Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3487405.3487657acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageseiccConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster
Public Access

A Comparison of SONA and MTurk for Cybersecurity Surveys

Published: 22 November 2021 Publication History

Abstract

For almost every online account, people are required to create a password to protect their information online. Since many people have many accounts, they tend to create insecure passwords and re-use passwords. These insecure passwords are often easy to guess, which can lead to compromised data. It is well-known that every person has a different personality type, which can be determined using personality models such as Big Five and True Colors. This research examines if there is a link between personality type and password security among a variety of participants in two groups of participants: SONA and MTurk. Each participant in both surveys answered questions based on password security and their personality type. Our results show that participants in the MTurk survey were more likely to choose a strong password and to exhibit better security behaviors and knowledge than participants in the SONA survey. This is mostly attributed to the age difference. However, the distribution of the results was similar for both MTurk and SONA. Future surveys on cybersecurity should include both types of demographics for a more generalizable result.

References

[1]
M Buhrmester and T Kwang. 2011. Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? on Psychological Science.
[2]
Dropbox. 2017. zxcvbn. https://github.com/dropbox/zxcvbn.
[3]
B W Gamblin, M P Winslow, B Lindsay, A W Newsom, and A Kehn. 2017. Comparing in-person, Sona, and Mechanical Turk measurements of three prejudice-relevant constructs. Current Psychology 36, 2 (2017), 217–224.
[4]
Margaret Gratian, Sruthi Bandi, Michel Cukier, Josiah Dykstra, and Amy Ginther. 2018. Correlating human traits and cyber security behavior intentions. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167404817302523. Computers & Security 73(2018), 345 – 358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2017.11.015
[5]
Tzipora Halevi, James Lewis, and Nasir Memon. 2013. A Pilot Study of Cyber Security and Privacy Related Behavior and Personality Traits. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on World Wide Web (Rio de Janeiro, Brazil) (WWW ’13 Companion). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 737–744. https://doi.org/10.1145/2487788.2488034
[6]
A. Maraj, M. V. Martin, M. Shane, and M. Mannan. 2019. On the null relationship between personality types and passwords. 2019 17th International Conference on Privacy, Security and Trust (PST) (2019).
[7]
A. McCormac, T. Zwaans, K. Parsons, D. Calic, M. Butavicius, and M. Pattinson. 2017. Individual differences and information security awareness. Computers in Human Behavior 69 (2017), 151–156.
[8]
G. Paolacci and J. Chandler. 2014. Inside the Turk: Understanding Mechanical Turk as a participant pool. Current directions in psychological science 23, 3 (2014), 184–188.
[9]
[9] Amazon Mechanical Turk.Accessed 2021. https://www.mturk.com/.
[10]
B. Zhang and S. Gearhart. 2020. Collecting Online Survey Data: A Comparison of Data Quality among a Commercial Panel & MTurk. Surv. Pract 13(2020).

Index Terms

  1. A Comparison of SONA and MTurk for Cybersecurity Surveys
        Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

        Information & Contributors

        Information

        Published In

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        EICC '21: Proceedings of the 2021 European Interdisciplinary Cybersecurity Conference
        November 2021
        97 pages
        ISBN:9781450390491
        DOI:10.1145/3487405
        Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        Published: 22 November 2021

        Check for updates

        Author Tags

        1. MTurk
        2. Password Strength
        3. Personality
        4. SONA
        5. Survey

        Qualifiers

        • Poster
        • Research
        • Refereed limited

        Funding Sources

        Conference

        EICC '21
        EICC '21: European Interdisciplinary Cybersecurity Conference
        November 10 - 11, 2021
        Virtual Event, Romania

        Contributors

        Other Metrics

        Bibliometrics & Citations

        Bibliometrics

        Article Metrics

        • 0
          Total Citations
        • 166
          Total Downloads
        • Downloads (Last 12 months)62
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)12
        Reflects downloads up to 22 Sep 2024

        Other Metrics

        Citations

        View Options

        View options

        PDF

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        HTML Format

        View this article in HTML Format.

        HTML Format

        Get Access

        Login options

        Media

        Figures

        Other

        Tables

        Share

        Share

        Share this Publication link

        Share on social media