research-article

Dating Apps Are Used for More Than Dating: How Users Disclose and Detect (Non-)Sexual Interest in People-Nearby Applications

Authors:

Nicholas Mullins,

Shelnesha Taylor,

Richard H. HollerAuthors Info & Claims

Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Volume 6, Issue GROUP

Article No.: 30, Pages 1 - 14

https://doi.org/10.1145/3492849

Published: 14 January 2022 Publication History

Abstract

Use and design of dating apps has evolved in recent years to accommodate other interaction goals beyond dating, prompting some researchers to now refer to these apps as people-nearby applications (PNAs). With this expansion of use comes increased potential for misinterpretation of users' goals for meeting face-to-face, which can pose risks to user safety particularly when disparities in sexual expectations occur. We present a survey study (n=132) with users of several PNAs and with various motivations for PNA-use to understand how interaction goals are disclosed and detected. The study finds such practices to be far from consistent, with some appearing highly susceptible to misinterpretation such as purposely delaying self-presentation of interaction goals until meeting face-to-face, and implying sexual expectations through vague references to "fun." We conclude by suggesting a modified version of the "swiping" feature in PNAs to facilitate consistent and overt self-presentation of interaction goals in ways that accommodate user tendencies discovered in the study.

Supplementary Material

ZIP File (v6group30aux.zip)

This material includes open-ended questions from the survey reported on in the paper, as well as the codebook resulting from analysis of the open-ended survey data. The file is a PDF.

Download
80.51 KB

References

[1]

Antonia Abbey. 1987. Misperceptions of friendly behavior as sexual interest: A survey of naturally occurring incidents. Psychol. Women Q. 11, 2 (1987), 173--194.

[2]

Adel Al-Dawood, Serene Alhajhussein, and Svetlana Yarosh. 2021. Saudi Arabian Parents' Perception of Online Marital Matchmaking Technologies. Proc. ACM Human-Computer Interact. 4, CSCW3 (January 2021), 1--32.

Digital Library

[3]

Monica Anderson, Emily A. Vogels, and Erica Turner. 2020. The virtues and downsides of online dating. Pew Research Center report. Retrieved from https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2020/02/06/the-virtues-and-downsides-of-online-dating/

[4]

Aaron Beach, Mike Gartrell, Sirisha Akkala, Jack Elston, John Kelley, Keisuke Nishimoto, Baishakhi Ray, Sergei Razgulin, Karthik Sundaresan, Bonnie Surendar, and others. 2008. Whozthat? evolving an ecosystem for context-aware mobile social networks. IEEE Netw. 22, 4 (2008), 50--55.

Digital Library

[5]

Jeremy Birnholtz, Colin Fitzpatrick, Mark Handel, and Jed R Brubaker. 2014. Identity, identification and identifiability: The language of self-presentation on a location-based mobile dating app. In Proc. MobileHCI 2014, 3--12.

Digital Library

[6]

Jeremy Birnholtz, Shruta Rawat, Richa Vashista, Dicky Baruah, Alpana Dange, and Anne-Marie Boyer. 2020. Layers of Marginality: An Exploration of Visibility, Impressions, and Cultural Context on Geospatial Apps for Men Who Have Sex With Men in Mumbai, India. Soc. Media+ Soc. 6, 2 (2020), 2056305120913995.

[7]

Jeremy Birnholtz, Irina Shklovski, Mark Handel, and Eran Toch. 2015. Let's talk about sex (Apps), CSCW. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference Companion on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, 283--288.

[8]

Ginette C. Blackhart, Jennifer Fitzpatrick, and Jessica Williamson. 2014. Dispositional factors predicting use of online dating sites and behaviors related to online dating. Comput. Human Behav. 33, (2014), 113--118.

Digital Library

[9]

Courtney Blackwell, Jeremy Birnholtz, and Charles Abbott. 2014. Seeing and being seen: Co-situation and impression formation using Grindr, a location-aware gay dating app. New Media Soc. (2014), 1--20.

[10]

Virginia Braun, Victoria Clarke, Nikki Hayfield, and Gareth Terry. 2019. Thematic Analysis. In Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences. Springer Singapore, Singapore, 843--860.

[11]

Bumble. Bumble. Retrieved May 21, 2021 from https://bumble.com/

[12]

John T Cacioppo, Stephanie Cacioppo, Gian C Gonzaga, Elizabeth L Ogburn, and Tyler J Vanderweele. 2013. Marital satisfaction and break-ups differ across on-line and off-line meeting venues. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 110, 25 (2013), 10135--10140.

