Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3468920.3468937acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesbdeConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Postoperative MPA-AUC Prediction for Kidney Transplant Recipients Based on Model Interpretability Technique

Published: 24 August 2021 Publication History

Abstract

Mycophenolic acid (MPA) is a commonly used immunosuppressant for organ transplant recipients. the Area Under Curve (AUC) of 0∼12 hours after taking mycophenolic acid (MPA) drugs is often monitored clinically to evaluate drug exposure and adjust medication dosage for individual treatment, so as to achieve the best immunosuppression state. However, in clinical practice, medical staff often need to collect the data of 9 to 12 blood samples within 0 to 12 hours after the patient takes the medicine, which leads to high test cost, heavy workload of medical staff and great pain to patients. This paper proposes a prediction method based on the Model interpretability technique SHAP. Firstly, SHAP calculates the influence of a single feature added to the input on the overall prediction results of the model and analyzes the weight of each feature. The ranking of the weights was used to dynamically select the best blood sampling time-points for prediction. Then we established a prediction model of for kidney transplantation recipients by artificial neural network. The experimental results show that When 4-point sampling is used, the MAE of prediction model is stable below 15%, and the prediction result is better than that of traditional feature selection method and blood collection time-points selection results proposed in other reference.

References

[1]
Y.P. Lu, Y.C. Zhu, M.Z. Liang, F. Nan, Q. Yu, L. Wang, J. Wang, Y.P. Li,.2006.Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Mycophenolic Acid Can Be Used as Predictor of Clinical Events for Kidney Transplant Recipients Treated With Mycophenolate Mofetil. Transplantation Proceedings, Vol. 38, 2048-2050. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.transproceed.2006.06.028.
[2]
Cao Yirui, Jia Yichen. 2020. Research progress on pharmacokinetics of mycophenolic acid drugs in organ transplant recipients. ORGAN TRANSPLANTATION 11(5): 635-645. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1674-7445.2020.05.018.
[3]
Zhang HJ,Wang GB,Chen YY,et al. 2019.Analysis of monitoring results of mycophenolic acid plasma concentration in one month after renal transplantation. The 9th National Symposium on therapeutic drug monitoring. https:// doi.org/10.26914/c.cnkihy.2019.046772
[4]
Susan E. Tett, Franck Saint-Marcoux, Christine E. Staatz, Merce Brunet, Alexander A. Vinks, Masatomo Miura, Pierre Marquet, Dirk R. Kuypers, Teun van Gelder, Dario Cattaneo,Mycophenolate. 2011. Mycophenolate, clinical pharmacokinetics, formulations, and methods for assessing drug exposure. Transplantation reviews (Orlando, Fla.), Vol. 25, 47-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trre.2010.06.001.
[5]
M. Baraldo,P.G. Cojutti,M. Isola,M.T. Feruglio,V. Tursi,U. Livi,M. Furlanut.2009. Validation of Limited Sampling Strategy for Estimation of Mycophenolic Acid Exposure During the First Year After Heart Transplantation. Transplantation Proceedings,41(10): 4277-4284.https://10.1016/j.transproceed.2009.08.077
[6]
Bai YJ,Shi YY,Zou YG,et al.2018 .A pilot study on predictive value of mycophenolic acid concentration monitoring in postoperative infection of renal transplant recipients .ChinJ Chin Lab Mgt.6(04):212-215. https://doi.org/10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-5820.2018.04.005
[7]
Hao, C., Gu, Z., Bing, C., Mao, H., Zhang, W., & Fan, Q. . 2008. Models for the prediction of mycophenolic acid area under the curve using a limited-sampling strategy and an enzyme multiplied immunoassay technique in chinese patients undergoing liver transplantation. Clinical Therapeutics, 30(12), 2387-2401.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinthera.2008.12.017
[8]
Shao K, Lu JQ, An HM, .2018. Exposure Estimation of Mycophenolic Acid in Chinese Renal Transplant Recipients by Limited Sampling Strategy.China Pharmacist,21(9): 1522-1527,1530. https://doi.org/CNKI:SUN:ZYSG.0.2018-09-004.
[9]
Tang, J.‐T., de Winter, B. C., Hesselink, D. A., Sombogaard, F., Wang, L.‐L., van Gelder, T. 2017. The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of mycophenolate mofetil in younger and elderly renal transplant recipients. Br J Clin Pharmacol, 83: 812– 822. https://doi.org/10.1111/bcp.13154
[10]
COSSART AR, COTTRELL WN, CAMPBELL SB, .2019. Characterizing the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of immunosuppressant medicines and patient outcomes in elderly renal transplantpatients. Transl Androl Urol,8(2):198-213. https://doi.org/10.21037/tau.2018.10.16
[11]
