research-article

Why do People (not) Want to Work from Home? An Individual-focused Literature Review on Telework

Authors:

Christian MaierAuthors Info & Claims

SIGMIS-CPR '21: Proceedings of the 2021 Computers and People Research Conference

Pages 41 - 49

https://doi.org/10.1145/3458026.3462155

Published: 29 June 2021 Publication History

Abstract

One challenge of telework before the Covid-19 pandemic, but even during it, is that even if organizations offer telework programs employees are not willing to work from home. Instead, they prefer to stay in the office. We conducted a literature review of 32 studies focusing on telework adoption to propose the employee telework adoption model, informing research and practice about telework and its successful implementation. Guided by the theory of planned behavior we identified six behavioral beliefs fostering telework adoption and five behavioral beliefs hindering telework adoption. Moreover, we reveal one normative and three control beliefs that foster or hinder it. This belief set constitues the employee telework adoption model, which is further discussed in terms of its implications for research and its guidance for future research endoveaurs.

Supplemental Material

MP4 File

In this video we explain the results of our paper and why do people (not) want to work from home. We identify factors that foster or inhibit employees telework adoption.

Download
134.89 MB

References

[1]

Icek Ajzen. 1985. From Intentions to Actions: A Theory of Planned Behavior. Action Control. Springer Berlin Heidelberg http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978--3--642--69746--3_2. Retrieved from.

[2]

Icek Ajzen. 1991. The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50, 2, 179--211.

[3]

René Arvola, Piia Tint, Ülo Kristjuhan, and Virve Siirak. 2017. Impact of Telework On the Perceived Work Environment of Older Workers. Scientific Annals of Economics and Business 64, 2, 199--214.

[4]

Diane E. Bailey and Nancy B. Kurland. 2002. A review of telework research: findings, new directions, and lessons for the study of modern work. J. Organiz. Behav. 23, 4, 383--400.

[5]

Ellen Baker, Gayle C. Avery, and John Crawford. 2006. Home Alone. The Role of Technology in Telecommuting. Information Resources Management Journal 19, 4, 1--22.

Digital Library

[6]

Roy F. Baumeister and Mark R. Leary. 1995. The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin 117, 3, 497--529.

[7]

Barbara Beham, Andreas Baierl, and Steven Poelmans. 2015. Managerial telework allowance decisions -- a vignette study among German managers. The International Journal of Human Resource Management 26, 11, 1385--1406.

[8]

France Bélanger and Christopher D. Allport. 2008. Collaborative technologies in knowledge telework: an exploratory study. Info Systems J 18, 1, 101--121.

[9]

France Bélanger, Rosann W. Collins, and Paul H. Cheney. 2001. Technology Requirements and Work Group Communication for Telecommuters. Information Systems Research 12, 2, 155--176.

Digital Library

[10]

Stuart M. Belle, D. L. Burley, and S. D. Long. 2015. Where do I belong? High-intensity teleworkers' experience of organizational belonging. Human resource development international : enhancing performance, learning and integrity 18, 1, 76--96.

[11]

Stuart M. Belle, D. L. Burley, and S. D. Long. 2015. Where do I belong? High-intensity teleworkers' experience of organizational belonging. Human resource development international : enhancing performance, learning and integrity 18, 1, 76--96.

[12]

T. A. Bentley, S. T. T. Teo, L. McLeod, F. Tan, R. Bosua, and M. Gloet. 2016. The role of organisational support in teleworker wellbeing: a socio-technical systems approach. Applied ergonomics 52, 207--215.

[13]

T. A. Bentley, S. T. T. Teo, L. McLeod, F. Tan, R. Bosua, and M. Gloet. 2016. The role of organisational support in teleworker wellbeing: a socio-technical systems approach. Applied ergonomics 52, 207--215.

[14]

Nicholas Bloom, James Liang, John Roberts, and Zhichun J. Ying. 2015. Does Working from Home Work? Evidence from a Chinese Experiment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 130, 1, 165--218.

