research-article

Open access

Relational, Flexible, Everyday: Learning from Ethics in Dementia Research

Authors:

Rens Brankaert,

Jennifer Boger,

Kellie MorrisseyAuthors Info & Claims

CHI '20: Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Pages 1 - 16

https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376627

Published: 23 April 2020 Publication History

All formats PDF

Abstract

Engaging in participatory research in HCI raises numerous ethical complexities such as consent, researcher relationships, and participant compensation. Doing HCI work in the area of dementia amplifies these issues, and researchers in this area are modelling ethical stances to ensure researcher-participant relationships focus on meaningful engagement and care. This paper presents an insight into the kinds of ethical foci required when doing design research with people living with dementia and their carers. We interviewed 22 HCI researchers with experience working in dementia care contexts. Our qualitative analysis outlines subsequent lessons-learned, such as recognition of the participants, self-care, research impact, and subjectivity in ethical review boards. Furthermore, we found the complexity of navigating both "everyday" and more formal, institutional ethics in dementia research has implications beyond the context of working with people with dementia and outline key considerations for ethical practices in socially orientated HCI research.

Supplementary Material

MP4 File (a500-hodge-presentation.mp4)

Download
132.00 MB

References

[1]

ACM. Criteria for Authorship. Retrieved September 20, 2019 from https://www.acm.org/publications/policies/authorship

[2]

Jan Philipp Albrecht. 2016. How the GDPR Will Change the World. European Data Protection Law Review (EDPL), 3: 287--289.

[3]

Arlene Astell, Sarah Smith, and Philip Joddrell. 2019. Using Technology in Dementia Care: A Guide to Technology Solutions for Everyday Living. Jessica Kingsley Publishers.

[4]

Madeline Balaam, Rob Comber, Rachel E. Clarke, Charles Windlin, Anna Ståhl, Kristina Höök, and Geraldine Fitzpatrick. 2019. Emotion Work in Experience-Centered Design. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '19), 602:1--602:12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300832.

Digital Library

[5]

Shaowen Bardzell and Jeffrey Bardzell. 2011. Towards a Feminist HCI Methodology: Social Science, Feminism, and HCI. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '11), 675--684. https://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979041.

Digital Library

[6]

Marguerite Barry, Kevin Doherty, Jose Marcano Belisario, Josip Car, Cecily Morrison, and Gavin Doherty. 2017. mHealth for Maternal Mental Health: Everyday Wisdom in Ethical Design. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '17), 2708--2756. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025918.

Digital Library

[7]

Mary Field Belenky, Blythe McVicker Clinchy, Nancy Rule Goldberger, and Jill Mattuck Tarule. 1986. Women's ways of knowing: The development of self, voice, and mind. Basic Books, New York, NY, US.

[8]

Kirsten Bell and Denielle Elliott. 2014. Censorship in the name of ethics: critical public health research in the age of human subjects regulation. Critical Public Health 24, 4: 385--391. https://doi.org/10.1080/09581596.2014.936727.

[9]

Steve Benford, Chris Greenhalgh, Bob Anderson, Rachel Jacobs, Mike Golembewski, Marina Jirotka, Bernd Carsten Stahl, Job Timmermans, Gabriella Giannachi, Matt Adams, Ju Row Farr, Nick Tandavanitj, and Kirsty Jennings. 2015. The Ethical Implications of HCI's Turn to the Cultural. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 22, 5: 24:1--24:37. https://doi.org/10.1145/2775107.

Digital Library

[10]

Lynda Berends and Jennifer Johnston. 2005. Using multiple coders to enhance qualitative analysis: The case of interviews with consumers of drug treatment. Addiction Research & Theory 13, 4: 373--381. https://doi.org/10.1080/16066350500102237.

[11]

Pernille Bjorn, Casey Fiesler, Michael Muller, Jessica Pater, and Pamela Wisniewski. 2018. Research Ethics Town Hall Meeting. In Proceedings of the 2018 ACM Conference on Supporting Groupwork (GROUP '18), 393--396. https://doi.org/10.1145/3148330.3154523.

