poster

User Engagement with Chatbots: A Discursive Psychology Approach

Authors:

L. Jean CampAuthors Info & Claims

CUI '20: Proceedings of the 2nd Conference on Conversational User Interfaces

Article No.: 52, Pages 1 - 4

https://doi.org/10.1145/3405755.3406165

Published: 22 July 2020 Publication History

Abstract

Conversational agents have transcended into multiple industries with increased ability for user engagement in intelligent conversation. Conversations with chatbots are different from interpersonal communication in terms of turn-taking, intentions, and behavior. We study de-identified chat logs across 30 conversations with a well-recognized chatbot to understand (i) how people create turns in conversation to perform 'social action', extending human experiences and knowledge (ii) how people express typical human constructs like emotion in their interaction with chatbots, and, (iii) what are the discursive strategies used by people to create 'shared meaning' and identity for themselves. Our findings reveal conversational expectations and behavior of users being similar to those in human-to-human sharing (how people talk), but greater diversity in the nature of information shared (what they talk about). This can advance discussion both in how we can design conversational agents to be more intelligible, as well as sensitive to unnecessary information disclosure.

References

[1]

Jackie Abell and Elizabeth H Stokoe. 2001. Broadcasting the Royal Role: Constructing Culturally Situated Identities in the Princess Diana Panorama Interview. British Journal of Social Psychology 40, 3 (2001), 417--435.

[2]

Irwin Altman. 1976. Privacy: A Conceptual Analysis. Environment and Behavior 8, 1 (1976), 7--29.

[3]

Gene Ball and Jack Breese. 2000. Emotion and Personality in a Conversational Agent. Embodied Conversational Agents (2000), 189--219.

Digital Library

[4]

Justine Cassell, Joseph Sullivan, Elizabeth Churchill, and Scott Prevost. 2000. Embodied Conversational Agents. MIT press.

Digital Library

[5]

Erving Goffman. 1978. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Harmondsworth London.

[6]

Arlie Russell Hochschild. 1979. Emotion Work, Feeling Rules, and Social Structure. American Journal of Sociology 85, 3 (1979), 551--575.

[7]

Jizhou Huang, Ming Zhou, and Dan Yang. 2007. Extracting Chatbot Knowledge from Online Discussion Forums. In IJCAI, Vol. 7. 423--428.

[8]

Chun-Hung Lu, Guey-Fa Chiou, Min-Yuh Day, Chorng-Shyong Ong, and Wen-Lian Hsu. 2006. Using Instant Messaging to Provide an Intelligent Learning Environment. In International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems. Springer, 575--583.

Digital Library

[9]

Clifford Nass, Youngme Moon, Brian J Fogg, Byron Reeves, and D Christopher Dryer. 1995. Can Computer Personalities be Human Personalities? International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 43, 2 (1995), 223--239.

Digital Library

[10]

Gordon Pask. 1976. Conversation Theory. Applications in Education and Epistemology (1976).

[11]

Jonathan Potter and Margaret Wetherell. 1987. Discourse and Social Psychology: Beyond Attitudes and Behaviour. Sage.

[12]

Gill Press. 2017. AI By The Numbers: 33 Facts And Forecasts About Chatbots And Voice Assistants. https://www.forbes.com/sites/gilpress/2017/05/15/ai-by-the-numbers-33-facts-and-forecasts-about-chatbots-and-voice-assistants. (Accessed on 09/20/2018).

[13]

Qiao Qian, Minlie Huang, Haizhou Zhao, Jingfang Xu, and Xiaoyan Zhu. 2017. Assigning Personality/Identity to a Chatting Machine for Coherent Conversation Generation. IJCAI (2017).

[14]

Harvey Sacks. 1984. On Doing 'Being Ordinary'. Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis (1984), 413--429.

[15]

Barry Schwartz. 1968. The Social Psychology of Privacy. Amer. J. Sociology 73, 6 (1968), 741--752.

[16]

Tuva Lunde Smestad. 2018. Personality Matters! Improving The User Experience of Chatbot Interfaces-Personality provides a stable pattern to guide the design and behaviour of conversational agents. Master's thesis. NTNU.

[17]

Gábor Tatai, Annamária Csordás, Árpád Kiss, Attila Szaló, and László Laufer. 2003. Happy Chatbot, Happy User. In International Workshop on Intelligent Virtual Agents. Springer, 5--12.

[18]

Joseph Weizenbaum. 1976. Computer Power and Human Reason: From Judgment to Calculation. (1976).

[19]

Joseph Weizenbaum et al. 1966. ELIZA---A Computer Program for the Study of Natural Language Communication between Man and Machine. ACM 9, 1 (1966), 36--45.

Digital Library

[20]

Sally Wiggins and Jonathan Potter. 2008. Discursive Psychology. The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research in Psychology (2008), 73--90.

[21]

Jennifer Zamora. 2017. I'm Sorry, Dave, I'm Afraid I Can't Do That: Chatbot Perception and Expectations. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Human Agent Interaction. ACM, 253--260.

