Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3424978.3425138acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescsaeConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A New Multiple Attribute Group Decision-making Approach to the Selection of Hotels for a Travel Company

Published: 20 October 2020 Publication History

Abstract

This paper proposes a new multi-attribute group decisionmaking (MAGDM) approach to conduct decision analysis with q-rung orthopair fuzzy (q-ROF) information, whose weights of attributes are completely unknown, based on Frank operations and improved Additive Ratio Assessment (ARAS). Firstly, we put forward the new operational laws of q-rung orthopair fuzzy number (q-ROFN) based on Frank operations. Then, we further give q-rung orthopair fuzzy Frank prioritized weighted (q-ROFFPWA) and q-rung orthopair fuzzy Frank prioritized weighted geometric (q-ROFFPWG) operator to aggregate fuzzy information effectively and study some properties of them. Furthermore, we propound an improved ARAS method to address MAGDM problem, where the weights of attributes determined through a newly defined generalized entropy. At last, we test the practicality of the proposed method by applying it to the selection of hotels for a travel company, and highlight the flexibility and superiority of this method by parameter analysis and comparative analysis.

References

[1]
Zadeh L A (1965). Fuzzy Sets. Information and Control, 8(3), 338--353.
[2]
Atanassov K T (1986). Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 20(1), 87--96.
[3]
Yager R (2014). Pythagorean Membership Grades in Multicriteria Decision Making. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 22(4), 958--965.
[4]
Yager R (2017). Generalized Orthopair Fuzzy Sets. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 25(5), 1222--1230.
[5]
Pei Z, Liu J, Hao F, et al. (2019). FLM-TOPSIS: The fuzzy linguistic multiset TOPSIS method and its application in linguistic decision making. Information Fusion, 45, 266--281.
[6]
Kong M, Pei Z, Ren F, et al. (2019). New Operations on Generalized Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Term Sets for Linguistic Decision Making. International Journalof Fuzzy Systems, 21(1), 243--262.
[7]
Wang L, Zhang H, Wang J and Li L (2018). Picture fuzzy normalized projection-based VIKOR method for the risk evaluation of construction project. Applied Soft Computing, 64, 216--226.
[8]
Boran F E, Genc S, Kurt M and Akay D (2009). A multi-criteria intuitionistic fuzzy group decision making for supplier selection with TOPSIS method. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(8), 11363--11368.
[9]
Zavadskas E K, Turskis Z and Vilutiene T (2010). Multiple criteria analysis of foundation instalment alternatives by applying Additive Ratio Assessment (ARAS) method. Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, 10(3), 123--141.
[10]
Karabasevic D, Stanujkic D and Urosevic S (2015). The MCDM model for personnel selection based on SWARA and ARAS methods. Management, 77, 43--52.
[11]
Karabasevic D, Paunkovic J and Stanujkic D (2016). Ranking of companies according to the indicators of corporate social responsibility based on SWARA and ARAS methods. Serbian Journal of Management, 11(1), 43--53.
[12]
Büyüközkan G and Göçer F (2018). An extension of ARAS methodology under Interval Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy environment for Digital Supply Chain. Applied Soft Computing, 69, 634--654.
[13]
Liu P and Wang P (2018). Some q-rung orthopair fuzzy aggregation operators and their applications to multiple-attribute decision making. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 33, 259--280.
[14]
Qin Y, Cui X, Huang M, Zhong Y, Tang Z and Shi P (2019). Archimedean Muirhead Aggregation Operators of q-Rung Orthopair Fuzzy Numbers for Multicriteria Group Decision Making. Complexity, 1--33.
[15]
Wei G W, Wei C, Wang J, Gao H and Wei Y (2019). Some q-rung orthopair fuzzy Maclaurin symmetric mean operators and their applications to potential evaluation of emerging technology commercialization. 34, 50--81.
[16]
Ju Y, Luo C, Ma J and Wang A (2019). A novel multiple-attribute group decision-making method based on q -rung orthopair fuzzy generalized power weighted aggregation operators. International Journal of Intelligent Systems.
[17]
Liu P and Wang Y (2020). Multiple attribute decision making based on q-Rung Orthopair Fuzzy generalized Maclaurin symmetic mean operators, Information Sciences. ins. 2020. 01.013.
[18]
Yager R (2008). Prioritized aggregation operators. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 48(1), 263--274.
[19]
Peng X and Liu L (2019). Information measures for q-rung orthopair fuzzy sets. International Journal of Intelligent Systems.

Index Terms

  1. A New Multiple Attribute Group Decision-making Approach to the Selection of Hotels for a Travel Company

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    CSAE '20: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Computer Science and Application Engineering
    October 2020
    1038 pages
    ISBN:9781450377720
    DOI:10.1145/3424978
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 20 October 2020

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. ARAS method
    2. Frank operation
    3. MAGDM
    4. Prioritized operator
    5. q-ROFS

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Conference

    CSAE 2020

    Acceptance Rates

    CSAE '20 Paper Acceptance Rate 179 of 387 submissions, 46%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 368 of 770 submissions, 48%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • 0
      Total Citations
    • 30
      Total Downloads
    • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 23 Feb 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media