Digital Library

[12]

Susanne Bødker. 2006. When Second Wave HCI Meets Third Wave Challenges. In Proceedings of the 4th Nordic Conference on Human-computer Interaction: Changing Roles (NordiCHI '06), 1--8. https://doi.org/10.1145/1182475.1182476.

Digital Library

[13]

John Bond. 1992. The medicalization of dementia. Journal of Aging Studies 6, 4: 397--403. https://doi.org/10.1016/0890--4065(92)90020--7.

[14]

Rita Maldonado Branco, Joana Quental, and Óscar Ribeiro. 2017. Personalised participation: an approach to involve people with dementia and their families in a participatory design project. CoDesign 13, 2: 127--143. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2017.1310903.

[15]

Rens Brankaert, Gail Kenning, Daniel Welsh, Sarah Foley, James Hodge, and David Unbehaun. 2019. Intersections in HCI, Design and Dementia: Inclusivity in Participatory Approaches. In Companion Publication of the 2019 on Designing Interactive Systems Conference 2019 Companion (DIS '19 Companion), 357--360. https://doi.org/10.1145/3301019.3319997.

Digital Library

[16]

Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3, 2: 77--101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.

[17]

Dawn Brooker. 2003. What is person-centred care in dementia? Reviews in Clinical Gerontology 13, 03: 215--222. https://doi.org/10.1017/S095925980400108X.

[18]

Dawn Brooker and Isabelle Latham. 2015. Person-Centred Dementia Care, Second Edition: Making Services Better with the VIPS Framework. Jessica Kingsley Publishers.

[19]

Amy S. Bruckman, Casey Fiesler, Jeff Hancock, and Cosmin Munteanu. 2017. CSCW Research Ethics Town Hall: Working Towards Community Norms. In Companion of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (CSCW '17 Companion), 113--115. https://doi.org/10.1145/3022198.3022199.

Digital Library

[20]

Morten Kyng. 1995. Cooperative Design: Techniques and Experiences From the Scandinavian Scene. In Readings in Human--Computer Interaction, RONALD M. Baecker, JONATHAN Grudin, WILLIAM A. S. Buxton and SAUL Greenberg (eds.). Morgan Kaufmann, 215--224. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-051574--8.50025-X.

[21]

Willig Carla. 2013. Introducing Qualitative Research In Psychology. McGraw-Hill Education (UK).

[22]

Hilary Davis and Jenny Waycott. 2015. Ethical Encounters: HCI Research in Sensitive and Complex Settings. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Australian Special Interest Group for Computer Human Interaction (OzCHI '15), 667--669. https://doi.org/10.1145/2838739.2838834.

Digital Library

[23]

DEEP. Dementia Enquirers. DEEP. Retrieved September 20, 2019 from https://www.dementiavoices.org.uk/dementia-enquirers/.

[24]

Jan Dewing. 2007. Participatory research: A method for process consent with persons who have dementia. Dementia 6, 1: 11--25. https://doi.org/10.1177/1471301207075625.

[25]

Jan Dewing. 2008. Personhood and dementia: revisiting Tom Kitwood's ideas. International Journal of Older People Nursing 3, 1: 3--13. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748--3743.2007.00103.x.

[26]

Paul Dourish. 2014. Reading and Interpreting Ethnography. In Ways of Knowing in HCI, Judith S. Olson and Wendy A. Kellogg (eds.). Springer New York, New York, NY, 1--23. https://doi.org/10.1007/978--1--4939-0378--8_1.

[27]

Sue Eckstein (ed.). 2003. Operational guidelines for ethics committees that review biomedical research. In Manual for Research Ethics Committees. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 505--515. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511550089.069.

[28]

Sarah J. L. Edwards, Richard Ashcroft, and Simon Kirchin. 2004. Research ethics committees: differences and moral judgement. Bioethics 18, 5: 408--427.

[29]

Melanie Ehrenkranz. Men Try to "Redefine" Sexual Consent With Blockchain. Gizmodo. Retrieved September 20, 2019 from https://gizmodo.com/men-try-to-redefine-sexual-consent-with-blockchain-1821964907.

