Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3313831.3376842acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Interaction Techniques for Visual Exploration Using Embedded Word-Scale Visualizations

Published: 23 April 2020 Publication History

Abstract

We describe a design space of view manipulation interactions for small data-driven contextual visualizations (word-scale visualizations). These interaction techniques support an active reading experience and engage readers through exploration of embedded visualizations whose placement and content connect them to specific terms in a document. A reader could, for example, use our proposed interaction techniques to explore word-scale visualizations of stock market trends for companies listed in a market overview article. When readers wish to engage more deeply with the data, they can collect, arrange, compare, and navigate the document using the embedded word-scale visualizations, permitting more visualization-centric analyses. We support our design space with a concrete implementation, illustrate it with examples from three application domains, and report results from two experiments. The experiments show how view manipulation interactions helped readers examine embedded visualizations more quickly and with less scrolling and yielded qualitative feedback on usability and future opportunities.

Supplemental Material

MP4 File
Preview video
SBV File
Preview video captions

References

[1]
Last read: March 2019. MarketWatch. (Last read: March 2019). https://www.marketwatch.com.
[2]
Last read: September 2019. Dictionary.com. (Last read: September 2019). https://www.dictionary.com.
[3]
Eytan Adar, Daniel S Weld, Brian N Bershad, and Steven S Gribble. 2007. Why we search: visualizing and predicting user behavior. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on World Wide Web. ACM, 161--170.
[4]
Benjamin Bach, Nathalie Henry Riche, Sheelagh Carpendale, and Hanspeter P'ster. 2017. The emerging genre of data comics. Computer Graphics and Applications 37, 3 (2017), 6--13.
[5]
Benjamin Bach, Nathalie Henry Riche, Tim Dwyer, Tara Madhayastha, Jean-Daniel Fekete, and Thomas Grabowski. 2015. Small MultiPiles: Piling time to explore temporal patterns in dynamic networks. Computer Graphics Forum 34, 3 (2015), 31--40.
[6]
Sriram Karthik Badam, Zhicheng Liu, and Niklas Elmqvist. 2019. Elastic documents: Coupling text and tables through contextual visualizations for enhanced document reading. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 25, 1 (2019), 661--671.
[7]
Sebastian Baltes, Oliver Moseler, Fabian Beck, and Stephan Diehl. 2015. Navigate, understand, communicate: How developers locate performance bugs. In ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement (ESEM). IEEE, 1--10.
[8]
Fabian Beck, Yasett Acurana, Tanja Blascheck, Rudolf Netzel, and Daniel Weiskopf. 2016. An expert evaluation of word-sized visualizations for analyzing eye movement data. In IEEE Second Workshop on Eye Tracking and Visualization (ETVIS). IEEE, 50--54.
[9]
Fabian Beck, Tanja Blascheck, Thomas Ertl, and Daniel Weiskopf. 2016. Word-sized eye tracking visualizations. In Burch M., Chuang L., Fisher B., Schmidt A., Weiskopf D. (eds) Eye Tracking and Visualization. ETVIS 2015. Springer.
[10]
Fabian Beck, Sebastian Koch, and Daniel Weiskopf. 2015. Visual analysis and dissemination of scientific literature collections with SurVis. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 22, 1 (2015), 180--189.
[11]
Fabian Beck, Oliver Moseler, Stephan Diehl, and Günter Daniel Rey. 2013. In situ understanding of performance bottlenecks through visually augmented code. In 21st International Conference on Program Comprehension (ICPC). IEEE, 63--72.
[12]
Fabian Beck and Daniel Weiskopf. 2017. Word-sized graphics for scienti?c texts. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 23, 6 (2017), 1576--1587.
[13]
Richard A Becker and William S Cleveland. 1987. Brushing scatterplots. Technometrics 29, 2 (1987), 127--142.
[14]
Jacques Bertin. 1967. Sémiologie graphique: Les diagrammes-Les réseaux-Les cartes. Mouton/Gauthier-Villars.
[15]
Jacques Bertin. 1983. Semiology of Graphics: Diagrams, Networks, Maps. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, WI, USA.
[16]
Anastasia Bezerianos, Fanny Chevalier, Pierre Dragicevic, Niklas Elmqvist, and Jean-Daniel Fekete. 2010. GraphDice: A system for exploring multivariate social networks. Computer Graphics Forum 29, 3 (2010), 863--872.
[17]
Tanja Blascheck, Lindsay MacDonald Vermeulen, Jo Vermeulen, Charles Perin, Wesley Willett, Thomas Ertl, and Sheelagh Carpendale. 2019. Exploration strategies for discovery of interactivity in visualizations. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 25, 2 (2019), 1407--1420.
