Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3488042.3488071acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pageskoli-callingConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

No Gender Difference in CS1 Grade for Students with Programming from High School: An Exploratory Study

Published: 18 November 2021 Publication History

Abstract

Programming is an increasingly important skill in the 21st century. Therefore, many education systems internationally offer non-compulsory programming (NCP) courses during high school years. Aim. Our goal is to study the effect of NCP on first-semester student performance in CS1. Because interest in computing is more often associated with men than women, we also want to study gender differences. Method. A total of 232 students from a Norwegian university were involved in the study. High school grades from the public student registry were analysed together with questionnaire data and the CS1 grade. Results. The students with NCP performed significantly better in CS1 than those without (average grade 4.4 vs. 3.6, where A, B, … , F is coded as 5, 4, … , 0). For women the difference in performance with and without NCP was 4.4 vs. 3.2, for men it was 4.4 vs. 3.8. Conclusion. This study shows that for students with NCP, the notorious gender difference in CS1 performance was absent. The other results merit further considerations regarding mathematics and science backgrounds, grades, prior experience, and self-efficacy.

References

[1]
Christine Alvarado, Gustavo Umbelino, and Mia Minnes. 2018. The Persistent Effect of Pre-College Computing Experience on College CS Course Grades. In Proceedings of the 49th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (Baltimore, Maryland, USA) (SIGCSE ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 876–881. https://doi.org/10.1145/3159450.3159508
[2]
Alex Lishinski, Aman Yadav, Jon Good, and Richard Enbody. 2016. Learning to Program: Gender Differences and Interactive Effects of Students’ Motivation, Goals, and Self-Efficacy on Performance. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research (Melbourne, VIC, Australia) (ICER ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 211–220. https://doi.org/10.1145/2960310.2960329
[3]
Katie Redmond, Sarah Evans, and Mehran Sahami. 2013. A large-scale quantitative study of women in computer science at Stanford University. In Proceeding of the 44th ACM technical symposium on Computer science education. 439–444.
[4]
C. Schreiner, E.K. Henriksen, J. Sjaastad, F. Jensen, and M. Løken. 2010. Project Lily: Choosing – or not choosing – STEM higher education in Norway. Technical Report. Naturfagsenteret. http://www.naturfagsenteret.no/binfil/download.php?did=6473
[5]
David H Uttal, Nathaniel G Meadow, Elizabeth Tipton, Linda L Hand, Alison R Alden, Christopher Warren, and Nora S Newcombe. 2013. The malleability of spatial skills: a meta-analysis of training studies.Psychological bulletin 139, 2 (2013), 352.
[6]
Jennifer Wang, Hai Hong, Jason Ravitz, and Marielena Ivory. 2015. Gender Differences in Factors Influencing Pursuit of Computer Science and Related Fields. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (Vilnius, Lithuania) (ITiCSE ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 117–122. https://doi.org/10.1145/2729094.2742611
[7]
Chris Wilcox and Albert Lionelle. 2018. Quantifying the benefits of prior programming experience in an introductory computer science course. In Proceedings of the 49th acm technical symposium on computer science education. 80–85.
[8]
B. Wilson and S. Shrock. 2001. Contributing to success in an introductory computer science course: a study of twelve factors. In SIGCSE ’01.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Teaching Ethics in Computing: A Systematic Literature Review of ACM Computer Science Education PublicationsACM Transactions on Computing Education10.1145/363468524:1(1-36)Online publication date: 14-Jan-2024
  • (2023)Engineering Students’ Experiences of Assessment in Introductory Computer Science CoursesIEEE Transactions on Education10.1109/TE.2023.323889566:4(350-359)Online publication date: 1-Aug-2023
  • (2022)On the computational thinking and diagrammatic reasoning of first-year computer science and engineering studentsFrontiers in Education10.3389/feduc.2022.9333167Online publication date: 29-Sep-2022

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
Koli Calling '21: Proceedings of the 21st Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research
November 2021
287 pages
ISBN:9781450384889
DOI:10.1145/3488042
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 18 November 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. CS1
  2. experience
  3. gender
  4. high school
  5. non-compulsory
  6. programming

Qualifiers

  • Short-paper
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Conference

Koli Calling '21

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 80 of 182 submissions, 44%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)24
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)4
Reflects downloads up to 20 Sep 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Teaching Ethics in Computing: A Systematic Literature Review of ACM Computer Science Education PublicationsACM Transactions on Computing Education10.1145/363468524:1(1-36)Online publication date: 14-Jan-2024
  • (2023)Engineering Students’ Experiences of Assessment in Introductory Computer Science CoursesIEEE Transactions on Education10.1109/TE.2023.323889566:4(350-359)Online publication date: 1-Aug-2023
  • (2022)On the computational thinking and diagrammatic reasoning of first-year computer science and engineering studentsFrontiers in Education10.3389/feduc.2022.9333167Online publication date: 29-Sep-2022

View Options

Get Access

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media