[30]

Ruth Elvish, Ian James, and Derek Milne. 2010. Lying in dementia care: an example of a culture that deceives in people's best interests. Aging & Mental Health 14, 3: 255--262. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607861003587610.

[31]

Ilker Etikan. 2016. Comparison of Convenience Sampling and Purposive Sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics 5: 1. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11.

[32]

Sam Fazio, Douglas Pace, Janice Flinner, and Beth Kallmyer. 2018. The Fundamentals of Person-Centered Care for Individuals With Dementia. The Gerontologist 58, suppl_1: S10--S19. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnx122.

[33]

Sarah Foley, John McCarthy, and Nadia Pantidi. 2019. The Struggle for Recognition in Advanced Dementia: Implications for Experience-Centered Design. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 26, 6: 1--29. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359594.

Digital Library

[34]

Sarah Foley, Nadia Pantidi, and John McCarthy. 2019. Care and Design: An Ethnography of Mutual Recognition in the Context of Advanced Dementia. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '19), 610:1--610:15. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300840.

Digital Library

[35]

Sarah Foley, Daniel Welsh, Nadia Pantidi, Kellie Morrissey, Tom Nappey, and John McCarthy. 2019. Printer Pals: Experience-Centered Design to Support Agency for People with Dementia. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '19), 404:1--404:13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300634.

Digital Library

[36]

Marcus Foth. Participatory Design and Action Research: Identical Twins or Synergetic Pair? .

[37]

Martin Fowler and Jim Highsmith. 2001. The Agile Manifesto. Dr. Dobb's. Retrieved December 24, 2019 from http://www.drdobbs.com/open-source/the-agile-manifesto/184414755.

[38]

Christopher Frauenberger, Amy S. Bruckman, Cosmin Munteanu, Melissa Densmore, and Jenny Waycott. 2017. Research Ethics in HCI: A Town Hall Meeting. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '17), 1295--1299. https://doi.org/10.1145/3027063.3051135.

Digital Library

[39]

Batya Friedman. 1996. Value-sensitive Design. interactions 3, 6: 16--23. https://doi.org/10.1145/242485.242493.

Digital Library

[40]

Kenneth J. Gergen. 1985. Social Constructionist Inquiry: Context and Implications. In The Social Construction of the Person, Kenneth J. Gergen and Keith E. Davis (eds.). Springer, New York, NY, 3--18. https://doi.org/10.1007/978--1--4612--5076-0_1.

[41]

Bernard Gert and Joshua Gert. 2017. The Definition of Morality. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2017), Edward N. Zalta (ed.). Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. Retrieved September 17, 2019 from https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2017/entries/morality-definition/.

[42]

Critical Platform Studies Group, Lilly Irani, Niloufar Salehi, Joyojeet Pal, Andrés Monroy-Hernández, Elizabeth Churchill, and Sneha Narayan. 2019. Patron or Poison?: Industry Funding of HCI Research. In Conference Companion Publication of the 2019 on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (CSCW '19), 111--115. https://doi.org/10.1145/3311957.3358610.

Digital Library

[43]

Maurice Hamington. 2019. Integrating Care Ethics and Design Thinking. Journal of Business Ethics 155, 1: 91--103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017--3522--6.

[44]

Niels Hendriks, Liesbeth Huybrechts, Andrea Wilkinson, and Karin Slegers. 2014. Challenges in Doing Participatory Design with People with Dementia. In Proceedings of the 13th Participatory Design Conference: Short Papers, Industry Cases, Workshop Descriptions, Doctoral Consortium Papers, and Keynote Abstracts - Volume 2 (PDC '14), 33--36. https://doi.org/10.1145/2662155.2662196.

Digital Library

[45]

James Hodge, Madeline Balaam, Sandra Hastings, and Kellie Morrissey. 2018. Exploring the Design of Tailored Virtual Reality Experiences for People with Dementia. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '18, 1--13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174088.