[18]
Jeremy Boy, Louis Eveillard, Françoise Detienne, and Jean-Daniel Fekete. 2016. Suggested Interactivity: Seeking Perceived Affordances for Information Visualization. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 22, 1 (2016), 10. To appear.
[19]
Ulrik Brandes, Bobo Nick, Brigitte Rockstroh, and Astrid Steffen. 2013. Gestaltlines. Computer Graphics Forum 32, 3 (2013), 171--180.
[20]
Richard Brath, Peter MacMurchy, and Ebad Banissi. 2019. The design space of SparkWords. In EuroVis 2019 - Short Papers. The Eurographics Association, 127--131.
[21]
Aaron Bycoffe. Last read: September 2019. The Endorsement Primary. (Last read: September 2019). https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/ 2016-endorsement-primary/.
[22]
Jack Callahan, Don Hopkins, Mark Weiser, and Ben Shneiderman. 1988. An empirical comparison of pie vs. linear menus. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI). ACM, 95--100.
[23]
Bay-Wei Chang, Jock Mackinlay, and Polle T Zellweger. 2000. Fluidly revealing information in fluid documents. In Proceedings of Smart Graphics. AAAI, Menlo Park, CA, USA, 178--181.
[24]
John B Cole and Paul M VanRaden. 2010. Visualization of results from genomic evaluations. Journal of Dairy Science 93, 6 (2010), 2727--2740.
[25]
Christopher Collins, Sheelagh Carpendale, and Gerald Penn. 2009. Docuburst: Visualizing document content using language structure. Computer Graphics Forum 28, 3 (2009), 1039--1046.
[26]
Pierre Dragicevic. 2016. Fair statistical communication in HCI. In Modern Statistical Methods for HCI. Springer, 291--330.
[27]
Pierre Dragicevic, Yvonne Jansen, Abhraneel Sarma, Matthew Kay, and Fanny Chevalier. 2019. Increasing the transparency of research papers with explorable multiverse analyses. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI). ACM.
[28]
Niklas Elmqvist, Andrew Vande Moere, Hans-Christian Jetter, Daniel Cernea, Harald Reiterer, and TJ Jankun-Kelly. 2011. Fluid interaction for information visualization. Information Visualization 10, 4 (2011), 327--340.
[29]
Leo D Frishberg. 2011. Interactive sparklines: A dynamic display of quantitative information. In Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI). ACM, 589--604.
[30]
Sohaib Ghani, Nathalie Henry Riche, and Niklas Elmqvist. 2011. Dynamic insets for context-aware graph navigation. Computer Graphics Forum 30, 3 (2011), 861--870.
[31]
Michael Gleicher, Danielle Albers, Rick Walker, Ilir Jusu?, Charles D Hansen, and Jonathan C Roberts. 2011. Visual comparison for information visualization. Information Visualization 10, 4 (2011), 289--309.
[32]
Pascal Gof?n, Jeremy Boy, Wesley Willett, and Petra Isenberg. 2016. An exploratory study of word-scale graphics in data-rich text documents. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 23, 10 (2016), 2275--2287.
[33]
Pascal Gof?n, Wesley Willett, Jean-Daniel Fekete, and Petra Isenberg. 2014. Exploring the placement and design of word-scale visualizations. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 20, 12 (2014), 2291--2300.
[34]
Pascal Gof?n, Wesley Willett, Jean-Daniel Fekete, and Petra Isenberg. 2015. Design considerations for Enhancing Word-Scale Visualizations with Interaction. In Posters of the IEEE Conference on Information Visualization (InfoVis). IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA, USA.
[35]
Jeffrey Heer and Ben Shneiderman. 2012. Interactive Dynamics for Visual Analysis. Communications of the ACM 55, 4 (2012), 45--54.
[36]
Jane Hoffswell, Arvind Satyanarayan, and Jeffrey Heer. 2018. Augmenting code with in situ visualizations to aid program understanding. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI). ACM, 532.
[37]
Steffen Koch, Michael John, Michael Wörner, Andreas Müller, and Thomas Ertl. 2014. VarifocalReader -- in-depth visual analysis of large text documents. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 20, 12 (2014), 1723--1732.
[38]
Nicholas Kong, Marti A Hearst, and Maneesh Agrawala. 2014. Extracting references between text and charts via crowdsourcing. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI). ACM, 31--40.
[39]
Shahid Latif and Fabian Beck. 2018. Visually augmenting documents with data. Computing in Science Engineering 20, 6 (2018), 96--103.
[40]
Shahid Latif and Fabian Beck. 2019. VIS author pro?les: Interactive descriptions of publication records combining text and visualization. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 25, 1 (2019), 152--161.
[41]
Shahid Latif, Diao Liu, and Fabian Beck. 2018. Exploring interactive linking between text and visualization. In EuroVis 2018 - Short Papers. Eurographics Association, 91--94.
