Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3453892.3461319acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagespetraConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

An Exploration of Machine Learning Methods for Predicting Post-stroke Aphasia Recovery

Published: 29 June 2021 Publication History

Abstract

Predicting the potential recovery outcome of post-stroke aphasia remains a challenging task. Our previous work[10] applied machine learning algorithms to predict participant response to therapy using a complex set of brain and behavioral data in individuals with post-stroke aphasia. The present work explores the additional predictive value of cognitive composite scores (CS), which measure visuo-spatial processing and verbal working memory; high-dimensional resting-state (RS) functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data, which measures the functional connectivity between brain regions; and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) data, which provides information related to microstructural integrity via fractional anisotropy (FA) values. We first perform feature selection on the RS data as it has about 5 times more features than than all the other feature-sets combined. Next, we append these RS features, CS scores, and FA values to our existing data set. Finally, we train Support Vector Machine (SVM) and Random Forest (RF) classifiers for various combinations of feature-sets and compare their performance in terms of accuracy, F1-score, sensitivity and selectivity. Results show that combinations of feature-sets outperform most individual feature-sets and whereas each feature-set is present among the top 20 combinations, many of them contain RS.

References

[1]
Joy Adamson, Andy Beswick, and Shah Ebrahim. 2004. Is stroke the most common cause of disability?Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases 13, 4 (2004), 171–177.
[2]
Oscar M Aguilar, Sheila J Kerry, Yean-Hoon Ong, Martina F Callaghan, Jennifer Crinion, Zoe Victoria Joan Woodhead, Cathy J Price, Alexander P Leff, and Thomas MH Hope. 2018. Lesion-site-dependent responses to therapy after aphasic stroke. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry 89, 12(2018), 1352–1354.
[3]
A Baddeley, H Emslie, and I Nimmo-Smith. 1994. Doors and people: a test of visual and verbal recall and recognition, Thames Valley Test Company, Bury St. Edmunds, UK (1994).
[4]
Elena Barbieri, Jennifer Mack, Brianne Chiappetta, Eduardo Europa, and Cynthia K Thompson. 2019. Recovery of offline and online sentence processing in aphasia: Language and domain-general network neuroplasticity. Cortex 120(2019), 394–418.
[5]
Max Bramer. 2007. Principles of data mining. Vol. 180. Springer.
[6]
Katie Daniel, Charles DA Wolfe, Markus A Busch, and Christopher McKevitt. 2009. What are the social consequences of stroke for working-aged adults? A systematic review. Stroke 40, 6 (2009), e431–e440.
[7]
Natalie Gilmore, Erin L Meier, Jeffrey P Johnson, and Swathi Kiran. 2018. Typicality-based semantic treatment for anomia results in multiple levels of generalisation. Neuropsychological rehabilitation(2018), 1–27.
[8]
Krzysztof Gorgolewski, Christopher D Burns, Cindee Madison, Dav Clark, Yaroslav O Halchenko, Michael L Waskom, and Satrajit S Ghosh. 2011. Nipype: a flexible, lightweight and extensible neuroimaging data processing framework in python. Frontiers in neuroinformatics 5 (2011), 13.
[9]
KJ Gorgolewski, O Esteban, C Burns, E Zeigler, B Pinsard, C Madison, 2017. Nipype: a flexible, lightweight and extensible neuroimaging data processing framework in Python. 0.13. 1. Genève: Zenodo (2017).
[10]
