Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
research-article

Adaptive Cognitive Training with Reinforcement Learning

Published: 04 March 2022 Publication History

Abstract

Computer-assisted cognitive training can help patients affected by several illnesses alleviate their cognitive deficits or healthy people improve their mental performance. In most computer-based systems, training sessions consist of graded exercises, which should ideally be able to gradually improve the trainee’s cognitive functions. Indeed, adapting the difficulty of the exercises to how individuals perform in their execution is crucial to improve the effectiveness of cognitive training activities. In this article, we propose the use of reinforcement learning (RL) to learn how to automatically adapt the difficulty of computerized exercises for cognitive training. In our approach, trainees’ performance in performed exercises is used as a reward to learn a policy that changes over time the values of the parameters that determine exercise difficulty. We illustrate a method to be initially used to learn difficulty-variation policies tailored for specific categories of trainees, and then to refine these policies for single individuals. We present the results of two user studies that provide evidence for the effectiveness of our method: a first study, in which a student category policy obtained via RL was found to have better effects on the cognitive function than a standard baseline training that adopts a mechanism to vary the difficulty proposed by neuropsychologists, and a second study, demonstrating that adding an RL-based individual customization further improves the training process.

References

[1]
Brainer. 2021. Brainer | Riabilitazione Cognitiva. Retrieved November 17, 2021 from http://www.brainer.it.
[2]
HAPPYneuron. 2021. Cognitive Therapy Tools, Cognitive Rehabilitation. Retrieved November 17, 2021 from https://www.happyneuronpro.com.
[3]
Schuhfried. 2021. Cognitive Training Program: CogniPlus—SCHUHFRIED. Retrieved November 17, 2021 from https://www.schuhfried.com/cogniplus.
[4]
Erica. 2021. Erica. Retrieved November 17, 2021 from http://www.erica.giuntios.it.
[5]
Neurotracker. 2021. NeuroTracker | #1 Cognitive Training System in the World. Retrieved November 17, 2021 from https://neurotracker.net.
[6]
RehaCom. 2021. RehaCom—Computer-Based Cognitive Therapy. Retrieved November 17, 2021 from https://www.rehacom.co.uk.
[7]
Tracy Packiam Alloway, Vanessa Bibile, and Gemma Lau. 2013. Computerized working memory training: Can it lead to gains in cognitive skills in students? Computers in Human Behavior 29, 3 (2013), 632–638.
[8]
F. Amonn, J. Frolich, D. Breuer, T. Banaschewski, and M. Doepfner. 2013. Evaluation of a computer-based neuropsychological training in children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). NeuroRehabilitation 32, 3 (2013), 555–62.
[9]
Mariana Medeiros Assed, Martha Kortas Hajjar Veiga de Carvalho, Cristiana Castanho de Almeida Rocca, and Antonio de Pádua Serafim. 2016. Memory training and benefits for quality of life in the elderly: A case report. Dementia & Neuropsychologia 10, 2 (April–June 2016), 152–155.
[10]
Shender Ávila-Sansores, Felipe Orihuela-Espina, and Luis Enrique-Sucar. 2013. Patient tailored virtual rehabilitation. In Converging Clinical and Engineering Research on Neurorehabilitation, José L Pons, Diego Torricelli, and Marta Pajaro (Eds.). Springer, Berlin, Germany, 879–883.
[11]
B. Lopez-Luengo and J. A. Muela-Martínez. 2016. Preliminary study of a rehabilitation program based on attentional processes to treat auditory hallucinations. Cognitive Neuropsychiatry 21, 4 (July 2016), 315–334.
[12]
Annushree Bablani, Damodar Reddy Edla, Diwakar Tripathi, and Ramalingaswamy Cheruku. 2019. Survey on brain-computer interface: An emerging computational intelligence paradigm. ACM Computing Surveys 52, 1 (2019), 1–32.
[13]
Robert Bauer and Alireza Gharabaghi. 2015. Reinforcement learning for adaptive threshold control of restorative brain-computer interfaces: A Bayesian simulation. Frontiers in Neuroscience 9 (2015), 36.
[14]
C. R. Bowie, M. Grossman, and M. Gupta. 2017. Action-based cognitive remediation for individuals with serious mental illnesses: Effects of real-world simulations and goal setting on functional and vocational outcomes. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal 40, 1 (2017), 53–60.
[15]
Stefano Cardullo. 2017. New Frontiers in Neuropsychology. The Padua Rehabilitation Tool: A New Software for Rehabilitation Using Touch-Screen Technology. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Padua.
[16]
Stefano Cardullo, Pes Maria Valeria, Tognon Ilaria, Pesenti Ambra, Luciano Gamberini, and Daniela Mapelli. 2016. Padua rehabilitation tool: A pilot study on patients with dementia. In Revised Selected Papers of the 4th International Conference on Games and Learning Alliance—Volume 9599 (GALA 2015). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany, 292–301.
[17]
Marco Cavallo, Federica Trivelli, Mauro Adenzato, Elena Bidoia, Roberta Margherita Giaretto, Francesco Oliva, Luca Ostacoli, Anisa Sala, and Rocco Luigi Picci. 2013. Do neuropsychological and social cognition abilities in schizophrenia change after intensive cognitive training? A pilot study. Clinical Neuropsychiatry 10, 5 (2013), 202–212.
[18]
Chih-Ming Chen and Yi-Lun Li. 2010. Personalised context-aware ubiquitous learning system for supporting effective English vocabulary learning. Interactive Learning Environments 18, 4 (2010), 341–364.
