Towards a better video comparison: case study
Pages 80 - 89
Abstract
Video comparison is a common task that people engage in when interacting with video contents, for instance, in video browsing and video editing. However, there exists little guidance to prompt and assist designers about a comparison task when designing user interfaces and interactions for a video application. To develop the guidance, we are synthesizing relevant knowledge from related research areas and our own prototypes into a theoretical model that pertains key elements and their relationships that characterise the interaction of video comparison. Here, we present a design originated from this model and an informal user study that helped us test and refine the model. The case study demonstrates the model's potential in shedding new lights on how applications that support video comparison could be designed better and also in offering avenues for future research in applications that depend on video comparison, regardless of domain areas.
References
[1]
Guha Balakrishnan, Frédo Durand, and John Guttag. 2015. Video Diff: Highlighting Differences Between Similar Actions in Videos. ACM Trans. Graph. 34, 6 (October 2015), 194:1--194:10.
[2]
Tom Bartindale, Guy Schofield, Clara Crivellaro, and Peter Wright. 2016. TryFilm: Situated Support for Interactive Media Productions. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (CSCW '16), 1412--1422.
[3]
Michel Beaudouin-Lafon. 2004. Designing Interaction, Not Interfaces. In Proceedings of the Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces (AVI '04), 15--22.
[4]
Pierfrancesco Bellini, Paolo Nesi, and Marco Serena. 2015. MyStoryPlayer: experiencing multiple audiovisual content for education and training. Multimed. Tools Appl. 74, 18 (2015), 8219--8259.
[5]
Michael Gleicher. 2018. Considerations for Visualizing Comparison. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 24, 1 (January 2018), 413--423.
[6]
Michael Gleicher, Danielle Albers, Rick Walker, Ilir Jusufi, Charles D Hansen, and Jonathan C Roberts. 2011. Visual comparison for information visualization. Inf. Vis. 10, 4 (2011), 289--309.
[7]
Kyungyoon Kim, John V Carlis, and Daniel F Keefe. 2017. Comparison techniques utilized in spatial 3D and 4D data visualizations: A survey and future directions. Comput. Graph. (2017).
[8]
Roman Lissermann, Simon Olberding, Benjamin Petry, Max Mühlhäuser, and Jürgen Steimle. 2012. PaperVideo: Interacting with Videos on Multiple Paper-like Displays. In Proceedings of the 20th ACM International Conference on Multimedia (MM '12), 129--138.
[9]
Matthew D Plumlee and Colin Ware. 2006. Zooming Versus Multiple Window Interfaces: Cognitive Costs of Visual Comparisons. ACM Trans. Comput. Interact. 13, 2 (June 2006), 179--209.
[10]
Atima Tharatipyakul, Hyowon Lee, Shengdong Zhao, and Richard C. Davis. 2016. Supporting the comparison of alternative stories. In Proceedings of the 28th Australian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction - OzCHI '16, 266--270.
[11]
Atima Tharatipyakul and Hyowon Lee. 2018. Towards a Better Video Comparison: Comparison as a Way of Browsing the Video Contents. In Proceedings of the 30th Australian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction - OzCHI '18.
[12]
Christian Tominski, Camilla Forsell, and Jimmy Johansson. 2012. Interaction Support for Visual Comparison Inspired by Natural Behavior. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 18, 12 (December 2012), 2719--2728.
Recommendations
Towards a better video comparison: comparison as a way of browsing the video contents
OzCHI '18: Proceedings of the 30th Australian Conference on Computer-Human InteractionComparison between videos is a basic task used in a wide variety of activities and domains. With ever-increasing social media contents that allow the mass consumption of video medium, our needs and uses for video comparison will only increase in the ...
A comparison of two agent interaction design approaches
The approach to designing agent interactions that is used by mainstream agent-oriented software engineering methodologies focuses on identifying the allowable sequences of messages, and capturing this as an interaction protocol. It has been argued that ...
Visual comparison for information visualization
Special issue on State of the Field and New Research DirectionsData analysis often involves the comparison of complex objects. With the ever increasing amounts and complexity of data, the demand for systems to help with these comparisons is also growing. IncreasingLy, information visuaLization tools support such ...
Comments
Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
May 2019
190 pages
ISBN:9781450366793
DOI:10.1145/3309700
Copyright © 2019 Owner/Author.
Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.
Sponsors
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 22 May 2020
Check for updates
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Extended-abstract
Conference
CHI '19
Sponsor:
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 63Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)8
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 09 Nov 2024
Other Metrics
Citations
Cited By
View allView Options
Get Access
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign in