research-article

Objects with Intent: Designing Everyday Things as Collaborative Partners

Authors:

Marco C. Rozendaal,

Boudewijn Boon,

Victor KaptelininAuthors Info & Claims

ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), Volume 26, Issue 4

Article No.: 26, Pages 1 - 33

https://doi.org/10.1145/3325277

Published: 17 June 2019 Publication History

Abstract

In HCI there is an increasing trend to approach computing artifacts as agents. In this article, we make a case for “Objects with Intent” (OwI's) as an emerging type of agents that take advantage of the meaning of everyday things as the site for their intelligence and agency. After reviewing relevant existing research in HCI and related fields, we demonstrate how OwI's provide a new perspective on human–agent interaction. We then elaborate on how the notion of OwI's is informed by Dennett's theory of intentionality and Leontiev's Activity Theory. Thereafter, we illustrate the application of OwI's through the design case of Fizzy, a robotic ball used to stimulate hospitalized children to engage in physical play. We end by discussing the nature and merit of OwI's and reflecting more broadly on the challenges involved in designing OwI's.

References

[1]

E. Aarts and R. Wichert. 2009. Ambient intelligence. In Technology Guide. Springer, Berlin, 244--249.

[2]

E. Ackermann. 2005. Playthings that do things: A young kid's “Incredibles”! In Proceedings of the Interaction Design and Children (IDC’05). pp. 1--8.

Digital Library

[3]

J. F. Allen, D. K. Byron, M. Dzikovska, G. Ferguson, L. Galescu, and A. Stent. 2001. Toward conversational human-computer interaction. AI Magazine 22, 4 (2001), 27.

Digital Library

[4]

J. H. Auger. 2014. Living with robots: A speculative design approach. Journal of Human-Robot Interaction 3, 1 (2014), 20--42.

Digital Library

[5]

J. Bardzell and S. Bardzell. 2008. Interaction criticism: A proposal and framework for a new discipline of HCI. In Proceedings of Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’08). ACM, 2463--2472.

[6]

K. B. Bærentsen and J. Trettvik. 2002. An activity theory approach to affordance. In Proceedings of the 2nd Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. ACM, 51--60.

Digital Library

[7]

D. Berdichevsky and E. Neuenschwander. 1999. Towards an ethics of persuasive technology. Communications of the ACM 42, 5 (1999), 51--58.

Digital Library

[8]

H. Beyer and K. Holtzblatt. 1997. Contextual Design: Defining Customer-Centered Systems. Elsevier.

Digital Library

[9]

S. Bødker and P. B. Andersen. 2005. Complex mediation. Human-Computer Interaction 20, 4 (2005), 353--402.

Digital Library

[10]

B. Boon, M. C. Rozendaal, M. M. van den Heuvel-Eibrink, J. van der Net, and P. J. Stappers. 2016. Playscapes: A design perspective on young children's physical play. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children. ACM, New York, NY, 181--189.

[11]

B. Boon, M. C. Rozendaal, and P. J. Stappers. 2018. Ambiguity and open-endedness in behavioural design. In Proceedings of the DRS 2018 International Conference: Catalyst. Design Research Society, Limerick, Ireland, 2075--2085.

[12]

C. Breazeal. 2003. Toward sociable robots. Robotics and Autonomous Systems 42, 3 (2003), 167--175.

[13]

R. A. Brooks. 1991. Intelligence without representation. Artificial Intelligence 47, 1--3 (1991), 139--159.

Digital Library

[14]

J. Cassell, T. Bickmore, L. Campbell, H. Vilhjálmsson, and H. Yan. 2000. Conversation as a System Framework: Designing Embodied Conversational Agents. Embodied Conversational Agents, 29--63.

Digital Library

[15]

T. Clemmensen, V. Kaptelinin, and B. Nardi. 2016. Making HCI theory work: An analysis of the use of activity theory in HCI research. Behaviour and Information Technology 35, 8 (2016), 608--627.

