Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3328886.3328901acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiccmbConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Design of Toys Packaging with Renting System Based on Consumer Preferences

Published: 24 March 2019 Publication History

Abstract

The emergence of the online toy rental business stimulate the need of packaging that can perform its main function and appealing to consumers. Therefore, a research is conducted on the toys renting packaging boxes to determine the most suitable design according to consumer preferences. The study uses an index of potential gain in customer value to determine the most crucial attributes that should be improved, semantic differential as a measurement scale of design preferences of each attribute, and choice-based conjoint analysis in order to obtain a model of the final packaging design according most favored by consumers. The results showed that the attributes that require performance improvements are product information, font size, orientation or position of elements, ease of carrying the packaging, packaging color, and graphic styles. The study also concluded that the packaging design which is most preferred by the consumers are a packaging that has a cutout handle, visual presentation of product information, contrast color mix, simplified product images, natural ornament shape, and the information products position is located at the upper side or top of a packaging's side.

References

[1]
Goldstein, Jeffrey. (2012). Play in Children's Development, Health, and Well-Being
[2]
Cenadi, C. S. (2000). Peranan Desain Kemasan Dalam Dunia Pemasaran. NIRMANA, 92--103.
[3]
Osterwalder, A., & Pigneur, Y. (2010). Business Model Generation. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
[4]
Longanecker, C. (2015, March 19). Why You Should Use a Subscription Business Model. Quoted September 30th, 2016, from Entrepreneur: https://www.entrepreneur.com/ article/243573
[5]
Ogata, A. F. (2004). Creative Playthings: Educational Toys and Postwar American Culture. The Henry Francis du Pont Winterthur Museum, Inc., 129--156.
[6]
GREAT Information.(n.d.). Retrieved from UC Davis Cancer Center: www.ucdmc.ucdavis.edu/cancer
[7]
Abidin, S. Z., Effendia, R. A., Ibrahima, R., & Idrisb, M. Z. (2014). A semantic approach in perception for packaging in the SME's food industries in Malaysia: a case study of Malaysia food product branding in United Kingdom. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 115--130.
[8]
{25} Orth, U. R., & Malkewitz, K. (2008). Holistic Package Design and Consumer Brand Impressions. Journal of Marketing, 64--81.
[9]
Velasco, C., Woods, A. T., & Spence, C. (2015). Evaluation the Orientation of Design Elements in Product Packaging Using an Online Orientation Task. Food Quality and Preference, 151--159.
[10]
Westernman, S. e. (2013). The Design of Consumer Packaging: Effects on Manipulation of Shape, Orientation, and Alignment of Graphical Forms on Consumer's Assesments. Food Quality and Preference, 8--17.
[11]
Tiwasing, W., Sahachaisaeree, N., & Hapeshi, K. (2013). Design Goals and Attention Differentiations among Target Groups: A Case of Toy Packaging Design Attracting Children and Parents' Purchasing Decision. Design Principles and Practices, 30--43.
[12]
Deliya, M. M., & Parmar, B. J. (2012). Global Journal of Management and Business Research. Role of Packaging on Consumer Buying Behavior--Patan District, 48--68.
[13]
Becker, L., Rompay, T. J., Schifferstein, H. N., & Galetzka, M. (2011). Tough package, strong taste The influence of packaging design on taste impressions and product evaluations. Food Quality and Preference, 17--23.
[14]
Jung, H. -S., & Jung, H.-S. (2010). A survey of the optimal handle position for boxes with different sizes and manual handling position. Applied Ergonomics, 115--122.
[15]
Drury, C. G., Law, C.-H., & Pawenski, C. S. (1982). A Survey of Industrial Box Handling. Human Factors, 553--565.
[16]
Prabowo, S. B., Astuti, R., & Effendi, M. (t.thn.). Analysis of Consumer Satisfaction Levels on Brownies Tempe by Using PGCV Method (Potential Gain in Customer Value). Malang, Indonesia: Universitas Brawijaya.
[17]
Hom, W. C. (1997). Make customer service analyses a little easier with the PGCV index. Quality Progress, 89.
[18]
Osgood, C. E. (1956). Method and Theory in Experimental Psychology.Oxford University Press.
[19]
Ploder, A., & Eder, A. (2015). Semantic Differential. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, 563--571.
[20]
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (1995). Multivariate Data Analysis. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
[21]
Kuhfeld, W. F. (2010). Marketing Research Methods in SAS. North Carolina: SAS Institute Inc.
[22]
Johnson, R., & Orme, B. (1996). How Many Questions Should You Ask in Choice-Based Conjoint Studies?. Quoted November 28th, 2016, from Sawtooth Software: http://www.sawtoothsoftware.com
[23]
Huertas-Garcia, R., Guitart-Tarres, L., & Nunez-Carballosa, A. (2015). Plackett-Burman design in choice-based conjoint analysis. International Journal of Market Research, 569--594.
[24]
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis 7th Ed. Pearson Prentice Hall.
[25]
Kumar, K. (1987). Conducting focus group interviews in developing countries. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Agency for International Development.
[26]
Escalada, M., & Heong, K. (2012, April 23). Focus Group Discussion. quoted December 1st, 2016, from Rice Knowledge Bank: http://www.knowledgebank.irri.org/capdev/images/stories/tools/Tools-Focus-group-discussion.pdf
[27]
Surjandari, I. (2010). Conjoint Analysis: Konsep dan Aplikasi. Jakarta: Penerbit Universitas Trisakti.
[28]
Tobias, P., & Trutna, L. (2003). Process Improvement. Dalam C. Croarkin, & P. Tobias, Engineering Statistic Handbook.NIST SEMATECH.
[29]
Field, A. (2006). Realibility Analysis. Research Methods II, 1--7.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Visual and Textual Elements of Board Game Packaging, What Do Children Prefer?—An Eyetracking StudyMarketing and Smart Technologies10.1007/978-981-97-1552-7_39(569-585)Online publication date: 4-Jun-2024
  • (2021)Creative Packaging Design for ProductsHuman Interaction, Emerging Technologies and Future Systems V10.1007/978-3-030-85540-6_115(907-911)Online publication date: 10-Sep-2021

Index Terms

  1. Design of Toys Packaging with Renting System Based on Consumer Preferences

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    ICCMB '19: Proceedings of the 2019 2nd International Conference on Computers in Management and Business
    March 2019
    92 pages
    ISBN:9781450361682
    DOI:10.1145/3328886
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    In-Cooperation

    • Univ. of Manchester: University of Manchester

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 24 March 2019

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Educational toys
    2. choice-based conjoint
    3. customer preference
    4. semantic differential
    5. toys renting

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Funding Sources

    • DRPM Universitas Indonesia

    Conference

    ICCMB 2019

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)14
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 25 Nov 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Visual and Textual Elements of Board Game Packaging, What Do Children Prefer?—An Eyetracking StudyMarketing and Smart Technologies10.1007/978-981-97-1552-7_39(569-585)Online publication date: 4-Jun-2024
    • (2021)Creative Packaging Design for ProductsHuman Interaction, Emerging Technologies and Future Systems V10.1007/978-3-030-85540-6_115(907-911)Online publication date: 10-Sep-2021

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media