To Flip or Not to Flip: Conformity Effect Across Cultures
Article No.: 370, Pages 1 - 7
Abstract
In group decision-making, we can frequently observe that an individual adapts their behavior or belief to fit in with the group’s majority opinion. This phenomenon has been widely observed to exist especially against an objectively correct answer—in face-to-face and online interaction alike. To a lesser extent, studies have investigated the conformity effect in settings based on personal opinions and feelings; thus, in settings where an objectively right or wrong answer does not exist. In such settings, the direction of conformity tends to play a role in whether an individual will conform. While cultural differences in conformity behavior have been observed repeatedly in settings with an objectively correct answer, the role of culture has not been explored yet for settings with subjective topics. Hence, the focus of this study is on how conformity develops across cultures for such cases. We developed an online experiment in which participants needed to reach a positive group consensus on adding a song to a music playlist. After seeing the group members’ ratings, the participants had the opportunity to revise their own. Our findings suggest that the willingness to flip to a positive outcome was far less than to a negative outcome. Overall, conformity behavior was far less pronounced for participants from the United Kingdom compared to participants from India.
References
[1]
Lillemor Adrianson. 2001. Gender and computer-mediated communication: group processes in problem solving. Computers in Human Behavior 17, 1 (2001), 71–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0747-5632(00)00033-9
[2]
Cameron Anderson and Gavin J. Kilduff. 2009. Why do dominant personalities attain influence in face-to-face groups? The competence-signaling effects of trait dominance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 96, 2(2009), 491–503. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014201
[3]
Solomon E. Asch. 1955. Opinions and Social Pressure. Scientific American 193, 5 (Nov. 1955), 31–35. https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican1155-31
[4]
Solomon E. Asch. 1956. Studies of independence and conformity: I. A minority of one against a unanimous majority.Psychological Monographs: General and Applied 70, 9 (1956), 70 pages. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0093718
[5]
Solomon E Asch. 1961. Effects Of Group Pressure Upon The Modification And Distortion Of Judgments. In Documents of Gestalt Psychology(3rd ed.). University of California Press, New York, NY, USA, 222–236. https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520313514-017
[6]
Christine Bauer and Bruce Ferwerda. 2020. Conformity Behavior in Group Playlist Creation. In Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Honolulu, HI, USA, 25–30 April) (CHI EA’20). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article LBW 114, 10 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3334480.3382942
[7]
Rod Bond. 2005. Group Size and Conformity. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations 8, 4 (Oct. 2005), 331–354. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430205056464
[8]
Rod Bond and Peter B. Smith. 1996. Culture and conformity: A meta-analysis of studies using Asch’s (1952b, 1956) line judgment task.Psychological Bulletin 119, 1 (1996), 111–137. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.119.1.111
[9]
Marco Cinnirella and Ben Green. 2007. Does ‘cyber-conformity’ vary cross-culturally? Exploring the effect of culture and communication medium on social conformity. Computers in Human Behavior 23, 4 (July 2007), 2011–2025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2006.02.009
[10]
Amra Delic, Julia Neidhardt, Thuy Ngoc Nguyen, and Francesco Ricci. 2018. An observational user study for group recommender systems in the tourism domain. Information Technology & Tourism 19, 1–4 (Feb. 2018), 87–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40558-018-0106-y
[11]
Pedro Dias and João Magalhães. 2013. Music recommendations for groups of users. In Proceedings of the 2013 ACM International Workshop on Immersive Media Experiences (Barcelona, Spain) (ImmersiveMe ’13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 21–24. https://doi.org/10.1145/2512142.2512151
[12]
Alice H Eagly. 1983. Gender and social influence: A social psychological analysis. American Psychologist 38, 9 (1983), 971–981. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.38.9.971
[13]
Alice H Eagly and Carole Chrvala. 1986. Sex differences in conformity: Status and gender role interpretations. Psychology of Women Quarterly 10, 3 (1986), 203–220. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1986.tb00747.x
[14]
Mairin Laura Hennebry and Kenneth Fordyce. 2017. Cooperative learning on an international masters. Higher Education Research & Development 37, 2 (Aug. 2017), 270–284. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2017.1359150
[15]
Nicholas Hertz, Tyler Shaw, Ewart J. de Visser, and Eva Wiese. 2019. Mixing It Up: How Mixed Groups of Humans and Machines Modulate Conformity. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making 13, 4 (Aug. 2019), 242–257. https://doi.org/10.1177/1555343419869465
[16]
Geert Hofstede. 2018. Culture’s consequences international differences in work-related values. SAGE, Beverly Hills, CA, USA. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781912128334
[17]
Geert Hofstede, Gert Jan Hofstede, and Michael Minkov. 2010. Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. Vol. 3rd, revised. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, USA.