Digital Library

[16]

A. Chamberlain, A. Crabtree, T. Rodden, M. Jones, and Y. Rogers. 2012. Research in the wild: Understanding ‘in the wild' approaches to design and development. In Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems Conference. ACM, 795--796.

[17]

N. Cila, I. Smit, E. Giaccardi, and B. Kröse. 2017. Products as agents: Metaphors for designing the products of the IoT age. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 448--459.

[18]

T. Clemmensen, V. Kaptelinin, and B. Nardi. 2016. Making HCI theory work: An analysis of the use of activity theory in HCI research. Behaviour and Information Technology 35, 8 (2016), 608--627.

Digital Library

[19]

M. Cole and Y. Engeström. 1993. A cultural-historical approach to distributed cognition. In Distributed Cognitions: Psychological and Educational Considerations. Cambridge University Press, 1--46.

[20]

D. J. Cook. 2009. Multi-agent smart environments. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Smart Environments 1, 1 (2009), 51--55.

Digital Library

[21]

A. Crabtree, A. Chamberlain, R. E. Grinter, M. Jones, T. Rodden, and Y. Rogers. 2013. Introduction to the special issue of “The Turn to The Wild.” ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 20, 3 (2013), 13.

Digital Library

[22]

D. C. Dennett. 1989. The Intentional Stance. MIT Press.

[23]

D. C. Dennett. 1991. Real patterns. Journal of Philosophy 88, 1 (1991), 27--51.

[24]

P. Dourish. 2004. Where the Action is: The Foundations of Embodied Interaction. MIT Press.

[25]

D. El'konin. 1977. Toward the problem of stages in the mental development of the child. In Soviet Developmental Psychology, M. Cole (Ed.). Sharpe, White Plains, NY, 538--563.

[26]

Y. Engeström. 1999. Activity theory and individual and social transformation. In Perspectives on Activity Theory, Y. Engeström, R. Miettinen, and R. Punamaki (Eds.). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 19--38.

[27]

Y. Engeström. 2014. Learning by Expanding. Cambridge University Press.

[28]

D. Fällman. 2011. The new good: Exploring the potential of philosophy of technology to contribute to human-computer interaction. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 1051--1060.

Digital Library

[29]

U. Farooq and J. Grudin. 2016. Human-computer integration. Interactions 23, 6 (2016), 26--32.

Digital Library

[30]

A. Følstad and P. B. Brandtzæg. 2017. Chatbots and the new world of HCI. Interactions 24, 4 (2017), 38--42.

Digital Library

[31]

J. Forlizzi. 2008. The product ecology: Understanding social product use and supporting design culture. International Journal of Design 2, 1 (2008), 11--20.

[32]

B. Friedman. 1996. Value-sensitive design. Interactions 3, 6 (1996), 16--23.

Digital Library

[33]

H. Hagras, V. Callaghan, M. Colley, G. Clarke, A. Pounds-Cornish, and H. Duman. 2004. Creating an ambient-intelligence environment using embedded agents. IEEE Intelligent Systems 19, 6 (2004), 12--20.

Digital Library

[34]

S. Hauser, D. Oogjes, R. Wakkary, and P. P. Verbeek. 2018. An annotated portfolio on doing postphenomenology through research products. In Proceedings of the 2018 on Designing Interactive Systems Conference. ACM, 459--471.

[35]

M. A. Hearst, J. Allen, C. Guinn, and E. Horvitz. 1999. Mixed-initiative interaction: Trends and controversies. IEEE Intelligent Systems 14, 5 (1999), 14--23.

Digital Library

[36]

F. Heider and M. Simmel. 1944. An experimental study of apparent behavior. American Journal of Psychology 57, 2 (1944), 243--259.

[37]

G. Hoffman, R. Kubat, and C. Breazeal. 2008. A hybrid control system for puppeteering a live robotic stage actor. In Proceedings of the 17th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN’08). IEEE, 354--359.

