Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
research-article

YourAdvalue: Measuring Advertising Price Dynamics without Bankrupting User Privacy

Published: 15 December 2021 Publication History

Abstract

The Real Time Bidding (RTB) protocol is by now more than a decade old. During this time, a handful of measurement papers have looked at bidding strategies, personal information flow, and cost of display advertising through RTB. In this paper, we present YourAdvalue, a privacy-preserving tool for displaying to end-users in a simple and intuitive manner their advertising value as seen through RTB. Using YourAdvalue, we measure desktop RTB prices in the wild, and compare them with desktop and mobile RTB prices reported by past work. We present how it estimates ad prices that are encrypted, and how it preserves user privacy while reporting results back to a data-server for analysis. We deployed our system, disseminated its browser extension, and collected data from 200 users, including 12000 ad impressions over 11 months. By analyzing this dataset, we show that desktop RTB prices have grown 4.6x over desktop RTB prices measured in 2013, and 3.8x over mobile RTB prices measured in 2015. We also study how user demographics associate with the intensity of RTB ecosystem tracking, leading to higher ad prices. We find that exchanging data between advertisers and/or data brokers through cookie-synchronization increases the median value of display ads by 19%. We also find that female and younger users are more targeted, suffering more tracking (via cookie synchronization) than male or elder users. As a result of this targeting in our dataset, the advertising value (i) of women is 2.4x higher than that of men, (ii) of 25-34 year-olds is 2.5x higher than that of 35-44 year-olds, (iii) is most expensive on weekends and early mornings.

