Cited By
View all- Mayfield EBlack A(2019)Analyzing Wikipedia Deletion Debates with a Group Decision-Making Forecast ModelProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/33593083:CSCW(1-26)Online publication date: 7-Nov-2019
What's in the Content of Wikipedia's Article for Deletion Discussions?
Authors: 
Ali Javanmardi, Lu XiaoAuthors Info & Claims
Pages 1215 - 1223
References
[1]
Arazy, O, Yeo, L., Nov, O.: Stay on the Wikipedia Task: When task‐related Disagreements Slip into Personal and Procedural Conflicts. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 64(8), 1634-1648 (2013)
[2]
Biuk-Aghai, R. P., & Cheang, F. H. H. 2011. Wikipedia category visualization using radial layout. In Proc. of the 7th International Symposium on Wikis and Open Collaboration, 193-194
[3]
Biuk-Aghai, R. P., Chan, R. C. K., Si, Y. W., & Fong, S. 2013. Visualizing recent changes in Wikipedia. Sci. Ch. Inf. Sci., 56(5), 1-15. 2013
[4]
Boldi, P., &Monti, C. 2016. Cleansing Wikipedia Categories using Centrality. In Proc. of the 25th International Conference Companion on World Wide (WWW '16 Companion), 969-974.
[5]
Ehmann, K., Large, A., Beheshti, J.: Collaboration in context: Comparing article evolution among subject disciplines in Wikipedia. First Monday, 13(10) (2008)
[6]
Geiger, R. S., & Ford, H. 2011. Participation in Wikipedia's article deletion processes. In Proc. of the 7th International Symposium on Wikis and Open Collaboration, 201-202
[7]
Iandoli L., Quinto I., Liddo, A. D., & Shum, S. B. 2014. Socially augmented argumentation tools: Rationale, design and evaluation of a debate dashboard. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud., 72 (3), 298-319.
[8]
Iosub, D., Laniado, D., Castillo, C., Morell, M. F., Kaltenbruner, A.: Emotions under discussion: Gender, status and communication in online collaboration. PloS one, 9(8), e104880 (2014).
[9]
Joyce, E., Pike, J., Butler, B.: Keeping eyes on the prize: Officially sanctioned rule breaking in mass collaboration systems. In Int. Proc. of Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW). 1081–1092, ACM, San Antonio, USA (2013).
[10]
Lam, S. T. K., & Riedl, J. 2009. Is Wikipedia growing a longer tail? In Proc. of the ACM 2009 International Conference on Supporting group work, 105-114
[11]
Lam, S. K., Karim, J., & Riedl, J. 2010. The effects of group composition on decision quality in a social production community. In Proc. of the 16th ACM International Conference on Supporting Group Work, 55-64
[12]
Reagle Jr, J. M.: Do as I do:: authorial leadership in Wikipedia. In: Int. Proc. of Symposium on Wikis, 143-156, ACM, Montreal, Canada (2007)
[13]
Rezgui, A., Crowston, K.: Stigmergic coordination in Wikipedia. In: Int. Proc. of OpenSym, (August 22–24, 2018, Paris, France), Retrieved from http://www.opensym.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/OpenSym2018_paper_34.pdf (2018)
[14]
Schneider, J., Passant, A., & Decker, S. 2012. Deletion discussions in Wikipedia: Decision factors and outcomes. In Proc. of the Eighth Annual International Symposium on Wikis and Open Collaboration.
[15]
Schneider, J., Samp, K., Passant, A., & Decker, S. 2013. Arguments about deletion: How experience improves the accept-ability of arguments in ad-hoc online task groups. In Proc. of the 2013 conference on Computer supported cooperative work, 1069-1080
[16]
Shneiderman, B. 1996. The eyes have it: A task by data type taxonomy for information visualizations. IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages, 336-343
[17]
Stefaner, M., Taraborelli, D., Ciampaglia, G. L. 2011. Notabilia - Visualizing Deletion Discussions on Wikipedia. http://notabilia.net
[18]
Stvilia, B., Twidale, M. B., Smith, L. C., & Gasser, L. 2008. Information quality work organization in Wikipedia. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol, 59(6), 983-1001.
[19]
Taraborelli, D., & Ciampaglia, G. L. 2010. Beyond notability. Collective deliberation on content inclusion in Wikipedia. In Proc. of the 4th IEEE International Conference on Self-Adaptive and Self-Organizing Systems (SASO), 122-125
[20]
Wattenberg, M., Viégas, F. B., & Hollenbach, K. (2007). Visualizing activity on Wikipedia with Chromograms. In Proc. of the 11th IFIP TC 13 international conference on Human-computer interaction (INTERACT'07), 272-287
[21]
Xiao, L., & Askin, N. 2014. What influences online deliberation? A Wikipedia study. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol, 65(5), 898-910.
[22]
Xiao, L., & Nickerson, J. 2019. Imperatives In Past Online Discussions: Another Helpful Source For Community Newcomers? Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (Jan. 8 – 11, Grand Wailea, Maui, USA), IEEE
Index Terms
- What's in the Content of Wikipedia's Article for Deletion Discussions?
Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.
Recommendations
Deletion discussions in Wikipedia: decision factors and outcomes
WikiSym '12: Proceedings of the Eighth Annual International Symposium on Wikis and Open CollaborationDeletion of articles is a common process in Wikipedia, in order to ensure the overall quality of the encyclopedia. Yet, there is a need to better understand the procedures in order to promote the best decisions without unnecessary community work. In ...
Participation in Wikipedia's article deletion processes
WikiSym '11: Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Wikis and Open CollaborationWe present results on a study of two levels of Wikipedia's article deletion process: speedy deletions (or CSDs) and articles for deletions (or AfDs). Our findings indicate that the deletion process is heavily frequented by a relatively small number of ...
Alternative interfaces for deletion discussions in Wikipedia: some proposals using decision factors
WikiSym '12: Proceedings of the Eighth Annual International Symposium on Wikis and Open CollaborationContent deletion is an important mechanism for maintaining quality in online communities. In Wikipedia, deletion is guided by complex procedures. Controversial cases (~12% [4]) are sent to special community discussions called "Articles for Deletion" (...
Comments
Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
Copyright © 2019 ACM.
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]
In-Cooperation
- IW3C2: International World Wide Web Conference Committee
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 13 May 2019
Check for updates
Qualifiers
- Research-article
- Research
- Refereed limited
Conference
WWW '19
Acceptance Rates
Overall Acceptance Rate 1,899 of 8,196 submissions, 23%
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- View Citations1Total Citations
- 135Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)18
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
Reflects downloads up to 10 Nov 2024
Other Metrics
Citations
Cited By
View all- Mayfield EBlack A(2019)Analyzing Wikipedia Deletion Debates with a Group Decision-Making Forecast ModelProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/33593083:CSCW(1-26)Online publication date: 7-Nov-2019
View Options
Get Access
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign inFull Access
View options
View or Download as a PDF file.
PDFeReader
View online with eReader.
eReaderHTML Format
View this article in HTML Format.
HTML Format