Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3406324.3410716acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmobilehciConference Proceedingsconference-collections
extended-abstract

The Effect of Latency on High Precision Micro Instructions in Mobile AR

Published: 25 February 2021 Publication History

Abstract

The effectiveness of AR superimposed instructions with video see-through displays has been extensively explored due to the widespread availability of suitable handheld devices such as smartphones. However, looking through a camera lens in such devices affects users’ performance due to distortions in visual representation and hardware capacity. While the former have been studied in detail (distortion of binocular disparity, accommodation/vergence conflict, geometrical distortions), the latter, mainly affected by system latency, has not been explored much. In this work, we present a system to measure the latency and two user studies: one exploring how well users can perceive differences in system latency, and one exploring the effects of latency on completion time and accuracy in following high precision micro AR instructions. The results show that users start to notice the difference in two compared latencies at 69 ms and that latency did not affect the performance (times and accuracy were similar in all conditions). Nevertheless, when ranking the phones with different latencies users preferred the phones of latency values 132 ms or lower. Both results provide a guide for building the best possible human perceivable system for a given task.

References

[1]
Mark Billinghurst and Hirokazu Kato. 2002. Collaborative augmented reality. Commun. ACM 45, 7 (2002), 64–70.
[2]
Klen Čopič Pucihar, Paul Coulton, and Jason Alexander. 2013. Creating a stereoscopic magic-lens to improve depth perception in handheld augmented reality. In Proceedings of the 15th MobileHCI. 448–451.
[3]
Klen Čopič Pucihar, Paul Coulton, and Jason Alexander. 2013. Evaluating dual-view perceptual issues in handheld augmented reality: device vs. user perspective rendering. In Proceedings of the 15th ACM on ICMI. 381–388.
[4]
Jonathan Deber, Ricardo Jota, Clifton Forlines, and Daniel Wigdor. 2015. How much faster is fast enough? user perception of latency & latency improvements in direct and indirect touch. In Proceedings of the 33rd CHI. 1827–1836.
[5]
Steffen Gauglitz, Cha Lee, Matthew Turk, and Tobias Höllerer. 2012. Integrating the physical environment into mobile remote collaboration. In Proceedings of the 14th MobileHCI. 241–250.
[6]
Steffen Gauglitz, Benjamin Nuernberger, Matthew Turk, and Tobias Höllerer. 2014. In touch with the remote world: remote collaboration with augmented reality drawings and virtual navigation. In Proceedings of the 20th VRST. 197–205.
[7]
Leo Gombač, Klen Čopič Pucihar, Matjaž Kljun, Paul Coulton, and Jan Grbac. 2016. 3D Virtual tracing and depth perception problem on mobile AR. In Proceedings of the 2016 EA CHI. 1849–1856.
[8]
Pavel Gurevich, Joel Lanir, Benjamin Cohen, and Ran Stone. 2012. TeleAdvisor: a versatile augmented reality tool for remote assistance. In Proceedings of the CHI. 619–622.
[9]
J.Y.H. Ng, M. Hausknecht, S. Vijayanarasimhan, O. Vinyals, R. Monga, and G. Toderici. 2015. Beyond short snippets: Deep networks for video classification.Technical Report arXiv:1503.08909. Cornell University.
[10]
Jarkko Polvi, Takafumi Taketomi, Goshiro Yamamoto, Arindam Dey, Christian Sandor, and Hirokazu Kato. 2016. SlidAR: A 3D positioning method for SLAM-based handheld augmented reality. Computers & Graphics 55(2016), 33–43.

Cited By

View all

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
MobileHCI '20: 22nd International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services
October 2020
248 pages
ISBN:9781450380522
DOI:10.1145/3406324
Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 25 February 2021

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Augmented Reality
  2. High Precision Interaction
  3. Latency
  4. Micro Interactions
  5. Remote Assistance
  6. Video See-Through Display

Qualifiers

  • Extended-abstract
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Conference

MobileHCI '20

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 202 of 906 submissions, 22%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 88
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)18
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 20 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media