Digital Library

[46]

James Hodge, Kyle Montague, Sandra Hastings, and Kellie Morrissey. 2019. Exploring Media Capture of Meaningful Experiences to Support Families Living with Dementia. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '19), 423:1--423:14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300653.

Digital Library

[47]

Joanne Horton, Richard Macve, and Geert Struyven. 2004. Chapter 20 - Qualitative Research: Experiences in Using Semi-Structured Interviews1. In The Real Life Guide to Accounting Research, Christopher Humphrey and Bill Lee (eds.). Elsevier, Oxford, 339--357. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-008043972--3/50022-0.

[48]

Maarten Houben, Rens Brankaert, Saskia Bakker, Gail Kenning, Inge Bongers, and Berry Eggen. 2019. Foregrounding Everyday Sounds in Dementia. In Proceedings of the 2019 on Designing Interactive Systems Conference (DIS '19), 71--83. https://doi.org/10.1145/3322276.3322287.

Digital Library

[49]

John Killick Claire Craig. 2012. Creativity and Communication in Persons With Dementia: A Practical Guide. Jessica Kingsley, London.

[50]

Tom Kitwood and Kathleen Bredin. 1992. Towards a Theory of Dementia Care: Personhood and Well-being. Ageing & Society 12, 3: 269--287. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X0000502X.

[51]

Mark L Knapp and Judith A Hall. 2013. Nonverbal Communication in Human Interaction. 8th Edition. Retrieved from https://testbank24.com/pdf/Test-Bank-Nonverbal-Communication-in-Human-Interaction-8th-Edition-Knapp.pdf.

[52]

Pia C. Kontos and Gary Naglie. 2007. Expressions of Personhood in Alzheimer's Disease: An Evaluation of Research-Based Theatre as a Pedagogical Tool. Qualitative Health Research 17, 6: 799--811. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732307302838.

[53]

Pia Kontos and Alisa Grigorovich. 2018. Integrating Citizenship, Embodiment, and Relationality: Towards a Reconceptualization of Dance and Dementia in Long-Term Care. The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 46, 3: 717--723. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073110518804233.

[54]

Pia Kontos and Wendy Martin. 2013. Embodiment and dementia: Exploring critical narratives of selfhood, surveillance, and dementia care. Dementia 12, 3: 288--302. https://doi.org/10.1177/1471301213479787.

[55]

Amanda Lazar. 2014. Using Technology to Increase Meaningful Engagement in a Memory Care Unit. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Supporting Group Work (GROUP '14), 255--257. https://doi.org/10.1145/2660398.2660433.

Digital Library

[56]

Amanda Lazar, Caroline Edasis, and Anne Marie Piper. 2017. A Critical Lens on Dementia and Design in HCI. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '17, 2175--2188. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025522.

Digital Library

[57]

Amanda Lazar, Caroline Edasis, and Anne Marie Piper. 2017. Supporting People with Dementia in Digital Social Sharing. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '17), 2149--2162. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025586.

Digital Library

[58]

V. Leuty, J. Boger, L. Young, J. Hoey, and A. Mihailidis. 2013. Engaging older adults with dementia in creative occupations using artificially intelligent assistive technology. Assistive technology?: the official journal of RESNA 25, 2: 72--79. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2012.715113.

[59]

Jill Manthorpe and Kritika Samsi. 2016. Person-centered dementia care: current perspectives. Clinical Interventions in Aging 11: 1733--1740. https://doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S104618.

[60]

Matts Mattsson and Stephen Kemmis. 2007. Praxis?related research: serving two masters? Pedagogy, Culture & Society 15, 2: 185--214. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681360701403706.

[61]

John McCarthy and Peter Wright. 2007. Technology As Experience. The MIT Press.

Digital Library

[62]

Johanna Meurer, Claudia Müller, Carla Simone, Ina Wagner, and Volker Wulf. 2018. Designing for Sustainability: Key Issues of ICT Projects for Ageing at Home. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 27, 3: 495--537. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-018--9317--1.

[63]

Kellie Morrissey and John McCarthy. 2015. Creative and Opportunistic Use of Everyday Music Technologies in a Dementia Care Unit. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM SIGCHI Conference on Creativity and Cognition (C&C '15), 295--298. https://doi.org/10.1145/2757226.2757228.