[15]

Kevin Carillo, Gaëlle Cachat-Rosset, Josianne Marsan, Tania Saba, and Alain Klarsfeld. 2020. Adjusting to epidemic-induced telework: empirical insights from teleworkers in France. Eur J Inf Syst, 1--20.

[16]

SinHui Chong, Yi Huang, and Chu-Hsiang D. Chang. 2020. Supporting interdependent telework employees: A moderated-mediation model linking daily COVID-19 task setbacks to next-day work withdrawal. The Journal of applied psychology 105, 12, 1408--1422.

[17]

Alison M. Collins, Donald Hislop, and Susan Cartwright. 2016. Social support in the workplace between teleworkers, office-based colleagues and supervisors. New Tech Work Empl 31, 2, 161--175.

[18]

H. Cooper and L. V. Hedges. 2009. Research synthesis as a scientific process. In The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis, Harris Cooper, Larry V. Hedges and Jeffrey C. Valentine, Eds. Russell Sage Foundation, New York, 3--16.

[19]

Elsevier. 2020. Data | Curated. Connected. Complete. (2020). Retrieved January 16, 2020 from https://www.elsevier.com/solutions/scopus.

[20]

Kathryn L. Fonner and Michael E. Roloff. 2010. Why Teleworkers are More Satisfied with Their Jobs than are Office-Based Workers: When Less Contact is Beneficial. Journal of Applied Communication Research 38, 4, 336--361.

[21]

J. J. Gabarro. 1990. The development of working relationships. In Intellectual teamwork: Social and technological foundations of cooperative work, J. Galegher, R. E. Kraut and C. Egido, Eds., 93--124.

[22]

Gallup. 2017. State of the American Workplace (2017). Retrieved January 19, 2020 from https://www.gallup.com/file/workplace/257549/State_American_Workplace_Report.pdf.

[23]

Global Workplace Analytics. 2019. Latest Telecommuting/Mobile Work/Remote Work Statistics (2019). Retrieved January 20, 2020 from https://globalworkplaceanalytics.com/telecommuting-statistics.

[24]

Timothy Golden. 2007. Co-workers who telework and the impact on those in the office: Understanding the implications of virtual work for co-worker satisfaction and turnover intentions. Human Relations 60, 11, 1641--1667.

[25]

Timothy D. Golden and Ravi S. Gajendran. 2018. Unpacking the Role of a Telecommuter's Job in Their Performance: Examining Job Complexity, Problem Solving, Interdependence, and Social Support. Journal of Business and Psychology 34, 1, 55--69.

[26]

Timothy D. Golden and Sumita Raghuram. 2010. Teleworker knowledge sharing and the role of altered relational and technological interactions. Journal of Organizational Behavior 31, 8, 1061--1085.

[27]

Timothy D. Golden and John F. Veiga. 2005. The Impact of Extent of Telecommuting on Job Satisfaction: Resolving Inconsistent Findings. Journal of Management 31, 2, 301--318.

[28]

Timothy D. Golden and John F. Veiga. 2008. The impact of superior-subordinate relationships on the commitment, job satisfaction, and performance of virtual workers. The leadership quarterly : LQ : an international journal of political, social and behavioral science 19, 1, 77--88.

[29]

Paul Gray. 1997. A Demand-Side Approach to Telecommuting. Information Systems Management 14, 4, 21--28.

[30]

Tomika W. Greer and Stephanie C. Payne. 2014. Overcoming telework challenges: Outcomes of successful telework strategies. The psychologist-manager journal : official journal of the Society of Psychologists in Management 17, 2, 87--111.

[31]

Ella Hafermalz and Kai Riemer. 2020. Productive and connected while working from home: what client-facing remote workers can learn from telenurses about "belonging through technology'. Eur J Inf Syst, 1--11.

[32]

Terry Hartig, Camilla Kylin, and Gunn Johansson. 2007. The Telework Tradeoff: Stress Mitigation vs. Constrained Restoration. Applied Psychology 56, 2, 231--253.

[33]

E. J. Hill, BRENT C. MILLER, SARA P. WEINER, and Joe Colihan. 1998. Influences of the virtual office on aspects of work and work/life balance. Personnel Psychology 51, 3, 667--683.

