Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3491102.3517449acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Tangible Collaboration: A Human-Centered Approach for Sharing Control With an Actuated-Interface

Published: 29 April 2022 Publication History

Abstract

Autonomous actuated-interfaces provide a unique research opportunity for shared-control interfaces, as the human and the interface collaborate using the physical interaction modality, manipulating the same physical elements at the same time. Prior studies show that sharing control with physical modality interfaces often results in frustration and low sense-of-control. We designed and implemented adaptive behavior for shared-control actuated-interfaces that extends prior work by providing humans the ability to anticipate the autonomous action, and then accept or override it. Results from a controlled study with 24 participants indicate better collaboration in the Adaptive condition compared with the Non-adaptive one, with improved sense-of-control, feelings of teamwork, and overall collaboration quality. Our work contributes to shared-control tangible, shape-change, and actuated interfaces. We show that leveraging minimal non-verbal social cues to physically communicate the actuated-interface’s intent, coupled with providing autonomy to the human to physically accept or override the shift-in-control, improves the shared-control collaboration.

Supplementary Material

MP4 File (3491102.3517449-talk-video.mp4)
Talk Video
MP4 File (3491102.3517449-video-preview.mp4)
Video Preview
MP4 File (3491102.3517449-video-figure.mp4)
Video Figure