[42]
Tomer Moscovich, Fanny Chevalier, Nathalie Henry Riche, Emmanuel Pietriga, and Jean-Daniel Fekete. 2009. Topology-Aware Navigation in Large Networks. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI). ACM, 2319--2328.
[43]
Daniela Oelke, David Spretke, Andreas Stoffel, and Daniel A Keim. 2012. Visual readability analysis: How to make your writings easier to read. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 18, 5 (2012), 662--674.
[44]
Jonas Parnow. 2015. Micro Visualizations: How can Micro Visualisations enhance text comprehension, memorability, and exploitation? Design Master Thesis. Potsdam University of Applied Sciences, Potsdam, Germany. http://www.microvis.info.
[45]
Jonas Parnow and Marian Dörk. 2015. Micro Visualizations: Data-driven typography and graphical text enhancement. In Posters of the Conference on Information Visualization (InfoVis). IEEE.
[46]
Charles Perin, Pierre Dragicevic, and Jean-Daniel Fekete. 2015. Crossets: manipulating multiple sliders by crossing. In Proceedings of the 41st Graphics Interface Conference. Canadian Information Processing Society, 233--240.
[47]
Charles Perin, Romain Vuillemot, and Jean-Daniel Fekete. 2013. SoccerStories: A kick-off for visual soccer analysis. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 19, 12 (2013), 2506--2515.
[48]
Jeffrey M Rzeszotarski and Aniket Kittur. 2014. Kinetica: naturalistic multi-touch data visualization. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI). ACM, 897--906.
[49]
Edward Segel and Jeffrey Heer. 2010. Narrative visualization: Telling stories with data. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 16, 6 (2010), 1139--1148.
[50]
John Stasko, Carsten Gorg, Zhicheng Liu, and Kanupriya Singhal. 2007. Jigsaw: Supporting investigative analysis through interactive visualization. In Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on Visual Analytics Science and Technology (VAST). IEEE, 131--138.
[51]
Markus Steinberger, Manuela Waldner, Marc Streit, Alexander Lex, and Dieter Schmalstieg. 2011. Context-preserving visual links. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 17, 12 (2011), 2249--2258.
[52]
Bongwon Suh, Allison Woodruff, Ruth Rosenholtz, and Alyssa Glass. 2002. Popout Prism: Adding perceptual principles to overview+detail document interfaces. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI). ACM, 251--258.
[53]
Ben Swift, Andrew Sorensen, Henry Gardner, and John cyberphysical programming. In 1st International Workshop on Live Programming (LIVE). IEEE, 27--30.
[54]
Christian Tominski, Camilla Forsell, and Jimmy Johansson. 2012. Interaction support for visual comparison inspired by natural behavior. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 18, 12 (2012), 2719--2728.
[55]
Edward R. Tufte. 2001. The visual display of quantitative information. Graphics Press, Cheshire, CT.
[56]
Edward R. Tufte. 2006. Beautiful evidence. Graphics Press, Cheshire, CT.
[57]
Stef van den Elzen and Jarke J van Wijk. 2013. Small multiples, large singles: A new approach for visual data exploration. Computer Graphics Forum 32, 3pt2 (2013), 191--200.
[58]
Frank Van Ham, Martin Wattenberg, and Fernanda B Viégas. 2009. Mapping text with phrase nets. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 15, 6 (2009), 1169--1176.
[59]
Bret Victor. Last read: March 2019. Explorable explanation. (Last read: March 2019). http://worrydream.com/ExplorableExplanations/.
[60]
Fernanda B Viegas, Martin Wattenberg, and Jonathan Feinberg. 2009. Participatory visualization with wordle. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 15, 6 (2009), 1137--1144.
[61]
Gareth Watts. Last read: March 2019. jQuery Sparklines. (Last read: March 2019). https://omnipotent.net/jquery.sparkline/.
[62]
Ji Soo Yi, Youn ah Kang, John T Stasko, and Julie A Jacko. 2007. Toward a deeper understanding of the role of interaction in information visualization. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 13, 6 (2007), 1224--1231.
[63]
Dongwook Yoon, Nicholas Chen, and François Guimbretière. 2013. TextTearing: Opening white space for digital ink annotation. In Proceedings of the Conference on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST). ACM, 107--112.
[64]
Polle Zellweger, Bay-Wei Chang, and Jock D Mackinlay. 1998. Fluid Links for Informed and Incremental Link Transitions. In Proceedings of the Ninth ACM Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia: Links, Objects, Time and Space-Structure in Hypermedia Systems: Links, Objects, Time and Space-Structure in Hypermedia Systems, Vol. 98. ACM, Hosking. 2013. Visual code annotations for 50--57.

