, P., Kodogiannis, V. and Revett, K. EEG signal classification using wavelet feature extraction and neural networks. IEEE, Sofia, 2006.
[15]
Chavan, A. and Kolte, M. Improved EEG signal processing with wavelet based multiscale PCA algorithm. IEEE, Pune, 2015.
[16]
Kalpakam, N. and Venkataramanan, S. Haar wavelet decomposition of EEG signal for ocular artifact de-noising: a mathematical analysis. IEEE, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, 2004.
[17]
Lun, D. P.-K. and Hsung, T.-C. Improved wavelet based a-priori SNR estimation for speech enhancement. IEEE, Paris, 2010.
[18]
Sumithra, M. and Thanuskodi, K. Wavelet based speech signal de-noising using hybrid thresholding. IEEE, Perundurai, Tamilnadu, 2009.
[19]
Medina, C., Alcaim, A. and Apolinario, J. Wavelet denoising of speech using neural networks for threshold selection. Electronics letters, 39, 25 (2003), 1869--1871.
[20]
Deng, N. and Jiang, C.-s. Selection of optimal wavelet basis for signal denoising. IEEE, Sichuan, 2012.
[21]
Lemm, S., Schafer, C. and Curio, G. BCI competition 2003-data set III: probabilistic modeling of sensorimotor/spl mu/rhythms for classification of imaginary hand movements. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 51, 6 (2004), 1077--1080.
[22]
Folkers, A., Mösch, F., Malina, T. and Hofmann, U. G. Realtime bioelectrical data acquisition and processing from 128 channels utilizing the wavelet-transformation. Neurocomputing, 52 (2003), 247--254.

Index Terms

  1. The Optimal Wavelet Basis for Electroencephalogram Denoising

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    ISAIMS '20: Proceedings of the 1st International Symposium on Artificial Intelligence in Medical Sciences
    September 2020
    313 pages
    ISBN:9781450388603
    DOI:10.1145/3429889
    © 2020 Association for Computing Machinery. ACM acknowledges that this contribution was authored or co-authored by an employee, contractor or affiliate of a national government. As such, the Government retains a nonexclusive, royalty-free right to publish or reproduce this article, or to allow others to do so, for Government purposes only.

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 04 December 2020

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. EEG
    2. root mean squared error
    3. signal to noise ratio
    4. wavelet basis

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Funding Sources

    • Natural Science Basic Research Program of Shaanxi
    • National Key R&D Program of China
    • National Natural Science Foundation of China

    Conference

    ISAIMS 2020

    Acceptance Rates

    ISAIMS '20 Paper Acceptance Rate 53 of 112 submissions, 47%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 53 of 112 submissions, 47%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • 0
      Total Citations
    • 55
      Total Downloads
    • Downloads (Last 12 months)4
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2
    Reflects downloads up to 22 Nov 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media