Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3447548.3467302acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageskddConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Public Access

Graph Infomax Adversarial Learning for Treatment Effect Estimation with Networked Observational Data

Published: 14 August 2021 Publication History

Abstract

Treatment effect estimation from observational data is a critical research topic across many domains. The foremost challenge in treatment effect estimation is how to capture hidden confounders. Recently, the growing availability of networked observational data offers a new opportunity to deal with the issue of hidden confounders. Unlike networked data in traditional graph learning tasks, such as node classification and link detection, the networked data under the causal inference problem has its particularity, i.e., imbalanced network structure. In this paper, we propose a Graph Infomax Adversarial Learning (GIAL) model for treatment effect estimation, which makes full use of the network structure to capture more information by recognizing the imbalance in network structure. We evaluate the performance of our GIAL model on two benchmark datasets, and the results demonstrate superiority over the state-of-the-art methods.

Supplementary Material

MP4 File (graph_infomax_adversarial_learning_for-zhixuan_chu-stephen_rathbun-38957876-nlhW.mp4)
Treatment effect estimation from observational data is a critical research topic across many domains. The foremost challenge in treatment effect estimation is how to capture hidden confounders. Recently, the growing availability of networked observational data offers a new opportunity to deal with the issue of hidden confounders. Unlike networked data in traditional graph learning tasks, such as node classification and link detection, the networked data under the causal inference problem has its particularity, i.e., imbalanced network structure. In this paper, we propose a Graph Infomax Adversarial Learning (GIAL) model for treatment effect estimation, which makes full use of the network structure to capture more information by recognizing the imbalance in network structure. We evaluate the performance of our GIAL model on two benchmark datasets, and the results demonstrate superiority over the state-of-the-art methods.

References

[1]
Ahmed M Alaa and Mihaela van der Schaar. 2017. Bayesian inference of individualized treatment effects using multi-task gaussian processes. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. 3424--3432.
[2]
Mohamed Ishmael Belghazi, Aristide Baratin, Sai Rajeshwar, Sherjil Ozair, Yoshua Bengio, Aaron Courville, and Devon Hjelm. 2018. Mutual information neural estimation. In International Conference on Machine Learning. 531--540.
[3]
Hugh A Chipman, Edward I George, and Robert E McCulloch. 2010. BART: Bayesian additive regression trees. The Annals of Applied Statistics, Vol. 4, 1 (2010), 266--298.
[4]
Zhixuan Chu, Stephen L Rathbun, and Sheng Li. 2020. Matching in Selective and Balanced Representation Space for Treatment Effects Estimation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2009.06828 (2020).
[5]
Ruocheng Guo, Jundong Li, Yichuan Li, K Selcc uk Candan, Adrienne Raglin, and Huan Liu. 2020. IGNITE: A Minimax Game Toward Learning Individual Treatment Effects from Networked Observational Data. IJCAI.
[6]
Ruocheng Guo, Jundong Li, and Huan Liu. 2019. Learning individual treatment effects from networked observational data. arXiv preprint arXiv:1906.03485 (2019).
[7]
Kaiming He, Xiangyu Zhang, Shaoqing Ren, and Jian Sun. 2015. Delving deep into rectifiers: Surpassing human-level performance on imagenet classification. In Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision. 1026--1034.
[8]
Jennifer L Hill. 2011. Bayesian nonparametric modeling for causal inference. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, Vol. 20, 1 (2011), 217--240.
[9]
R Devon Hjelm, Alex Fedorov, Samuel Lavoie-Marchildon, Karan Grewal, Phil Bachman, Adam Trischler, and Yoshua Bengio. 2018. Learning deep representations by mutual information estimation and maximization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1808.06670 (2018).
[10]
Guido W Imbens and Donald B Rubin. 2015. Causal inference in statistics, social, and biomedical sciences. Cambridge University Press.
[11]
Guido W Imbens and Jeffrey M Wooldridge. 2009. Recent developments in the econometrics of program evaluation. Journal of economic literature, Vol. 47, 1 (2009), 5--86.
[12]
Xiaodong Jiang, Pengsheng Ji, and Sheng Li. 2019. CensNet: Convolution with Edge-Node Switching in Graph Neural Networks. In International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 2656--2662.
[13]
Diederik P Kingma and Jimmy Ba. 2014. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6980 (2014).
[14]
Thomas N Kipf and Max Welling. 2016. Semi-supervised classification with graph convolutional networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1609.02907 (2016).
[15]
Sheng Li and Yun Fu. 2017. Matching on balanced nonlinear representations for treatment effects estimation. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. 929--939.
[16]
Sheng Li, Nikos Vlassis, Jaya Kawale, and Yun Fu. 2016. Matching via Dimensionality Reduction for Estimation of Treatment Effects in Digital Marketing Campaigns. In International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 3768--3774.
[17]
Christos Louizos, Uri Shalit, Joris M Mooij, David Sontag, Richard Zemel, and Max Welling. 2017. Causal effect inference with deep latent-variable models. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. 6446--6456.
[18]
Donald B Rubin. 1974. Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies. Journal of educational Psychology, Vol. 66, 5 (1974), 688.
[19]
Uri Shalit, Fredrik D Johansson, and David Sontag. 2017. Estimating individual treatment effect: generalization bounds and algorithms. In Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Machine Learning-Volume 70. 3076--3085.
[20]
Victor Veitch, Yixin Wang, and David Blei. 2019. Using embeddings to correct for unobserved confounding in networks. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. 13792--13802.
[21]
Petar Velivc ković, Guillem Cucurull, Arantxa Casanova, Adriana Romero, Pietro Lio, and Yoshua Bengio. 2017. Graph attention networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1710.10903 (2017).
[22]
Petar Velickovic, William Fedus, William L Hamilton, Pietro Liò, Yoshua Bengio, and R Devon Hjelm. 2019. Deep Graph Infomax. In ICLR (Poster).
[23]
Stefan Wager and Susan Athey. 2018. Estimation and inference of heterogeneous treatment effects using random forests. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc., Vol. 113, 523 (2018), 1228--1242.
[24]
Yixin Wang and David M Blei. 2019. The blessings of multiple causes. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc., Vol. 114, 528 (2019), 1574--1596.
[25]
Liuyi Yao, Zhixuan Chu, Sheng Li, Yaliang Li, Jing Gao, and Aidong Zhang. 2020. A Survey on Causal Inference. arXiv preprint arXiv:2002.02770 (2020).
[26]
Liuyi Yao, Sheng Li, Yaliang Li, Mengdi Huai, Jing Gao, and Aidong Zhang. 2018. Representation learning for treatment effect estimation from observational data. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. 2633--2643.
[27]
Liuyi Yao, Sheng Li, Yaliang Li, Hongfei Xue, Jing Gao, and Aidong Zhang. 2019. On the estimation of treatment effect with text covariates. In Proceedings of the 28th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 4106--4113.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Learning Individual Treatment Effects under Heterogeneous Interference in NetworksACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data10.1145/367376118:8(1-21)Online publication date: 16-Aug-2024
  • (2024)Graph Neural Networks for Individual Treatment Effect EstimationIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2024.343766512(106884-106894)Online publication date: 2024
  • (2024)Uplift Modeling Under Limited SupervisionMachine Learning and Knowledge Discovery in Databases. Research Track10.1007/978-3-031-70365-2_8(127-144)Online publication date: 22-Aug-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Graph Infomax Adversarial Learning for Treatment Effect Estimation with Networked Observational Data