Digital Library

Cited By

Barbara Onyekwelu IShrestha REika Sandnes F(2024)“Not quite there yet”: On Users Perception of Popular Healthcare Chatbot Apps for Personal Health ManagementProceedings of the 17th International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments10.1145/3652037.3652042(191-197)Online publication date: 26-Jun-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3652037.3652042
Abdelhamid SMallari TAly M(2023)Cybersecurity Awareness, Education, and Workplace Training Using Socially Enabled Intelligent ChatbotsCreative Approaches to Technology-Enhanced Learning for the Workplace and Higher Education10.1007/978-3-031-41637-8_1(3-16)Online publication date: 24-Sep-2023
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-41637-8_1
ČERNÝ M(2022)GALLERYIST ANNA: CHATBOT AS AN EDUCATIONAL RESOURCEJournal of Technology and Information10.5507/jtie.2022.00914:1(49-68)Online publication date: 6-Oct-2022
https://doi.org/10.5507/jtie.2022.009
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

User Engagement with Chatbots: A Discursive Psychology Approach
1. Computing methodologies
  1. Artificial intelligence
    1. Philosophical/theoretical foundations of artificial intelligence
2. Human-centered computing
  1. Human computer interaction (HCI)
  2. Interaction design
    1. Interaction design process and methods
      1. User centered design

Recommendations

Chatbots Language Design: The Influence of Language Variation on User Experience with Tourist Assistant Chatbots
Chatbots are often designed to mimic social roles attributed to humans. However, little is known about the impact of using language that fails to conform to the associated social role. Our research draws on sociolinguistic to investigate how a chatbot’s ...
Leveraging Large Language Models to Power Chatbots for Collecting User Self-Reported Data
CSCW

Large language models (LLMs) provide a new way to build chatbots by accepting natural language prompts. Yet, it is unclear how to design prompts to power chatbots to carry on naturalistic conversations while pursuing a given goal such as collecting self-...
Exploring how politeness impacts the user experience of chatbots for mental health support
Abstract
Politeness is important in human–human interaction when asking people to engage in sensitive conversations. If politeness manifests similarly in human–chatbot interaction, it may play an important role in the design of sensitive chatbot ...
Highlights
- Politeness can both positively and negatively impact the chatbot user experience.
- The Personal politeness chatbot was experienced as caring and encouraging.
- The Passive politeness chatbot was experienced as too apologetic and ...

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences

CUI '20: Proceedings of the 2nd Conference on Conversational User Interfaces

July 2020

271 pages

ISBN:9781450375443

DOI:10.1145/3405755

Conference Chairs:
María Inés Torres,
Stephan Schlögl,
Program Chairs:
Leigh Clark,
Martin Porcheron

Copyright © 2020 Owner/Author.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 22 July 2020

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Poster
Research
Refereed limited

Conference

CUI '20

CUI '20: 2nd Conference on Conversational User Interfaces

July 22 - 24, 2020

Bilbao, Spain

Acceptance Rates

CUI '20 Paper Acceptance Rate 13 of 39 submissions, 33%;

Overall Acceptance Rate 34 of 100 submissions, 34%

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

8
Total Citations
View Citations
616
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)168
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)16

Reflects downloads up to 12 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Barbara Onyekwelu IShrestha REika Sandnes F(2024)“Not quite there yet”: On Users Perception of Popular Healthcare Chatbot Apps for Personal Health ManagementProceedings of the 17th International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments10.1145/3652037.3652042(191-197)Online publication date: 26-Jun-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3652037.3652042
Abdelhamid SMallari TAly M(2023)Cybersecurity Awareness, Education, and Workplace Training Using Socially Enabled Intelligent ChatbotsCreative Approaches to Technology-Enhanced Learning for the Workplace and Higher Education10.1007/978-3-031-41637-8_1(3-16)Online publication date: 24-Sep-2023
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-41637-8_1
ČERNÝ M(2022)GALLERYIST ANNA: CHATBOT AS AN EDUCATIONAL RESOURCEJournal of Technology and Information10.5507/jtie.2022.00914:1(49-68)Online publication date: 6-Oct-2022
https://doi.org/10.5507/jtie.2022.009
Carmichael LPoirier SCoursaris CLéger PSénécal S(2022)Users’ Information Disclosure Behaviors during Interactions with Chatbots: The Effect of Information Disclosure NudgesApplied Sciences10.3390/app12241266012:24(12660)Online publication date: 10-Dec-2022
https://doi.org/10.3390/app122412660
Rezwana JMaher MMaiden NSas C(2022)Understanding User Perceptions, Collaborative Experience and User Engagement in Different Human-AI Interaction Designs for Co-Creative SystemsProceedings of the 14th Conference on Creativity and Cognition10.1145/3527927.3532789(38-48)Online publication date: 20-Jun-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3527927.3532789
Borsci SSchmettow MMalizia AChamberlain Avan der Velde F(2022)A confirmatory factorial analysis of the Chatbot Usability Scale: a multilanguage validationPersonal and Ubiquitous Computing10.1007/s00779-022-01690-027:2(317-330)Online publication date: 4-Aug-2022
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-022-01690-0
Avgustis IShirokov AIivari N(2021)“Please Connect Me to a Specialist”: Scrutinising ‘Recipient Design’ in Interaction with an Artificial Conversational AgentHuman-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 202110.1007/978-3-030-85610-6_10(155-176)Online publication date: 26-Aug-2021
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85610-6_10
Motger QFranch XMarco J(2021)Integrating Adaptive Mechanisms into Mobile Applications Exploiting User FeedbackResearch Challenges in Information Science10.1007/978-3-030-75018-3_23(347-355)Online publication date: 8-May-2021
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75018-3_23

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Figures

Tables

Media

View Table of Conten