Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3411763.3451610acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

Mitigating the Effects of Reading Interruptions by Providing Reviews and Previews

Published: 08 May 2021 Publication History

Abstract

As reading on mobile devices is becoming more ubiquitous, content is consumed in shorter intervals and is punctuated by frequent interruptions. In this work, we explore the best way to mitigate the effects of reading interruptions on longer text passages. Our hypothesis is that short summaries of either previously read content (reviews) or upcoming content (previews) will help the reader re-engage with the reading task. Our target use case is for students who study using electronic textbooks and who are frequently mobile. We present a series of pilot studies that examine the benefits of different types of summaries and their locations, with respect to variations in text content and participant cohorts. We find that users prefer reviews after an interruption, but that previews shown after interruptions have a larger positive influence on comprehension. Our work is a first step towards smart reading applications that proactively provide text summaries to mitigate interruptions on the go.

References

[1]
Alireza Ahmadi. 2010. Comprehension of a Non-Text: The Effect of the Title and Ambiguity Tolerance.Journal of Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics 15, 1 (Nov. 2010), 163–176.
[2]
Katrin Angerbauer, Tilman Dingler, Dagmar Kern, and Albrecht Schmidt. 2015. Utilizing the Effects of Priming to Facilitate Text Comprehension. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems(Seoul, Republic of Korea) (CHI EA ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1043–1048. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702613.2732914
[3]
A Baddeley, AW Eysenck, and MC Anderson. 2009. Memory. New York: Psychology Press.
[4]
Jill T Boruff and Dale Storie. 2014. Mobile devices in medicine: a survey of how medical students, residents, and faculty use smartphones and other mobile devices to find information. Journal of the Medical Library Association: JMLA 102, 1 (2014), 22.
[5]
John D Bransford and Marcia K Johnson. 1972. Contextual prerequisites for understanding: Some investigations of comprehension and recall. Journal of verbal learning and verbal behavior 11, 6 (1972), 717–726. https://doi.org/
[6]
Tilman Dingler, Dagmar Kern, Katrin Angerbauer, and Albrecht Schmidt. 2017. Text Priming - Effects of Text Visualizations on Readers Prior to Reading. In Human-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 2017, Regina Bernhaupt, Girish Dalvi, Anirudha Joshi, Devanuj K. Balkrishan, Jacki O’Neill, and Marco Winckler (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 345–365.
[7]
Helen M Hodgetts and Dylan M Jones. 2006. Contextual cues aid recovery from interruption: The role of associative activation.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 32, 5(2006), 1120.
[8]
Shamsi T. Iqbal and Brian P. Bailey. 2005. Investigating the Effectiveness of Mental Workload as a Predictor of Opportune Moments for Interruption. In CHI ’05 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Portland, OR, USA) (CHI EA ’05). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1489–1492. https://doi.org/10.1145/1056808.1056948
[9]
Dagmar Kern, Paul Marshall, and Albrecht Schmidt. 2010. Gazemarks: Gaze-Based Visual Placeholders to Ease Attention Switching. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Atlanta, Georgia, USA) (CHI ’10). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2093–2102. https://doi.org/10.1145/1753326.1753646
[10]
Walter Kintsch and Teun A. van Dijk. 1978. Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Decis. Sci. 85, 5 (1978), 363–394.
[11]
Luis Leiva, Matthias Böhmer, Sven Gehring, and Antonio Krüger. 2012. Back to the App: The Costs of Mobile Application Interruptions. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (San Francisco, California, USA) (MobileHCI ’12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 291–294. https://doi.org/10.1145/2371574.2371617
[12]
Ziming Liu. 2005. Reading behavior in the digital environment: Changes in reading behavior over the past ten years. Journal of documentation 61, 6 (2005), 700–712. https://doi.org/10.1108/00220410510632040
[13]
Alexander Mariakakis, Mayank Goel, Md Tanvir Islam Aumi, Shwetak N. Patel, and Jacob O. Wobbrock. 2015. SwitchBack: Using Focus and Saccade Tracking to Guide Users’ Attention for Mobile Task Resumption. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Seoul, Republic of Korea) (CHI ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2953–2962. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702539
[14]
Thierry Morineau, Caroline Blanche, Laurence Tobin, and Nicolas Guéguen. 2005. The emergence of the contextual role of the e-book in cognitive processes through an ecological and functional analysis. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 62, 3 (March 2005), 329–348. https://doi.org/
[15]
M. Nilsson, M. Drugge, U. Liljedahl, K. Synnes, and P. Parnes. 2005. A Study on Users’ Preference on Interruption When Using Wearable Computers and Head Mounted Displays. In Third IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications. 149–158. https://doi.org/10.1109/PERCOM.2005.5
[16]
Roger Ratcliff and Gail McKoon. 1988. A retrieval theory of priming in memory.Psychological review 95, 3 (1988), 385. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.95.3.385
[17]
Christina Schneegass and Fiona Draxler. 2021. Designing Task Resumption Cues for Interruptions in Mobile Learning Scenarios. In Technology-Augmented Perception and Cognition. Springer, 125–181.
[18]
C. Speier, I. Vessey, and J. Valacich. 2003. The Effects of Interruptions, Task Complexity, and Information Presentation on Computer-Supported Decision-Making Performance. Decis. Sci. 34(2003), 771–797.
[19]
Endel Tulving, Daniel L Schacter, and Heather A Stark. 1982. Priming effects in word-fragment completion are independent of recognition memory.Journal of experimental psychology: learning, memory, and cognition 8, 4(1982), 336.
[20]
Shaun Wallace, Rick Treitman, Jeff Huang, Ben D Sawyer, and Zoya Bylinskii. 2020. Accelerating Adult Readers with Typeface: A Study of Individual Preferences and Effectiveness. In Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–9.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)COR Themes for Readability from Iterative FeedbackProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642108(1-23)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
  • (2024)Supporting Task Switching with Reinforcement LearningProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642063(1-18)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
  • (2023)User-Centered Investigation of Features for Attention Management Systems in an Online Vignette StudyProceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia10.1145/3626705.3627766(108-121)Online publication date: 3-Dec-2023
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
CHI EA '21: Extended Abstracts of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
May 2021
2965 pages
ISBN:9781450380959
DOI:10.1145/3411763
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 08 May 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. interruptions
  2. mobile reading
  3. reading interfaces

Qualifiers

  • Poster
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Conference

CHI '21
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 6,164 of 23,696 submissions, 26%

Upcoming Conference

CHI '25
CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
April 26 - May 1, 2025
Yokohama , Japan

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)31
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
Reflects downloads up to 18 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)COR Themes for Readability from Iterative FeedbackProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642108(1-23)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
  • (2024)Supporting Task Switching with Reinforcement LearningProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642063(1-18)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
  • (2023)User-Centered Investigation of Features for Attention Management Systems in an Online Vignette StudyProceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia10.1145/3626705.3627766(108-121)Online publication date: 3-Dec-2023
  • (2023)MuM'23 Workshop on Interruptions and Attention ManagementProceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia10.1145/3626705.3626706(548-551)Online publication date: 3-Dec-2023
  • (2022)Personalized Font Recommendations: Combining ML and Typographic Guidelines to Optimize ReadabilityProceedings of the 2022 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3532106.3533457(1-25)Online publication date: 13-Jun-2022
  • (2022)Towards Individuated Reading Experiences: Different Fonts Increase Reading Speed for Different IndividualsACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction10.1145/350222229:4(1-56)Online publication date: 31-Mar-2022

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media