research-article

A Comparison of Segmentation Methods in Gastric Histopathology Images

Authors:

Xiaoyan LiAuthors Info & Claims

ISICDM 2020: The Fourth International Symposium on Image Computing and Digital Medicine

Pages 75 - 79

https://doi.org/10.1145/3451421.3451438

Published: 27 August 2021 Publication History

Abstract

Gastric Cancer is one of the five most common types of malignant tumors among men and women worldwide and it is very important to make precise diagnosis for the early stage of gastric cancer. In this paper, we compare eight methods in Gastric Histopathology Image Segmentation (GHIS) including most classical and state-of-the-art ones. For estimating the segmentation result, we use seven evaluation indexes. Our study carries out that deep learning method shows the effectiveness in GHIS and the DenseCRF using the U-Net feature map performs best overall.

References

[1]

V. Badrinarayanan, A. Kendall, and R. Cipolla. 2017. Segnet: A Deep Convolutional Encoder-decoder Architecture for Image Segmentation. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 39, 12(2017), 2481–2495.

[2]

T. Chan and L. Vese. 1999. An active contour model without edges. In International Conference on Scale-Space Theories in Computer Vision. 141–151.

[3]

L. Chen, G. Papandreou, I. Kokkinos, K. Murphy, and A.Yuille. 2018. DeepLab: Semantic Image Segmentation with Deep Convolutional Nets, Atrous Convolution, and Fully Connected CRFs. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 40, 4 (2018), 834–848.

[4]

E. Garcia, R. Hermoza, C. Castanon, L. Cano, M. Castillo, and C. Castanñeda. 2017. Automatic Lymphocyte Detection on Gastric Cancer IHC Images Using Deep Learning. In Proc. of CBMS 2017. 200–204.

[5]

J. Hartigan and M.Wong. 1979. Algorithm AS 136: A -means Clustering Algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C (Applied Statistics) 28, 1 (1979), 100–108.

[6]

P. Krähenbühl and V. Koltun. 2011. Efficient inference in fully connected crfs with gaussian edge potentials. In Advances in neural information processing systems. 109–117.

[7]

S. Li. 1994. Markov Random Field Models in Computer Vision. In Proc. of ECCV 1994. 361–370.

[8]

J. Long, E. Shelhamer, and T. Darrell. 2015. Fully Convolutional Networks for Semantic Segmentation. In Proc. of ICPR 2015. 3431–3440.

[9]

S. Osher, R. Fedkiw, and K. Piechor. 2004. Level set methods and dynamic implicit surfaces. Appl. Mech. Rev. 57, 3 (2004), B15–B15.

[10]

N. Otsu. 1979. A Threshold Selection Method from Gray-level Histograms. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 9, 1 (1979), 62–66.

[11]

Ronneberger, P. Fischer, and T. Brox. 2015. U-net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation. In Proc. of MICCAI 2015. 234–241.

[12]

B. Stewart and C. Wild. 2014. World Cancer Report 2014. World Health Organization, UN).

[13]

Tsai, A. Yezzi, W.Wells, C. Tempany, D. Tucker, A. Fan,W. Grimson, and A. Willsky. 2003. A Shape-based Approach to the Segmentation of Medical Imagery Using Level Sets. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 22, 2 (2003), 137–154.

[14]

L. Vincent and P. Soille. 1991.Watersheds in Digital Spaces: An Efficient Algorithm based on Immersion Simulations. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 6 (1991), 583–598.

Digital Library

[15]

Yezzi, S. Kichenassamy, A. Kumar, P. Olver, and A. Tannenbaum. 1997. A Geometric Snake Model for Segmentation of Medical Imagery. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 16, 2 (1997), 199–209.

[16]

Z. Zhang, J. Gao, G. Lv, and D. Zhao. 2018. Pathological Image Classification of Gastric Cancer based on Depth Learning. Computer Science 45, 11A (2018), 263–268.

Cited By

Jing YLi CDu TJiang TSun HYang JShi LGao MGrzegorzek MLi X(2023)A comprehensive survey of intestine histopathological image analysis using machine vision approachesComputers in Biology and Medicine10.1016/j.compbiomed.2023.107388165(107388)Online publication date: Oct-2023
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2023.107388
Du TZhao H(2022)Texture Analysis of Enhanced MRI and Pathological Slides Predicts EGFR Mutation Status in Breast CancerBioMed Research International10.1155/2022/13766592022(1-15)Online publication date: 26-May-2022
https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/1376659

Recommendations

A State-of-the-art Review for Gastric Histopathology Feature Extraction Methods
ISICDM 2020: The Fourth International Symposium on Image Computing and Digital Medicine

Gastric cancer is the fourth most common cancer in the world and the second most common cause of cancer-related deaths. Accurate diagnosis of gastric cancer is very important. In recent years, with the development of computer-aided diagnosis system, ...
The clinical value of dual-energy CT imaging in preoperative evaluation of pathological types of gastric cancer
BACKGROUND:
Gastric cancer (GC) is the fifth most common cancer worldwide and the third leading cause of cancer death. Due to the low rate of early diagnosis, most patients are already in the advanced stage and lose the chance ...
Cluster-Induced Mask Transformers for Effective Opportunistic Gastric Cancer Screening on Non-contrast CT Scans
Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention – MICCAI 2023
Abstract
Gastric cancer is the third leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide, but no guideline-recommended screening test exists. Existing methods can be invasive, expensive, and lack sensitivity to identify early-stage gastric cancer. In this ...

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences

ISICDM 2020: The Fourth International Symposium on Image Computing and Digital Medicine

December 2020

239 pages

ISBN:9781450389686

DOI:10.1145/3451421

Copyright © 2020 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 27 August 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article
Research
Refereed limited

Conference

ISICDM 2020

ISICDM 2020: The Fourth International Symposium on Image Computing and Digital Medicine

December 5 - 7, 2020

Shenyang, China

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

2
Total Citations
View Citations
29
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)4
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

Reflects downloads up to 18 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Jing YLi CDu TJiang TSun HYang JShi LGao MGrzegorzek MLi X(2023)A comprehensive survey of intestine histopathological image analysis using machine vision approachesComputers in Biology and Medicine10.1016/j.compbiomed.2023.107388165(107388)Online publication date: Oct-2023
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2023.107388
Du TZhao H(2022)Texture Analysis of Enhanced MRI and Pathological Slides Predicts EGFR Mutation Status in Breast CancerBioMed Research International10.1155/2022/13766592022(1-15)Online publication date: 26-May-2022
https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/1376659

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Table of Contents