[19]
Karl Bang Christensen, Svend Kreiner, and Mounir Mesbah. 2013. Rasch Models in Health. Wiley Online Library.
[20]
Konstantina Chrysafiadi and Maria Virvou. 2012. Evaluating the integration of fuzzy logic into the student model of a web-based learning environment. Expert Systems with Applications 39, 18 (2012), 13127–13134.
[21]
Antonio Coronato, Muddasar Naeem, Giuseppe De Pietro, and Giovanni Paragliola. 2020. Reinforcement learning for intelligent healthcare applications: A survey. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine 109 (2020), 101964.
[22]
Tyne Crow, Andrew Luxton-Reilly, and Burkhard Wuensche. 2018. Intelligent tutoring systems for programming education: A systematic review. In Proceedings of the 20th Australasian Computing Education Conference (ACE’18). ACM, New York, NY, 53–62.
[23]
T. d’Amato, R. Bation, A. Cochet, I. Jalenques, F. Galland, E. Giraud-Baro, M. Pacaud-Troncin, et al. 2011. A randomized, controlled trial of computer-assisted cognitive remediation for schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Research 125, 2-3 (Nov. 2011), 284–290.
[24]
Eling D. de Bruin, Eva van het Reve, and Kurt Murer. 2013. A randomized controlled pilot study assessing the feasibility of combined motor–cognitive training and its effect on gait characteristics in the elderly. Clinical Rehabilitation 27, 3 (2013), 215–225.
[25]
M. Fan-Cheng and D. Ya-Ping. 2012. Reinforcement learning adaptive control for upper limb rehabilitation robot based on fuzzy neural network. In Proceedings of the 31st Chinese Control Conference. 5157–5161.
[26]
G. Fenza, F. Orciuoli, and D. G. Sampson. 2017. Building adaptive tutoring model using artificial neural networks and reinforcement learning. In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE 17th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT’17). 460–462.
[27]
Mauro Gaspari, Floriano Zini, and Sergio Stecchi. 2020. Enhancing cognitive rehabilitation in multiple sclerosis with a disease-specific tool. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology 2020 (2020), 1–14.
[28]
Beate Grawemeyer, Manolis Mavrikis, Wayne Holmes, Sergio Gutierrez-Santos, Michael Wiedmann, and Nikol Rummel. 2016. Affecting off-task behaviour: How affect-aware feedback can improve student learning. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (LAK’16). ACM, New York, NY, 104–113.
[29]
D. M. A. Gronwall. 1977. Paced auditory serial-addition task: A measure of recovery from concussion. Perceptual and Motor Skills 44, 2 (1977), 367–373.
[30]
Magdalena Hagovska and Iveta Nagyova. 2017. The transfer of skills from cognitive and physical training to activities of daily living: A randomised controlled study. European Journal of Ageing 14, 2 (June 2017), 133–142.
[31]
Philip D. Harvey. 2019. Domains of cognition and their assessment. Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience 21, 3 (Sept. 2019), 227–237.
[32]
Christopher J. Hasson, Julia Manczurowsky, and Sheng-Che Yen. 2015. A reinforcement learning approach to gait training improves retention. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 9 (2015), 459.
[33]
Frode Moen, Maria Hrozanova, and Tore Stiles. 2018. The effects of perceptual-cognitive training with NeuroTracker on executive brain functions among elite athletes. Cogent Psychology 5, 1 (2018), Article 1544105.
[34]
M. R. Mohammadi, Z. Keshavarzi, and S. B. Talepasand. 2014. The effectiveness of computerized cognitive rehabilitation training program in improving cognitive abilities of schizophrenia clients. Iran Journal of Psychiatry 9, 4 (Oct. 2014), 209–215.
[35]
J. N. Motter, M. A. Pimontel, D. Rindskopf, D. P. Devanand, P. M. Doraiswamy, and J. R. Sneed. 2016. Computerized cognitive training and functional recovery in major depressive disorder: A meta-analysis. Journal of Affective Disorders 189, 1 (2016), 184–191.
[36]
Elham Mousavinasab, Nahid Zarifsanaiey, Sharareh R. Niakan Kalhori, Mahnaz Rakhshan, Leila Keikha, and Marjan Ghazi Saeedi. 2018. Intelligent tutoring systems: A systematic review of characteristics, applications, and evaluation methods. Interactive Learning Environments 29, 1 (2018), 1–22.
[37]
Theo Mulder and Jacqueline Hochstenbach. 2001. Adaptability and flexibility of the human motor system: Implications for neurological rehabilitation. Neural Plasticity 8, 1–2 (2001), 131–140.
[38]
Georgios Naros and Alireza Gharabaghi. 2015. Reinforcement learning of self-regulated \(\beta\) -oscillations for motor restoration in chronic stroke. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 9 (2015), 391.
[39]
Hyacinth S. Nwana. 1990. Intelligent tutoring systems: An overview. Artificial Intelligence Review 4, 4 (1990), 251–277.
[40]
Ludovico Pedullà, Giampaolo Brichetto, Andrea Tacchino, Claudio Vassallo, Paola Zaratin, Mario Battaglia, Laura Bonzano, and Marco Bove. 2016. Adaptive vs. non-adaptive cognitive training by means of a personalized app: A randomized trial in people with multiple sclerosis. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation 13, 1 (Oct. 2016), 88.
[41]
C. Peretz, A. D. Korczyn, E. Shatil, V. Aharonson, S. Birnboim, and N. Giladi. 2011. Computer-based, personalized cognitive training versus classical computer games: A randomized double-blind prospective trial of cognitive stimulation. Neuroepidemiology 36, 2 (2011), 91–99.
[42]
R. C. Petersen and J. C. Morris. 2005. Mild cognitive impairment as a clinical entity and treatment target. Archives of Neurology 62, 7 (2005), 1164–1166.