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Conferences
      KDD '21: Proceedings of the 27th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining
      August 2021
      4259 pages
      ISBN:9781450383325
      DOI:10.1145/3447548
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Sponsors

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 14 August 2021

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. causal inference
      2. graph mining
      3. social network analysis

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article

      Funding Sources

      • U.S. Army Research Office

      Conference

      KDD '21
      Sponsor:

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate 1,133 of 8,635 submissions, 13%

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)187
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)31
      Reflects downloads up to 21 Nov 2024

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2024)Learning Individual Treatment Effects under Heterogeneous Interference in NetworksACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data10.1145/367376118:8(1-21)Online publication date: 16-Aug-2024
      • (2024)Graph Neural Networks for Individual Treatment Effect EstimationIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2024.343766512(106884-106894)Online publication date: 2024
      • (2024)Uplift Modeling Under Limited SupervisionMachine Learning and Knowledge Discovery in Databases. Research Track10.1007/978-3-031-70365-2_8(127-144)Online publication date: 22-Aug-2024
      • (2023)Modeling Interference for Individual Treatment Effect Estimation from Networked Observational DataACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data10.1145/362844918:3(1-21)Online publication date: 9-Dec-2023
      • (2023)CF-GODE: Continuous-Time Causal Inference for Multi-Agent Dynamical SystemsProceedings of the 29th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining10.1145/3580305.3599272(997-1009)Online publication date: 6-Aug-2023
      • (2023)Causal Effect Estimation on Hierarchical Spatial Graph DataProceedings of the 29th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining10.1145/3580305.3599269(2145-2154)Online publication date: 6-Aug-2023
      • (2023)Enhancing Asynchronous Time Series Forecasting with Contrastive Relational Inference2023 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining Workshops (ICDMW)10.1109/ICDMW60847.2023.00082(588-592)Online publication date: 4-Dec-2023
      • (2023)Continual Causal Inference with Incremental Observational Data2023 IEEE 39th International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE)10.1109/ICDE55515.2023.00263(3430-3439)Online publication date: Apr-2023
      • (2023)Estimating Treatment Effects Under Heterogeneous InterferenceMachine Learning and Knowledge Discovery in Databases: Research Track10.1007/978-3-031-43412-9_34(576-592)Online publication date: 18-Sep-2023
      • (2023)Causal Effect Estimation: Recent Progress, Challenges, and OpportunitiesMachine Learning for Causal Inference10.1007/978-3-031-35051-1_5(79-100)Online publication date: 9-Aug-2023
      • Show More Cited By

      View Options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Login options

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media