References

[1]
Nalini Ambady and Robert Rosenthal. 1998. Nonverbal communication. Encyclopedia of mental health 2 (1998), 775–782.
[2]
Lucy Anderson-Bashan, Benny Megidish, Hadas Erel, Iddo Wald, Guy Hoffman, Oren Zuckerman, and Andrey Grishko. 2018. The greeting machine: an abstract robotic object for opening encounters. In 2018 27th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN). IEEE, 595–602.
[3]
Christoph Bartneck, Dana Kulić, Elizabeth Croft, and Susana Zoghbi. 2009. Measurement instruments for the anthropomorphism, animacy, likeability, perceived intelligence, and perceived safety of robots. International journal of social robotics 1, 1 (2009), 71–81.
[4]
Richard E Boyatzis. 1998. Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. sage.
[5]
Marcelo Coelho and Jamie Zigelbaum. 2011. Shape-changing interfaces. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 15, 2 (2011), 161–173.
[6]
Philip R Cohen and Hector J Levesque. 1991. Teamwork. Nous 25, 4 (1991), 487–512.
[7]
Hadas Erel, Tzachi Shem Tov, Yoav Kessler, and Oren Zuckerman. 2019. Robots are Always Social: Robotic Movements are Automatically Interpreted as Social Cues. In Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–6.
[8]
Maliheh Ghajargar, Jeffrey Bardzell, Alison Smith Renner, Peter Gall Krogh, Kristina Höök, David Cuartielles, Laurens Boer, and Mikael Wiberg. 2021. From” Explainable AI” to” Graspable AI”. In Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction. 1–4.
[9]
G Gibbs. 2008. Analysing qualitative data (Qualitative research kit). Retrieved from (2008).
[10]
Jens Emil Grønbæk, Majken Kirkegaard Rasmussen, Kim Halskov, and Marianne Graves Petersen. 2020. KirigamiTable: Designing for proxemic transitions with a shape-changing tabletop. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–15.
[11]
Guy Hoffman. 2019. Evaluating fluency in human–robot collaboration. IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems 49, 3 (2019), 209–218.
[12]
Guy Hoffman and Wendy Ju. 2014. Designing robots with movement in mind. Journal of Human-Robot Interaction 3, 1 (2014), 91–122.
[13]
Eva Hornecker. 2005. A design theme for tangible interaction: embodied facilitation. In ECSCW 2005. Springer, 23–43.
[14]
Hiroshi Ishii, Dávid Lakatos, Leonardo Bonanni, and Jean-Baptiste Labrune. 2012. Radical atoms: beyond tangible bits, toward transformable materials. interactions 19, 1 (2012), 38–51.
[15]
Vahid Izadi, Arjun Yeravdekar, and Amirhossein Ghasemi. 2019. Determination of roles and interaction modes in a haptic shared control framework. In Dynamic Systems and Control Conference, Vol. 59148. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, V001T05A005.
[16]
Lukas Kaiser, Andreas Schlotzhauer, and Mathias Brandstötter. 2018. Safety-related risks and opportunities of key design-aspects for industrial human-robot collaboration. In International Conference on Interactive Collaborative Robotics. Springer, 95–104.
[17]
Meera Khalid 2020. Futuristic Model of Automatic Electric Cooking Machine. In 2020 International Conference on Power, Instrumentation, Control and Computing (PICC). IEEE, 1–6.
[18]
Chris L Kleinke. 1986. Gaze and eye contact: a research review.Psychological bulletin 100, 1 (1986), 78.
[19]
Hector J Levesque, Philip R Cohen, and José HT Nunes. 1990. On acting together. SRI International Menlo Park, CA 94025-3493.
[20]
David Lindlbauer, Jens Emil Grønbæk, Morten Birk, Kim Halskov, Marc Alexa, and Jörg Müller. 2016. Combining shape-changing interfaces and spatial augmented reality enables extended object appearance. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 791–802.
[21]
Thomas W Malone and Kevin Crowston. 1990. What is coordination theory and how can it help design cooperative work systems?. In Proceedings of the 1990 ACM conference on Computer-supported cooperative work. 357–370.
[22]
Valerie Lynn Manusov. 2014. The sourcebook of nonverbal measures: Going beyond words. Psychology Press.
[23]
Benny Megidish. 2017. Butter. https://butter-robotics.web.app/
[24]
Benny Megidish, Oren Zuckerman, and Guy Hoffman. 2017. Animating mechanisms: A pipeline for authoring robot gestures. In Proceedings of the Companion of the 2017 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. 45–45.
[25]
Moran Mizrahi, Amos Golan, Ariel Bezaleli Mizrahi, Rotem Gruber, Alexander Zoonder Lachnise, and Amit Zoran. 2016. Digital gastronomy: Methods & recipes for hybrid cooking. In Proceedings of the 29th Annual Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. 541–552.
[26]
Meredith Ringel Morris, Anthony Cassanego, Andreas Paepcke, Terry Winograd, Ann Marie Piper, and Anqi Huang. 2006. Mediating group dynamics through tabletop interface design. IEEE computer graphics and applications 26, 5 (2006), 65–73.
[27]
Clifford Nass, BJ Fogg, and Youngme Moon. 1996. Can computers be teammates?International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 45, 6 (1996), 669–678.
[28]
Austin Lee Nichols and Jon K Maner. 2008. The good-subject effect: Investigating participant demand characteristics. The Journal of general psychology 135, 2 (2008), 151–166.
[29]
Raymond Opdenakker. 2006. Advantages and disadvantages of four interview techniques in qualitative research. In Forum qualitative sozialforschung/forum: Qualitative social research, Vol. 7.
[30]
James Patten and Hiroshi Ishii. 2007. Mechanical constraints as computational constraints in tabletop tangible interfaces. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. 809–818.
[31]
