Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3328778.3366884acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessigcseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

An Unexplored Relationship: Women in Computing and Athletics

Published: 26 February 2020 Publication History

Abstract

The literature documents the underrepresentation of women in computer science, reasons for the absence of women in computing, and promising practices for increasing female majors in computer science. Among the many reasons for women's avoidance of computer science are: feelings of intimidation, lack of confidence, and aversion to the competitive climate in computing. This paper reports results from a study whose purpose lies in surveying a sample of 457 students at a Midwest US university to answer the questions: What are the personality traits of female athletes who enroll in computer science courses? How are these traits similar to or different from those of male athletes, non-athletes, and students who do not enroll in Computer Science I (CS1) How do grades in CS1 differ among these groups? How do personality traits, gender, athletic team membership, and grades interact? The results of this research study indicate that when females' levels of confidence and intimidation are similar to those of their male peers, women outperform males in CS1. This novel study and its results open the door to additional research questions, new strategies for recruiting women into computing, and potential projects involving female athletes and computer science.

References

[1]
ACM-W. ACM Council on Women in Computing. Retrieved from women.acm.org/.
[2]
ACM-W Chapters. Retrieved from https://women.acm.org/chapter/.
[3]
AnitaB.org. Retrieved from anitab.org/.
[4]
Aspirations in Computing. Retrieved from aspirations.org/.
[5]
Lecia. J. Barker and Kathy Garvin-Doxas. 2004. Making visible the behaviors that influence learning environment: A qualitative exploration of computer science classrooms. Comput. Sci. Educ. 14, 2 (Aug. 2010), 119--146.
[6]
Lecia J. Barker, Melissa O'Neill, and Nida Kazim. 2014. Framing classroom climate for student learning and retention in computer science. In Proceedings of the 45th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE '14), ACM Press, New York, NY, 319--324.
[7]
Sylvia Beyer, Kristina Rynes, Julie Perrault, Kelly Hay, Susan Haller. 2003. Gender differences in computer science students. In Proceedings of the 34th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education (SIGCSE '03), ACM Press, New York, NY, 49--53.
[8]
Sylvia Beyer. 2014. Why are women underrepresented in Computer Science? Gender differences in stereotypes, self-efficacy, values, and interests and predictors of future CS course-taking and grades. Computer Science Education, 24, 153--192.
[9]
CRA-W. Computing Research Association's Committee on the Status of Women in Computing Research. Retrieved from cra/cra-w/.
[10]
DREU. Distributed Research Experiences for Undergraduates. Retrieved from https://cra.org/cra-w/dreu/.
[11]
Joyce Ehrlinger, E. Ashby Plant, Marissa K. Hartwig, Jordan J. Vossen, Corey J. Columb, Lauren E. Brewer. 2018. Sex Roles 78, 40 (Jan. 2018), 40--51.
[12]
Grace Hopper Celebration of Women in Computing. Retrieved from https://ghc.anitab.org/.
[13]
Erin Irick. 2018. NCAA sports sponsorship and participation rates report: 1981--1982-2010--2011, National Collegiate Athletics Association, Indianapolis, IN, 69. Retrieved from https://ncaaorg.s3.amazonaws.com/research/sportpart/Oct2018RES_2017--18SportsSponsorshipParticipationRatesReport.pdf/.
[14]
Kathleen J. Lehman, Linda J. Sax, and Hilary B. Zimmerman. 2017. Women planning to major in computer science: Who are they and what makes them unique? Computer Science Education 26:4, 277--298.
[15]
Jane Margolis and Allan Fisher. 2002. Unlocking the Clubhouse: Women in Computing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
[16]
Jane Margolis, Allan Fisher, and Faye Miller. Women in Computer Sciences: Closing the Gender Gap in Higher Education. Work in progress. Retrieved from https://www.cs.cmu.edu/afs/cs/project/gendergap/www/confidence.html/.
[17]
Joanne McGrath Cohoon. 2002. Recruiting and retaining women in undergraduate computing majors. SIGSCSE Bull. 34, 2 (June 2002), 48--52.
[18]
NSF. National Science Foundation. National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics, special tabulations of U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved from https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsf19304/digest/field-of-degree-women#computer-sciences/.
[19]
NCWIT. National Center for Women & IT. Retrieved from NCWIT.org/.
[20]
John Robst and Jack Keil. 2000. The relationship between athletic participation and academic performance: Evidence from NCAA Division III. Applied Economics 32, 5 (Jan. 2000), 547--558.
[21]
Elaine Seymour and Nancy Hewitt. 1997. Talking About Leaving: Why Undergraduates Leave the Sciences. Westview Press, Boulder, CO
[22]
Joy Teague. 2002. Women in computing: what brings them to it, what keeps them in it? SIGSCSE Bull. 34, 2 (June 2002), 147--158.
[23]
Mark S. Tremblay, J. Wyatt Inman, and J. Douglas Willms. 2000. The relationship between physical activity, self-esteem and academic achievement in 12-year-old children. Pediatric Exercise Science 12, 312--323.
[24]
Terra Uham. 2010. The differences of personality traits and competitive tendencies bet\ween female collegiate athletes and females majoring in professional competitive fields. Master's Thesis. Fort Hayes State University, Hays, Kansas, USA.

Cited By

View all
  • (2020)The Power of Female Athletes to Level the Computer Science Playing FieldProceedings of the 2020 ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education10.1145/3341525.3387416(232-238)Online publication date: 15-Jun-2020

Index Terms

  1. An Unexplored Relationship: Women in Computing and Athletics

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    SIGCSE '20: Proceedings of the 51st ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education
    February 2020
    1502 pages
    ISBN:9781450367936
    DOI:10.1145/3328778
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 26 February 2020

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. academic performance
    2. athletics
    3. competitiveness
    4. computer science i
    5. confidence
    6. gender issues
    7. intimidation
    8. recruitment
    9. retention

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Conference

    SIGCSE '20
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 1,595 of 4,542 submissions, 35%

    Upcoming Conference

    SIGCSE Virtual 2024
    1st ACM Virtual Global Computing Education Conference
    December 5 - 8, 2024
    Virtual Event , NC , USA

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)20
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)4
    Reflects downloads up to 21 Nov 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2020)The Power of Female Athletes to Level the Computer Science Playing FieldProceedings of the 2020 ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education10.1145/3341525.3387416(232-238)Online publication date: 15-Jun-2020

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media