research-article

Inducing and Mitigating Stereotype Threat Through Gendered Virtual Body-Swap Illusions

Authors:

Tabitha C. Peck,

Jessica J. Good,

Kimberly A. BourneAuthors Info & Claims

CHI '20: Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Pages 1 - 13

https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376419

Published: 23 April 2020 Publication History

Abstract

A psychological phenomenon termed "stereotype threat" has been shown to contribute to women's underperformance and underrepresentation in math and science fields. Within the virtual reality literature, a recent study utilized gendered body-swap illusions (i.e., women in male virtual bodies) to mitigate the effects of stereotype threat among a sample of female participants. The present research provides a much needed replication of this intervention, as well as a critical extension of virtual reality research on the Proteus Effect to test whether stereotype threat can be induced among male participants immersed in a female virtual body. Results supported both the replication and extension hypotheses; female participants embodied in male avatars were buffered from stereotype threat whereas male participants embodied in female avatars suffered from stereotype threat. Avatar gender also influenced participants' math confidence and awareness of the negative societal stereotype regarding women's math ability.

References

[1]

Joshua Aronson, Diane M. Quinn, and Steven J. Spencer. 1998. Stereotype threat and the academic underperformance of minorities and women. In Prejudice: The target's perspective, Janet K. Swim and Charles Stangor (Eds.). Academic Press, San Diego, CA, 83--103.

[2]

Alan D. Baddeley. 1986. Working memory. Clarendon/Oxford University Press.

[3]

Domna Banakou, Sameer Kishore, and Mel Slater. 2018. Virtually being einstein results in an improvement in cognitive task performance and a decrease in age bias. Frontiers in psychology 9 (2018), 917.

[4]

Chris Beasley. 2005. Gender and sexuality: Critical theories, critical thinkers. Sage.

[5]

Sylwia Bedy´ nska, Izabela Krejtz, and Grzegorz Sedek. 2018. Chronic stereotype threat is associated with mathematical achievement on representative sample of secondary schoolgirls: The role of gender identifcation, working memory, and intellectual helplessness. Frontiers in psychology 9, 1 (April 2018), 428.

[6]

Sian L. Beilock, Robert J. Rydell, and Allen R. McConnell. 2007. Stereotype threat and working memory: Mechanisms, alleviation, and spillover. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 136, 2 (2007), 256--276.

[7]

Geoffrey D. Borman. 2017. Advancing values affrmation as a scalable strategy for mitigating identity threats and narrowing national achievement gaps. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 114, 29 (July 2017), 7486--7488.

[8]

Matthew Botvinick and Jonathan Cohen. 1998. Rubber hands 'feel' touch that eyes see. Nature 391, 6669 (Feb. 1998), 756.

[9]

Paul G. Davies, Steven J. Spencer, and Claude M. Steele. 2005. Clearing the air: Identity safety moderates the effects of stereotype threat on women's leadership aspirations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 88, 2 (Feb. 2005), 276--287.

[10]

Paulette C. Flore and Jelte M. Wicherts. 2015. Does stereotype threat infuence performance of girls in stereotyped domains? A meta-analysis. Journal of School Psychology 53, 1 (Feb. 2015), 25--44.

[11]

Chad E. Forbes and Toni Schmader. 2010. Retraining attitudes and stereotypes to affect motivation and cognitive capacity under stereotype threat. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 99, 5 (Nov. 2010), 740--754.

[12]

National Science Foundation. 2019a. NSF - Broadening Participation. (2019). https://www.nsf.gov/od/broadeningparticipation/bp.jsp

[13]

National Science Foundation. 2019b. Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering: 2019. Technical Report. Alexandria, VA, USA. https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/wmpd

[14]

Liliana M. Garces and Lorelle L. Espinosa. 2013. Promoting access to undergraduate STEM education: The legal and policy environment. The Bridge on STEM Education: Progress and Prospects 43, 1 (March 2013), 35--41.

[15]

Suzanne Goldenberg. 2005. Why women are poor at science, by Harvard president. (Jan 2005). https://www.theguardian.com/science/2005/jan/18/ educationsgendergap.genderissues

[16]

Mar Gonzalez-Franco and Tabitha C. Peck. 2018. Avatar embodiment: Towards a standardized questionnaire. Frontiers in Robotics and AI 5 (June 2018), 74.

[17]

Jessica J. Good, Julie A. Woodzicka, and Lylan C. Wingfeld. 2010. The effects of gender stereotypic and counter-stereotypic textbook images on science performance. The Journal of Social Psychology 150, 2 (March 2010), 132--147.

