Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3472306.3478349acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesivaConference Proceedingsconference-collections
extended-abstract

Someone or Something to Play With?: An Empirical Study on how Parents Evaluate the Social Appropriateness of Interactions Between Children and Differently Embodied Artificial Interaction Partners

Published: 14 September 2021 Publication History

Abstract

Children are raised with technologies that are able to respond to them in natural language. This not only makes it easy to communicate but also to connect with them socially. While communication abilities might have benefits (e.g., for learning), it might also raise concerns among parents as the technologies are not necessarily designed to facilitate the children's social, emotional, and cognitive developments and serve as a model for the construction of a social world among humans. First technologies children can talk to differ in their embodiment (e.g., robots and voice assistants), which could affect central variables, such as social presence, trust, and privacy concerns. The present study aimed to investigate how parents conceptualize socially appropriate interactions between children and technologies. The results underline the parents' emphasis on embodiment and privacy protection. The study underlines the importance of incorporating the parental perspective to meet the expectations of responsible interactions between children and technologies.

References

[1]
S. Kopp, L. Gesellensetter, N. C. Krämer, and I. Wachsmuth, "A Conversational Agent as Museum Guide -- Design and Evaluation of a Real-World Application," in Lecture notes in computer science Lecture notes in artificial intelligence, vol. 3661, Intelligent virtual agents: 5th international working conference, IVA 2005, Kos, Greece, September 12-14, 2005; proceedings, T. Panayiotopoulos, J. Gratch, R. Aylett, D. Ballin, P. Olivier, and T. Rist, Eds., Berlin: Springer, 2005, pp. 329--343.
[2]
UNESCO, Ed., I'd blush if I could: closing gender divides in digital skills through education, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000367416.page=1
[3]
B. Reeves and C. I. Nass, The media equation: How people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places, 1st ed. Stanford, Calif.: CSLI Publ, 1996.
[4]
G. Airenti, "The Development of Anthropomorphism in Interaction: Intersubjectivity, Imagination, and Theory of Mind," Frontiers in psychology, vol. 9, p. 2136, 2018.
[5]
E. Ackerman, Meet Moxie, a Social Robot That Helps Kids With Social-Emotional Learning: A new social robot designed for children wants to help promote social, emotional, and cognitive development. [Online]. Available: https://spectrum.ieee.org/automaton/robotics/home-robots/moxie-a-social-robot-for-childhood-development
[6]
Y. Xu and M. Warschauer, "What Are You Talking To?: Understanding Children's Perceptions of Conversational Agents," in Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Honolulu HI USA, 2020, pp. 1--13.
[7]
F. Tanaka, A. Cicourel, and J. R. Movellan, "Socialization between toddlers and robots at an early childhood education center," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 104, no. 46, pp. 17954--17958, 2007.
[8]
S. Wiertz, "Der Roboter -- mein Freund? [The Robot -My Friend?]," in Techno:Phil, Neue Technologien - neue Kindheiten?: Ethische und bildungsphilosophische Perspektiven, M. F. Buck, J. Drerup, and G. Schweiger, Eds., Berlin Germany: J.B. Metzler, 2020, pp. 107--123.
[9]
M. von Salisch, "Children's emotional development: Challenges in their relationships to parents, peers, and friends," International Journal of Behavioral Development, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 310--319, 2001.
[10]
K. Kim, L. Boelling, S. Haesler, J. Bailenson, G. Bruder, and G. F. Welch, "Does a Digital Assistant Need a Body? The Influence of Visual Embodiment and Social Behavior on the Perception of Intelligent Virtual Agents in AR," in 2018 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality: Munich, Germany, 16--20 October 2018: proceedings, Munich, Germany, 2018, pp. 105--114.
[11]
K. M. Lee, Y. Jung, J. Kim, and S. R. Kim, "Are physically embodied social agents better than disembodied social agents?: The effects of physical embodiment, tactile interaction, and people's loneliness in human-robot interaction," International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, vol. 64, no. 10, pp. 962--973, 2006.
[12]
H. A. M. Voorveld and T. Araujo, "How Social Cues in Virtual Assistants Influence Concerns and Persuasion: The Role of Voice and a Human Name," Cyberpsychology, behavior and social networking, vol. 23, no. 10, pp. 689--696, 2020.
[13]
R. Stower, N. Calvo-Barajas, G. Castellano, and A. Kappas, "A Meta-analysis on Children's Trust in Social Robots," Int J of Soc Robotics, 2021.
[14]
L. Qiu and I. Benbasat, "Evaluating Anthropomorphic Product Recommendation Agents: A Social Relationship Perspective to Designing Information Systems," Journal of Management Information Systems, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 145--182, 2009.
[15]
H. Xu, T. Dinev, H. J. Smith, and P. Hart, Eds., Examining the Formation of Individual's Privacy Concerns: Toward an Integrative View, 2008.
[16]
J.-Y. Jian, A. M. Bisantz, and C. G. Drury, "Foundations for an Empirically Determined Scale of Trust in Automated Systems," International Journal of Cognitive Ergonomics, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 53--71, 2000.
[17]
T. Ammari, J. Kaye, J. Y. Tsai, and F. Bentley, "Music, Search, and IoT," ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact., vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 1--28, 2019.
[18]
E. McReynolds, S. Hubbard, T. Lau, A. Saraf, M. Cakmak, and F. Roesner, "Toys that Listen," in Explore, innovate, inspire: CHI 2017: May 6-11, Denver, CO, USA, Denver Colorado USA, 2017, pp. 5197--5207.
[19]
J. Li, "The benefit of being physically present: A survey of experimental works comparing copresent robots, telepresent robots and virtual agents," International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, vol. 77, pp. 23--37, 2015.
[20]
T. Gnambs and M. Appel, "Are robots becoming unpopular? Changes in attitudes towards autonomous robotic systems in Europe," Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 93, pp. 53--61, 2019.
[21]
J. Lau, B. Zimmerman, and F. Schaub, "Alexa, Are You Listening?," Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact., vol. 2, CSCW, pp. 1--31, 2018.
[22]
M. L. Jones and K. Meurer, "Can (and should) Hello Barbie keep a secret?," in 2016 IEEE International Symposium on Ethics in Engineering, Science and Technology (ETHICS): May 13-14, 2016, Vancouver, BC, Canada, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 2016, pp. 1--6.

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Children's Fundamental Rights in Human-Robot Interaction ResearchCompanion of the 2023 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/3568294.3580148(561-566)Online publication date: 13-Mar-2023

Index Terms

  1. Someone or Something to Play With?: An Empirical Study on how Parents Evaluate the Social Appropriateness of Interactions Between Children and Differently Embodied Artificial Interaction Partners

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    IVA '21: Proceedings of the 21st ACM International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents
    September 2021
    238 pages
    ISBN:9781450386197
    DOI:10.1145/3472306
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 14 September 2021

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Child-Robot Interaction
    2. Child-Technology Interaction
    3. Parental Perspective
    4. Privacy Concerns
    5. Social Appropriateness
    6. Social Presence
    7. Trust

    Qualifiers

    • Extended-abstract
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Funding Sources

    Conference

    IVA '21
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 53 of 196 submissions, 27%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)29
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)9
    Reflects downloads up to 21 Nov 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2023)Children's Fundamental Rights in Human-Robot Interaction ResearchCompanion of the 2023 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/3568294.3580148(561-566)Online publication date: 13-Mar-2023

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media