[38]

G. Hoffman and W. Ju. 2014. Designing robots with movement in mind. Journal of Human-Robot Interaction 3, 1 (2014), 89--122.

Digital Library

[39]

L. E. Holmquist. 2017. Intelligence on tap: Artificial intelligence as a new design material. Interactions 24, 4 (2017), 28--33.

Digital Library

[40]

E. Horvitz. 1999. Principles of mixed-initiative user interfaces. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 159--166.

Digital Library

[41]

H. Ishii and B. Ulmer. 1997. Tangible bits: Towards seamless interfaces between people, bits and atoms. In Proceedings of ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’97). 234--241

[42]

G. Jacucci, A. Spagnolli, J. Freeman, and L. Gamberini. 2014. Symbiotic interaction: A critical definition and comparison to other human-computer paradigms. In Proceedings of International Workshop on Symbiotic Interaction. Springer, Cham, 3--20.

[43]

L. E. Janlert and E. Stolterman. 1997. The character of things. Design Studies 18, 3 (1997), 297--314.

[44]

W. Ju and L. Leifer. 2008. The design of implicit interactions: Making interactive systems less obnoxious. Design Issues 24, 3 (2008), 72--84.

[45]

V. Kaptelinin and B. A. Nardi. 2006. Acting with Technology: Activity Theory and Interaction Design. MIT Press.

Digital Library

[46]

V. Kaptelinin and K. Kuutti. 1999. Cognitive tools reconsidered: From augmentation to mediation. In Humane Interfaces: Questions of Method and Practice in Cognitive Technology, J. P. Marsh, B. Gorayska, and J. L. Mey (Eds.). Elsevier.

[47]

E. Karapanos. 2013. User experience over time. In Modeling users’ Experiences with Interactive Systems. Springer, Berlin, 57--83.

[48]

L. C. Klopfenstein, S. Delpriori, S. Malatini, and A. Bogliolo. 2017. The rise of bots: A survey of conversational interfaces, patterns, and paradigms. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems. ACM, 555--565.

[49]

M. Kuniavsky. 2010. Smart Things: Ubiquitous Computing User Experience Design. Elsevier.

Digital Library

[50]

K. Kuutti. 1996. Activity theory as a potential framework for human-computer interaction research. In Context and Consciousness: Activity Theory and Human-Computer Interaction. MIT Press, 17--44.

Digital Library

[51]

K. Kuutti and L. J. Bannon. 2014. The turn to practice in HCI: Towards a research agenda. In Proceedings of the 32nd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 3543--3552.

Digital Library

[52]

Latour. 2005. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

[53]

B. Laurel. 1997. Interface agents: Metaphors with character. In Human Values and the design of Computer Technology. Center for the Study of Language and Information Stanford, 207--219.

Digital Library

[54]

A. N. Leontiev. 1975. Activities. Consciousness. Personality. Politizdat, Moscow.

[55]

F. Levillain and E. Zibetti. 2017. Behavioral objects: The rise of the evocative machines. Journal of Human-Robot Interaction 6, 1 (2017), 4--24.

Digital Library

[56]

Y. K. Lim, E. Stolterman, H. Jung, and J. Donaldson. 2007. Interaction gestalt and the design of aesthetic interactions. In Proceedings of the 2007 Conference on Designing Pleasurable Products and Interfaces. ACM, 239--254.

Digital Library

[57]

Y. K. Lim, E. Stolterman, and J. Tenenberg. 2008. The anatomy of prototypes: Prototypes as filters, prototypes as manifestations of design ideas. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 15, 2 (2008), 7.

Digital Library

[58]

B. Marenko. 2014. Neo-animism and design: A new paradigm in object theory. Design and Culture 6, 2 (2014), 219--241.

[59]

B. Marenko and P. van Allen. 2016. Animistic design: How to reimagine digital interaction between the human and the nonhuman. Digital Creativity 27, 1 (2016), 52--70.