Yiwen Gu, Murtadha Bahrani, Anne Billot, Sha Lai, Emily J. Braun, Maria Varkanitsa, Julia Bighetto, Brenda Rapp, Todd B. Parrish, David Caplan, Cynthia K. Thompson, Swathi Kiran, and Margrit Betke. 2020. A Machine Learning Approach for Predicting Post-Stroke Aphasia Recovery: A Pilot Study. In Proceedings of the 13th ACM International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments(Corfu, Greece) (PETRA ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 22, 9 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3389189.3389204
[11]
Ajay D Halai, Anna M Woollams, and Matthew A Lambon Ralph. 2018. Predicting the pattern and severity of chronic post-stroke language deficits from functionally-partitioned structural lesions. NeuroImage: Clinical 19(2018), 1–13.
[12]
Thomas MH Hope, Alex P Leff, and Cathy J Price. 2018. Predicting language outcomes after stroke: Is structural disconnection a useful predictor?NeuroImage: Clinical 19(2018), 22–29.
[13]
Thomas MH Hope, Mohamed L Seghier, Alex P Leff, and Cathy J Price. 2013. Predicting outcome and recovery after stroke with lesions extracted from MRI images. NeuroImage: clinical 2(2013), 424–433.
[14]
Jeffrey P Johnson, Erin L Meier, Yue Pan, and Swathi Kiran. 2019. Treatment-related changes in neural activation vary according to treatment response and extent of spared tissue in patients with chronic aphasia. Cortex 121(2019), 147–168.
[15]
M-L Kauhanen, Juha Tapani Korpelainen, Pauliina Hiltunen, R Määttä, Helinä Mononen, E Brusin, Kyösti A Sotaniemi, and VV Myllylä. 2000. Aphasia, depression, and non-verbal cognitive impairment in ischaemic stroke. Cerebrovascular Diseases 10, 6 (2000), 455–461.
[16]
Andrew Kertesz. 2007. WAB-R: Western aphasia battery-revised. PsychCorp.
[17]
Roy PC Kessels, Martine JE Van Zandvoort, Albert Postma, L Jaap Kappelle, and Edward HF De Haan. 2000. The Corsi block-tapping task: standardization and normative data. Applied neuropsychology 7, 4 (2000), 252–258.
[18]
Sigfus Kristinsson, Wanfang Zhang, Chris Rorden, Roger Newman-Norlund, Alexandra Basilakos, Leonardo Bonilha, Grigori Yourganov, Feifei Xiao, Argye Hillis, and Julius Fridriksson. 2020. Machine learning-based multimodal prediction of language outcomes in chronic aphasia. Human Brain Mapping (2020).
[19]
Durjoy Lahiri, Souvik Dubey, Alfredo Ardila, Debasish Sanyal, and Biman Kanti Ray. 2020. Determinants of aphasia recovery: Exploratory decision tree analysis. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience(2020), 1–8.
[20]
Jonathan MC Lam and Walter P Wodchis. 2010. The relationship of 60 disease diagnoses and 15 conditions to preference-based health-related quality of life in Ontario hospital-based long-term care residents. Medical care (2010), 380–387.
[21]
Ronald M Lazar, Allison E Speizer, Joanne R Festa, John W Krakauer, and Randolph S Marshall. 2008. Variability in language recovery after first-time stroke. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry 79, 5(2008), 530–534.
[22]
Mary Jo Nissen and Peter Bullemer. 1987. Attentional requirements of learning: Evidence from performance measures. Cognitive psychology 19, 1 (1987), 1–32.
[23]
F. Pedregosa, G. Varoquaux, A. Gramfort, V. Michel, B. Thirion, O. Grisel, M. Blondel, P. Prettenhofer, R. Weiss, V. Dubourg, J. Vanderplas, A. Passos, D. Cournapeau, M. Brucher, M. Perrot, and E. Duchesnay. 2011. Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python. Journal of Machine Learning Research 12 (2011), 2825–2830.
[24]
Dorian Pustina, Harry Branch Coslett, Lyle Ungar, Olufunsho K Faseyitan, John D Medaglia, Brian Avants, and Myrna F Schwartz. 2017. Enhanced estimations of post-stroke aphasia severity using stacked multimodal predictions. Human brain mapping 38, 11 (2017), 5603–5615.
[25]
Dorothee Saur, Olaf Ronneberger, Dorothee Kümmerer, Irina Mader, Cornelius Weiller, and Stefan Klöppel. 2010. Early functional magnetic resonance imaging activations predict language outcome after stroke. Brain 133, 4 (2010), 1252–1264.
[26]
Shai Shalev-Shwartz and Shai Ben-David. 2014. Understanding Machine Learning: From Theory to Algorithms. Cambridge University Press, USA.