[34]

Magid Igbaria and Tor Guimaraes. 1999. Exploring Differences in Employee Turnover Intentions and Its Determinants among Telecommuters and Non-Telecommuters. Journal of Management Information Systems 16, 1, 147--164.

Digital Library

[35]

Magid Igbaria and Tor Guimaraes. 1999. Exploring Differences in Employee Turnover Intentions and Its Determinants among Telecommuters and Non-Telecommuters. J. Manage. Inf. Syst. 16, 1, 147--164.

Digital Library

[36]

Viviane Illegems, Alain Verbeke, and Rosette S'Jegers. 2001. The organizational context of teleworking implementation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 68, 3, 275--291.

[37]

Omer F. Iscan and Atilhan Naktiyok. 2005. Attitudes towards Telecommuting: The Turkish Case. J Inf Technol 20, 1, 52--63.

[38]

Seth Kaplan, Lia Engelsted, Xue Lei, and Karla Lockwood. 2018. Unpackaging Manager Mistrust in Allowing Telework: Comparing and Integrating Theoretical Perspectives. J Bus Psychol 33, 3, 365--382.

[39]

U. Konradt, R. Schmook, A. Wilm, and G. Hertel. 2000. Health circles for teleworkers: selective results on stress, strain and coping styles. Health education research 15, 3, 327--338.

[40]

Ellen E. Kossek, Brenda A. Lautsch, and Susan C. Eaton. 2006. Telecommuting, control, and boundary management: Correlates of policy use and practice, job control, and work--family effectiveness. Journal of Vocational Behavior 68, 2, 347--367.

[41]

Nancy B. Kurland and Diane E. Bailey. 1999. The advantages and challenges of working here, there anywhere, and anytime. Organizational Dynamics 28, 2, 53--68.

[42]

Nancy B. Kurland and Diane E. Bailey. 1999. The advantages and challenges of working here, there anywhere, and anytime. Organizational Dynamics 28, 2, 53--68.

[43]

Laurent M. Lapierre and Tammy D. Allen. 2006. Work-supportive family, family-supportive supervision, use of organizational benefits, and problem-focused coping: implications for work-family conflict and employee well-being. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology 11, 2, 169--181.

[44]

Sven Laumer, Daniel Beimborn, Christian Maier, and Christoph Weinert. 2013. Enterprise Content Management. Business & Information Systems Engineering 5, 6, 449--452.

[45]

Paul M. Leonardi, Jeffrey W. Treem, and Michele H. Jackson. 2010. The Connectivity Paradox: Using Technology to Both Decrease and Increase Perceptions of Distance in Distributed Work Arrangements. Journal of Applied Communication Research 38, 1, 85--105.

[46]

Carl P. Maertz and Rodger W. Griffeth. 2004. Eight Motivational Forces and Voluntary Turnover: A Theoretical Synthesis with Implications for Research. Journal of Management 30, 5, 667--683.

[47]

Christian Maier, Sven Laumer, Damien Joseph, Jens Mattke, and Tim Weitzel. 2021. Turnback Intention: An Analysis of the Drivers of IT Professionals' Intention to Return to a Former Employer. Management Information Systems Quarterly forthcoming.

[48]

Christian Maier, Sven Laumer, Monideepa Tarafdar, Jens Mattke, Lea Reis, and Tim Weitzel. 2021. Challenge and hindrance IS use stressors and appraisals: Explaining contrarian associations in post-acceptance IS use behavior. Journal of the Association for Information Systems.

[49]

Christian Maier, Sven Laumer, Jason B. Thatcher, Sun Heshan, Christoph Weinert, and Tim Weitzel. 2020. Social Networking Site Use Resumption: A Model of Return Migration. Journal of the Association for Information Systems.

[50]

Christian Maier, Sven Laumer, Jakob Wirth, and Tim Weitzel. 2019. Technostress and the hierarchical levels of personality: a two-wave study with multiple data samples. Eur J Inf Syst 28, 5, 496--522.