[43]
David J. Reinkensmeyer, Emmanuel Guigon, and Marc A. Maier. 2012. A computational model of use-dependent motor recovery following a stroke: Optimizing corticospinal activations via reinforcement learning can explain residual capacity and other strength recovery dynamics. Neural Networks 29–30 (2012), 60–69.
[44]
Matthew Rudary, Satinder Singh, and Martha E. Pollack. 2004. Adaptive cognitive orthotics: Combining reinforcement learning and constraint-based temporal reasoning. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML’04). ACM, New York, NY, 91.
[45]
Jeff Sauro and James R. Lewis. 2016. Quantifying the User Experience: Practical Statistics for User Research (2nd ed.). Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, CA.
[46]
M. Semkovska, Ahern, D. O. Lonargáin, S. Lambe, and D. M. McLaughlin. 2015. Efficacy of neurocognitive remediation therapy during an acute depressive episode and following remission: Results from two randomised pilot studies. European Psychiatry 30, 1 (2015), 403.
[47]
Shitian Shen and Min Chi. 2016. Reinforcement learning: The sooner the better, or the later the better? In Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on User Modeling Adaptation and Personalization (UMAP’16). ACM, New York, NY, 37–44.
[48]
V. J. Shute and D. Zapata-Rivera. 2010. Intelligent systems. In International Encyclopedia of Education (3rd ed.), Penelope Peterson, Eva Baker, and Barry McGaw (Eds.). Elsevier, Oxford, UK, 75–80.
[49]
Franca Stablum. 2005. PASAT: Paced Auditory Serial Addition Task. Technical Report. Department of General Psychology, University of Padova.
[50]
Richard S. Sutton and Andrew Barto. 1998. Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
[51]
Matthew E. Taylor and Peter Stone. 2009. Transfer learning for reinforcement learning domains: A survey. Journal of Machine Learning Research 10 (Dec. 2009), 1633–1685.
[52]
Tom N. Tombaugh. 2006. A comprehensive review of the paced auditory serial addition test (PASAT). Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology 21, 1 (2006), 53–76.
[53]
Bernhard Treutwein. 1995. Adaptive psychophysical procedures. Vision Research 35, 17 (1995), 2503–2522.
[54]
Oliver Tucha, Lara Tucha, Gesa Kaumann, Sebastian König, Katharina M. Lange, Dorota Stasik, Zoe Streather, Tobias Engelschalk, and Klaus W. Lange. 2011. Training of attention functions in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. ADHD Attention Deficit and Hyperactivity Disorders 3, 3 (Sept. 2011), 271–283.
[55]
Thialda T. Vlagsma, Annelien A. Duits, Hilde T. Dijkstra, Teus van Laar, and Jacoba M. Spikman. 2020. Effectiveness of ReSET; a strategic executive treatment for executive dysfunctioning in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation 30, 1 (2020), 67–84.
[56]
Emma Yhnell, Hannah Furby, Rachel S. Breen, Lucy C. Brookes-Howell, Cheney J. G. Drew, Rebecca Playle, Gareth Watson, Claudia Metzler-Baddeley, Anne E. Rosser, and Monica E. Busse. 2018. Exploring computerised cognitive training as a therapeutic intervention for people with Huntington’s disease (CogTrainHD): Protocol for a randomised feasibility study. Pilot and Feasibility Studies 4 (2018), 45.
[57]
Elad Yom-Tov, Guy Feraru, Mark Kozdoba, Shie Mannor, Moshe Tennenholtz, and Irit Hochberg. 2017. Encouraging physical activity in patients with diabetes: Intervention using a reinforcement learning system. Journal of Medical Internet Research 19, 10 (Oct. 2017), e338.
[58]
Chao Yu, Jiming Liu, and Shamim Nemati. 2020. Reinforcement learning in healthcare: A survey. arxiv:1908.08796[cs.LG].
[59]
Guojing Zhou, Hamoon Azizsoltani, Markel Sanz Ausin, Tiffany Barnes, and Min Chi. 2019. Hierarchical reinforcement learning for pedagogical policy induction. In Artificial Intelligence in Education, Seiji Isotani, Eva Millán, Amy Ogan, Peter Hastings, Bruce McLaren, and Rose Luckin (Eds.). Springer International, Cham, Switzerland, 544–556.
[60]
Mo Zhou, Yonatan Mintz, Yoshimi Fukuoka, Ken Goldberg, Elena Flowers, Philip Kaminsky, Alejandro Castillejo, and Anil Aswani. 2018. Personalizing mobile fitness apps using reinforcement learning. CEUR Workshop Proceedings 2068 (March 2018)., http://ceur–ws.org/Vol–2068/humanize7.pdf https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32405286.
[61]
Ronan Zimmermann, Ute Gschwandtner, Nina Benz, Florian Hatz, Christian Schindler, Ethan Taub, and Peter Fuhr. 2014. Cognitive training in Parkinson disease: Cognition-specific vs nonspecific computer training. Neurology 82, 14 (April 2014), 1219–1226.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Leveraging AI in E-Learning: Personalized Learning and Adaptive Assessment through Cognitive Neuropsychology—A Systematic AnalysisElectronics10.3390/electronics1318376213:18(3762)Online publication date: 22-Sep-2024
  • (2024)Impact of AI-Powered Solutions in Rehabilitation Process: Recent Improvements and Future TrendsInternational Journal of General Medicine10.2147/IJGM.S453903Volume 17(943-969)Online publication date: Mar-2024
  • (2024)Emotions as implicit feedback for adapting difficulty in tutoring systems based on reinforcement learningEducation and Information Technologies10.1007/s10639-024-12699-8Online publication date: 27-Apr-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems
ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems  Volume 12, Issue 1
March 2022
206 pages
ISSN:2160-6455
EISSN:2160-6463
DOI:10.1145/3505196
Issue’s Table of Contents