[13]

Johannes Kuo-Huie Chiang and Hung-Yue Suen. 2015. Self-presentation and hiring recommendations in online communities: Lessons from LinkedIn. Comput. Human Behav. 48, (July 2015), 516--524.

Digital Library

[14]

Edmond Pui Hang Choi, Janet Yuen Ha Wong, and Daniel Yee Tak Fong. 2018. An emerging risk factor of sexual abuse: the use of smartphone dating applications. Sex. Abus. 30, 4 (2018), 343--366.

[15]

Francesca Comunello, Lorenza Parisi, and Francesca Ieracitano. 2020. Negotiating gender scripts in mobile dating apps: between affordances, usage norms and practices. Information, Commun. Soc. (2020), 1--17.

[16]

Elena Francesca Corriero and Stephanie Tom Tong. 2016. Managing uncertainty in mobile dating applications: Goals, concerns of use, and information seeking in Grindr. Mob. Media Commun. 4, 1 (2016), 121--141.

[17]

Danielle Couch and Pranee Liamputtong. 2008. Online dating and mating: The use of the internet to meet sexual partners. Qual.Health Res 18, 2 (2008), 268--279. [pii];10.1177/1049732307312832 [doi]

[18]

Judith Donath. 2007. Signals in social supernets. J. Comput. Commun. 13, 1 (2007), 231--251.

[19]

Judith Donath. 2007. Signals, cues and meaning. Personal communication.

[20]

Nathan Eagle and Alex Pentland. 2005. Social serendipity: Mobilizing social software. IEEE Pervasive Comput. 4, 2 (2005), 28--34.

Digital Library

[21]

Nicole B Ellison, Jeffrey T Hancock, and Catalina L Toma. 2012. Profile as promise: A framework for conceptualizing veracity in online dating self-presentations. New Media Soc. 14, 1 (2012), 45--62.

[22]

Nicole Ellison, Rebecca Heino, and J. L. Gibbs. 2006. Managing impressions online: self-presentation processes in the online dating environment. J. Comput. Commun. 11, (2006), 415--441.

[23]

Julia R Fernandez and Jeremy Birnholtz. 2019. " I Don't Want Them to Not Know" Investigating Decisions to Disclose Transgender Identity on Dating Platforms. Proc. ACM Human-Computer Interact. 3, CSCW (2019), 1--21.

[24]

Andrew T Fiore and Judith S Donath. 2004. Online Personals: An Overview. In CHI'04 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in ?, 1395--1398.

Digital Library

[25]

Colin Fitzpatrick and Jeremy Birnholtz. 2018. ?I Shut the Door": Interactions, tensions, and negotiations from a location-based social app. New Media Soc. 20, 7 (2018), 2469--2488.

[26]

Jeana H Frost, Zoe Chance, Michael I Norton, and Dan Ariely. 2008. People are experience goods: Improving online dating with virtual dates. J. Interact. Mark. 22, 1 (2008), 51--61.

[27]

Jennifer L. Gibbs, Nicole B. Ellison, and Rebecca D. Heino. 2006. Self-presentation in online personals: The role of anticipated future interaction, self-disclosure, and perceived success in internet dating. Communic. Res. 33, 2 (2006), 152--177.

[28]

Jennifer L Gibbs, Nicole B Ellison, and Chih-Hui Lai. 2010. First comes love, then comes Google: An investigation of uncertainty reduction strategies and self-disclosure in online dating. Communic. Res. 38, 1 (2010), 70--100.

[29]

Louisa Gilbert, Aaron L Sarvet, Melanie Wall, Kate Walsh, Leigh Reardon, Patrick Wilson, John Santelli, Shamus Khan, Martie Thompson, Jennifer S Hirsch, and others. 2019. Situational contexts and risk factors associated with incapacitated and nonincapacitated sexual assaults among college women. J. Women's Heal. 28, 2 (2019), 185--193.

[30]

Rosalie Gillett. 2018. Intimate intrusions online: Studying the normalisation of abuse in dating apps. In Women's Studies International Forum, 212--219.

[31]

Erving Goffman. 1978. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York, NY: Harmondsworth.

[32]

Jeffrey A Hall, Namkee Park, Hayeon Song, and Michael J Cody. 2010. Strategic misrepresentation in online dating: The effects of gender, self-monitoring, and personality traits. J. Soc. Pers. Relat. 27, 1 (2010), 117--135.

[33]

Jeffrey T. Hancock, Catalina Toma, and Nicole Ellison. 2007. The truth about lying in online dating profiles. In CHI Proceedings, 449--452.