[27]
Joshua Sarfaty Siegel, Lenny E Ramsey, Abraham Z Snyder, Nicholas V Metcalf, Ravi V Chacko, Kilian Weinberger, Antonello Baldassarre, Carl D Hacker, Gordon L Shulman, and Maurizio Corbetta. 2016. Disruptions of network connectivity predict impairment in multiple behavioral domains after stroke. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 113, 30(2016), E4367–E4376.
[28]
Salim S Virani, Alvaro Alonso, Emelia J Benjamin, Marcio S Bittencourt, Clifton W Callaway, April P Carson, Alanna M Chamberlain, Alexander R Chang, Susan Cheng, Francesca N Delling, 2020. Heart disease and stroke statistics—2020 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 141, 9 (2020), e139–e596.
[29]
David Wechsler. 1955. Wechsler adult intelligence scale–. (1955).
[30]
Susan Whitfield-Gabrieli and Alfonso Nieto-Castanon. 2012. Conn: a functional connectivity toolbox for correlated and anticorrelated brain networks. Brain connectivity 2, 3 (2012), 125–141.
[31]
Robert W Wiley and Brenda Rapp. 2019. Statistical analysis in Small-N Designs: using linear mixed-effects modeling for evaluating intervention effectiveness. Aphasiology 33, 1 (2019), 1–30.
[32]
Grigori Yourganov, Julius Fridriksson, Chris Rorden, Ezequiel Gleichgerrcht, and Leonardo Bonilha. 2016. Multivariate connectome-based symptom mapping in post-stroke patients: networks supporting language and speech. Journal of Neuroscience 36, 25 (2016), 6668–6679.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Transparently Predicting Therapy Compliance of Young Adults Following Ischemic StrokeExplainable Artificial Intelligence10.1007/978-3-031-63803-9_2(24-41)Online publication date: 10-Jul-2024
  • (2024)Machine learning‐based radiomics in neurodegenerative and cerebrovascular diseaseMedComm10.1002/mco2.7785:11Online publication date: 28-Oct-2024
  • (2023)Fusion Approaches to Predict Post-stroke Aphasia Severity from Multimodal Neuroimaging Data2023 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision Workshops (ICCVW)10.1109/ICCVW60793.2023.00279(2636-2645)Online publication date: 2-Oct-2023
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
PETRA '21: Proceedings of the 14th PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments Conference
June 2021
593 pages
ISBN:9781450387927
DOI:10.1145/3453892
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 29 June 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Aphasia
  2. Feature Selection
  3. Machine Learning
  4. Recovery
  5. Stroke

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Funding Sources

  • NIH/NIDCD Clinical Research Center Grant

Conference

PETRA '21

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)34
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3
Reflects downloads up to 21 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Transparently Predicting Therapy Compliance of Young Adults Following Ischemic StrokeExplainable Artificial Intelligence10.1007/978-3-031-63803-9_2(24-41)Online publication date: 10-Jul-2024
  • (2024)Machine learning‐based radiomics in neurodegenerative and cerebrovascular diseaseMedComm10.1002/mco2.7785:11Online publication date: 28-Oct-2024
  • (2023)Fusion Approaches to Predict Post-stroke Aphasia Severity from Multimodal Neuroimaging Data2023 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision Workshops (ICCVW)10.1109/ICCVW60793.2023.00279(2636-2645)Online publication date: 2-Oct-2023
  • (2022)Understanding and Predicting Cognitive Improvement of Young Adults in Ischemic Stroke Rehabilitation TherapyFrontiers in Neurology10.3389/fneur.2022.88647713Online publication date: 13-Jul-2022
  • (2022)Multimodal Neural and Behavioral Data Predict Response to Rehabilitation in Chronic Poststroke AphasiaStroke10.1161/STROKEAHA.121.03674953:5(1606-1614)Online publication date: May-2022

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media