[18]

Cynthia Hess, Barbara Gault, and Yi Youngmin. 2013. Accelerating change for faculty women of color in STEM: Policy, action, and collaboration. Technical Report. https://tinyurl.com/skwon87

[19]

Pascal Huguet and Isabelle Régner. 2009. Counter-stereotypic beliefs in math do not protect school girls from stereotype threat. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 45, 4 (2009), 1024--1027.

[20]

Jeremy P. Jamieson and Stephen G. Harkins. 2007. Mere effort and stereotype threat performance effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 93, 4 (2007), 544--564.

[21]

Hannah Jordt, Sarah L Eddy, Riley Brazil, Ignatius Lau, Chelsea Mann, Sara E Brownell, Katherine King, and Scott Freeman. 2017. Values affrmation intervention reduces achievement gap between underrepresented minority and white students in introductory biology classes. CBE Life Sciences Education 16, 3 (2017), ar41.

[22]

Michael J. Kane, M. Kathryn Bleckley, Andrew R.A. Conway, and Randall W. Engle. 2001. A controlled-attention view of working-memory capacity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 130, 2 (June 2001), 169.

[23]

Konstantina Kilteni, Raphaela Groten, and Mel Slater. 2012. The sense of embodiment in virtual reality. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 21, 4 (2012), 373--387.

Digital Library

[24]

Konstantina Kilteni, Antonella Maselli, Konrad P. Kording, and Mel Slater. 2015. Over my fake body: body ownership illusions for studying the multisensory basis of own-body perception. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 9 (2015), 141.

[25]

Colin W. Leach, Martijn Van Zomeren, Sven Zebel, Michael L.W. Vliek, Sjoerd F. Pennekamp, Bertjan Doosje, Jaap W. Ouwerkerk, and Russell Spears. 2008. Group-level self-defnition and self-investment: A hierarchical (multicomponent) model of in-group identifcation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 95, 1 (July 2008), 144--165.

[26]

Sarah Lopez, Yi Yang, Kevin Beltran, Soo Jung Kim, Jennifer Cruz Hernandez, Chelsy Simran, Bingkun Yang, and Beste F. Yuksel. 2019. Investigating implicit gender bias and embodiment of White males in virtual reality with full body visuomotor synchrony. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 557.

Digital Library

[27]

Michael D. Mrazek, Jason M. Chin, Toni Schmader, Kimberly A. Hartson, Jonathan Smallwood, and Jonathan W. Schooler. 2011. Threatened to distraction: Mind-wandering as a consequence of stereotype threat. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 47, 6 (2011), 1243--1248.

[28]

Brian A Nosek, Frederick L Smyth, Natarajan Sriram, Nicole M Lindner, Thierry Devos, Alfonso Ayala, Yoav Bar-Anan, Robin Bergh, Huajian Cai, Karen Gonsalkorale, and others. 2009. National differences in gender--science stereotypes predict national sex differences in science and math achievement. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106, 26 (2009), 10593--10597.

[29]

Ann Oakley. 2016. Sex, gender and society. Routledge.

[30]

Laurie T. O'Brien and Christian S. Crandall. 2003. Stereotype threat and arousal: Effects on women's math performance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 29, 6 (June 2003), 782--789.

[31]

Tabitha C. Peck, My Doan, Kimberly A. Bourne, and Jessica J. Good. 2018. The effect of gender body-swap illusions on working memory and stereotype threat. IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics 24, 4 (April 2018), 1604--1612.

Digital Library

[32]

Tabitha C. Peck, Sofa Seinfeld, Salvatore M. Aglioti, and Mel Slater. 2013. Putting yourself in the skin of a black avatar reduces implicit racial bias. Consciousness and Cognition 22, 3 (Sept. 2013), 779--787.

[33]

Diane M. Quinn and Steven J. Spencer. 2001. The interference of stereotype threat with women's generation of mathematical problem-solving strategies. Journal of Social Issues 57, 1 (2001), 55--71.

[34]

Jessica D. Remedios and Muna. Akhtar. 2019. Intersectional approaches to the study of confronting prejudice. In Confronting Prejudice and Discrimination, Robyn K. Mallett and Margo J. Monteith (Eds.). Academic Press, London, UK, 179--200.

[35]

Ralph J. Roberts, Lisa D. Hager, and Christine Heron. 1994. Prefrontal cognitive processes: Working memory and inhibition in the antisaccade task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 123, 4 (1994), 374--393.

[36]

Daniel Roth, Jean-Luc Lugrin, Marc Erich Latoschik, and Stephan Huber. 2017. Alpha IVBO - Construction of a scale to measure the illusion of virtual body ownership. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '17). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 2875--2883.

Digital Library

[37]

Laurie Rudman, Julie Phelan, and Jessica Heppen. 2007. Developmental sources of implicit attitudes. Personality Social Psychology Bulletin 33 (Dec. 2007), 1700--1713.