[60]

M. F. McTear. 2000. Intelligent interface technology: From theory to reality? Interacting with Computers 12, 4 (2000), 323--336.

[61]

M. Mori, K. F. MacDorman, and N. Kageki. 2012. The uncanny valley {from the field}. IEEE Robotics 8 Automation Magazine 19, 2 (2012), 98--100.

[62]

C. Nass, J. Steuer, L. Henriksen, and D. C. Dryer. 1994. Machines, social attributions, and ethopoeia: Performance assessments of computers subsequent to. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 40, 3 (1994), 543--559.

Digital Library

[63]

D. Norman. 2013. The Design of Everyday Things: Revised and Expanded Edition. Basic Books, AZ.

[64]

D. A. Norman. 1994. How might people interact with agents. Communications of the ACM 37, 7 (1994), 68--71.

Digital Library

[65]

D. A. Norman. 2014. Some observations on mental models. In Mental Models. Psychology Press, 15--22.

[66]

W. Odom, J. Zimmerman, L. S. Davidoff, J. Forlizzi, A. K. Dey, and M. K. Lee. 2012. A fieldwork of the future with user enactments. In Proceedings of Designing Interactive Systems Conference (DIS’12). 338--347.

[67]

W. T. Odom, A. J. Sellen, R. Banks, D. S. Kirk, T. Regan, M. Selby, and J. Zimmerman. 2014. Designing for slowness, anticipation and re-visitation: A long term field study of the photobox. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 1961--1970.

Digital Library

[68]

H. Petroski. 1992. The Evolution of Useful Things: How Everyday Artifacts-From Forks and Pins to Paper Clips and Zippers-Came to be as They Are. Knopf, NY.

[69]

J. Piaget. 1951. The Child's Conception of the World (No. 213). Rowman 8 Littlefield.

[70]

J. Pierce, Y. Strengers, P. Sengers, and S. Bødker. 2013. Introduction to the special issue on practice-oriented approaches to sustainable HCI. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 20, 4 (2013), 20.

Digital Library

[71]

B. Reeves and C. I. Nass. 1996. The Media Equation: How People Treat Computers, Television, and New Media like Real People and Places. Cambridge University Press.

Digital Library

[72]

E. Robles and M. Wiberg. 2010. Texturing the material turn in interaction design. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction. ACM, 137--144.

Digital Library

[73]

Y. Rogers. 2012. HCI theory: Classical, modern, and contemporary. Synthesis Lectures on Human-Centered Informatics 5, 2 (2012), 1--129.

[74]

D. Rose. 2014. Enchanted Objects: Design, Human Desire, and the Internet of Things. Simon and Schuster.

[75]

P. R. Ross and S. A. Wensveen. 2010. Designing behavior in interaction: Using aesthetic experience as a mechanism for design. International Journal of Design 4, 2 (2010), 3--13.

[76]

M. C. Rozendaal. 2016. Objects with intent: A new paradigm for interaction design. Interactions 23, 3 (2016), 62--65.

Digital Library

[77]

S. L. Rubinshtein. 1946. Foundations of General Psychology. Academic Science, Moscow.

[78]

R. M. Ryan and E. L. Deci. 2000. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist 55, 1 (2000), 68.

[79]

S. Šabanović, S. Reeder, and B. Kechavarzi. 2014. Designing robots in the wild: In situ prototype evaluation for a break management robot. Journal of Human-Robot Interaction 3, 1 (2014), 70--88.

Digital Library

[80]

K. Salen and E. Zimmerman. 2003. Rules of Play. Game Design Fundamentals. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

Digital Library

[81]

I. Sample and A. Hern. 2014. Scientists dispute whether computer “Eugene Goostman” passed Turing test. The Guardian. Retrieved June 2, 2019 from https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/jun/09/scientists-disagree-over-whether-turing-test-has-been-passed.