[51]

Paula McDonald, Kerry Brown, and Lisa Bradley. 2005. Explanations for the provision utilisation gap in work-life policy. Women in Management Review 20, 1, 37--55.

[52]

Patricia L. Mokhtarian and Michael N. Bagley. 2000. Modeling employees' perceptions and proportional preferences of work locations: the regular workplace and telecommuting alternatives. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 34, 4, 223--242.

[53]

Patricia L. Mokhtarian, Ilan Salomon, and Sangho Choo. 2005. Measuring the Measurable: Why can't we Agree on the Number of Telecommuters in the U.S.? Quality & Quantity 39, 4, 423--452.

[54]

2019. Working from home: characteristics and outcomes of telework. International Journal of Manpower 40, 1, 87--101.

[55]

Emma S. Nordbäck, Karen K. Myers, and Robert D. McPhee. 2017. Workplace flexibility and communication flows: a structurational view. Journal of Applied Communication Research 45, 4, 397--412.

[56]

Caroline E. Oehlhorn, Christian Maier, Sven Laumer, and Tim Weitzel. 2020. Human resource management and its impact on strategic business-IT alignment: A literature review and avenues for future research. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems 29, 4, 101641.

[57]

N. L. Reinsch. 1997. Relationships Between Telecommuting Workers and Their Managers: An Exploratory Study. Journal of Business Communication 34, 4, 343--367.

[58]

Kevin W. Rockmann and Michael G. Pratt. 2015. Contagious Offsite Work and the Lonely Office: The Unintended Consequences of Distributed Work. Academy of Management Discoveries 1, 2, 150--164.

[59]

Lisa A. Schur, Mason Ameri, and Douglas Kruse. 2020. Telework After COVID: A "Silver Lining" for Workers with Disabilities? Journal of occupational rehabilitation 30, 4, 521--536.

[60]

Darren M. Scott, Ivy Dam, Antonio Páez, and Robert D. Wilton. 2012. Investigating the Effects of Social Influence on the Choice to Telework. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 44, 5, 1016--1031.

[61]

Mahmud A. Shareef, Yogesh K. Dwivedi, Sven Laumer, and Norm Archer. 2016. Citizens' Adoption Behavior of Mobile Government (mGov): A Cross-Cultural Study. Information Systems Management 33, 3, 268--283.

Digital Library

[62]

Patricia M. Sias, Hannah Pedersen, Erin B. Gallagher, and Irina Kopaneva. 2012. Workplace Friendship in the Electronically Connected Organization. Human Communication Research 38, 3, 253--279.

[63]

S. M. Siha and R. W. Monroe. 2006. Telecommuting's past and future: a literature review and research agenda. Business Process Management Journal 12, 4, 455--482.

[64]

Society for Human Resources Management. 2019. Employee Benefits 2019. Leave and Flexible Working (2019). Retrieved January 19, 2020 from https://www.shrm.org/hr-today/trends-and-forecasting/research-and-surveys/pages/benefits19.aspx.

[65]

Younghwan Song and Jia Gao. 2019. Does Telework Stress Employees Out? A Study on Working at Home and Subjective Well-Being for Wage/Salary Workers. Journal of Happiness Studies, 1--20.

[66]

Gregory K. Stephens and Bernadette Szajna. 1998. Perceptions and Expectations: Why People Choose a Telecommuting Work Style. International journal of electronic commerce 3, 1, 70--85.

Digital Library

[67]

Laurent Taskin and Flore Bridoux. 2010. Telework: a challenge to knowledge transfer in organizations. The International Journal of Human Resource Management 21, 13, 2503--2520.

[68]

Thompson S. H. Teo, Vivien K. G. Lim, and Sook H. Wai. 1998. An Empirical Study of Attitudes Towards Teleworking among Information Technology (IT) Personnel. International Journal of Information Management 18, 5, 329--343.

[69]

Jason B. Thatcher and Pamela L. Perrewe. 2002. An Empirical Examination of Individual Traits as Antecedents to Computer Anxiety and Computer Self-Efficacy. Management information systems : mis quarterly 26, 4, 381.

