Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3472301.3484357acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesihcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Analytical Model for Classifying Areas of Interest in Interactive Systems

Published: 18 October 2021 Publication History

Abstract

Several organizations have invested in solutions to improve user experience when interacting with computer systems and tools. One of the applied strategies is the study of users behavior in order to identify which areas of interest (AOI) mostly attract their attention in the application interfaces. In this context, this paper proposes an analytical model that defines AOI based on HyperText Markup Language (HTML) objects of the system interface and classifies them based on an algorithm that uses data from the Tracking Techniques Based User Experience Evaluation Tool (T2-UXT). To evaluate the proposal, a feasibility study was carried out on the Amazon portal. Results allow us to visualize a ranking of areas that mostly attract attention from users during the interaction. As such, it can assist organizations in the creation of interacting ways that benefit their interests as well as their customers' interests.

References

[1]
Gabriela Arbex. 2021. E-commerce global pode movimentar US$ 3, 4 tri em 2025. https://bit.ly/3z32gwd
[2]
W. Banuenumah, F. Sekyere, and K. A. Dotche. 2017. Field survey of smart metering implementation using a simple random method: A case study of New Juaben Municipality in Ghana. In 2017 IEEE PES PowerAfrica. 352--357. https://doi.org/10.1109/PowerAfrica.2017.7991250
[3]
Sylvain Castagnos, Nicolas Jones, and Pearl Pu. 2010. Eye-tracking product recommenders' usage. In Proceedings of the fourth ACM conference on Recommender systems - RecSys '10. ACM Press. https://doi.org/10.1145/1864708.1864717
[4]
Lukas Cegan and Petr Filip. 2017. Advanced web analytics tool for mouse tracking and real-time data processing. In 2017 IEEE 14th International Scientific Conference on Informatics. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/informatics.2017.8327288
[5]
Ashish Kr; Chilamkurti Naveen; Baek Seungmin;and Nam Yunyoung Dash, Sujata; Luhach. 2019. A Neuro-fuzzy approach for user behaviour classification and prediction. Journal of Cloud Computing 8, 1 (2019), 17.
[6]
Kennedy Edson Silva de Souza, Rodrigo Oliveira Zacarias, Marcos César da Rocha Seruffo, and Rodrigo Pereira dos Santos. 2020. T2-UXT: A Tool to Support Transparency Evaluation in Software Ecosystems Portals. In Proceedings of the 34th Brazilian Symposium on Software Engineering (Natal, Brazil) (SBES '20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 415--420. https://doi.org/10.1145/3422392.3422502
[7]
Octavian Dospinescu and Adriana Emilia Percă-Robu. 2017. The analysis of e-commerce sites with eye-tracking technologies. BRAIN. Broad Research in Artificial Intelligence and Neuroscience 8, 3 (2017), 85--100.
[8]
A. C. B. Garcia, V. Vieira, A. Vivacqua, J. França, and A. Dias. 2020. Groupware 4.0: Avanços e desafios da computação social. In 39a Jornada de Atualização em Informática (JAI). Sociedade Brasileira de Computação, 347--351.
[9]
R. Kelly Garrett. 2019. Social media's contribution to political misperceptions in U.S. Presidential elections. PLOS ONE 14, 3 (03 2019), 1--16. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0213500
[10]
Jonathan Grudin. 1994. Groupware and Social Dynamics: Eight Challenges for Developers. Commun. ACM 37, 1 (Jan. 1994), 92--105. https://doi.org/10.1145/175222.175230
[11]
Roy S Hessels, Chantal Kemner, Carlijn van den Boomen, and Ignace TC Hooge. 2016. The area-of-interest problem in eyetracking research: A noise-robust solution for face and sparse stimuli. Behavior research methods 48, 4 (2016), 1694--1712.
[12]
E-Confy PDM LTDA. 2019. NEOTRUST 2a Edição. https://bit.ly/2ZggEjM
[13]
Anna Beatriz Marques, Tayana Conte, and Simone Diniz Junqueira Barbosa. 2016. Representando a interação e navegação de sistemas interativos através de um modelo orientado à usabilidade: Um estudo de viabilidade. In Proceedings of IHC'16, Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems.
[14]
Alexandra Papoutsaki, James Laskey, and Jeff Huang. 2017. SearchGazer: Webcam Eye Tracking for Remote Studies of Web Search. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGIR Conference on Human Information Interaction & Retrieval (CHIIR). ACM.
[15]
J. N. Sari, L. E. Nugroho, R. Ferdiana, and P. I. Santosa. 2018. Evaluation of Fixation Duration Accuracy in Determining Selected Product on E-commerce. In 2018 10th International Conference on Information Technology and Electrical Engineering (ICITEE). 146--151.
[16]
K. E. S. Souza, M. C. R. Seruffo, H. D. De Mello, D. D. S. Souza, and M. M. B. R. Vellasco. 2019. User Experience Evaluation Using Mouse Tracking and Artificial Intelligence. IEEE Access 7 (2019), 96506--96515. Issue 7. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2927860
[17]
Laura Maria [Badea (Stroie)]. 2014. Predicting Consumer Behavior with Artificial Neural Networks. Procedia Economics and Finance 15 (2014), 238 - 246. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(14)00492-4 Emerging Markets Queries in Finance and Business (EMQ 2013).

Cited By

View all

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
IHC '21: Proceedings of the XX Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems
October 2021
523 pages
ISBN:9781450386173
DOI:10.1145/3472301
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

In-Cooperation

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 18 October 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Analytical Model and Area of Interest
  2. Evaluation
  3. Interactive Systems
  4. User Behavior

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Conference

IHC '21

Acceptance Rates

IHC '21 Paper Acceptance Rate 29 of 77 submissions, 38%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 331 of 973 submissions, 34%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 69
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)4
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 13 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media