Wang J,Wang LL,Guo M,Wei JF. 2019.Investigation on Monitoring Scheme of Mycophenolic Acid in Renal Transplant Recipients by Limited Sampling Methods. Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research,27(6):445-448.https://dor.org/ 10.13664/j.cnki.pcr.2019.06.011
[12]
Wang HB,Man JW,Hu W,Ren XS,et al.2020.Application of Blood Mycophenolic acid Concentration Monitoring in renal transplant recipients.Medical Recapitulate,26(04):652-657.https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1006-2084.2020.04.006
[13]
Liu S,Zhang EY,Yi ZM,Zhao RS.2021.Analysis for the current status of mycophenolic acid therapeutic drug monitoring in China. The Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology,37(03):308-311.https:// doi.org/ 10.13699/j.cnki.1001-6821.2021.03.025
[14]
LIN Bin, He-Qiu-Yi, Hu- Qiong, Wang-Chang-Xi, Chen- Jie, Zheng-Zhi-Hua, Li-Shu-Xia, Chen- Xiao. 2009.Prediction of mycophenolic acid exposure in renal transplantation recipients by artificial neural network. Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica, 44(12): 1397-1401.https://doi.org/ 10.16438/j.0513-4870.2009.12.024
[15]
Z. Wang, J. Poon, S. Sun and S. Poon, "Attention-based Multi-instance Neural Network for Medical Diagnosis from Incomplete and Low Quality Data," 2019 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN), Budapest, Hungary, 2019, pp. 1-8, https://doi.org/10.1109/IJCNN.2019.8851846.
[16]
CHEN Zhaozhi, LI Dongdong, WANG Zhe, RUAN Tong, GAO Ju. 2019.Locality Sensitive Discriminant Matrixized Classifier with Under-Sampling for Heart Failure Prediction. Journal of East China University of Science and Technology, 45(1): 156-162. https://doi.org/10.14135/j.cnki.1006-3080.20171217001.
[17]
Yao X, Huang H, Wei C, .2015. Limited Sampling Strategy for Mycophenolic Acid in Chinese Kidney Transplant Recipients Receiving Enteric-Coated Mycophenolate Sodium and Tacrolimus During the Early Posttransplantation Phase. Therapeutic Drug Monitoring.Vol 37, 516-523. https://doi.org/10.1097/FTD.0000000000000170
[18]
Marco Tulio Ribeiro, Sameer Singh, and Carlos Guestrin. 2016. "Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifier. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1135-1144.https://doi.org/10.1145/2939672.2939778
[19]
Marco Tulio Ribeiro, Sameer Singh, and Carlos Guestrin. 2018. Anchors: High-precision modelagnostic explanations. In AAAI, vol. 18, 1527-1535. https://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/AAAI/AAAI18/paper/view/16982.
[20]
Scott M. Lundberg and Su-In Lee. 2017. A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. In Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS'17). Curran Associates Inc., Red Hook, NY, USA, 4768–4777. http://papers.nips.cc/paper/7062-a-unified-approach-to-interpreting-model-prediction.
[21]
Cen MY,Wang J,Liang WQ.2008.Prediction of elimination rate constant of amikacin in Neonates with BP neural network .Chimese Pharmaceutical Joural,43(18):1420-1423. https://doi.org/CNKI:SUN:ZGYX.0.2008-18-014
[22]
Sun PP,Li J,Y LJ,et al. 2014.Determination of mycophenolic acid in Chinese children with renal transplantation by limited sample method,National academic conference of Chinese society of clinical pharmacy 2014.
[23]
B, H. M. A., C, S. S., B, C. Z., C, I. G., A, J. T., A, R. O., 2007. Therapeutic drug monitoring of mycophenolic acid in kidney transplant patients: a abbreviated sampling strategy. Transplantation Proceedings.39(3), 596-599.https://doi.org/ 10.1016 / j.transproceed.2006.12.027
[24]
Bai YJ,Shi YY,Zou YG,et al.2018 .A pilot study on predictive value of mycophenolic acid concentration monitoring in postoperative infection of renal transplant recipients .ChinJ Chin Lab Mgt.6(04):212-215. https://doi.org/10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-5820.2018.04.005

Index Terms

  1. Postoperative MPA-AUC Prediction for Kidney Transplant Recipients Based on Model Interpretability Technique
      Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      BDE '21: Proceedings of the 2021 3rd International Conference on Big Data Engineering
      May 2021
      175 pages
      ISBN:9781450389426
      DOI:10.1145/3468920
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 24 August 2021

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. ANN
      2. MPA AUC
      3. Model interpretability technique
      4. kidney transplant

      Qualifiers

      • Article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Conference

      BDE 2021

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • 0
        Total Citations
      • 24
        Total Downloads
      • Downloads (Last 12 months)2
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
      Reflects downloads up to 14 Nov 2024

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      View Options

      Get Access

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      HTML Format

      View this article in HTML Format.

      HTML Format

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media