[38]

Laurie A. Rudman. 2004. Sources of implicit attitudes. Current Directions in Psychological Science 13, 2 (April 2004), 79--82.

[39]

Laurie A. Rudman, Richard D. Ashmore, and Melvin L Gary. 2001. " Unlearning" automatic biases: The malleability of implicit prejudice and stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 81, 5 (Nov. 2001), 856--868.

[40]

RJ Rydell, KJ Van Loo, and KL Boucher. 2014. Which executive functions are impaired by stereotype threat and account for different threat-related outcomes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 40 (2014), 377--390.

[41]

Toni Schmader and Michael Johns. 2003. Converging evidence that stereotype threat reduces working memory capacity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 85, 3 (Oct. 2003), 440--452.

[42]

S Seinfeld, J Arroyo-Palacios, G Iruretagoyena, R Hortensius, LE Zapata, D Borland, B de Gelder, M Slater, and MV Sanchez-Vives. 2018. Offenders become the victim in virtual reality: impact of changing perspective in domestic violence. Scientifc reports 8, 1 (2018), 2692.

[43]

Haein Shin and Tara Stafford Ocansey. 2018. Stepping into a Virtual Reality Classroom for Teacher Training. (June 2018). https://blogs.ei.columbia.edu/2018/06/08/ virtual-reality-teacher-training/

[44]

Mel Slater, Bernhard Spanlang, Maria V. Sanchez-Vives, and Olaf Blanke. 2010. First person experience of body transfer in virtual reality. PloS ONE 5, 5 (2010), e10564.

[45]

Steven J. Spencer, Christine Logel, and Paul G. Davies. 2016. Stereotype threat. Annual Review of Psychology 67 (Jan. 2016), 415--437.

[46]

Claude M. Steele and Joshua Aronson. 1995. Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 69, 5 (1995), 797--811.

[47]

Jeff Stone. 2002. Battling doubt by avoiding practice: The effects of stereotype threat on self-handicapping in white athletes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 28, 12 (Dec. 2002), 1667--1678.

[48]

Jeff Stone, Christian I. Lynch, Mike Sjomeling, and John M. Darley. 1999. Stereotype threat effects on Black and White athletic performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 77, 6 (1999), 1213--1227.

[49]

Gregory M. Walton and Geoffrey L. Cohen. 2003. Stereotype lift. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 39, 5 (2003), 456--467.

[50]

Oliver Wilhelm, Andrea Hildebrandt, and Klaus Oberauer. 2013. What is working memory capacity, and how can we measure it? Frontiers in Psychology 4 (July 2013).

[51]

Julia Carrie Wong. 2017. Google reportedly fres author of anti-diversity memo. (Aug 2017). https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/aug/08/ google-fires-author-anti-diversity-memo

[52]

Anna Woodcock, Paul R. Hernandez, Mica Estrada, and P. Schultz. 2012. The consequences of chronic stereotype threat: Domain disidentifcation and abandonment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 103, 4 (2012), 635--646.

[53]

Nick Yee and Jeremy Bailenson. 2007. The Proteus effect: The effect of transformed self-representation on behavior. Human Communication Research 33, 3 (July 2007), 271--290.

Cited By

You CPeck TStuart JGomes de Siqueira ALok B(2024)What my bias meant for my embodiment: an investigation on virtual embodiment in desktop-based virtual realityFrontiers in Virtual Reality10.3389/frvir.2024.12515645Online publication date: 25-Mar-2024
https://doi.org/10.3389/frvir.2024.1251564
Ogawa NBaba JNakanishi J(2024)Investigating Effect of Altered Auditory Feedback on Self-Representation, Subjective Operator Experience, and Task Performance in Teleoperation of a Social RobotProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642561(1-18)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613904.3642561
Prinsloo PKhalil MSlade S(2024) Vulnerable student digital well‐being in AI ‐powered educational decision support systems ( AI ‐ EDSS ) in higher education British Journal of Educational Technology10.1111/bjet.1350855:5(2075-2092)Online publication date: 16-Jul-2024
https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13508
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Inducing and Mitigating Stereotype Threat Through Gendered Virtual Body-Swap Illusions
1. Applied computing
  1. Law, social and behavioral sciences
    1. Psychology
2. Human-centered computing
  1. Human computer interaction (HCI)
    1. HCI design and evaluation methods
      1. User studies
    2. Interaction paradigms
      1. Virtual reality

Recommendations

Leveling up on stereotype threat

We examined post-game stereotype threat effects of avatar gender experimentally.Use of a customized male (vs. female) avatar led to better math scores.The less avatar embodiment during avatar use, the stronger this effect.Main implication: psychological ...
Do casual gaming environments evoke stereotype threat? Examining the effects of explicit priming and avatar gender

Despite relatively equal participation rates between females and males in casual gaming, females often report stigmatisation and prejudice towards their gaming competency within this sub-domain. Applying the theoretical framework of stereotype threat, ...
Playing under threat. Examining stereotype threat in female game players

The present study assesses the impact of stereotype threat on how women experience digital gaming in an evaluative context. By means of a controlled lab experiment, this study tested the effects of reinforcing stereotypical information suggesting that ...