Digital Library

[34]

Jeffrey T. Hancock and Catalina L. Toma. 2009. Putting your best face forward: The accuracy of online dating photographs. J. Commun. 59, 2 (2009), 367--386.

[35]

Mark J Handel and Irina Shklovski. 2012. Disclosure, ambiguity and risk reduction in real-time dating sites. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM international conference on Supporting group work, 175--178.

Digital Library

[36]

Alejandro Henao. 2017. Impacts of Ridesourcing-Lyft and Uber-on Transportation Including VMT, Mode Replacement, Parking, and Travel Behavior. University of Colorado at Denver.

[37]

Joey Chiao-Yin Hsiao and Tawanna R Dillahunt. 2017. People-nearby applications: How newcomers move their relationships offline and develop social and cultural capital. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing, 26--40.

[38]

Joey Chiao-Yin Hsiao and Tawanna R Dillahunt. 2017. Detecting Life Changes: Increasing Opportunities to Benefit from People-Nearby Applications. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1700--1707.

Digital Library

[39]

Anthony J Lee, Morgan J Sidari, Sean C Murphy, James M Sherlock, and Brendan P Zietsch. 2020. Sex differences in misperceptions of sexual interest can be explained by sociosexual orientation and men projecting their own interest onto women. Psychol. Sci. 31, 2 (2020), 184--192.

[40]

Leah E LeFebvre. 2018. Swiping me off my feet: Explicating relationship initiation on Tinder. J. Soc. Pers. Relat. 35, 9 (2018), 1205--1229.

[41]

Kristen P Lindgren, Michele R Parkhill, William H George, and Christian S Hendershot. 2008. Gender differences in perceptions of sexual intent: A qualitative review and integration. Psychol. Women Q. 32, 4 (2008), 423--439.

[42]

Jennifer Marlow, Laura Dabbish, and Jim Herbsleb. 2013. Impression formation in online peer production: activity traces and personal profiles in github. In Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Computer supported cooperative work - CSCW '13, 117.

Digital Library

[43]

Christina Masden and W Keith Edwards. 2015. Understanding the role of community in online dating. In CHI Proceedings, 535--544.

Digital Library

[44]

Julia Mayer and Quentin Jones. 2016. Encount'r: Exploring Passive Context-Awareness for Opportunistic Social Matching. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing Companion, 349--352.

Digital Library

[45]

Julia M Mayer, Starr Roxanne Hiltz, Louise Barkhuus, Kaisa Väänänen, and Quentin Jones. 2016. Supporting opportunities for context-aware social matching: An experience sampling study. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2430--2441.

Digital Library

[46]

Carin Perilloux, Judith A Easton, and David M Buss. 2012. The misperception of sexual interest. Psychol. Sci. 23, 2 (2012), 146--151.

[47]

Jonathan Petrychyn, Diana C Parry, and Corey W Johnson. 2020. Building community, one swipe at a time: hook-up apps and the production of intimate publics between women. Heal. Sociol. Rev. (2020), 1--15.

[48]

John R Porter, Kiley Sobel, Sarah E Fox, Cynthia L Bennett, and Julie A Kientz. 2017. Filtered out: Disability disclosure practices in online dating communities. Proc. ACM Human-Computer Interact. 1, CSCW (2017), 87.

Digital Library

[49]

Anastasia Powell and Nicola Henry. 2019. Technology-facilitated sexual violence victimization: Results from an online survey of Australian adults. J. Interpers. Violence 34, 17 (2019), 3637--3665.

[50]

Fortuna Procentese and Flora Gatti. 2019. People-nearby applications and local communities: Questioning about individuals' loneliness and social motivations toward people-nearby applications. J. Community Psychol. 47, 5 (2019), 1282--1294.

[51]

Janine Rowse, Caroline Bolt, and Sanjeev Gaya. 2020. Swipe right: the emergence of dating-app facilitated sexual assault. A descriptive retrospective audit of forensic examination caseload in an Australian metropolitan service. Forensic Sci. Med. Pathol. (2020), 1--7.

[52]

Gilla K. Shapiro, Ovidiu Tatar, Arielle Sutton, William Fisher, Anila Naz, Samara Perez, and Zeev Rosberger. 2017. Correlates of Tinder Use and Risky Sexual Behaviors in Young Adults. Cyberpsychology, Behav. Soc. Netw. 20, 12 (December 2017), 727--734.

[53]

Sindy R. Sumter, Laura Vandenbosch, and Loes Ligtenberg. 2017. Love me Tinder: Untangling emerging adults' motivations for using the dating application Tinder. Telemat. Informatics 34, 1 (2017), 67--78.