References

[1]
eMarketer. emarketer releases new global media ad spending estimates. https://www.emarketer.com/content/emarketer-total-media-ad-spending-worldwide-will-rise-7--4-in-2018, 2018.
[2]
Lauren Fisher. Us programmatic ad spending forecast 2019. https://www.emarketer.com/content/us-programmatic-ad-spending-forecast-2019, 2019.
[3]
Ola Rask. What is programmatic advertising? the ultimate guide (2020). https://www.match2one.com/blog/what-is-programmatic-advertising/#Who_uses_programmatic, 2020.
[4]
Michalis Pachilakis, Panagiotis Papadopoulos, Evangelos P. Markatos, and Nicolas Kourtellis. No more chasing waterfalls: A measurement study of the header bidding ad-ecosystem. In Proceedings of the Internet Measurement Conference, IMC '19, page 280--293, New York, NY, USA, 2019. Association for Computing Machinery.
[5]
John Cook, Rishab Nithyanand, and Zubair Shafiq. Inferring tracker-advertiser relationships in the online advertising ecosystem using header bidding. Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies, 2020(1):65--82, 2020.
[6]
Automatad Team. Programmatic direct - everything you need to know. https://headerbidding.co/programmatic-direct/, 2019.
[7]
Mat Bennett. Private marketplace deals (pmps): The essential guide. https://oko.uk/blog/private-marketplace-deals-pmps, 2020.
[8]
Lukasz Olejnik, Minh-Dung Tran, and Claude Castelluccia. Selling off user privacy at auction. In 21st Annual Network and Distributed System Security Symposium, NDSS, San Diego, California, USA, February 23--26, 2014.
[9]
Panagiotis Papadopoulos, Nicolas Kourtellis, Pablo Rodriguez Rodriguez, and Nikolaos Laoutaris. If you are not paying for it, you are the product: How much do advertisers pay to reach you? In Proceedings of the 2017 Internet Measurement Conference, pages 142--156. ACM, 2017.
[10]
Nikolaos Laoutaris. Data transparency: Concerns and prospects [point of view]. Proceedings of the IEEE, 2018.
[11]
José González Caba nas, Angel Cuevas, and Rubén Cuevas. Fdvt: Data valuation tool for facebook users. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 2017.
[12]
Pushkal Agarwal, Sagar Joglekar, Panagiotis Papadopoulos, Nishanth Sastry, and Nicolas Kourtellis. Stop tracking me bro! differential tracking of user demographics on hyper-partisan websites. In Proceedings of The Web Conference 2020, WWW '20, page 1479--1490, New York, NY, USA, 2020. Association for Computing Machinery.
[13]
InvestingAnswers. Cost Per Thousand (CPM). http://www.investinganswers.com/financial-dictionary/businesses-corporations/cost-thousand-cpm-2917, 2017.
[14]
William Vickrey. Counterspeculation, auctions, and competitive sealed tenders. The Journal of finance, 1961.
[15]
Interactive Advertising Bureau. IAB Tech - Lab Content Taxonomy. https://www.iab.com/guidelines/iab-quality-assurance-guidelines-qag-taxonomy/, 2017.
[16]
Statista: the Statistics Portal. Internet advertising spending worldwide from 2007 to 2022, by format. https://www.statista.com/statistics/276671/global-internet-advertising-expenditure-by-type/, 2019.
[17]
eMarketer. US Real-Time Bidding (RTB) Digital Display Ad Spending, by Segment, 2015--2021 (billions). https://www.emarketer.com/chart/228035/us-real-time-bidding-rtb-digital-display-ad-spending-by-segment-2015--2021-billions, 2019.
[18]
Christi Olson. The desktop's death has been greatly exaggerated: How it's holding its own in a mobile world. https://searchengineland.com/desktop-isnt-dead-desktop-holding-mobile-world-268151, 2017.
[19]
Google. Mobile path to purchase: Five key findings. https://ssl.gstatic.com/think/docs/mobile-path-to-purchase-5-key-findings_research-studies.pdf, 2013.
[20]
BusinessOfApps. Mobile app advertising rates (2018). https://www.businessofapps.com/ads/research/mobile-app-advertising-cpm-rates/, 2019.
[21]
Kenshoo Social. Men are cheap: 12-month study of 65 billion impressions reveals men cost less to reach with facebook ads and respond better. https://www.kenshoo.co.uk/menarecheappr/, 2012.
[22]
Panagiotis Papadopoulos, Nicolas Kourtellis, and Evangelos Markatos. Cookie synchronization: Everything you always wanted to know but were afraid to ask. In The World Wide Web Conference, pages 1432--1442, 2019.
[23]
Gunes Acar, Christian Eubank, Steven Englehardt, Marc Juarez, Arvind Narayanan, and Claudia Diaz. The web never forgets: Persistent tracking mechanisms in the wild. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security, 2014.
[24]
Muhammad Ahmad Bashir, Sajjad Arshad, William Robertson, and Christo Wilson. Tracing information flows between ad exchanges using retargeted ads. In 25th USENIX Security Symposium, pages 481--496, August 2016.
[25]
Panagiotis Papadopoulos, Nicolas Kourtellis, and Evangelos P Markatos. The cost of digital advertisement: Comparing user and advertiser views. In Proceedings of the 2018 World Wide Web Conference, pages 1479--1489, 2018.
[26]
Fotios Papaodyssefs, Costas Iordanou, Jeremy Blackburn, Konstantina Papagiannaki, and Nikolaos Laoutaris. Web identity translator. In ACM HotNets, 2015.
[27]
Noel Agnew Kevin Flood. Iab tech lab announces final content taxonomy v2 ready for adoption. https://iabtechlab.com/blog/iab-tech-lab-announces-final-content-taxonomy-v2-ready-for-adoption/, 2017.
[28]
Mopub. Iab categories. https://developers.mopub.com/publishers/ui/marketplace/iab-category-blocking/, 2019.
[29]
Steven Englehardt and Arvind Narayanan. Online tracking: A 1-million-site measurement and analysis. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security, CCS '16, pages 1388--1401. ACM, 2016.
[30]
Emmanouil Papadogiannakis, Panagiotis Papadopoulos, Nicolas Kourtellis, and Evangelos P. Markatos. User tracking in the post-cookie era: How websites bypass gdpr consent to track users. In Proceedings of the Web Conference 2021, WWW '21, page 2130--2141, New York, NY, USA, 2021. Association for Computing Machinery.
[31]
Muhammad Ahmad Bashir and Christo Wilson. Diffusion of user tracking data in the online advertising ecosystem. Proc. Priv. Enhancing Technol., 2018(4):85--103, 2018.