Digital Library

[70]

The Local. 2021. What you need to know about Germany's new working from home rules (2021). Retrieved February 10, 2021 from https://www.thelocal.de/20210120/what-you-need-to-know-about-germanys-new-home-office-ordinance.

[71]

Nick van der Meulen, Peter van Baalen, Eric van Heck, and Sipko Mülder. 2019. No teleworker is an island: The impact of temporal and spatial separation along with media use on knowledge sharing networks. J Inf Technol 34, 3, 243--262.

[72]

Tinne Vander Elst, Ronny Verhoogen, Maarten Sercu, Anja van den Broeck, Elfi Baillien, and Lode Godderis. 2017. Not Extent of Telecommuting, But Job Characteristics as Proximal Predictors of Work-Related Well-Being. Journal of occupational and environmental medicine 59, 10, e180-e186.

[73]

Jan Vom Brocke, Alexander Simons, Kai Riemer, Björn Niehaves, Ralf Plattfaut, and Anne Cleven. 2015. Standing on the Shoulders of Giants: Challenges and Recommendations of Literature Search in Information Systems Research. Communications of the Association for Information Systems 37.

[74]

Lena Waizenegger, Brad McKenna, Wenjie Cai, and Taino Bendz. 2020. An affordance perspective of team collaboration and enforced working from home during COVID-19. Eur J Inf Syst 29, 4, 429--442.

[75]

Christoph Weinert, Christian Maier, and Sven Laumer. 2015. Why are teleworkers stressed? An empirical analysis of the causes of telework-enabled stress. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Wirtschaftsinformatik, Osnabrück.

[76]

Christoph Weinert, Christian Maier, Sven Laumer, and Tim Weitzel. 2014. Does teleworking negatively influence IT professionals? In the 52nd ACM conference, 139--147.

Digital Library

[77]

Robert D. Wilton, Antonio Páez, and Darren M. Scott. 2011. Why do you care what other people think? A qualitative investigation of social influence and telecommuting. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 45, 4, 269--282.

[78]

Thomas Wirtky, Sven Laumer, Andreas Eckhardt, and Tim Weitzel. 2016. On the Untapped Value of e-HRM - A Literature Review. Communications of the Association for Information Systems 38, 20--83.

[79]

Chee S. Yap and Helen Tng. 1990. Factors associated with attitudes towards telecommuting. Information & Management 19, 4, 227--235.

Cited By

Silva DAraújo MFrancisco IPinto EAlbuquerque C(2024)Os Efeitos do Teletrabalho nas Organizações: Equilíbrio Entre a Vida Pessoal e ProfissionalGestão.org10.51359/1679-1827.2024.26226422:1Online publication date: 25-Jul-2024
https://doi.org/10.51359/1679-1827.2024.262264
Kim JFay D(2024)A Taste of Telework: Effects of Remote Work Arrangements During and After the Global PandemicPublic Personnel Management10.1177/00910260241271322Online publication date: 27-Aug-2024
https://doi.org/10.1177/00910260241271322
Zahmat Doost EZhang W(2024)The Impact of Different Interruptions on Perceived Stress: Developing a Multimodal Measurement for Early DetectionInternational Journal of Human–Computer Interaction10.1080/10447318.2024.2356403(1-21)Online publication date: 24-May-2024
https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2024.2356403
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Why do People (not) Want to Work from Home? An Individual-focused Literature Review on Telework
1. Social and professional topics
  1. Professional topics
    1. Management of computing and information systems
      1. Project and people management

Recommendations

Telework: an innovation where nobody is getting on the bandwagon?
Special double issue: diffusion of technological innovation

Despite predictions over the years that many employees would soon be teleworking from their homes, neither employees in general nor information systems (IS) professionals in particular, whose work is especially appropriate for telework, have begun ...
Telework: Enablers and Moderators when Assessing Organisational Fit
SAICSIT '14: Proceedings of the Southern African Institute for Computer Scientist and Information Technologists Annual Conference 2014 on SAICSIT 2014 Empowered by Technology

Home-based work, also referred to as distance work, virtual work or Telework, is enabled by information and communication technologies, and has been in existence for over 35 years. Even with significant technological improvements, telework has not ...
Telework: when your job is on the line
CHI EA '97: CHI '97 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems

This panel will discuss teleworking experiences. Our panel consists of several types of teleworkers, a manager of a teleworker and a researcher who studied teleworking. The panel will address questions concerning the value of telework, the factors that ...