Digital Library

[54]

Michael Terry, Elizabeth D Mynatt, Kathy Ryall, and Darren Leigh. 2002. Social net: using patterns of physical proximity over time to infer shared interests. In CHI Extended Abstracts, 816--817.

[55]

Loren Terveen and David W McDonald. 2005. Social matching: A framework and research agenda. ACM Trans. Comput. Interact. 12, 3 (2005), 401--434.

Digital Library

[56]

Elisabeth Timmermans and Elien De Caluwé. 2017. Development and Validation of the Tinder Motives Scale (TMS). Comput. Human Behav. 70, (2017), 341--350.

Digital Library

[57]

Elisabeth Timmermans and Cédric Courtois. 2018. From swiping to casual sex and/or committed relationships: Exploring the experiences of Tinder users. Inf. Soc. 34, 2 (2018), 59--70.

[58]

Tinder. About Tinder. Tinder Newsroom. Retrieved May 31, 2020 from https://www.tinderpressroom.com/about

[59]

Eran Toch and Inbal Levi. 2013. Locality and privacy in people-nearby applications. In Proceedings of the 2013 ACM international joint conference on Pervasive and ubiquitous computing, 539--548.

Digital Library

[60]

Catalina L. Toma and Jeffrey T. Hancock. 2010. Looks and lies: The role of physical attractiveness in online dating delf-presentation and deception. Communic. Res. 37, 3 (2010), 335--351.

[61]

Catalina L Toma, Jeffrey T Hancock, and Nicole B Ellison. 2008. Separating fact From fiction: An examination of deceptive self-presentation in online dating profiles. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 34, 8 (2008), 1023--1036.

[62]

Teresa A Treat, Hannah Hinkel, Jodi R Smith, and Richard J Viken. 2016. Men's perceptions of women's sexual interest: Effects of environmental context, sexual attitudes, and women's characteristics. Cogn. Res. Princ. Implic. 1, 1 (2016), 1--13.

[63]

UK National Crime Agency. 2016. Emerging new threat in online dating: Initial trends in internet dating-initiated serious sexual assaults. National Crime Agency London, England. Retrieved from https://trends.ifla.org/node/425

[64]

Jessica Vitak. 2012. The Impact of Context Collapse and Privacy on Social Network Site Disclosures. J. Broadcast. Electron. Media 56, 4 (October 2012), 451--470.

[65]

Mark Warner, Andreas Gutmann, M Angela Sasse, and Ann Blandford. 2018. Privacy unraveling around explicit HIV status disclosure fields in the online geosocial hookup app Grindr. Proc. ACM human-computer Interact. 2, CSCW (2018), 1--22.

Digital Library

[66]

Mark Warner, Juan F Maestre, Jo Gibbs, Chia-Fang Chung, and Ann Blandford. 2019. Signal Appropriation of Explicit HIV Status Disclosure Fields in Sex-Social Apps used by Gay and Bisexual Men. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1--15.

Digital Library

[67]

Chad Van De Wiele and Stephanie Tom Tong. 2014. Breaking boundaries: The uses & gratifications of Grindr. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM international joint conference on pervasive and ubiquitous computing, 619--630.

Digital Library

[68]

Shangwei Wu and Janelle Ward. 2020. Looking for "interesting people": Chinese gay men's exploration of relationship development on dating apps. Mob. Media Commun. 8, 3 (2020), 342--359.

[69]

Doug Zytko, Sukeshini A Grandhi, and Quentin Jones. 2016. The coaches said...what?: Analysis of online dating strategies recommended by dating coaches. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Supporting Group Work, 385--397.

Digital Library

[70]

Douglas Zytko, Nicholas Furlo, Bailey Carlin, and Matthew Archer. 2021. Computer-Mediated Consent to Sex: The Context of Tinder. Proc. ACM Human-Computer Interact. 5, CSCW1 (2021), 27.

Digital Library

[71]

Douglas Zytko, Sukeshini A. Grandhi, and Quentin Jones. 2014. Impression management struggles in online dating. In Proceedings of the 18th international conference on supporting group work, 53--62.

Digital Library

[72]

Douglas Zytko, Sukeshini A Grandhi, and Quentin Jones. 2015. Frustrations with Pursuing Casual Encounters through Online Dating. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1935--1940.