[32]
Peter Eckersley. How unique is your web browser? In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Privacy Enhancing Technologies, PETS'10, page 1--18, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2010. Springer-Verlag.
[33]
L. Sweeney. k-anonymity: A model for protecting privacy. IEEE Security and Privacy, 10:1--14, 01 2002.
[34]
Panagiotis Papadopoulos, Antonis Papadogiannakis, Michalis Polychronakis, Apostolis Zarras, Thorsten Holz, and Evangelos P Markatos. K-subscription: Privacy-preserving microblogging browsing through obfuscation. In Proceedings of the 29th Annual Computer Security Applications Conference, pages 49--58, 2013.
[35]
US Department of Education. Family educational rights and privacy act (ferpa). https://www2.ed.gov/policy/gen/guid/fpco/ferpa/index.html.
[36]
Ministry of the Interior and Safety. Personal data protection laws in korea. https://www.privacy.go.kr/eng.
[37]
Hyukki Lee, Soohyung Kim, Jong Wook Kim, and Yon Dohn Chung. Utility-preserving anonymization for health data publishing. BMC Medical Informatics & Decision Making, 17, 2017.
[38]
Cynthia Dwork. Differential privacy. In 33rd International Conference on Automata, Languages and Programming (ICALP), 2006.
[39]
Costas Iordanou, Nicolas Kourtellis, Juan Miguel Carrascosa, Claudio Soriente, Ruben Cuevas, and Nikolaos Laoutaris. Beyond content analysis: Detecting targeted ads via distributed counting. In 15th CoNEXT, pages 110--122, 2019.
[40]
Robin C. Geyer, Tassilo Klein, and Moin Nabi. Differentially private federated learning: A client level perspective. In 31st Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS), 2017.
[41]
Phillipa Gill, Vijay Erramilli, Augustin Chaintreau, Balachander Krishnamurthy, Konstantina Papagiannaki, and Pablo Rodriguez. Follow the money: Understanding economics of online aggregation and advertising. In Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Internet Measurement Conference, 2013.
[42]
Panagiotis Papadopoulos, Nicolas Kourtellis, and Evangelos P. Markatos. Exclusive: How the (synced) cookie monster breached my encrypted vpn session. In Proceedings of the 11th European Workshop on Systems Security, EuroSec'18, pages 6:1--6:6. ACM, 2018.
[43]
Alessandro Acquisti, Leslie K John, and George Loewenstein. What is privacy worth? The Journal of Legal Studies, 2013.
[44]
Juan Pablo Carrascal, Christopher Riederer, Vijay Erramilli, Mauro Cherubini, and Rodrigo de Oliveira. Your browsing behavior for a big mac: Economics of personal information online. In Proceedings of the 22nd international conference on World Wide Web, 2013.
[45]
Jacopo Staiano, Nuria Oliver, Bruno Lepri, Rodrigo de Oliveira, Michele Caraviello, and Nicu Sebe. Money walks: A human-centric study on the economics of personal mobile data. In Proceedings of the ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing, 2014.
[46]
Christopher Riederer, Vijay Erramilli, Augustin Chaintreau, Balachander Krishnamurthy, and Pablo Rodriguez. For sale : Your data: By : You. In Proceedings of the 10th ACM Workshop on Hot Topics in Networks, 2011.
[47]
Waqar Aqeel, Debopam Bhattacherjee, Balakrishnan Chandrasekaran, P. Brighten Godfrey, Gregory Laughlin, Bruce Maggs, and Ankit Singla. Untangling header bidding lore: Some myths, some truths, and some hope. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Passive and Active Measurement, PAM 2020, 2020.
[48]
Alessandro Acquisti Veronica Marotta, Vibhanshu Abhishek. Online tracking and publishers' revenues:an empirical analysis, 2019.
[49]
David Dittrich and Erin Kenneally. The menlo report: Ethical principles guiding information and communication technology research. Technical report, 2012.
[50]
Caitlin M. Rivers and Bryan L. Lewis. Ethical research standards in a world of big. F1000Research, 3, 2014.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Ad Laundering: How Websites Deceive Advertisers into Rendering Ads Next to Illicit ContentCompanion Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 202410.1145/3589335.3651466(782-785)Online publication date: 13-May-2024
  • (2022)What factors affect targeting and bids in online advertising?Proceedings of the 22nd ACM Internet Measurement Conference10.1145/3517745.3561460(210-229)Online publication date: 25-Oct-2022

Index Terms

  1. YourAdvalue: Measuring Advertising Price Dynamics without Bankrupting User Privacy

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Measurement and Analysis of Computing Systems
      Proceedings of the ACM on Measurement and Analysis of Computing Systems  Volume 5, Issue 3
      POMACS
      December 2021
      435 pages
      EISSN:2476-1249
      DOI:10.1145/3506735
      Issue’s Table of Contents
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 15 December 2021
      Published in POMACS Volume 5, Issue 3

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. advertising transparency
      2. real time bidding ad-auctions
      3. user privacy and anonymity

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article

      Funding Sources

      • EU H2020 Research and Innovation programme
      • Marie Sklodowska-Curie grant agreement

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)53
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3
      Reflects downloads up to 26 Sep 2024

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2024)Ad Laundering: How Websites Deceive Advertisers into Rendering Ads Next to Illicit ContentCompanion Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 202410.1145/3589335.3651466(782-785)Online publication date: 13-May-2024
      • (2022)What factors affect targeting and bids in online advertising?Proceedings of the 22nd ACM Internet Measurement Conference10.1145/3517745.3561460(210-229)Online publication date: 25-Oct-2022

      View Options

      Get Access

      Login options

      Full Access

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media