Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3469096.3474935acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdocengConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper
Public Access

Metadata-driven eye tracking for real-time applications

Published: 16 August 2021 Publication History

Abstract

When conducting eye tracking studies, having a mechanism to collect data, build workflows, and validate results in a FAIR (i.e., findable, accessible, interoperable, and reusable) manner, facilitates automation. Given the vast landscape of vendor-specific eye tracking software, adopting FAIR metadata standards for the eye tracking domain is one step towards this. In this paper, we propose an approach to simplify the creation, execution, and validation of eye tracking studies through metadata. Using a metadata format that we developed, we first describe two eye trackers, and two datasets collected using them. Next, we use this metadata to simulate real-time data collection by replaying each dataset. From this replayed data, we analyze eye movements in real-time, and synthesize eye movement data from analytics in real-time. Based on our results, we discuss the utility of metadata in real-time eye tracking studies, and how this idea can be generalized into other applications.

References

[1]
Margaret M Burnett and David W McIntyre. 1995. Visual programming. COMPUTER-LOS ALAMITOS- 28 (1995), 14--14.
[2]
Andrew Duchowski, Sophie Jörg, Aubrey Lawson, Takumi Bolte, Lech Świrski, and Krzysztof Krejtz. 2015. Eye movement synthesis with 1/f pink noise. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM SIGGRAPH Conference on Motion in Games. 47--56.
[3]
Andrew T Duchowski, Sophie Jörg, Tyler N Allen, Ioannis Giannopoulos, and Krzysztof Krejtz. 2016. Eye movement synthesis. In Proceedings of the ninth biennial ACM symposium on eye tracking research & applications. 147--154.
[4]
Andrew T Duchowski, Krzysztof Krejtz, Nina A Gehrer, Tanya Bafna, and Per Bsekgaard. 2020. The Low/High Index of Pupillary Activity. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--12.
[5]
MFP Gillies and Neil A Dodgson. 2002. Eye movements and attention for behavioural animation. The Journal of Visualization and Computer Animation 13, 5 (2002), 287--300.
[6]
Carole Goble, Sarah Cohen-Boulakia, Stian Soiland-Reyes, Daniel Garijo, Yolanda Gil, Michael R Crusoe, Kristian Peters, and Daniel Schober. 2020. FAIR computational workflows. Data Intelligence 2, 1-2 (2020), 108--121.
[7]
Yasith Jayawardana and Sampath Jayarathna. 2019. DFS: a dataset file system for data discovering users. In 2019 ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (JCDL). IEEE, 355--356.
[8]
Yasith Jayawardana and Sampath Jayarathna. 2020. Streaming Analytics and Workflow Automation for DFS. In Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries in 2020. 513--514.
[9]
Gavindya Jayawardena, Anne Michalek, Andrew Duchowski, and Sampath Jayarathna. 2020. Pilot study of audiovisual speech-in-noise (sin) performance of young adults with adhd. In ACM Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and Applications. 1--5.
[10]
Siddhartha Joshi, Yin Li, Rishi M Kalwani, and Joshua I Gold. 2016. Relationships between pupil diameter and neuronal activity in the locus coeruleus, colliculi, and cingulate cortex. Neuron 89, 1 (2016), 221--234.
[11]
C. Kothe. 2014. Lab streaming layer (LSL). https://github.com/sccn/labstreaminglayer 26 (2014), 2015.
[12]
Mohammad Amin Kuhail, Shahbano Farooq, Rawad Hammad, and Mohammed Bahja. 2021. Characterizing Visual Programming Approaches for End-User Developers: A Systematic Review. IEEE Access (2021).
[13]
Chee Sun Liew, Malcolm P Atkinson, Michelle Galea, Tan Fong Ang, Paul Martin, and Jano I Van Hemert. 2016. Scientific workflows: moving across paradigms. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR) 49, 4 (2016), 1--39.
[14]
Alex Poole and Linden J Ball. 2006. Eye tracking in HCI and usability research. In Encyclopedia of human computer interaction. IGI Global, 211--219.
[15]
Dario D Salvucci and Joseph H Goldberg. 2000. Identifying fixations and saccades in eye-tracking protocols. In Proceedings of the 2000 symposium on Eye tracking research & applications. 71--78.
[16]
Arvind Satyanarayan, Kanit Wongsuphasawat, and Jeffrey Heer. 2014. Declarative Interaction Design for Data Visualization. In ACM User Interface Software & Technology (UIST). http://idl.cs.washington.edu/papers/reactive-vega
[17]
Mark D Wilkinson, Michel Dumontier, IJsbrand Jan Aalbersberg, Gabrielle Appleton, Myles Axton, Arie Baak, Niklas Blomberg, Jan-Willem Boiten, Luiz Bonino da Silva Santos, Philip E Bourne, et al. 2016. The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific data 3 (2016), 160018.

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)FAIR4PGHD: A framework for FAIR implementation over PGHDFAIR Connect10.3233/FC-2305001:1(35-40)Online publication date: 3-Feb-2023

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
DocEng '21: Proceedings of the 21st ACM Symposium on Document Engineering
August 2021
178 pages
ISBN:9781450385961
DOI:10.1145/3469096
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 16 August 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. eye tracking
  2. metadata
  3. replay
  4. simulation
  5. stream processing

Qualifiers

  • Short-paper

Funding Sources

Conference

DocEng '21
Sponsor:
DocEng '21: ACM Symposium on Document Engineering 2021
August 24 - 27, 2021
Limerick, Ireland

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 194 of 564 submissions, 34%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)107
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)12
Reflects downloads up to 26 Sep 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)FAIR4PGHD: A framework for FAIR implementation over PGHDFAIR Connect10.3233/FC-2305001:1(35-40)Online publication date: 3-Feb-2023

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Get Access

Login options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media