Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3330430.3333640acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesl-at-sConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

Informing the Design of Collaborative Activities in MOOCs using Actionable Predictions

Published: 24 June 2019 Publication History

Abstract

With the aim of supporting instructional designers in setting up collaborative learning activities in MOOCs, this paper derives prediction models for student participation in group discussions. The salient feature of these models is that they are built using only data prior to the learning activity, and can thus provide actionable predictions, as opposed to post-hoc approaches common in the MOOC literature. Some learning design scenarios that make use of this actionable information are illustrated.

References

[1]
C. Alario-Hoyos, M. Perez-Sanagustin, C. Delgado-Kloos, H.A. Parada, and M. Muñoz Organero. 2014. Delving into participants' profiles and use of social tools in MOOCs. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies 7, 3 (2014), 260--266.
[2]
M.L. Bote-Lorenzo and E. Gómez-Sánchez. 2018. An approach to build in situ models for the prediction of the decrease of academic engagement indicators in Massive Open Online Courses. Journal of Universal Computer Science 24, 8 (2018), 1052--1071.
[3]
S. Boyer and K. Veeramachaneni. 2015. Transfer learning for predictive models in Massive Open Online Courses. In Proc. of the 17th Conf. on Artificial Intelligence in Education. 54--63.
[4]
P. Dillenbourg. 1999. Collaborative Learning: Cognitive and Computational Approaches. Elsevier Science.
[5]
M. Ding, Y. Wang, E. Hemberg, and U. O'Reilly. 2019. Transfer Learning Using Representation Learning in Massive Open Online Courses. In Proc. of the 9th Int. Conf. on Learning Analytics & Knowledge (LAK19). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 145--154.
[6]
E. Er, E. Gómez-Sánchez, M.L. Bote-Lorenzo, J.I. Asensio-Pérez, and Y. Dimitriadis. 2018. Supporting group formation in ongoing MOOCs using actionable predictive models. In Proceedings of the 5th Learning with MOOCs Conference.
[7]
J. Gardner and C. Brooks. 2018. Student success prediction in MOOCs. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 28, 2 (2018), 127--203.
[8]
K.F. Hew and W.S. Cheung. 2014. Students' and instructors' use of massive open online courses (MOOCs): Motivations and challenges. Educational Research Review 12 (2014), 45--58.
[9]
L.A. Jeni, J.F. Cohn, and F. Torre. 2013. Facing imbalanced data recommendations for the use of performance metrics. In Proc. of the 5th Conf. on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction. 245--251.
[10]
K. Manathunga and D. Hernández-Leo. 2015. Has research on collaborative learning technologies addressed massiveness? A literature review. Educational Technology & Society 18, 4 (2015), 357--370.
[11]
L. Sanz-Martínez, E. Er, A. Martínez-Monés, Y. Dimitriadis, and M.L. Bote-Lorenzo. 2019. Creating collaborative groups in a MOOC: a homogeneous engagement grouping approach. Behaviour & Information Technology (2019).
[12]
H. Spoelstra, P.V. Rosmalen, T. Houtmans, and P. Sloep. 2015. Team formation instruments to enhance learner interactions in open learning environments. Computers in Human Behavior 45, 2015 (2015), 11--20.
[13]
J. Whitehill, K. Mohan, D. Seaton, Y. Rosen, and D. Tingley. 2017. MOOC dropout prediction: How to measure accuracy?. In Proc. of the 4th ACM Conf. on Learning @ Scale. 161--164.
[14]
Z. Zheng, T. Vogelsang, and N. Pinkwart. 2015. The impact of small learning group composition on student engagement and success in a MOOC. In Proc. of the 8th Int. Conf. on Educational Data Mining. 500--503.

Cited By

View all
  • (2020)Online Case Intelligent Interaction System based on Virtual Reality Technology Under the Background of Novel Coronavirus2020 4th International Conference on Trends in Electronics and Informatics (ICOEI)(48184)10.1109/ICOEI48184.2020.9143039(862-865)Online publication date: Jun-2020

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
L@S '19: Proceedings of the Sixth (2019) ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale
June 2019
386 pages
ISBN:9781450368049
DOI:10.1145/3330430
Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 24 June 2019

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. MOOC
  2. actionable learning analytics
  3. collaborative learning

Qualifiers

  • Poster
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Funding Sources

Conference

L@S '19

Acceptance Rates

L@S '19 Paper Acceptance Rate 24 of 70 submissions, 34%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 117 of 440 submissions, 27%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)1
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 14 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2020)Online Case Intelligent Interaction System based on Virtual Reality Technology Under the Background of Novel Coronavirus2020 4th International Conference on Trends in Electronics and Informatics (ICOEI)(48184)10.1109/ICOEI48184.2020.9143039(862-865)Online publication date: Jun-2020

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media