[18]
Hofstede et al.2015. Dimension Data Matrix [data]. https://geerthofstede.com/research-and-vsm/dimension-data-matrix/. [accessed 2021-08-30].
[19]
Andrea B. Hollingshead. 1996. Information Suppression and Status Persistence in Group Decision Making The Effects of Communication Media. Human Communication Research 23, 2 (Dec. 1996), 193–219. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1996.tb00392.x
[20]
Yili Hong, Ni Huang, Gord Burtch, and Chunxiao Li. 2016. Culture, Conformity, and Emotional Suppression in Online Reviews. Journal of the Association of Information Systems 17, 11, Article 2 (Nov. 2016), 21 pages. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00443
[21]
Yutaka Horita and Masanori Takezawa. 2018. Cultural Differences in Strength of Conformity Explained Through Pathogen Stress: A Statistical Test Using Hierarchical Bayesian Estimation. Frontiers in Psychology 9, Article 1921 (Oct. 2018), 12 pages. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01921
[22]
A. Jenness. 1932. The role of discussion in changing opinion regarding a matter of fact.Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 27, 3 (1932), 279–296. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0074620
[23]
Sara Kiesler and Lee Sproull. 1992. Group decision making and communication technology. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 52, 1 (June 1992), 96–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(92)90047-b Group Decision Making.
[24]
Rudi Klauss and Bernard M. Bass. 1974. Group Influence on Individual Behavior across Cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 5, 2 (June 1974), 236–246. https://doi.org/10.1177/002202217400500209
[25]
Bart P. Knijnenburg, Martijn C. Willemsen, and Alfred Kobsa. 2011. A pragmatic procedure to support the user-centric evaluation of recommender systems. In Proceedings of the Fifth ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (Chicago, IL, USA) (RecSys ’11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 321–324. https://doi.org/10.1145/2043932.2043993
[26]
Payel Kundu and Denise Dellarosa Cummins. 2013. Morality and conformity: The Asch paradigm applied to moral decisions. Social Influence 8, 4 (Oct. 2013), 268–279. https://doi.org/10.1080/15534510.2012.727767
[27]
Lieve Laporte, Christof van Nimwegen, and Alex J. Uyttendaele. 2010. Do people say what they think. In Proceedings of the 6th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction Extending Boundaries (Reykjavik, Iceland) (NordiCHI ’10). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 305–314. https://doi.org/10.1145/1868914.1868951
[28]
Knud S. Larsen. 1974. Conformity in the Asch Experiment. Journal of Social Psychology 94, 2 (Dec. 1974), 303–304. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1974.9923224
[29]
Eun-Ju Lee. 2006. When and How Does Depersonalization Increase Conformity to Group Norms in Computer-Mediated Communication?Communication Research 33, 6 (Dec. 2006), 423–447. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650206293248
[30]
Beichen Liang and Yanbin He. 2011. The effect of culture on consumer choice: The need for conformity vs. the need for uniqueness. International Journal of Consumer Studies 36, 3 (June 2011), 352–359. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1470-6431.2011.01013.x
[31]
Yiming Liu, Xuezhi Cao, and Yong Yu. 2016. Are You Influenced by Others When Rating?. In Proceedings of the 10th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (Boston, MA, USA) (RecSys ’16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 269–272. https://doi.org/10.1145/2959100.2959141
[32]
Misa Maruyama, Scott P. Robertson, Sara Douglas, Roxanne Raine, and Bryan Semaan. 2017. Social Watching a Civic Broadcast. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (Portland, OR, USA) (CSCW ’17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 794–807. https://doi.org/10.1145/2998181.2998340
[33]
Misa T. Maruyama, Scott P. Robertson, Sara K. Douglas, Bryan C. Semaan, and Heather A. Faucett. 2014. Hybrid Media Consumption: How Tweeting during a Televised Political Debate Influences the Vote Decision. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work & social computing (Baltimore, MD, USA) (CSCW ’14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1422–1432. https://doi.org/10.1145/2531602.2531719
[34]
