Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3441369.3441381acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdmipConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Accuracy Comparison between Learning Method and Signal Processing Method Using Iteration for Severely Blur Images

Published: 24 March 2021 Publication History

Abstract

Blurring is one of the most common types of image degradation. When the blurring function (PSF) is unknown and a degraded image is to be recovered, the conventional method requires the estimation of two unknowns, which are the PSF and its ideal image, from a single input image. Thus, the method of performing alternating a PSF estimation and an ideal image estimation processing has been successful. On the other hand, blind image restoration using AI has made remarkable progress in recent years, enabling clearer estimation. In this paper, we compare the conventional iterative method with the AI method, and aim to improve the performance of images containing large blurring, which was not expected in conventional test images.

References

[1]
L. Chen, F. Fang, T. Wang and G. Zhang, “Blind Image Deblurring With Local Maximum Gradient Prior”, IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition ( CVPR), pp. 1742-1750, 2019.
[2]
R. Teranishi, T. Goto and T. Nagata, “Improvement of Robustness Blind Image Restoration Method Using Failing Detection Process”, CBEES Digital Medicine and Image Processing ( DMIP), 2019.
[3]
X. Tao, H. Cao, X. Shen, J. Wang and J. Jia, “Scale-recurrent Network for Deep Image Debluring” IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition ( CVPR), pp. 8174-8182, 2018.
[4]
S. Nah, T. H. Kim, K. M. Lee, “Deep Multi-scale Convolutional Neural Network for Dynamic Scene Deblurring”, IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition ( CVPR), pp. 3883-3891, 2017.
[5]
X. Li and J. Jiaya, “Two-Phase Kernel Estimation for Robust Motion Deblurring”, European Conference on Computer vision ( ECCV), pp. 157-170, 2010.
[6]
D. Krishnan and R. Fergus, “Fast image deconvolution using hyper-Laplacian PSrior,” Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst., vol. 22, pp. 1033 – 1041, 2009.
[7]
S. J. Osher and E. Fatemi, “Nonlinear Total Variation Based Noise Removal Algorithms,” Physica D, Vol. 60, pp. 259-268, 1992.
[8]
C. R. Vogel and M. E. Oman, “Iterative Methods for Total Variation Denoising”, SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, Vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 227-238, 1996.
[9]
F. Malgouyres and F. Guichard, “Edge Direction Preserving Image Zooming: A Mathematical and Numerical Analysis”, SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, Vol. 39, No. 1, 2002.
[10]
H. A. Aly and E. Dubois, “Image Up-Sampling Using Total Variation Regularization with A New Observation Model”, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, Vol. 14, No. 10, pp. 1647-1659, 2005.
[11]
T. Goto, R. Komatsu and M. Sakurai, “Blocky Noise Reduction for JPEG Images Using Total Variation Minimization”, International Conference on Information, Communications and Signal Processing ( ICICS’09), pp. 1007–1011, 2009.
[12]
F. Alter, S. Durand and J. Froment, “Adapted Total Variation for Artifact Free Decompression of JPEG Images”, Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision, Vol. 23, No. 2, pp. 199-211, 2005.
[13]
H. Shen, E. Y. Lam, M. K. Ng and L. Zhang, “A Total Variation Regularization Based Super-Resolution Reconstruction Algorithm for Digital Video”, EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing, pp. 1–16, 2007.
[14]
A. Chambolle, “An Algorithm for Total Variation Minimization and Applications”, Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision, Vol. 20, No. 1, pp. 89–97, 2004.
[15]
S. J. Osher and L. I. Rudin, “Feature - Oriented Image Enhancement Using Shock Filters”, SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, Vol. 27, pp. 910-940, 1990.
[16]
S. Cho and S. Lee, “Fast Motion Deblurring”, ACM Transactions on Graphics ( SIGGRAPH), Vol. 28, No. 5, pp. 145:1–145:8, 2009.

Cited By

View all
  • (2022)A Reliable Image Quality Assessment Metric: Evaluation Using Camera ImpactsPattern Recognition and Image Analysis10.1134/S105466182203018X32:3(551-560)Online publication date: 1-Sep-2022
  • (2022)Image Quality Assessment Metric Fusing Traditional and Dempster-Shafer TheoryPattern Recognition, Computer Vision, and Image Processing. ICPR 2022 International Workshops and Challenges10.1007/978-3-031-37742-6_37(482-497)Online publication date: 21-Aug-2022

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
DMIP '20: Proceedings of the 2020 3rd International Conference on Digital Medicine and Image Processing
November 2020
80 pages
ISBN:9781450389044
DOI:10.1145/3441369
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 24 March 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Blind deconvolution
  2. Blur
  3. Deep learning
  4. Image restoration
  5. Point spread function

Qualifiers

  • Article
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Conference

DMIP '20

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)2
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 22 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2022)A Reliable Image Quality Assessment Metric: Evaluation Using Camera ImpactsPattern Recognition and Image Analysis10.1134/S105466182203018X32:3(551-560)Online publication date: 1-Sep-2022
  • (2022)Image Quality Assessment Metric Fusing Traditional and Dempster-Shafer TheoryPattern Recognition, Computer Vision, and Image Processing. ICPR 2022 International Workshops and Challenges10.1007/978-3-031-37742-6_37(482-497)Online publication date: 21-Aug-2022

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media