Majken Kirkegård Rasmussen, Timothy Merritt, Miguel Bruns Alonso, and Marianne Graves Petersen. 2016. Balancing user and system control in shape-changing interfaces: a designerly exploration. In Proceedings of the TEI’16: Tenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction. 202–210.
[32]
Majken K. Rasmussen, Esben W. Pedersen, Marianne G. Petersen, and Kasper Hornbæk. 2012. Shape-Changing Interfaces: A Review of the Design Space and Open Research Questions. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 735–744. https://doi.org/10.1145/2207676.2207781
[33]
Eckard Riedenklau, Thomas Hermann, and Helge Ritter. 2012. An integrated multi-modal actuated tangible user interface for distributed collaborative planning. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded and Embodied Interaction. 169–174.
[34]
Danielle Rifinski, Hadas Erel, Adi Feiner, Guy Hoffman, and Oren Zuckerman. 2021. Human-human-robot interaction: robotic object’s responsive gestures improve interpersonal evaluation in human interaction. Human–Computer Interaction 36, 4 (2021), 333–359.
[35]
Anne Roudaut, Abhijit Karnik, Markus Löchtefeld, and Sriram Subramanian. 2013. Morphees: toward high” shape resolution” in self-actuated flexible mobile devices. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 593–602.
[36]
Garriy Shteynberg and Adam D Galinsky. 2011. Implicit coordination: Sharing goals with similar others intensifies goal pursuit. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 47, 6 (2011), 1291–1294.
[37]
Miriam Sturdee and Jason Alexander. 2018. Analysis and classification of shape-changing interfaces for design and application-based research. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR) 51, 1 (2018), 1–32.
[38]
Alif Ahmad Syamsudduha, Dyah Pratiwi, Ardhani Reswari Yudistari, Jonathan Hindharta, and Agushinta R Dewi. 2013. Future smart cooking machine system design. Telkomnika 11, 4 (2013), 827.
[39]
Peter Van Beek. 2006. Backtracking search algorithms. In Foundations of artificial intelligence. Vol. 2. Elsevier, 85–134.
[40]
Anke Van Oosterhout, Miguel Bruns Alonso, and Satu Jumisko-Pyykkö. 2018. Ripple thermostat: Affecting the emotional experience through interactive force feedback and shape change. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–12.
[41]
WX Yan, Z Fu, YH Liu, RQ Liu, YZ Zhao, XY Zhou, JH Tang, and P Yan. 2006. A new automatic cooking machine for Chinese dishes. In 2006 IEEE International Conference on Automation Science and Engineering. IEEE, 534–539.
[42]
Oren Zuckerman, Ofir Sadka, Ron Gissin, and Hadas Erel. 2021. TUI as Social Entity: a Study of Joint-actuation and Turn-taking-actuation in Actuated-interfaces. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–12.
[43]
Oren Zuckerman, Dina Walker, Andrey Grishko, Tal Moran, Chen Levy, Barak Lisak, Iddo Yehoshua Wald, and Hadas Erel. 2020. Companionship Is Not a Function: The Effect of a Novel Robotic Object on Healthy Older Adults’ Feelings of” Being-Seen”. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–14.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Human Understanding and Perception of Unanticipated Robot Action in the Context of Physical InteractionACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/364345813:1(1-26)Online publication date: 11-Mar-2024
  • (2024)Performing a Task Alongside a Robot: Exploring the Impact of Social ComparisonExtended Abstracts of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613905.3651055(1-7)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
  • (2023)RetroLens: A Human-AI Collaborative System for Multi-step Retrosynthetic Route PlanningProceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544548.3581469(1-20)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023

Index Terms

  1. Tangible Collaboration: A Human-Centered Approach for Sharing Control With an Actuated-Interface

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    CHI '22: Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
    April 2022
    10459 pages
    ISBN:9781450391573
    DOI:10.1145/3491102
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 29 April 2022

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Actuated interface
    2. Human-centered.
    3. Qualitative Methods
    4. Shape change
    5. Shared-control
    6. Tangible collaboration

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Conference

    CHI '22
    Sponsor:
    CHI '22: CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
    April 29 - May 5, 2022
    LA, New Orleans, USA

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 6,199 of 26,314 submissions, 24%

    Upcoming Conference

    CHI '25
    CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
    April 26 - May 1, 2025
    Yokohama , Japan

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)95
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)5
    Reflects downloads up to 16 Nov 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Human Understanding and Perception of Unanticipated Robot Action in the Context of Physical InteractionACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/364345813:1(1-26)Online publication date: 11-Mar-2024
    • (2024)Performing a Task Alongside a Robot: Exploring the Impact of Social ComparisonExtended Abstracts of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613905.3651055(1-7)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
    • (2023)RetroLens: A Human-AI Collaborative System for Multi-step Retrosynthetic Route PlanningProceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544548.3581469(1-20)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format.

    HTML Format

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media