Stanley Milgram. 1961. Nationality and Conformity. Scientific American 205, 6 (Dec. 1961), 45–51. https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican1261-45
[35]
Andreas Mladenow, Christine Bauer, and Christine Strauss. 2015. Collaborative Shopping with the Crowd. In 12th International Conference on Cooperative Design, Visualization & Engineering (CDVE 2015) (Mallorca, Spain, 20–23 September) (Lecture Notes in Computer Science (LNCS), Vol. 9320), Yuhua Luo (Ed.). Springer, Cham, Germany, 162–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24132-6_19
[36]
Nigel Nicholson, Steven G. Cole, and Thomas Rocklin. 1985. Conformity in the Asch situation: A comparison between contemporary British and US university students. British Journal of Social Psychology 24, 1 (Feb. 1985), 59–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.1985.tb00660.x
[37]
Patricia Niland, Antonia C. Lyons, Ian Goodwin, and Fiona Hutton. 2014. Friendship Work on Facebook: Young Adults’ Understandings and Practices of Friendship. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology 25, 2 (May 2014), 123–137. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2201
[38]
Se Hyung Oh. 2013. Do collectivists conform more than individualists? Cross-cultural differences in compliance and internalization. Social Behavior and Personality 41, 6 (July 2013), 981–994. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2013.41.6.981
[39]
So Yeon Park, Nicole K. Santero, Blair Kaneshiro, and Jin Ha Lee. 2021. Armed in ARMY: A Case Study of How BTS Fans Successfully Collaborated to #MatchAMillion for Black Lives Matter. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445353
[40]
T Postmes, R Spears, and M Lea. 2000. The formation of group norms in computer-mediated communication. Human Communication Research 26, 3 (July 2000), 341–371. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2000.tb00761.x
[41]
Tom Postmes, Russell Spears, Khaled Sakhel, and Daphne de Groot. 2001. Social Influence in Computer-Mediated Communication: The Effects of Anonymity on Group Behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 27, 10 (Oct. 2001), 1243–1254. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672012710001
[42]
Xin Qin, Chen Chen, Kai Chi Yam, Limei Cao, Wanlu Li, Jian Guan, Puchu Zhao, Xiaowei Dong, and Yiqiang Lin. 2022. Adults still can’t resist: A social robot can induce normative conformity. Computers in Human Behavior 127, Article 107041(2022), 7 pages. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.107041
[43]
Lara Quijano-Sanchez, Juan A. Recio-Garcia, Belen Diaz-Agudo, and Guillermo Jimenez-Diaz. 2013. Social factors in group recommender systems. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology 4, 1 (Jan. 2013), 30 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2414425.2414433
[44]
Michael Rosander and Oskar Eriksson. 2012. Conformity on the Internet—The role of task difficulty and gender differences. Computers in Human Behavior 28, 5 (Sept. 2012), 1587–1595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.03.023
[45]
Shalom H. Schwartz. 1999. A Theory of Cultural Values and Some Implications for Work. Applied Psychology 48, 1 (Jan. 1999), 23–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.1999.tb00047.x
[46]
Shalom H. Schwartz. 2008. The 7 Schwartz cultural value orientation scores for 80 countries [data]. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.3313.3040
[47]
Shalom H. Schwartz. 2012. An Overview of the Schwartz Theory of Basic Values. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture 2, 1, Article 11 (Dec. 2012), 20 pages. https://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1116
[48]
Peter B. Smith, Shaun Dugan, and Fons Trompenaars. 1996. National Culture and the Values of Organizational Employees. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 27, 2 (March 1996), 231–264. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022196272006
[49]
Harry C. Triandis. 1990. Cross-cultural studies of individualism and collectivism. In Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 1989(1989/01/01 ed.), JJ Berman (Ed.). Vol. 37. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, NE, USA, 41–133. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ /2485857
[50]
Edwin J.C. van Leeuwen, Rachel L. Kendal, Claudio Tennie, and Daniel B.M. Haun. 2015. Conformity and its look-a-likes. Animal Behaviour 110 (Dec. 2015), e1–e4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2015.07.030
[51]