Digital Library

[64]

Kellie Morrissey, John McCarthy, and Nadia Pantidi. 2017. The Value of Experience-Centred Design Approaches in Dementia Research Contexts. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '17), 1326--1338. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025527.

Digital Library

[65]

Kellie Morrissey, Gavin Wood, David Green, Nadia Pantidi, and John McCarthy. 2016. "I'm a rambler, I'm a gambler, I'm a long way from home." In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems - DIS '16, 1008--1020. https://doi.org/10.1145/2901790.2901798.

Digital Library

[66]

Michael J Muller and Allison Druin. Participatory Design: The Third Space in HCI. 70.

[67]

Cosmin Munteanu, Amy Bruckman, Michael Muller, Christopher Frauenberger, Casey Fiesler, Robert E. Kraut, Katie Shilton, and Jenny Waycott. 2019. SIGCHI Research Ethics Town Hall. In Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '19), panel05:1--panel05:6. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290607.3311742.

Digital Library

[68]

Cosmin Munteanu, Heather Molyneaux, Wendy Moncur, Mario Romero, Susan O'Donnell, and John Vines. 2015. Situational Ethics: Re-thinking Approaches to Formal Ethics Requirements for Human-Computer Interaction. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15), 105--114. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702481.

Digital Library

[69]

NHS. NHS - Involving people in their own care. Retrieved December 24, 2019 from https://www.england.nhs.uk/ourwork/patient-participation/.

[70]

Alison Novak. 2014. Anonymity, Confidentiality, Privacy, and Identity: The Ties That Bind and Break in Communication Research. Review of Communication 14, 1: 36--48. https://doi.org/10.1080/15358593.2014.942351.

[71]

Lorelli S. Nowell, Jill M. Norris, Deborah E. White, and Nancy J. Moules. 2017. Thematic Analysis: Striving to Meet the Trustworthiness Criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 16, 1: 1609406917733847. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847.

[72]

Chaim Noy. 2008. Sampling Knowledge: The Hermeneutics of Snowball Sampling in Qualitative Research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology 11, 4: 327--344. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645570701401305.

[73]

Femi Oyebode and Darren Shickle. 2005. The Mental Capacity Act 2005. Clinical Medicine 6, 2: 2005--2006. https://doi.org/10.1258/147775006776173309.

[74]

Nancy A. Pachana, Jacki Liddle, Nancye M. Peel, Elizabeth Beattie, Christine Juang, and Bob G. Knight. 2014. Can We Do Better? Researchers' Experiences with Ethical Review Boards on Projects with Later Life as a Focus. Journal of Alzheimer's Disease 43, 3: 701--707. https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-141956.

[75]

Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Assessing the System for Protecting Human Research Participants, Daniel D. Federman, Kathi E. Hanna, and Laura Lyman Rodriguez. 2002. Back to Basics: Scientific, Conflict of Interest, and Ethical Review of Research Protocols. National Academies Press (US). Retrieved September 19, 2019 from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK43564/.

[76]

Wanda Pillow. 2003. Confession, catharsis, or cure? Rethinking the uses of reflexivity as methodological power in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 16, 2: 175--196. https://doi.org/10.1080/0951839032000060635.

[77]

Thomas Scanlon. 1998. What We Owe to Each Other. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

[78]

silicon. 2017. The battle for ethics at the cutting edge of technology. Silicon Republic. Retrieved September 20, 2019 from https://www.siliconrepublic.com/machines/ethics-technology-fiachra-o-brolchain-dcu.

[79]

Laura Stark. 2007. Victims in Our Own Minds? IRBs in Myth and Practice. Law & Society Review 41, 4: 777--786. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540--5893.2007.00323.x.

[80]

Sanna Talja, Kimmo Tuominen, and Reijo Savolainen. 2005. "Isms" in information science: constructivism, collectivism and constructionism. Journal of Documentation 61: 79--101. https://doi.org/10.1108/00220410510578023.