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 04 March 2022
Accepted: 01 June 2021
Revised: 01 April 2021
Received: 01 May 2020
Published in TIIS Volume 12, Issue 1

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Computerized cognitive training
  2. personalization
  3. adaptivity

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Refereed

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)340
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)33
Reflects downloads up to 02 Oct 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Leveraging AI in E-Learning: Personalized Learning and Adaptive Assessment through Cognitive Neuropsychology—A Systematic AnalysisElectronics10.3390/electronics1318376213:18(3762)Online publication date: 22-Sep-2024
  • (2024)Impact of AI-Powered Solutions in Rehabilitation Process: Recent Improvements and Future TrendsInternational Journal of General Medicine10.2147/IJGM.S453903Volume 17(943-969)Online publication date: Mar-2024
  • (2024)Emotions as implicit feedback for adapting difficulty in tutoring systems based on reinforcement learningEducation and Information Technologies10.1007/s10639-024-12699-8Online publication date: 27-Apr-2024
  • (2023)Combined extended reality and reinforcement learning to promote healthcare and reduce social anxiety in fragile X syndrome: a new assessment tool and a rehabilitative strategyFrontiers in Psychology10.3389/fpsyg.2023.127311714Online publication date: 20-Dec-2023
  • (2023)Combining reinforcement learning and virtual reality in mild neurocognitive impairment: a new usability assessment on patients and caregiversFrontiers in Aging Neuroscience10.3389/fnagi.2023.118949815Online publication date: 24-May-2023

View Options

Get Access

Login options

Full Access

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Full Text

View this article in Full Text.

Full Text

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media