[82]

E. Stolterman and A. Croon Fors. 2008. Critical HCI Research: A research position proposal. Design Philosophy Papers, 1 (2008).

[83]

D. I. Tapia, A. Abraham, J. M. Corchado, and R. S. Alonso. 2010. Agents and ambient intelligence: Case studies. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing 1, 2 (2010), 85--93.

[84]

L. Takayama. 2009. Making sense of agentic objects and teleoperation: In-the-moment and reflective perspectives. In Proceedings of the 2009 4th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI). IEEE, 239--240.

Digital Library

[85]

A. S. Taylor. 2009. Machine intelligence. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 2109--2118.

Digital Library

[86]

A. Vallgårda. 2014. Giving form to computational things: Developing a practice of interaction design. Personal Ubiquitous Computing 18, 3 (2014), 577--592.

Digital Library

[87]

P. Van Allen, J. McVeigh-Schultz, B. Brown, H. M. Kim, and D. Lara. 2013. AniThings: Animism and heterogeneous multiplicity. In Proceedings of the CHI'13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 2247--2256.

Digital Library

[88]

P.-P. Verbeek. 2011. Moralizing Technology: Understanding and Designing the Morality of Things. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

[89]

P. P. Verbeek. 2015. Cover story beyond interaction: A short introduction to mediation theory. Interactions 22, 3 (2015), 26--31.

Digital Library

[90]

L. S. Vygotsky. 1978. Mind in society: The development of higher mental process. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

[91]

R. Wakkary, D. Oogjes, H. W. Lin, and S. Hauser. 2018. Philosophers living with the tilting bowl. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 94

[92]

M. Wiberg. 2014. Methodology for materiality: Interaction design research through a material lens. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 18, 3 (2014), 625--636.

Digital Library

[93]

J. Wertsch. 1981. The concept of activity in Soviet psychology: An introduction. In The Concept of Activity in Soviet Psychology, J. Wertsch (Ed.). M. E. Sharpe, Armonk, N.Y., 3--36.

[94]

M. Wooldridge and N. R. Jennings. 1995. Intelligent agents: Theory and practice. The Knowledge Engineering Review 10, 2 (1995), 115--152.

[95]

V. W. Zue and J. R. Glass. 2000. Conversational interfaces: Advances and challenges. Proceedings of the IEEE 88, 8 (2000), 1166--1180.

Cited By

Tost JFlechtner RMaué RHeidmann F(2024)Caring for a companion as a form of self-care. Exploring the design space for irritating companion technologies for mental healthProceedings of the 13th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/3679318.3685343(1-15)Online publication date: 13-Oct-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3679318.3685343
Jarsve TJacobsen RSoma-Jestilä RWoźniak PNiess J(2024)AMoRE: Four Perspectives on Talking About and Experiencing RobotsProceedings of the 13th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/3679318.3685342(1-13)Online publication date: 13-Oct-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3679318.3685342
Arn LHuang E(2024)“Robots Can Do Disgusting Things, but Also Good Things”: Fostering Children’s Understanding of AI through StorytellingACM Transactions on Computing Education10.1145/367761324:3(1-55)Online publication date: 27-Sep-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3677613
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Objects with Intent: Designing Everyday Things as Collaborative Partners
1. Human-centered computing
  1. Human computer interaction (HCI)
  2. Interaction design

Recommendations

Understanding the Role of Objects in Cross-Disciplinary Collaboration

In this paper we make a case for the use of multiple theoretical perspectives—theory on boundary objects, epistemic objects, cultural historical activity theory, and objects as infrastructure—to understand the role of objects in cross-disciplinary ...
Designing mediation
ECCE '15: Proceedings of the European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics 2015

The aim of this paper is to analyze the concept of mediation in the context of current HCI research, with a special focus on the use of the concept to inform and guide the design of interactive artifacts and environments. The paper discusses the ...
Workshop on interacting with smart objects
IUI '11: Proceedings of the 16th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces

The number of smart objects in our everyday life is steadily increasing. In this workshop we discuss how the interaction with these smart objects should be designed from various perspectives.