[81]

Maria Dolores C. Tongco. 2007. Purposive Sampling as a Tool for Informant Selection. https://doi.org/10.17348/era.5.0.147--158.

[82]

Austin L. Toombs, Andy Dow, John Vines, Colin M. Gray, Barbara Dennis, Rachel Clarke, and Ann Light. 2018. Designing for Everyday Care in Communities. In Proceedings of the 2018 ACM Conference Companion Publication on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS '18 Companion), 391--394. https://doi.org/10.1145/3197391.3197394.

Digital Library

[83]

Cathy Treadaway and Gail Kenning. 2016. Sensor e-textiles: person centered co-design for people with late stage dementia. Working with Older People. https://doi.org/10.1108/WWOP-09--2015-0022.

[84]

Julia Twigg and Christina E. Buse. 2013. Dress, dementia and the embodiment of identity: Dementia. https://doi.org/10.1177/1471301213476504.

[85]

David Unbehaun, Konstantin Aal, Daryoush Daniel Vaziri, Rainer Wieching, Peter Tolmie, and Volker Wulf. 2018. Facilitating Collaboration and Social Experiences with Videogames in Dementia: Results and Implications from a Participatory Design Study. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 2, CSCW: 175. https://doi.org/10.1145/3274444.

Digital Library

[86]

David Unbehaun, Daryoush Daniel Vaziri, Konstantin Aal, Rainer Wieching, Peter Tolmie, and Volker Wulf. 2018. Exploring the Potential of Exergames to affect the Social and Daily Life of People with Dementia and their Caregivers. 62. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173636.

Digital Library

[87]

John Vines, Roisin McNaney, Rachel Clarke, Stephen Lindsay, John McCarthy, Steve Howard, Mario Romero, and Jayne Wallace. 2013. Designing For- and With- Vulnerable People. In CHI '13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '13), 3231--3234. https://doi.org/10.1145/2468356.2479654.

Digital Library

[88]

John Vines, Róisín McNaney, Amey Holden, Ivan Poliakov, Peter Wright, and Patrick Olivier. 2017. Our Year With the Glass: Expectations, Letdowns and Ethical Dilemmas of Technology Trials With Vulnerable People. Interacting with Computers 29, 1: 27--44. https://doi.org/10.1093/iwc/iww017.

[89]

Loïc Wacquant. 2015. For a Sociology of Flesh and Blood. Qualitative Sociology 38, 1: 1--11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-014--9291-y.

[90]

Jayne Wallace. 2013. Interaction Design, Heritage, and the Self. interactions 20, 5: 16--20. https://doi.org/10.1145/2500247.

Digital Library

[91]

Jayne Wallace, John McCarthy, Peter C. Wright, and Patrick Olivier. 2013. Making design probes work. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '13, 3441. https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2466473.

Digital Library

[92]

Jayne Wallace, Anja Thieme, Gavin Wood, Guy Schofield, and Patrick Olivier. 2012. Enabling self, intimacy and a sense of home in dementia. In Proceedings of the 2012 ACM annual conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '12, 2629. https://doi.org/10.1145/2207676.2208654.

Digital Library

[93]

Jayne Wallace, Anja Thieme, Gavin Wood, Guy Schofield, and Patrick Olivier. 2012. Enabling self, intimacy and a sense of home in dementia. In Proceedings of the 2012 ACM annual conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '12, 2629. https://doi.org/10.1145/2207676.2208654.

Digital Library

[94]

Jayne Wallace, Peter C. Wright, John McCarthy, David Philip Green, James Thomas, and Patrick Olivier. 2013. A Design-led Inquiry into Personhood in Dementia. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '13), 2617--2626. https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2481363.

Digital Library

[95]

Lin Wan, Claudia Müller, Dave Randall, and Volker Wulf. 2016. Design of A GPS Monitoring System for Dementia Care and Its Challenges in Academia-Industry Project. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 23, 5: 31:1--31:36. https://doi.org/10.1145/2963095.