Lisa Slattery Walker. 2015. Social Influence. In The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology. Wiley-Blackwell, Malden, MA, USA. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405165518.wbeoss154.pub2
[52]
Joseph B. Walther. 1992. Interpersonal Effects in Computer-Mediated Interaction. Communication Research 19, 1 (Feb. 1992), 52–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365092019001003
[53]
Aaron C. Weinschenk, Costas Panagopoulos, Karly Drabot, and Sander van der Linden. 2018. Gender and social conformity: Do men and women respond differently to social pressure to vote?Social Influence 13, 2 (2018), 53–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/15534510.2018.1432500
[54]
Senuri Wijenayake, Danula Hettiachchi, Simo Hosio, Vassilis Kostakos, and Jorge Goncalves. 2021. Effect of Conformity on Perceived Trustworthiness of News in Social Media. IEEE Internet Computing 25, 1 (Jan. 2021), 12–19. https://doi.org/10.1109/mic.2020.3032410
[55]
Senuri Wijenayake, Niels van Berkel, Vassilis Kostakos, and Jorge Goncalves. 2019. Measuring the Effects of Gender on Online Social Conformity. Proceedings of the ACM Human-Computer Interaction 3, CSCW, Article 145 (Nov. 2019), 24 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359247
[56]
Senuri Wijenayake, Niels van Berkel, Vassilis Kostakos, and Jorge Goncalves. 2020. Impact of contextual and personal determinants on online social conformity. Computers in Human Behavior 108, Article 106302 (July 2020), 22 pages. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106302
[57]
Senuri Wijenayake, Niels van Berkel, Vassilis Kostakos, and Jorge Goncalves. 2020. Quantifying the Effect of Social Presence on Online Social Conformity. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 4, CSCW1, Article 055 (may 2020), 22 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3392863
[58]
Bowen Zhang, Yucheng Dong, and Enrique Herrera-Viedma. 2019. Group Decision Making with Heterogeneous Preference Structures: An Automatic Mechanism to Support Consensus Reaching. Group Decision and Negotiation 28, 3 (Jan. 2019), 585–617. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-018-09609-y
[59]
Dongsong Zhang, Paul Benjamin Lowry, Lina Zhou, and Xiaolan Fu. 2007. The Impact of Individualism—Collectivism, Social Presence, and Group Diversity on Group Decision Making Under Majority Influence. Journal of Management Information Systems 23, 4 (May 2007), 53–80. https://doi.org/10.2753/mis0742-1222230404
[60]
Haiyi Zhu, Bernardo Huberman, and Yarun Luon. 2012. To Switch or Not to Switch: Understanding Social Influence in Online Choices. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Austin, TX, USA) (CHI ’12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2257–2266. https://doi.org/10.1145/2207676.2208383
Index Terms
- To Flip or Not to Flip: Conformity Effect Across Cultures
Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.
Recommendations
Conformity Behavior in Group Playlist Creation
CHI EA '20: Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsA strong research record has evidenced that individuals tend to conform with a group's majority opinion. In contrast to existing literature that investigates conformity to a majority opinion against an objectively correct answer, the originality of our ...
Comments
Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
April 2022
3066 pages
ISBN:9781450391566
DOI:10.1145/3491101
Copyright © 2022 Owner/Author.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives International 4.0 License.
Sponsors
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 28 April 2022
Check for updates
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Poster
- Research
- Refereed limited
Funding Sources
Conference
CHI '22
Sponsor:
CHI '22: CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
April 29 - May 5, 2022
LA, New Orleans, USA
Acceptance Rates
Overall Acceptance Rate 6,164 of 23,696 submissions, 26%
Upcoming Conference
CHI '25
- Sponsor:
- sigchi
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 264Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)115
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)11
Reflects downloads up to 19 Nov 2024
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign inFull Access
View options
View or Download as a PDF file.
PDFeReader
View online with eReader.
eReaderHTML Format
View this article in HTML Format.
HTML Format