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction

ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction Volume 26, Issue 4

August 2019

251 pages

ISSN:1073-0516

EISSN:1557-7325

DOI:10.1145/3341168

Editor:
Kristina Höök
KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Sweden

Issue’s Table of Contents

Copyright © 2019 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 17 June 2019

Accepted: 01 March 2019

Revised: 01 November 2018

Received: 01 February 2018

Published in TOCHI Volume 26, Issue 4

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article
Research
Refereed

Funding Sources

The Swedish Research Council

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

43
Total Citations
View Citations
1,368
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)231
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)18

Reflects downloads up to 21 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Tost JFlechtner RMaué RHeidmann F(2024)Caring for a companion as a form of self-care. Exploring the design space for irritating companion technologies for mental healthProceedings of the 13th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/3679318.3685343(1-15)Online publication date: 13-Oct-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3679318.3685343
Jarsve TJacobsen RSoma-Jestilä RWoźniak PNiess J(2024)AMoRE: Four Perspectives on Talking About and Experiencing RobotsProceedings of the 13th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/3679318.3685342(1-13)Online publication date: 13-Oct-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3679318.3685342
Arn LHuang E(2024)“Robots Can Do Disgusting Things, but Also Good Things”: Fostering Children’s Understanding of AI through StorytellingACM Transactions on Computing Education10.1145/367761324:3(1-55)Online publication date: 27-Sep-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3677613
Lallemand CLushnikova ADawson JToebosch R(2024)Trinity: A Design Fiction to Unravel the Present and Future Tensions in Professional Informatics and Awareness Support ToolsProceedings of the 3rd Annual Meeting of the Symposium on Human-Computer Interaction for Work10.1145/3663384.3663396(1-15)Online publication date: 25-Jun-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3663384.3663396
Cho H(2024)Reimagining Human-Thing Interactions Through Iterative Posthumanist Design SpeculationsCompanion Publication of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3656156.3665125(1-5)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3656156.3665125
Núñez-Pacheco CPoikolainen Rosén A(2024)Articulating Felt Senses for More-Than-Human Design: A Viewpoint for NoticingProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3661554(1029-1043)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3643834.3661554
Correia FNeto IFortes-Ferreira MOogjes DAlmeida TGrollman DBroadbent EJu WSoh HWilliams T(2024)More-than-human Perspective on the Robomorphism ParadigmCompanion of the 2024 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/3610978.3640761(11-19)Online publication date: 11-Mar-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3610978.3640761
Setijadi Prihatmanto ASukoco ABudiyono ATresnawati DLestari NTeja Sukmana HAtiah UWahyuni SRatnawati WAbimanyu Munastha K(2024)Architecture Transformation: Integrating Smart Systems for Intelligent Agent-Based Service Management in Smart OrganizationsIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2024.345684512(146968-146995)Online publication date: 2024
https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3456845
D’Olivo PLangerak ASpek DBussmann JRozendaal MRegterschot GVisch V(2024)Designing for social relatedness between stroke survivors and eHealth: ‘Edo’ an embodied coach for stroke rehabilitation in the home contextDesign for Health10.1080/24735132.2024.2397154(1-27)Online publication date: 17-Sep-2024
https://doi.org/10.1080/24735132.2024.2397154
Kimura RNakajima T(2024)Exploring Opportunities from the More-than-Human Perspective for Investigating Wicked Problem in Our Entangled WorldDistributed, Ambient and Pervasive Interactions10.1007/978-3-031-59988-0_5(72-92)Online publication date: 29-Jun-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/978-3-031-59988-0_5
Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Article

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Issue’s Table of Contents