Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3451421.3451464acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesisicdmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Blind CT Image Quality Assessment Model Based on CT Image Statistics

Published: 27 August 2021 Publication History

Abstract

Image quality assessment is widely used in many image processing tasks, which can help researchers adjust image processing algorithms, design imaging systems, and evaluate image processing systems. Generally, CT image quality assessment can be categorized into task-specific and general image quality evaluation. Task-specific image quality assessment evaluates the performance of the imaging system or the detectability of the tumor. These IQA index, for example, are modulation transfer function (MTF), Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR), observer model, etc. General image quality assessment measures the general reconstruction image quality under different reconstruction algorithms. SSIM (Structural Similarity), Mean Squared Error (MSE), etc. are the traditional general image quality assessment indexes widely used in nowadays CT image quality assessment. The drawback of these indexes is the demand for reference images, which is not practical in the real CT system. In this paper, we design a CT image dataset, and by using this dataset, and we propose a blind image quality assessment (BIQA) model based on CT image statistics, which can be employed to measure the algorithms under no reference image situation. Different from other image datasets, we recruited no-converged images of the reconstruction process in designing datasets, which enables our BIQA model to evaluate non-converged images during the iterations. Hence, the BIQA model can be embedded in the reconstruction process to monitor reconstructed image quality during iterations.

References

[1]
W. F. Xue, L. Zhang, X. Q. Mou, and A. C. Bovik, “Gradient Magnitude Similarity Deviation: A Highly Efficient Perceptual Image Quality Index,” IEEE Transactions on Image Processing,vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 684-695, Feb, 2014.
[2]
L. Zhang, L. Zhang, X. Q. Mou, and D. Zhang, “FSIM: A Feature Similarity Index for Image Quality Assessment,” IEEE Transactions on Image Processing,vol. 20, no. 8, pp. 2378-2386, Aug, 2011.
[3]
Z. Wang, A. C. Bovik, H. R. Sheikh, and E. P. Simoncelli, “Image quality assessment: From error visibility to structural similarity,” IEEE Transactions on Image Processing,vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 600-612, Apr, 2004.
[4]
W. F. Xue, X. Q. Mou, L. Zhang, A. C. Bovik, and X. C. Feng, “Blind Image Quality Assessment Using Joint Statistics of Gradient Magnitude and Laplacian Features,” IEEE Transactions on Image Processing,vol. 23, no. 11, pp. 4850-4862, Nov, 2014.
[5]
A. Mittal, A. K. Moorthy, and A. C. Bovik, “No-Reference Image Quality Assessment in the Spatial Domain,” IEEE Transactions on Image Processing A Publication of the IEEE Signal Processing Society,vol. 21, no. 12, pp. 4695, 2012.
[6]
I.-T. R. BT, 1082-1. Studies toward the unification of picture assessment methodology, Technical report, International Telecommunication Union, 1990.
[7]
S. Winkler, "On the properties of subjective ratings in video quality experiments." pp. 139-144.
[8]
R. K. Mantiuk, A. Tomaszewska, and R. Mantiuk, "Comparison of four subjective methods for image quality assessment." pp. 2478-2491

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
ISICDM 2020: The Fourth International Symposium on Image Computing and Digital Medicine
December 2020
239 pages
ISBN:9781450389686
DOI:10.1145/3451421
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 27 August 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. CT image dataset
  2. CT image statistics
  3. blind image quality assessment

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Conference

ISICDM 2020

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 44
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)11
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 20 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media