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences

SIGMIS-CPR '21: Proceedings of the 2021 Computers and People Research Conference

June 2021

104 pages

ISBN:9781450384063

DOI:10.1145/3458026

General Chairs:
Sven Laumer
Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Germany
,
Damien Joseph
Nanyang Technological University, Singapore
,
Program Chairs:
Daniel Beimborn
University of Bamberg, Germany
,
Leigh Ellen Potter
Griffith University, Australia
,
Jeria Quesenberry
Carnegie Mellon University, USA

Copyright © 2021 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

SIGMIS: ACM Special Interest Group on Management Information Systems

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 29 June 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article

Conference

SIGMIS-CPR '21

Sponsor:

SIGMIS

SIGMIS-CPR '21: 2021 Computers and People Research Conference

June 30, 2021

Virtual Event, Germany

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 300 of 480 submissions, 63%

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

11
Total Citations
View Citations
1,198
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)238
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)21

Reflects downloads up to 19 Sep 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Silva DAraújo MFrancisco IPinto EAlbuquerque C(2024)Os Efeitos do Teletrabalho nas Organizações: Equilíbrio Entre a Vida Pessoal e ProfissionalGestão.org10.51359/1679-1827.2024.26226422:1Online publication date: 25-Jul-2024
https://doi.org/10.51359/1679-1827.2024.262264
Kim JFay D(2024)A Taste of Telework: Effects of Remote Work Arrangements During and After the Global PandemicPublic Personnel Management10.1177/00910260241271322Online publication date: 27-Aug-2024
https://doi.org/10.1177/00910260241271322
Zahmat Doost EZhang W(2024)The Impact of Different Interruptions on Perceived Stress: Developing a Multimodal Measurement for Early DetectionInternational Journal of Human–Computer Interaction10.1080/10447318.2024.2356403(1-21)Online publication date: 24-May-2024
https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2024.2356403
Böhnen CKuhnimhof T(2024)Working from home and commuter travel in germany – panel data analysis of long-term effectsTransportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice10.1016/j.tra.2024.104257190(104257)Online publication date: Dec-2024
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2024.104257
Wong ACheung F(2024)The impacts of work-from-home goal alignment on employee well-being and turnover intentions: the mediating role of work engagementAsian Journal of Business Ethics10.1007/s13520-024-00198-513:S1(87-107)Online publication date: 22-Apr-2024
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13520-024-00198-5
Godefroid MBorghoff VPlattfaut RNiehaves B(2024)Teleworking antecedents: an exploration into availability bias as an impedimentInformation Systems and e-Business Management10.1007/s10257-023-00652-0Online publication date: 17-Jan-2024
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10257-023-00652-0
Augstein MNeumayr TSchönböck JKovacs C(2023)Remote Persons Are Closer Than They Appear: Home, Team and a LockdownProceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544548.3580989(1-25)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3544548.3580989
Neo LTan JChew T(2022)The Influence of COVID-19 on Women’s Perceptions of Work-Family Conflict in SingaporeSocial Sciences10.3390/socsci1102007311:2(73)Online publication date: 14-Feb-2022
https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci11020073
Hostettler Macias LRavalet ERérat P(2022)Potential rebound effects of teleworking on residential and daily mobilityGeography Compass10.1111/gec3.1265716:9Online publication date: 25-Aug-2022
https://doi.org/10.1111/gec3.12657
Van Slyke CClary GTazkarji M(2022)Distress, Eustress, and Continuance Intentions for Distance LearnersJournal of Computer Information Systems10.1080/08874417.2022.203747763:1(149-161)Online publication date: 28-Feb-2022
https://doi.org/10.1080/08874417.2022.2037477
Show More Cited By

View Options

Get Access

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Table of Contents