Digital Library

[96]

Lin Wan, Claudia Müller, Volker Wulf, and David William Randall. 2014. Addressing the Subtleties in Dementia Care: Pre-study & Evaluation of a GPS Monitoring System. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '14), 3987--3996. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557307.

Digital Library

[97]

Jenny Waycott, Hilary Davis, Anja Thieme, Stacy Branham, John Vines, and Cosmin Munteanu. 2015. Ethical Encounters in HCI: Research in Sensitive Settings. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '15), 2369--2372. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702613.2702655.

Digital Library

[98]

Jenny Waycott, Greg Wadley, Stefan Schutt, Arthur Stabolidis, and Reeva Lederman. 2015. The Challenge of Technology Research in Sensitive Settings. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Australian Special Interest Group for Computer Human Interaction on - OzCHI '15, 240--249. https://doi.org/10.1145/2838739.2838773.

Digital Library

[99]

Daniel Welsh, Kellie Morrissey, Sarah Foley, Roisin McNaney, Christos Salis, John McCarthy, and John Vines. 2018. Ticket to Talk: Supporting Conversation Between Young People and People with Dementia Through Digital Media. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '18), 375:1--375:14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173949.

Digital Library

[100]

Sarah Myers West. 2019. Data Capitalism: Redefining the Logics of Surveillance and Privacy. Business and Society 58, 1: 20--41. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650317718185.

[101]

Symptoms. Alzheimer's Society. Retrieved September 19, 2019 from https://www.alzheimers.org.uk/about-dementia/symptoms-and-diagnosis/symptoms.

[102]

WMA - The World Medical Association-WMA Declaration of Helsinki -- Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects. Retrieved September 17, 2019 from https://www.wma.net/policies-post/wma-declaration-of-helsinki-ethical-principles-for-medical-research-involving-human-subjects/.

[103]

Dementia Lab 2020 / Supporting Ability / The Conference. Retrieved December 24, 2019 from http://www.dementialabconference.com

Cited By

Popova KDemir APark JComber R(2024)Voicing Discomfort, Communicating Breakdowns: Design Exploration of Felt Ethics in a Body-Based WorkshopProceedings of the 13th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/3679318.3685375(1-13)Online publication date: 13-Oct-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3679318.3685375
Kleban K(2024)Adapting UX Research for People Living with Alzheimer's, Dementia, and MCI: Improving the UX Research Process for ParticipantsProceedings of the 26th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility10.1145/3663548.3688542(1-6)Online publication date: 27-Oct-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3663548.3688542
Collingham HWallace JCrawshaw PHunt L(2024)Mariana's Song: Materializing Personhood through Non-Linear Multisensory Experiences Designed for People Living with Advanced DementiaProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3660724(819-843)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3643834.3660724
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Relational, Flexible, Everyday: Learning from Ethics in Dementia Research
1. Human-centered computing
  1. Human computer interaction (HCI)
    1. Empirical studies in HCI
    2. HCI design and evaluation methods
      1. User studies

Recommendations

Videogames and the Ethics of Care

Videogames have the potential to create ethical experiences and encourage ethical reflection. Usually, this potential is understood in the context of the dominant moral theories: utilitarianism and Kantianism. However, it has been argued that a complete ...
From ethics washing to ethics bashing: a view on tech ethics from within moral philosophy
FAT* '20: Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency

The word 'ethics' is under siege in technology policy circles. Weaponized in support of deregulation, self-regulation or handsoff governance, "ethics" is increasingly identified with technology companies' self-regulatory efforts and with shallow ...
Machines and the face of ethics

In this article I try to show in what sense Emmanuel Levinas' `ethics as first philosophy' moves our ethical thinking away from what has been called `centrist ethics'. Proceeding via depictions of the structure of Levinasian ethics and including ...