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Charagraph: Interactive Generation of Charts for Realtime Annotation of Data-Rich ParagraphsProceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544548.3581091(1-18)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
  • (2023)Studies and design considerations for animated transitions between small-scale visualizationsJournal of Visualization10.1007/s12650-023-00937-z26:6(1421-1443)Online publication date: 28-Aug-2023
  • (2022)Animated Transitions for Small-Scale VisualizationsProceedings of the 15th International Symposium on Visual Information Communication and Interaction10.1145/3554944.3554945(1-8)Online publication date: 16-Aug-2022
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Interaction Techniques for Visual Exploration Using Embedded Word-Scale Visualizations

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    CHI '20: Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
    April 2020
    10688 pages
    ISBN:9781450367080
    DOI:10.1145/3313831
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 23 April 2020

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. glyphs
    2. information visualization
    3. interaction techniques
    4. text visualization
    5. word-scale visualization

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Conference

    CHI '20
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 6,199 of 26,314 submissions, 24%

    Upcoming Conference

    CHI 2025
    ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
    April 26 - May 1, 2025
    Yokohama , Japan

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)82
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)9
    Reflects downloads up to 19 Feb 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2023)Charagraph: Interactive Generation of Charts for Realtime Annotation of Data-Rich ParagraphsProceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544548.3581091(1-18)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
    • (2023)Studies and design considerations for animated transitions between small-scale visualizationsJournal of Visualization10.1007/s12650-023-00937-z26:6(1421-1443)Online publication date: 28-Aug-2023
    • (2022)Animated Transitions for Small-Scale VisualizationsProceedings of the 15th International Symposium on Visual Information Communication and Interaction10.1145/3554944.3554945(1-8)Online publication date: 16-Aug-2022
    • (2022)CiteRead: Integrating Localized Citation Contexts into Scientific Paper ReadingProceedings of the 27th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces10.1145/3490099.3511162(707-719)Online publication date: 22-Mar-2022
    • (2022)Kori: Interactive Synthesis of Text and Charts in Data DocumentsIEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics10.1109/TVCG.2021.311480228:1(184-194)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2022
    • (2021)Does Interaction Improve Bayesian Reasoning with Visualization?Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3411764.3445176(1-14)Online publication date: 6-May-2021
    • (2021)Comparative Layouts Revisited: Design Space, Guidelines, and Future DirectionsIEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics10.1109/TVCG.2020.303041927:2(1525-1535)Online publication date: Feb-2021

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format.

    HTML Format

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media