Digital Library

Cited By

Janulevičiūtė MMikuličiūtė V(2024)Internetinės pažinčių programėlės: kaip vyro patrauklumo vertinimas priklauso nuo jo atsiskleidimo ir moterų vienišumo lygioOnline Dating Apps: How a Man’s Attractiveness Rating Depends on His Level of Disclosure and Women’s Level of LonelinessInformation & Media10.15388/Im.2024.100.1100(8-21)Online publication date: 4-Mar-2024
https://doi.org/10.15388/Im.2024.100.1
DeVito MFeuston JMelder EMalloy CPonder CBrubaker J(2024)Safety and Community Context: Exploring a Transfeminist Approach to Sapphic Relationship PlatformsProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36536948:CSCW1(1-34)Online publication date: 26-Apr-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3653694
Armstrong TLeong TBuckingham Shum Svan den Hoven E(2024)"This is the kind of experience I want to have": Supporting the experiences of queer young men on social platforms through designProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3661564(1681-1700)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3643834.3661564
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Dating Apps Are Used for More Than Dating: How Users Disclose and Detect (Non-)Sexual Interest in People-Nearby Applications
1. Human-centered computing
  1. Collaborative and social computing
    1. Empirical studies in collaborative and social computing

Recommendations

Computer-Mediated Consent to Sex: The Context of Tinder
CSCW

This paper reports an interview study about how consent to sexual activity is computer-mediated. The study's context of online dating is chosen due to the prevalence of sexual violence, or nonconsensual sexual activity, that is associated with dating app-...
Foregrounding Women's Safety in Mobile Social Matching and Dating Apps: A Participatory Design Study
GROUP

The design of social matching and dating apps has changed continually through the years, marked notably by a shift to mobile devices, and yet user safety has not historically been a driver of design despite mounting evidence of sexual and other harms. ...
Rethinking Dating Apps as Sexual Consent Apps: A New Use Case for AI-Mediated Communication
CSCW '21 Companion: Companion Publication of the 2021 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing

This paper reports a participatory design study about how dating apps could be designed to mediate sexual consent exchange and ultimately serve as scalable sexual violence prevention solutions. Participants (n=17) were dating app users identifying as ...

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction

Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction Volume 6, Issue GROUP

GROUP

January 2022

992 pages

EISSN:2573-0142

DOI:10.1145/3511803

Editor:
Jeff Nichols
Apple Inc., United States

Issue’s Table of Contents

Copyright © 2022 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 14 January 2022

Published in PACMHCI Volume 6, Issue GROUP

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article

Funding Sources

Oakland University
Oakland University Research Committee

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

7
Total Citations
View Citations
684
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)258
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)13

Reflects downloads up to 01 Oct 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Janulevičiūtė MMikuličiūtė V(2024)Internetinės pažinčių programėlės: kaip vyro patrauklumo vertinimas priklauso nuo jo atsiskleidimo ir moterų vienišumo lygioOnline Dating Apps: How a Man’s Attractiveness Rating Depends on His Level of Disclosure and Women’s Level of LonelinessInformation & Media10.15388/Im.2024.100.1100(8-21)Online publication date: 4-Mar-2024
https://doi.org/10.15388/Im.2024.100.1
DeVito MFeuston JMelder EMalloy CPonder CBrubaker J(2024)Safety and Community Context: Exploring a Transfeminist Approach to Sapphic Relationship PlatformsProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36536948:CSCW1(1-34)Online publication date: 26-Apr-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3653694
Armstrong TLeong TBuckingham Shum Svan den Hoven E(2024)"This is the kind of experience I want to have": Supporting the experiences of queer young men on social platforms through designProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3661564(1681-1700)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3643834.3661564
Kim HOh SLee GJung SJung KLim H(2024)Exploring Multi-faceted Motivations and Strategies Using Mobile Dating Applications: Case Study of Tinder Users in South KoreaProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36330738:GROUP(1-14)Online publication date: 21-Feb-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3633073
Zheng WWalquist EDatey IZhou XBerishaj KMcdonald MParkhill MZhu DZytko D(2024)“It’s Not What We Were Trying to Get At, but I Think Maybe It Should Be”: Learning How to Do Trauma-Informed Design with a Data Donation Platform for Online Dating Sexual ViolenceProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642045(1-15)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613904.3642045
Paul AAhmed S(2023)Computed compatibility: examining user perceptions of AI and matchmaking algorithmsBehaviour & Information Technology10.1080/0144929X.2023.219657943:5(1002-1015)Online publication date: 14-Apr-2023
https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2023.2196579
Aljasim HZytko D(2022)Foregrounding Women's Safety in Mobile Social Matching and Dating AppsProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/35675597:GROUP(1-25)Online publication date: 29-Dec-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3567559

View Options

Get Access

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Article

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Issue’s Table of Contents