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences

CHI '20: Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

April 2020

10688 pages

ISBN:9781450367080

DOI:10.1145/3313831

General Chairs:
Regina Bernhaupt
Eindhoven University of Technology, Netherlands
,
Florian 'Floyd' Mueller
Monash University, Australia
,
David Verweij
Newcastle University, UK
,
Josh Andres
RMIT, Australia
,
Program Chairs:
Joanna McGrenere
University of British Columbia, Canada
,
Andy Cockburn
University of Canterbury, New Zealand
,
Ignacio Avellino
University of Maryland Baltimore County, USA
,
Alix Goguey
Grenoble Alpes University, France
,
Pernille Bjørn
University of Copenhagen, Denmark
,
Shengdong (Shen) Zhao
National University of Singapore, Singapore
,
Briane Paul Samson
Future University Hakodate, Japan & De La Salle University, Philippines
,
Rafal Kocielnik
University of Washington, USA

Copyright © 2020 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 23 April 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article

Conference

CHI '20

Sponsor:

SIGCHI

CHI '20: CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

April 25 - 30, 2020

HI, Honolulu, USA

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 6,199 of 26,314 submissions, 24%

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

24
Total Citations
View Citations
860
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)135
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)4

Reflects downloads up to 19 Sep 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

You CPeck TStuart JGomes de Siqueira ALok B(2024)What my bias meant for my embodiment: an investigation on virtual embodiment in desktop-based virtual realityFrontiers in Virtual Reality10.3389/frvir.2024.12515645Online publication date: 25-Mar-2024
https://doi.org/10.3389/frvir.2024.1251564
Ogawa NBaba JNakanishi J(2024)Investigating Effect of Altered Auditory Feedback on Self-Representation, Subjective Operator Experience, and Task Performance in Teleoperation of a Social RobotProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642561(1-18)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613904.3642561
Prinsloo PKhalil MSlade S(2024) Vulnerable student digital well‐being in AI ‐powered educational decision support systems ( AI ‐ EDSS ) in higher education British Journal of Educational Technology10.1111/bjet.1350855:5(2075-2092)Online publication date: 16-Jul-2024
https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13508
Do TProtko CMcMahan R(2024)Stepping into the Right Shoes: The Effects of User-Matched Avatar Ethnicity and Gender on Sense of Embodiment in Virtual RealityIEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics10.1109/TVCG.2024.337206730:5(2434-2443)Online publication date: 4-Mar-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1109/TVCG.2024.3372067
Peck TGood J(2024)Measuring Embodiment: Movement Complexity and the Impact of Personal CharacteristicsIEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics10.1109/TVCG.2023.327072530:8(4588-4600)Online publication date: Aug-2024
https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2023.3270725
Hosseini SQuan JDeng XMiyake YNozawa T(2024)Avatar-Based Feedback in Job Interview Training Impacts Action Identities and AnxietyIEEE Transactions on Affective Computing10.1109/TAFFC.2024.336383515:3(1608-1620)Online publication date: Jul-2024
https://doi.org/10.1109/TAFFC.2024.3363835
Kao DMubarrat SJoshi APandita SMousas CLiang HRatan R(2024)Exploring how gender-anonymous voice avatars influence women’s performance in online computing group workInternational Journal of Human-Computer Studies10.1016/j.ijhcs.2023.103146181(103146)Online publication date: Jan-2024
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2023.103146
Mottelson AMuresan AHornbæk KMakransky G(2023)A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Effectiveness of Body Ownership Illusions in Virtual RealityACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction10.1145/359076730:5(1-42)Online publication date: 23-Sep-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3590767
Kosch TKarolus JZagermann JReiterer HSchmidt AWoźniak P(2023)A Survey on Measuring Cognitive Workload in Human-Computer InteractionACM Computing Surveys10.1145/358227255:13s(1-39)Online publication date: 13-Jul-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3582272
Leong JPerteneder FRajvee MMaes P(2023)“Picture the Audience...”: Exploring Private AR Face Filters for Online Public SpeakingProceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544548.3581039(1-13)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3544548.3581039
Show More Cited By

View Options

Get Access

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Table of Contents