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences

CHI '20: Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

April 2020

10688 pages

ISBN:9781450367080

DOI:10.1145/3313831

General Chairs:
Regina Bernhaupt
Eindhoven University of Technology, Netherlands
,
Florian 'Floyd' Mueller
Monash University, Australia
,
David Verweij
Newcastle University, UK
,
Josh Andres
RMIT, Australia
,
Program Chairs:
Joanna McGrenere
University of British Columbia, Canada
,
Andy Cockburn
University of Canterbury, New Zealand
,
Ignacio Avellino
University of Maryland Baltimore County, USA
,
Alix Goguey
Grenoble Alpes University, France
,
Pernille Bjørn
University of Copenhagen, Denmark
,
Shengdong (Shen) Zhao
National University of Singapore, Singapore
,
Briane Paul Samson
Future University Hakodate, Japan & De La Salle University, Philippines
,
Rafal Kocielnik
University of Washington, USA

Copyright © 2020 Owner/Author.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution International 4.0 License.

Sponsors

SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 23 April 2020

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article

Funding Sources

Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council

Conference

CHI '20

Sponsor:

SIGCHI

CHI '20: CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

April 25 - 30, 2020

HI, Honolulu, USA

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 6,199 of 26,314 submissions, 24%

Upcoming Conference

CHI '25

Sponsor:
sigchi

CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

April 26 - May 1, 2025

Yokohama , Japan

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

27
Total Citations
View Citations
1,888
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)382
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)53

Reflects downloads up to 13 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Popova KDemir APark JComber R(2024)Voicing Discomfort, Communicating Breakdowns: Design Exploration of Felt Ethics in a Body-Based WorkshopProceedings of the 13th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/3679318.3685375(1-13)Online publication date: 13-Oct-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3679318.3685375
Kleban K(2024)Adapting UX Research for People Living with Alzheimer's, Dementia, and MCI: Improving the UX Research Process for ParticipantsProceedings of the 26th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility10.1145/3663548.3688542(1-6)Online publication date: 27-Oct-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3663548.3688542
Collingham HWallace JCrawshaw PHunt L(2024)Mariana's Song: Materializing Personhood through Non-Linear Multisensory Experiences Designed for People Living with Advanced DementiaProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3660724(819-843)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3643834.3660724
Popova KFigueras CHöök KLampinen A(2024)Who Should Act? Distancing and Vulnerability in Technology Practitioners' Accounts of Ethical ResponsibilityProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36374348:CSCW1(1-27)Online publication date: 26-Apr-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3637434
Houben MLee MFoley SMorrissey KBrankaert R(2024)HCI Research in Sensitive Settings: Learning Researcher Reflexivity, Ethical Conduct and Empathy in Participatory Design ApproachesExtended Abstracts of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613905.3636280(1-4)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613905.3636280
While ZBlascheck TGong YIsenberg PSarvghad A(2024)Glanceable Data Visualizations for Older Adults: Establishing Thresholds and Examining Disparities Between Age GroupsProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642776(1-17)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613904.3642776
Houben MBrankaert RGosen Mvan Overloop VIJsselsteijn W(2024)Design Opportunities for Care Transitions in Dementia: Understanding Informal Caregivers’ Experiences Through a Practice-Informed ApproachProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642556(1-13)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613904.3642556
Toso FBrankaert RHendriks NLenaerts LWilkinson A(2023)Reflecting on Living Labs as Multi-Stakeholder Collaborative Networks to Evaluate Technological Products for People Living with DementiaInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health10.3390/ijerph2003167320:3(1673)Online publication date: 17-Jan-2023
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20031673
Campbell SDowlen RFleetwood-Smith R(2023)Embracing Complexity Within Creative Approaches to Dementia Research: Ethics, Reflexivity, and Research PracticesInternational Journal of Qualitative Methods10.1177/1609406923116593222Online publication date: 2-Apr-2023
https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069231165932
Raß EUnbehaun DWulf VLüssem JEilers HLenz GTandler JAfzali SEroglu B(2023)Investigating the Potential and Impacts of Social Robots to Engage People with Advanced Dementia and their Caregivers: Early Insights from an Exploratory Ethnographic Study within a Protected Care EnvironmentProceedings of the 16th International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments10.1145/3594806.3594826(272-278)Online publication date: 5-Jul-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3594806.3594826
Show More Cited By

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

Get Access

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Table of Contents